A woman who married and had children with two different sociopathic men wrote us this week. Her story and questions are timely since they allow me to mention another upcoming book, the conference Donna and I attended last weekend and to discuss vindictiveness.
It seems most women who have children with sociopaths end up with the sociopaths walking out on their children as well as the women, leaving the survivors to mop up and struggle to understand what happened on their own. From what I understand of sociopaths, the prevalent attitude they seem to behave as if they “don’t care” about anything except doing what benefits them”¦ (she told her story of marriage, children, custody battles and vindictive sociopaths)”¦ So, is vindictiveness a trait typically found in sociopaths or are these guys merely trying to maintain or regain their power and it just happens to look like vindictiveness on the surface? These guys have definitely expressed some serious rage, especially after losing as spectacularly as they did when they tried to take custody and prevent me from moving. Is anger an emotion sociopaths feel when they don’t get their own way? Do they ever “get over” it?
Many women tend to repeatedly pick sociopaths as partners
There are many women who have relationships with more than one sociopathic man. Sometimes children result from one or all of the relationships, since sociopaths like to father a lot of children. (My son’s father has 7 children I know about.) The resultant children carry the sociopath’s genes and are exposed to the sociopath’s fathering behavior.
Sociopathic/psychopathic men are at least 4 times more common than sociopathic women. The interpersonal love-relationship patterns are the means by which sociopaths replicate themselves and perpetuate sociopathy within our society. It is very important, then, to understand women who love sociopathic men. Is there anything different about them? Are they drawn to sociopaths because of prior abuse? Is it simply that sociopaths con them and they are especially gullible? These are tough questions for those of us who have had relationships with sociopathic men, but we have to ask them. The stakes are too high for everyone for us to avoid asking and answering these questions. Sandra L. Brown, M.A., and I recently conducted a survey/study that has addressed these questions and more. Stay tuned because a book with our initial findings is nearly complete. The results are enlightening and freeing.
Batterers often win custody of children
Last weekend Donna and I attended a conference, the Battered Women’s Custody Conference. This conference is held every year and so plan on attending next year if you missed it. The conference addresses one end of the spectrum of sociopaths—sociopathic men who are physically violent. It is incredible the courts often give children over to these sociopaths! Batterers are a little different from the sociopaths most of us know. These sociopaths have been referred to as secondary psychopaths, as opposed to the primary psychopaths we are most familiar with.
Primary verses secondary psychopathy
Secondary psychopaths are more insecure (than are primary psychopaths) about the status and power they so desire. Whereas primary psychopaths are grandiose and feel confident in their supremacy, secondary psychopaths are always on the lookout for threats to their status. They are also prepared to meet status threats with physical violence. Secondary psychopaths have more problems with impulse control than primary psychopaths. They also tend to be more emotional, displaying more anger. I think the average perpetrator of domestic violence fits the profile of a secondary psychopath very well.
There are other minor differences between secondary and primary psychopaths, but the similarities between them are more noteworthy than the differences. Both primary and secondary psychopaths are unable to love, have poor impulse control and impaired moral reasoning. Genetics play a substantial role in the development of both, and it is not true that one is environmental and the other genetic, as is commonly believed.
Sociopathic fathers
The parenting behavior of sociopaths has not been thoroughly studied. In my opinion the reason for this is the belief held by many researchers and clinicians that sociopaths abandon their young. This belief is related to another belief—that sociopaths are incapable of attachment. These two fallacies have stood in the way of efforts to eliminate this disorder and the suffering of victims. First of all, to those who hold on to the second misconception, If sociopaths are incapable of attachment, why do they engage in stalking? Scientists measure attachment as the tendency to seek proximity to a specific special other. Is not stalking the ultimate manifestation of attachment behavior? Sociopaths often verbally report they love others. Let’s take this to be a reflection of a longing for specific people, then we can start to understand sociopaths.
The feeling of longing
The feeling of longing sociopaths have is related to the fact that certain people in their lives have previously been a source of pleasure. We tend to get attached to things and people that have brought us pleasure in the past. There are three social pleasures: affection, dominance and sex, and possibly a separate fourth, parenting. Although sociopaths may experience a modicum of affection, the primary pleasure they derive from relationships is associated with power as opposed to love. When a sociopath says, “I love you,” he means he greatly enjoys the pleasure of possessing you and having power over you. SO how dare you question his love!
Children are also possessions sociopaths enjoy having dominion over. Part of the enjoyment of parenting they have is the prospect of turning, particularly sons, into miniature versions of themselves. For this reason, any money that the court orders your sociopath to give his children is not worth the trade off. If your sociopath will give up his possessions for a price, pay him off and be done with him. If the sociopath succeeds at his goal of turning his sons into miniature versions of himself, you will live your entire life surrounded by sociopaths, you will never escape and have peace/love.
Vindictiveness
Sociopaths are by nature extremely vindictive! Vindictiveness comes from the power/dominance system in our brains. Scientific studies show that sociopathic people derive great pleasure from revenge. Revenge is a very primitive emotion that evolved to ensure enforcement of social reciprocity. It evolved before the capacity for love. We know this because of studies of chimpanzees. Chimpanzees are very vindictive and vengeful when a comrade fails to reciprocate, and their capacity for love has not evolved much. It is only the threat of revenge that induces chimpanzees to cooperate with each other, because they do not have love bonds that motivate cooperation. When a chimpanzee shares his food, he does not likely get a warm fuzzy feeling inside, instead he knows that others will later do the same for him. If others fail to reciprocate, revenge is always taken.
Thankfully most humans receive a double reward when they cooperate with each other and a double punishment when they fail to cooperate. The double reward is the inherent pleasure in knowing we did a good for someone else, and the thought that good might someday be reciprocated. The double punishment is the guilt over harming someone and the fear that the harm will be reciprocated. Please hear me, sociopaths are like chimpanzees. They do not feel good when they do good for someone, they thus expect immediate reciprocity. They do not feel bad when they hurt someone, but they are smart enough to know revenge might follow. This is why prison is an occupational hazard for them. They also do not comprehend the guilt other people feel. This is why it is important to them to mete out huge punishments toward everyone who has offended them.
When you have to deal with sociopaths, be ever mindful that these individuals are devoid of pleasure from goodness and devoid of guilt over evil. Although they take advantage of other’s emotions, they have it in their minds that the rest of the human race is like them. They therefore feel it is necessary to get revenge in order to reduce the likelihood of future attacks on their status, power and possessions.
I am also a victim of a psychopath, that being my father. Malignant narcissist, rather. To(may)to, to(mah)to.
potted towmater’s – oh my
Hi Myers, I don’t post often, but in my experience spaths are very, very vindictive, and also manipulate others to assist in their ‘revenge’. Revenge has not just be confined to me but also my children. As I have previously posted I am forever being taken to court by this spath to avoid child maintenance, my next court date 4th November. For those like Oxy and Skylar, I am eternally grateful as they have given me strength to ‘stay calm, and carry on’. The spath can pay, just won’t, control etc etc.
Spaths are vindictive, because it makes them feel important; as deep down they are booooring; they think themselves superior but when exposed and shown to be what they are they take revenge and if they can get someone else to do their dirty work even better!
This is about my 60th court appearance ..which has achieved nothing, zippo, zilch ..apart from a judgment he has to pay! I have 2 more years left of being victimised by this particular spath through the court system, I have already served 6 years, a prison sentence would have been easier!
I am sorry for the loss of your wife, and for your baby not to have their mother. I cannot even imagine your pain.
I agree, sociopaths are very vindictive. Narcissists probably moreso. But primary psychopaths, in my experience, aren’t nearly as vengeful. And if they ever seem vindictive or become angry at someone, it’s only another method of control, not the result of strong emotion. Sociopaths tend to be more sensitive to external threat and insult, whereas primaries will generally move along unless there is some other reason to act, such as monetary gain or respect in the criminal hierarchy.
It was a long time ago, and I’ve moved on. But thank you.
Gardening tools:
shovel
hoe
gloves
lots of manure (from a bull)
rocks (all gray)
plants Potted or not
I knew it! Man, my intuition is good.
Louise,
Good for you girl! LOL 🙂
Ana:
Thanks! Now if I can just USE that intuition every time I FEEL it! I am getting better at it though than I used to be 🙂
Louise,
Yes, I’m getting better at it too, or so I thought!! Still having trouble “sizing” up people sometimes…
I’m glad you are getting better at it! It takes time, of couse.:)
My intuition was on it as well from the first moment.
Myers, I guess you technically cannot do anything mean via the internet so long as we know what you are….so…..can I ask some stuff?
I had thought that a psychopath and a sociopath are the same thing. What is the difference then?
I totally agree that vindictiveness or expressed anger/hurt is just a method of control (sometimes). For example, it could be used to make the other person feel guilty or that they deserve whatever the Path is going to deal. But you say it’s not so much a sociopath thing but more of a psychopath thing to use it like this. Really? So this makes me wonder if my ex was a sociopath or psychopath (to(may)to / to(mah)to), but I’m just trying to figure out what happened. Sometimes he seemed genuinely pissed, like when he felt the things he was “entitled” to were not being given to him. Other times, I felt that he tried to figure out by watching other people what was “bad” and then would only get “upset” if these things happened. For example, if I punched him in the face (never did of course) he wouldn’t make any fuss about this….unless someone ELSE had expressed that punching someone you love in the face is bad….in which case he STILL wouldn’t use it until he needed me to feel guilty. Then suddenly he’d bring up something that had never really bothered him, but that he knew was socially accepted as “bad”. He needed to talk to other people about things so he could see how they’d react to something, because he himself had no idea what the rest of the world though was “right” and “wrong” so he’d study them, their reactions, and then make a mental note that he could probably get a mob on his side of those things had happened to him. Yet he really never knew WHY they were wrong, because he himself never felt the emotion of being wronged…..well, like I said, unless he wasn’t being given what he was “entitled” to. I could have cheated on him and if I acted nonchalant about it, he might have just gone along and acted nonchalant too. But if I accidentally washed his underwear with blank pants and they turned grey, then acted like it was a huge deal, he’d go along with this too and rant and rave about the horrible person I was for abusing him like this. He really had no idea left from right, so he’d gauge other people’s reactions.
By the way, children do something very similar to this a lot! I have a lot of experience with children, and I have seen this many times: Child falls down. Child looks at mommy. Mommy has a look of shock on her face. Child starts to cry like it’s the end of the world. OR Mommy DOESN’T have a look of shock on her face. Child goes back to playing like nothing happened.