There have been countless depictions of sociopaths and other predatory personalities in film. Most are pretty bad, incomplete and/or inaccurate. But some have been dead-on.
And so I’ve canvassed my memory for what I regard as several notably excellent portraits of sociopaths in film. I’d be curious what you think of these performances (if you’ve seen them), and eager to discover, through you, new film/television portraits of sociopaths that ring disturbingly true.
In no special order, I’ll start with the original foreign film, The Vanishing, 1986 (not the subsequent and lame Hollywood remake). The Vanishing delivers-up one of the most sinister depictions of a sociopath I’ve ever seen. The fright derives less from graphic violence (there is none) than from the movie’s success at immersing you into the compartmentalized world of its principal character, who is seamlessly managing the presentation of a normal, well-adjusted family man, as he simultaneously and covertly pursues his secret life and morbid agenda.
Next is Unlawful Entry, 1992, a movie starring Ray Liotta as a local cop who smoothly enters the life of a young neighborhood couple (actors Kurt Russell and Anne Archer). Although somewhat formulaic plot-wise, the movie’s performances are impressive. Liotta’s sociopath—glib, charming and seductive—will make the hair on your skin rise. And both Archer and Russell vividly express the tension and alarm arising from their slow awareness that Liotta isn’t who he appeared so convincingly to be.
Richard Gere, in a somewhat unheralded role, nails-down a sociopathic cop in Internal Affairs, 1990. Gere gives a riveting presentation of the sociopathic mentality. Andy Garcia (actor), an Internal Affairs cop in Gere’s department, finds himself in the unenviable position of having to confront the slowly unfolding breadth (and horror) of Gere’s sociopathy. Garcia is also incredible. As in Unlawful Entry, the movie accurately shows how sociopaths can invade, lodge themselves in, and violate innocent, dignified lives.
One of the greatest performances of a sociopath I’ve ever seen can be found in Episode#44 of the former HBO series Six Feet Under. The episode is called, “That’s My Dog.” In it, David (actor Michael C. Hall) extends a random act of help to a road-stranded stranger, Jake (actor Michael Weston). David then finds himself overpowered by Jake, who, in the course of the episode’s hour, manages to embody virtually every relevant, sinister quality for which the sociopath is notorious. Weston’s demonic performance is astonishing. Hall’s as the traumatized victim of a sadistic sociopath is equally amazing.
Great performance, yes. Sociopath? Maybe not.
Dexter
Speaking of actor Michael C. Hall, I wonder what your take is on Dexter, the great Showtime Series in which Hall plays a sociopathic serial killer working, by day, as a Miami crime-scene forensics analyst?
I love this series, which is coming into its third season. But as disturbing a character as Dexter is, I would not characterize him as a sociopath. This is just a fun diagnostic quibble. Ostensibly, Dexter grows up a budding, violent sociopath. His father (or father-figure) recognizes the dark, evil side over which, as a boy and adolescent, Dexter seems to have little, and diminishing, control. The father sees that Dexter is compulsively, inexorably inclined to sadistic violence.
His solution is to somehow train Dexter to direct his sociopathic, homicidal proclivities towards cruel, menacing, destructive individuals. Best, if someone’s got to be snuffed-out by Dexter, it be someone the world will be better without!
And so Dexter becomes skilled, over time, at identifying individuals the world won’t miss; individuals as dangerous and creepy as he.
Why, then, is Dexter not really a sociopath—and indeed, diagnostically speaking, not even necessarily plausible? Because, despite his violent, murderous compulsions, Dexter is, first of all, a fundamentally sincere person. He is also loyal–for instance to his sister and a girlfriend. And while Dexter struggles to “feel” warm feelings, indeed anything—a struggle, incidentally, that he embraces—he knows how to have the backs of others, even where his self-interest may be at risk.
In a word, Dexter strives, against his darkest, most sordid inclinations, for growth. This is precisely what makes him and the series so fascinating, and precisely what rules him out as sociopath.
What do you think?
(This article is copyrighted (c) 2008 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
Why the pretense in the first place?
If being an anti-social personality is biological … then lets do something constructive about it?
This sham hiding behind civil and constitutional rights for everyone is baloney. These folks have a medical problem, lets face it once and for all and do something for them in society so the rest of us can be protected from all the chaos they create.
They can work and be productive, they just can’t feel what doing a good job is … the satisfaction etc.
They can’t feel satisfaction for anything? The reason they breath, the reason to work, the reason for family, children, pets? Anything.
Same thing with these banks failing. How many anti-social personalities are working in this industry … giving everyone lip service all these years … not follow up with anything they said they would follow up on?
Yeah, bail them out to the point of keeping a roof over their heads, food on the table, basic bills paid, medical etc. the basics in life.
None of this multi-million dollar packages to the CEOs and upper management. Hey, sell your mansions, sell your fleet of cars, sell your luxury yacht and let’s get down to basics with what you need to survive.
But, oh, nooooooooooo. The big ego in DC will bail these folks out on our backs … and let them keep their mansions, toys etc. WHAT A JOKE. ABSOLUTE JOKE.
IN MY DAY, YOU COULDN’T GET A LOAN FOR A MORTGAGE UNLESS YOUR CREDIT HISTORY THAT YOU DEVELOPED OVER MANY YEARS WAS PERFECT. Perfect. Perfect paying your utility bills all those years, perfect for paying your rent, perfect for paying your medical bills, perfect for this perfect for that. Not this crap giving people a mortgage with no credit history behind them …? Yeah, but the psychos didn’t care …. STAMP, STAMP approved… STAMP, STAMP, approved … next? Can I have my bennies for years end doing a good job? Oh, promotion? Thanks … oh, car at my disposal? Thanks. Yadda, yadda, yadda.
Ridiculous. Totally ridiculous. Notice how this happened 4 months before Georgie is out of office? So the other two schmucks can say they had nothing to do with Bush’s decision. It happened before we got into office.
Why don’t we all just pick a wall, any wall … and smash our heads into them tonight. We an do it all together. Just bash our heads against the wall … because that’s how ridiculous this bail out is. Giving our money to psychopaths pissing money up a rope in the first place, now hand them 700 million so they can piss that up a rope too. This is the ultimate example of the phrase “of throwing good money after bad money”.
Peace.
Wini, absolutely!!
But why single out the president, Swivel, unless you ascribe to leftist propaganda, when obviously Bush didn’t operate in a vacuum.
I’m guessing “W” would be more authentic if Stone would accurately portray the talking heads on BOTH sides. I’ve wondered about decisions on both sides, and that if some on the left have also been dulled by dope (not to be partisan or disrespectful).
Politicians are mind altered alright–but it’s on power and greed, and they are enabled on taxpayer dollars.
Benzthere: I did mention “both” sides. I said then the two, oh I should have said remaining instead of “left”. Ok, the two running for the highest office can sit there and point the blame on Georgie doing this … cause he’s leaving office.
Reminds me of when Nixon was pardoned … one prez leaving and the new one entering pardons him.
It’s beyond twinkies in twighlight zone.
Benz: It’s all propaganda … both sides. You watch CNN then channel surf to FOX news … back and forth, back and forth … and maybe, just maybe … the truth is found somewhere in the middle. Then you have to weigh out that “truth” with what you know to be real instead of all the hollywood gagga stuff.
I SOOO agree with you about Woody Allen!!! He is definitely a pedophile and a sociopath. As his wife (i.e. his “ex daughter”) and he have now adopted children together “the chain of pain” is unbroken.
I admire Mia for changing their childrens first names (after Woody left her with her daughter), to help to start anew life.. Anything that helps is good!
The most chilling portrayal of a sociopath was Michael Keaton in Pacific Heights. The personal terror that it brought to my bones was beyond belief. I am a single mother of 3 struggling beyond belief to maintain a somewhat normal lifestyle for my children & I. I have dealt with a sociopathic ex-husband who will stop at nothing to get what he wants & what he feels folks & society owe him. He has succeeded in manipulating police, lawyers, judges, school personnel, etc, and has cost me thousands of dollars to keep my kids safe frm his wrath. I have been forced to rent out my downstairs apt to keep bills paid so my children & I could eat. After seeing Keaton in Pacific Heights, I view every single tenant as a sociopath until THEY prove otherwise. Remember “Innocent until proven Guilty”….well, it’s the opposite with me because of this movie.
In the second season of Dexter, Dexter has relations with a woman named Lila. She plays a more accurate description of a sociopath than Dexter. I am not sure if this was intentional or not. Perhaps Dexter isn’t a sociopath in the show either. He certainly doesn’t scream sociopath to me. He displays and states proof that he does in fact care for the people around him. He apologizes to his girlfriend and goes to her son’s speech at school. This not behavior associated with a sociopath.
I recently watched a movie on DVD called “The Broken” (2008 – directed by Sean Ellis and starring Lena Headley).
It’s advertised as a kind of horror, but it’s more of a psychologicalical thriller. I watched it with 2 other people and they were both really angry at the ‘unexplained’ ending, wondering what the heck the whole movie was about.
Every single review I can find online says pretty much the same thing as well and it doesn’t always get the best reviews. The reason for this is that no one gets what it’s really about.
I might be reading a lot into it but to me it symbolically and metaphorically and psycholigically, is a depiction of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, largely from the Narcissist’s perspective, as the protagonist of the film. I think it shows a Narc who actually SEES what she is and comes apart. The use of shattering mirrors is an important element that the film uses for this.
I don’t know a whole lot about Jung’s concept of The Shadow, but I know enough to guess that the other characters in the film (the main character’s father, boyfriend, brother and brother’s gf) are experiencing Shadow elements with the mirrors.
The ending is really what bothers everyone who’s seen the film – because of how she just drives off into the light with no explanation of anything that’s happened. But, what I see in it is the Narcissist acts out violently on the knowledge of her “darkness” and kills the “other” to restore balance (denial) once again.
I think the Diane Downs story is the perfect representation of a true sociopath. Just listening to her speak is a trip in itself. She was a master at spin. And the re enactment she did at the car 3 days after she did this? She was joking and laughing……..made my skin crawl. She could be so articulate and so manipulative, that you would have never seen it coming. I see the same thing in my P daughters. I love the salting the cow analogy…it’s so true…so when they start to show their true colors to you and you confide in someone about them…they have already secured this “good guy” image in the very people that you think would understand. I think we all have gotten much wiser to the game. I just refuse to play anymore.
Dear Creampuff,
As long as you have contact with them in your life, you still unfortunately, “Play the game” to one extent or another. That’s the sad part of it.
My son and I have a dear friend who is married to one, and we occasionally have to be around HER in order to visit with him, however, I have FINALLY gotten to the point that I can be around her and not want to puke–at least for short periods of time, in order to visit with him. It took quite a while to get to this point though. She was such a trigger I coujldn’t stand to be in the same room with her.
Good luck to you (((((Hugs)))))