Healing from an emotional trauma or extended traumatic experience is a like a long, intimate dance with reality. Or perhaps a three-act ballet. We are on the stage of our own minds, surrounded by the props of our lives, dancing to the music of our emotions. Our memories flash on the backdrop or float around like ribbons in the air. Down below the stage, in the orchestra pit, a chorus puts words to the feelings and gives us advice drawn from our parents’ rules, our church’s rules, all the rules from the movies and books and conversations that have ever colored our thinking.
And our job is to dance our way through the acts.
The first act is named “Magic Thinking.” We stumble onto the stage, stunned, confused and in pain. Our first dance is denial — the “it doesn’t matter” dance. Our second dance is bargaining — the “maybe I can persuade whoever is in power to fix this” dance. The third and last dance before the intermission is anger.
This article is about anger.
The emotional spine
Everyone here who has gone through the angry phase knows how complex it is. We are indignant, bitter, sarcastic, outraged, waving our fiery swords of blame. We are also — finally — articulate, funny, re-asserting power over our lives. We are hell on wheels, demanding justice or retribution. We are also in transition between bargaining and letting go, so all this is tinged with hope on one side and grief on the other.
Anger really deserves a book, rather than a brief article. It is the end of the first act of our healing, because it really changes everything — our way of seeing, our thinking, our judgments, the way we move forward. Like the element of fire, it can be clarifying, but it can also be destructive. To complicate the situation further, many (if not all of us) tended to repress our anger before we entered this healing process.
So it may be helpful to discuss what anger is, where it comes from. What we call anger is part of a spectrum of reactions that originates in the oldest part of our brain. The brain stem, sometimes called the lizard brain, oversees automatic survival mechanisms like breathing, heartbeat, hunger, sleep and reproduction. It also generates powerful emotional messages related to survival.
These messages travel through increasingly sophisticated layers of our emotional and intellectual processing. One of those layers, the limbic system or mammal brain, is where we keep memories of good and bad events, and work out how to maximize pleasure and avoid pain (often through addictive strategies). The messages pass through this layer on the way to our cerebral cortex.
There in the thinking layer, we name things and organize them. We maintain concepts of community and identity (right and left brain), and we manipulate them continually to run our lives as thinking, self-aware beings. Beyond the thinking brain is the even more advanced area of the frontal cortex, which maintains our awareness of the future, interconnectivity (holistic thinking), and the “high level” views that further moderate our primitive responses into philosophic and spiritual meanings.
What our thinking brains name “anger” is actually a sensation of physical and emotional changes caused by the brain stem in reaction to perceived danger. The spectrum of those danger-related sensations roughly includes alertness, fear and anger. While our higher brain may see a purpose in separating fear and anger into different categories, our lizard brain doesn’t make those distinctions. It just keeps altering our hormones and brain chemicals for all kinds of situations, depending on its analysis of what we need to do to survive.
The point of this long digression is this: alertness-fear-anger responses are a normal part of our ability to survive. They travel “up” into our higher processing as the strong spine of our survival mechanism. There is nothing wrong with feeling them. In fact, paying attention to them is better for us in every way than ignoring our feelings (denial) or trying to delude ourselves about what is happening (bargaining).
The many forms of anger
One of the most interesting things about the English language is its many verb forms, which express various conditions of timeliness and intent. I can. I could. I could have. I would have. I might have. I should have. I will. I might. I was going to.
Those same factors of timeliness and intent can be found in the many facets of anger. Bitterness and resentment are simmering forms of anger related to past and unhealed hurts. Likewise sarcasm and passive-aggressive communications are expressions of old disappointment or despair. Frustration is a low-level form of anger, judging a circumstance or result as unsatisfactory. Contempt and disgust are more pointed feelings associated with negative judgments.
When anger turns into action, we have explosive violence, plans for future revenge and sabotage. When anger is turned on ourselves, we have depression and addictions. The judgments associated with anger foster black-and-white thinking, which can be the basis for bias and all kinds of “ism’s,” especially if the anger is old, blocked for some reason, and thus diffuse or not directed primarily at its source. This typically happens when we feel disempowered to defend ourselves.
All of that sounds pretty terrible and toxic. But, in fact, the most toxic forms of anger are the ones in which the anger is not allowed to surface. The lizard brain does not stop trying to protect us until we deal with the threat, and so we live with the brain chemicals and hormones of anger until we do.
Anger can also be healthy. The anger of Jesus toward the money changers in the temple is a model of righteous anger. In response to trauma, righteous anger is a crucial part of the healing process. Anger has these characteristics:
• Directed at the source of the problem
• Narrowly focused and dominating our thinking
• Primed for action
• Intensely aware of personal resources (internal and environmental)
• Willing to accept minor losses or injuries to win
Anger is about taking care of business. At its most primitive level, anger is what enables us to defend our lives, to kill what would kill us. In modern times, it enables us to meet aggression with aggression in order to defend ourselves or our turf. We expect to feel pain in these battles, but we are fighting to win.
However, anger also has its exhilaration, a sense of being in a moment where we claim our own destiny. For those of us who have been living through the relatively passive and self-defeating agony of denial and bargaining, anger can feel wonderful.
As it should, because anger is the expression of our deepest self, rejecting this new reality. We are finally in speaking-up mode. We are finally taking in our situation and saying, “No! I don’t want this. I don’t like it. I don’t like you for creating this in my life. I don’t like how it feels. I don’t like what I’m getting out of it. And if it doesn’t stop this instant, I want you out of my life.”
Getting over our resistance to anger
Of course, we don’t exactly say that when we’re inside the relationship. In fact, we don’t exactly think it, even when we’re out of the relationship. And why is that? Because — and this only my theory, but it seems to be born out here on LoveFraud — people who get involved with sociopaths are prone to suppress their anger, because they are afraid of it, ashamed of it, or confused about its meaning.
When faced with a painful situation, they suppress their inclination to judge the situation in terms of the pain they’re experiencing, and instead try to understand. They try to understand the other person. They try to understand the circumstances. They try to interpret their own pain through all kinds of intellectual games to make it something other than pain. To an extent, this could be described as the bargaining phase. But for most of us, this is a bargaining phase turned into a life strategy. It’s an unfinished response to a much earlier trauma that we have taken on as a way of life.
Which is very good for the sociopath, who can use it to gaslight us while s/he pursues private objectives of looting our lives for whatever seems useful or entertaining. Until we have nervous breakdowns or die, or wake up.
We can all look at the amount of time it took us to wake up, or the difficulty we’re having waking up, at evidence of how entrenched we’ve been in our avoidance of our own anger. It retrospect, it is an interesting thing to review. Why didn’t we kick them out of our lives the first time they lied or didn’t show up? Why didn’t we throw their computer out of the window when we discovered their profiles on dating sites? Why didn’t we cut off their money when we discovered they were conning us? Why didn’t we spit in their eye when they insulted us? Why didn’t we burn their clothes on the driveway the first time they were unfaithful?
Because we were too nice to do that? Well, anger is the end of being nice. It may be slow to emerge. We may have to put all the pieces together in our heads, until we decide that yes, maybe we do have the right to be angry. Yes, they were bad people. No, we didn’t deserve it. And finally, we are mad. At them.
Anger in our healing process
Anger is the last phase of magical thinking. We are very close to a realistic appraisal of reality. The only thing “magical” about it is this: no amount of outrage or force we can exert on the situation can change it. The sociopath is not going to change. We cannot change the past, or the present we are left with.
But anger has its own gifts. First and foremost is that we identify the external cause of our distress. We place our attention where it belongs at this moment — on the bad thing that happened to us and the bad person who caused it.
Second, we reconnect with our own feelings and take them seriously. This is the beginning of repairing our relationships with ourselves, which have often become warped and shriveled with self-hatred and self-distrust when we acted against our own interests in our sociopathic relationships.
Third, anger is a clarifying emotion. It gives us a laser-like incisiveness. It may not seem so when we are still struggling with disbelief or self-questioning or resentment accumulated through the course of the relationship. But once we allow ourselves to experience our outrage and develop our loathing for the behavior of the sociopath, we can dump the burden of being understanding. We can feel the full blazing awareness that runs through all the layers of brain, from survival level through our feelings through our intellect and through our eyes as we look at that contemptible excuse for a human being surrounded by the wreckage s/he creates. Finally our brains are clear.
And last, but at least as important as the rest, is the rebirth of awareness of personal power that anger brings. Anger is about power. Power to see, to decide, to change things. We straighten up again from the long cringe, and in the action-ready brain chemicals of anger, we surprise ourselves with the force of our ability and willingness to defend ourselves. We may also surprise ourselves with the violent fantasies of retribution and revenge we discover in ourselves. (Homicidal thoughts, according to my therapist, are fine as long as we don’t act on them.)
It is no wonder that, for many of us, the angry phase is when we learn to laugh again. Our laughter may be bitter when it is about them. But it can be joyous about ourselves, because we are re-emerging as powerful people.
The main thing we do with this new energy is blaming. Though our friends and family probably will not enjoy this phase (because once we start blaming, it usually doesn’t stop at the sociopath), this is very, very important. Because in blaming, we also name what we lost. When we say “you did this to me,” we are also saying, “Because of you, I lost this.”
Understanding what has changed — what we lost — finally releases us from magical thinking and brings us face to face with reality. For many of us this is an entirely new position in our personal relationships. In the next article, we’ll discuss how anger plays out in our lives.
Until then, I hope you honor your righteous anger, casting blame wherever its due. And take a moment to thank your lizard brain for being such a good friend to you.
Namaste. The healing warrior in me salutes the healing warrior in you.
Kathy
STJ,
I admire and appreciate how brave you are.
You are definitely a warrior angel.
Micheal
Your welcome.
Star
Take care of that beautiful spirit.
Skylar
Neverending angel of light with your theories and analysisis. Forgot to add-In your search for truth and understanding.
STJ
xxx
Sharing the journey—I think you misunderstood the comments about star being “insane”— the word was in quotes AND it was teasing, and I made it plain that it was teasing. By telling her that she was “starting to sound sane” I was complimenting her on her very good posts on some subjects. I also later explained that when we all come here at first we are in the “spin cycle” of insanity and pain (including myself) so this was NOT a slam at Star at all.
Let me clarify LOVE FRAUD IS LIKE A CHURCH…..it is an open blog to anyone who wants to come sit in the pews, and that includes some people who are “sinners,” but it isn’t open to people who come in and disturb the other people….for example if a church service was going on and someone who was drunk and raving came in, he would be escorted out, or if someone came in and sat down and said “Hi, I’m Satan, but I’m actually pretty nice and I’d like to stay and talk to you guys” I think he would be escorted out as well because many people would be upset and afraid just by his very presence. When people come here and say “Im a diagnosed psychopath” it is for many people the same as the man walking into church and saying “I’m Satan” for other members of LF to sit him down, give him a cup of cyber tea and a pillow for his bad, and make him comfortable in the pew is very upsetting to others who have been abused by psychopaths. If he is as he says a psychopath, thenn by DEFINITION he is NOT benign.
I have a right to free speech here on this blog as long as I am not offensive to others or call them names. I try to NOT be offensive to others. Just knowing that Michael is offense by his very presence I try to not give him attention (though he usually brings along a couple of his “dupes” that keep a conversation going with him when no one else from LF’s legitimate posters will carry on a conversation with him.
Because I know that talking to him is offensive to others I will not carry on a conversation with him. Though I did answer him about my comment about offering my son’s address. (tongue in cheek) Him jumping on it and saying that he has a friend who wants to study one made me laugh, I thought, well, why isn’t she studying YOU?
As for “forgiving” michael….michael has been asked REPEATEDLY by Donna to NOT COME HERE BECAUSE HE IS DISRUPTIVE. He comes here anyway. That shows lack of respect for donna and the rest of us. She banned him. Blocked his access, so he goes and gets another IP address and comes back, under another name. He has done this over and over and over….and after she banned him yet again yesterday HE RETURNED AGAIN, and she had to block him for the second time.
It isn’t about “not forgiving” Michael, it is about the CONSEQUENCES for his bad behavior, for his DISRESPECTING Donna’s request that he not come here….I don’t hate michael, and I forgive his past bad behavior, but I don’t trust him or want to associate with him, and there is no good purpose to be served for him to come here to blog with a group of which 99% don’t want him here and some small percentage are freaked out by him being here openly.
So, sharing the journey, I hope that explains what I did and why, that’s about as good as I can get in telling you why I do what I do, and what my objection to Michael is. I’ really am sorry if that offends either you or Star. That wasn’t my intent.
I understand that people don’t like Michael hanging around, or is encouraged to stay around by interacting with him. I understand it disturbs and may trigger people.
I also understand that some people are interested in what he has to say when he’s here. I understand they don’t particularly feel the need to look him up at his homesites, because many there either don’t understand the severity of sociopathy and are empathic to him, praising him in the sky, or there are other spaths.
What I don’t understand is people being treated hostile over it. And like STJ I don’t think that’s Michael’s responsibility, but those who act hostile to other LF members (and I’m not saying that everyone who prefers LF posters to completely ignore him acted hostile). I don’t mean Michael is innocent either: I agree that, even if he visits “sounding” respectful, Michael is basically disrespectful by not accepting Donna’s ban.
I will respect the request not to interact with Michael in the future, out of courtesy for people who get triggered and feel unsafe when he’s around, and because I don’t feel I have much to learn from him. The sole questions I had were the two questions I asked, and he answered them for me, if not in the obvous way. I do not regret the three posts I made in response to him though. Nor do I feel other people who interacted with him need to apologize for it, defend it, or made to regret it.
Dar,
I am not “beating up” on anyone for interacting with him or looking for an apology from anyone…I do understand WHY they did (they told me why) but my comments were only to make them aware that OTHER PEOPLE were made uncomfortable with Michael’s open presence here after he has come here multiple times before and caused problems and donna has BANNED him from coming here. So his very presence has been disruptive and he comes here when donna is away, so if we interact with him donna hasn’t had time to block his posts. So this time he was “acting nice” doesn’t cut any slack for how he has beaten up people here in the past.
It is hard to think of analogies of him but say for example, my son Patrick came here to blog….or your x, no matter now “nice”they acted, it would make people uncomfortable and THAT is why Michael needs to stay off the blog, BECAUSE his presence is disruptive EVERY time he comes here even if he is “nicey” which he usually is a first
The discussion we are having here now with people upset is the perfect example of the disruptions he causes. Some people want to blog with him, it triggers others, and so on. Donna has asked us in the past to not interact with the self proclaimed psychopaths and troublemakers but to notify her with the “report abusive comment button” and she will block them. In Michael’s case, he keeps coming back as a way to “show donna” she can’t control him by using different IP addresses and so on.
You mention you will respect OUT OF **COURTESY** FOR PEOPLE WHO GET TRIGGERED AND FEEL UNSAFE…..that’s what this is all about. Courtesy for others.
If Every time I said the word “blue” on here (just to pick a word at random) and someone or someones notified me that it triggered them if I used that word, would I mind finding another word. Well, DUH? What’s the big deal. It is COURTESY to honor such a request. Sure, I have a RIGHT to use the word “blue” but if it makes it uncomfortable for someone else, or impedes their learning and healing by triggering them, then I’ll find another word. And yea, I know it is “their problem” and not mine, but What does it cost me to be COURTEOUS to others? Not much really I don’t think.
To be courteous, caring, kind, thoughtful and nice doesn’t cost me much I think.
That’s what I like most about LOVEFRAUD is that the people here (except for the occasional troll) ARE kind, considerate, caring, and do their best not to trigger others. This blog has VERY little turmoil or problems between posters. Where there is the occasional problem donna takes care of it as soon as possible, but she can’t be here 24/7 so we posters have to be respectful to each other and supportive of each other and 99.9% of the time we are. I’ve never been on a blog that was this much of a supportive community. I’m glad you are part of it Darwin’smom.
Oxy
Great post. You made me realize something.
I saw that Michael was being nice this time, and I thought maybe I could learn something from him (he was arguing that gray rock isn’t the best idea, I wanted to know what the best idea was).
He was being harmless at the time, and I wanted to learn.
However, you are right. Michael has triggered people in the past, he usually turns nasty, it upsets people, and Donna asked us to stay away.
I got temporarily lulled by his peaceful approach this time and engaged.
I’m sorry.
I guess it’s just like my spath – he would be horrid and I would run away…..but then when he was nice, I completely forgot about the horrid parts. Silly, stupid me.
Athena
Athena, yes, that is exactly what they do, they LULL us into thinking “well this time they are being nice”
I remember a little kid that I used to sit for, he was a real monster with his mother, but not with me. He knew just hhow far he could push us, and not me very far, but he was actually smarter than his mom and he would pull tricks like that.
She would send him to his room because he had acted up. When he got in there the would pull drawers out and throw them, TRASH the room, but he would hear her coming and sit on the end of his bed, and when she opened the door he would say “I’m being gooooood now” and she would look at the trashed room and at him and she’s say, ‘Well, he IS being good now”and let him out of his room…..that is the way Michael acts. He comes here all “sweetsy” (ignoring the fact he has been banned from here) and that in the past he has been nasty and hateful and trouble making, and lures people into talking to him. He also brought a couple of folks with him to keep the conversation going in case none of us talked to him. Go back and look at the posts if they are still here. You can see the people who came with him keeping the conversations going until one of us finally goes in.
Nah, Athena, you are not silly or stupid, they just know how to gull us and lull us into forgetting about the boundary violations they do. Like saying “Ted Bundy was such a nice friend when he wasn’t killing women.” Or “John Wayne Gacy was a great clown when he wasn’t killing and raping young boys.” LOL It is all in how you look at them.
“I thought maybe I could learn something from him(he was arguing that gray rock isn’t the best idea, I wanted to know what the best idea was)”
JMHO, but I don’t think there is anything that we can learn from THEM, because they will tell us what they think we want to hear, so we will continue to entertain them and they do fake nice to lull us into thinking that they are benign. There is nothing I can learn from him, except maybe how to disrespect others-by continuing to show up somewhere where he isn’t wanted and where no one gives a s**t about what he has to say.
Of course he thinks gray rock is a bad idea, because that means he is being ignored and no one is entertaining him, and that’s not fun and exciting to him-like getting someone freaked out or riled up. That is fun to him and all the pretending that he does will never make me believe otherwise. I’m not at all interested in what he thinks is the best idea because whatever he says is only serving his purpose and it’s not for the good of anyone on this blog.
No matter how he shoots his mouth off about being polite and respectful, we all know that there are some people on this blog that are freaked out and triggered just knowing that a self professed psychopath is here-even if he isn’t saying anything. That is exactly the problem with him-they don’t give a shit and it’s all about them. It’s his inability to understand why his presence would upset people, and that is all about what he is-someone who doesn’t get emotions and has no empathy for anyone whatsoever. I mean really dude-you’re not going to make anyone here feel sorry for you-here’s a quarter, call someone who cares!
I dont think anybody owes anybody an apology for anything.
STJ,
Thanks, and you too. I wish you the best on your healing path, and I suspect that you are going to be just fine. I appreciate your bravery, too.
This site is no place for someone like me. And if you think Michael was nasty when he was attacked, you don’t want to know how nasty I can be when I feel attacked. It might make Michael look like the Mother Theresa. This is the main reason I can’t be here anymore.
And Oxy, there is never any context where I would have considered myself “insane”. Under the circumstances, I think I’m unusually sane. I usually just let stuff like that go, but I brought it up to make a point. I know your intentions are harmless, but words are extremely powerful, and they carry certain energy. You might want to consider what you say to people. I am also insulted that you suggested I go to the sociopath site or talk to your son in lieu of having a peaceful conversation here.
Y’all need to start taking responsibility for your own issues and boundaries and stop blaming others.
Peace out,
Star