By The Front Porch Talker
“Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins? Distinctly we see the difference of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other? So with sanity and insanity”¦the soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.” From Billy Budd (Herman Melville).
We all live the lie sometimes: everybody lies. Lying is part of the American social contract; a matter of civility and manners, in some circles. Culturally, we even eschew the truth sometimes, equating it with rudeness. Who wants to hear that they are looking old or that their appearance is less-than-stellar? While our American cultural values appear friendly—albeit naïve—to the world, we are fiercely private and “independent” about our deeper feelings. Nobody wants to seem powerless or out of control.
We all know why we lie: because it is convenient; or, maybe it is easier just to keep the peace—so we believe. Sometimes we lie by saying that everything is just fine when it really isn’t. We tell our friends that we are just fine to signify that our real feelings are private. I do feel a little better now, just saying I’m fine. In turn, they tell us the same lie—it’s quid pro quo social management. Sometimes we lie to protect others from our reality; or, to protect ourselves from our own reality. We tell ourselves that we should be fine and that by saying it aloud we will be fine.
The truth is: not all lies are equal. Some people lie because they can and because it serves them in some way. They don’t live by social rules—or any rules, except as it harms us and benefits them. They are not part of the social contract of civility or convenience. They are “people of the lie,” as Scott Peck calls them in his book of the same name. They are the narcissists and sociopaths who live among us, undetected, and wholly without a conscience. They imitate our emotions to fill the vacancy of their own. They pretend to care, to have feelings of remorse even, if it will serve their own ends.
Sociopaths run the gamut of the danger zone—from the trusted partner or friend who steals your identity and every dime you have, to the person who commits violent acts against innocent people who “trusted the wrong person.” They are the “people of the lie.” They will take everything you ever had, including your dignity, then move on to the next person, leaving us to wonder: what could we have done differently? But even that is part of the manipulation. The truth is: there was nothing you could have done, or that anybody can do, especially if they are well adept at evading the law, which most of them are.
They hurt everybody, and because we would like to believe that they are “just like us—”you know, with morals and a conscience, they continue to offend. I have known more than my share of sociopaths and others who have no discernable conscience. I’ve spent half of my life blaming myself for “letting them” harm me and people I’ve known. I always wondered why sociopaths do what they do—it’s because they can.
I am thinking now of the anniversary of the month that my college student was murdered, back in 1993. Lisa had been moving from one apartment to another, and had solicited the help of a stranger. It had been a violent death: and, it is still unsolved. She was only twenty-two years old at the time.
At a memorial service for Lisa I read the following quote, which I’d written as part of a eulogy for her.
“Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins? Distinctly we see the difference of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other? So with sanity and insanity”¦the soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.” From, Billy Budd (Herman Melville).
The truth is: we don’t know exactly where one color in the rainbow ends and the next begins. It seems that I’ve learned a lot about the colors, which I’d like to share with you. From Lisa’s death, I learned that fear is a good thing, unless you run with it. Many of us see a person whom we fear, for whatever reason, and we bypass our intuition to let them in.
For all the violent events that I have witnessed in my life, I will name a color. Yellow is for all the charming sociopaths who made their way into our apartments, and ultimately into our lives, then betrayed us—or worse.
Red is for the raging friend in high school, Barbara, who beat-up another girl, Aileen, in my presence and in the presence of the whole school. Aileen later died of a concussion. Barbara was never charged.
Green is for Tucson, Arizona where I witnessed a murder and a near-murder. For the man who lived next door to me while I was in graduate school—a gun lover. I heard the gun go off, then saw the man dragging a woman across the bare parking lot. I reported this to the police and even showed them a puddle of blood in the parking lot, but nothing was ever done.
The Green near-murder would involve me. While living alone in Tucson in a big house on Speedway Avenue, near the center of town, I was interrupted from my writing one day. My dog never barked. Something just told me to walk through my fenced back yard and look over the gate to the narrow space in the side-yard. A man was attempting to hoist himself up and into my kitchen window. The press had called him “The Prime-Time Rapist.” As my dog and I stood there staring, in shock, he jumped down and stared back. He was maybe twenty feet away. The moment we locked eyes was the pivotal moment. We both ran, in opposite directions. That night, he was gunned-down by the police.
Purple is for the female sociopath who stole my identity and everything I had in my life, then changed her name and found somebody else to steal from. I had been a “trusted friend” for over ten years. I had helped her through her years of disability. I knew her children and her grandchild. But nothing in the world prepared me for what she would do to me. I lost my job, my retirement account, my house, and all the money and credit I had worked so hard to earn, all because I had trusted a sociopath with a very long history of scamming people.
The most difficult part for me is the trail of tears we leave behind with all of this unfinished business and grieving—for what never was. Sociopaths steal our innocence, and perhaps our naiveté too, for no particular reason and with no particular meaning. They leave us unfinished too, at least privately.
Unfinished, but not defeated. We look to some higher power to finish what we cannot. We know that pain is inevitable in life—for all of us. But suffering—that is optional. We love who we love, because we are human and we have a conscience. We love people imperfectly, then when we’ve held too long to the outcome drawn somewhere in our imaginations, we detach with love and let go to a power that some call God. Fly high and free!
In the end, I tell myself this: there are plenty more colors in a rainbow, if you look closely. Some are nuanced or muted; some appear tinted at different angles, with more or less light than when you first had seen it. Some colors form hazy borders about exactly where the colors become “blendingly into the next,” just as “sanity and insanity does.”
Truths are blendingly complex too—a sign of intimacy. Whatever we reveal to others we are also revealing to ourselves, simultaneously. The pain is tacit and unspoken. But paradoxically, we are freed of suffering and that need to control or soften things with our lies. The only truth that we can know for sure borders on solipsism: that we know that our own mind exists; all else is speculation, at best. We can only know our own private and ineffable experiences of what is or isn’t the truth. The rest is beyond us to know for sure.
And, I will repeat the words I began with: we can never really know what is in the hearts of others. We can hope against hope, but never know for sure.
I will never be the same trusting person I once was. Thank God. The muted pinks and blues and greens are becoming clearer, with more defined lines now. I know that it’s time to finish my novel, and get on with the business of living, and to honor those who, for whatever reason, weren’t as lucky as me and didn’t survive.
We may not ever really know what is in another person’s heart, but now—now that we’ve seen that vacant look; and, now that we’ve heard the superficial stories and lies that never did quite add-up, because they didn’t. Now that we are older, and probably wiser, we can cut through the artifice, the faker, the liar and cheat, the approximation of humanity—like butter, and spread it over so many slices of proverbial bread.
I mentioned yesterday that I think we all have a bit of spath in us and Kathleen (in her polished way-yes!) elaborated on that thought something like this: if we don’t, then we should!! That is how I read it anyway.
I liked that thought. Since I have been on LF I am learning how to properly benefit from the tool kit of my less fortunate spath brothers and sisters!! hahaha 🙂
I want to go back often and read her post from yesterday. It spells it out so beautifully.
As long as I stay in my good place, I see no reason why I cannot protect myself from spaths by outspathing them!!
Kathleen, ahhhh thank you.
it feels so good to read your words.
I told my BF last night that I’m worried about how I neglect myself and the stress that it is causing me. He told me to look out for number 1. Always take care of me first.
That’s what he says, but I feel pressure to take care of him, first. That’s the price for being too empathic. I feel what other people are feeling and they are usually feeling concern for themselves. OK, I’m also employed by him – but the salary is small and I work 24/7. gotta renegotiate I guess.
Hope,
No I haven’t gotten any catfood yet, but at least he has stopped emailing me again. It was triggering me. Not as strong as I imagine myself to be. It takes a toll, picking at this scab to make it grow a calloused scar.
adamsrib, thanks for the kind words.
I just wanted to expand about the inner sociopath. We have it. It’s a built-in capability to stop worrying about anything else, but protecting ourselves, when the need arises.
However, for us, it’s costly. Necessary sometimes, but costly. We don’t enjoy acting like this. And we often feel a little slimed by it, after the thrill of “winning” is over.
The fact is that “winning” in these situations is nothing more than eliminating a threat. We get back to where we were before. There is something good that comes out of it, in the sense of exercising our self-protective muscles and discovering that we are capable of taking care of ourselves. But these are always exceptional times. The lasting benefit of the exercise is more knowledge of what we can do when we have to. Except in small, very controlled ways, it’s not relevent to the “normal” world of friendly community.
So, a second point is ANY encounter with a predator is costly. It may just cost a little bit of annoyance. It may cost a lot of time and effort to extract the little bugger’s sucking tentacles out of our lives. It may drive us to doing things that ordinarily we would would never dream of doing, and so cause us to have to do some healing with ourselves.
When we’re in the angry phase of post-trauma healing, it’s a period of getting to know our boundaries and our willingness to protect them. It’s natural to do a little muscle flexing, because we’re just discovering we have them.
But in the real world, there is no upside to these encounters. Just cost.
So the quicker we recognize them, the less chance they have to mess with us. There are a lot of “rules” that people develop for recognizing them. But my rule is simple — I feel uncomfortable. With them. About what’s going on. Maybe about something I can’t put my finger on. But when I start to feel uncomfortable, I back away. If they follow, I start creating obstacles. If I still can’t get rid of them, I find ways to communicate that I’m am going to be very, very expensive to deal with. And if necessary, start making their lives miserable.
But my goal is not to get to that point. It’s a lot easier on me to recognize them quickly and just shut them out.
As I said, all of this is a kind of exercise to teach us about ourselves, and what we’re capable of doing to protect what is important to us.
This is something we need to know. Just knowing our own strength and our ability to handle a threat changes the way we approach life. We develop an aura of groundedness and density (rather than being the kind of floppy people who are always making room for others and are easy to push aside). It comes from the fact that we’re prepared to deal with things, and unafraid to leave the realm of “nice” to say what we want and straighten out anyone who thinks we’re a pushover.
None of this means that we’re intentionally rude. We’re just living in our own reality. Depending on the circumstances — like dealing with a sweet elderly relative who probably won’t live long enough to understand certain nitty-gritty details of our lives — we may moderate it. Or dealing with a new potential lover, who probably isn’t ready to know that we threw our last lover’s (the sociopath’s) computer out of a sixth story window. Or dealing with a boss who probably doesn’t need to know that we call him L’il Poopy Pants in our mental conversations with him. But other times, most of the time for some of us, we just call it as we see it. And figure the consequences are less costly than enduring chronic dysfunction.
And while this post seems to have gone far afield from the topic of getting comfortable with your inner sociopath, it’s really not. That aspect of ourselves has a lot of different ways of being expressed. But they all come down to a certain set of characteristics that communicate “This is who I am,” “Whether you like it or not is your problem,” “Don’t touch what’s mine if you want to keep all your fingers,” and “If you think I can’t protect myself, you’re making a mistake that will get progressively more expensive for you.”
It’s the part of us that reads the contracts before we sign them. That stands back a bit, often in “conventionally courteous” non-communication, until other people say clearly what they want from us and we decide whether or not we want to respond. That considers trust to be something that’s earned everyday. That can disappear into silent stillness, when asked to participate in stupidity or evil. That can relentlessly change the subject. Or laugh hysterically while saying, “Oh you must be kidding. You are such a joker.” Or practice so you can dial 411 on the cell phone in your sleep. Or carry a keychain video camera to create evidence. Or invest in one killer black business suit to deal with “New York moments” in which you need to maintain the upper hand. And is prepared to figure out exactly how to sabotage something that can’t be addressed directly.
It’s all the same thing. And yes, parts of it seem to be fun at the time. But when we get away from the threat and our vision expands again to take in the larger world and recognize how much opportunity for joy and growth and gratitude exists, we’re relieved that it’s over. None of it is real life, in the way we want to live it. People who are like that all the time burn out. We just use it when we have to, and carry the knowledge that we can.
Fortunately, for most of us, the challenges that surface this side of our character take up a fraction of our lives. All of it is real. But most of it is a lot friendlier.
I hope this makes sense.
Kathy
PS – Skylar, honey, what are you doing? A “boyfriend” who is also your employer, and you work 24/7 for little pay, and feel pressured to take care of him? That sounds like a slave, or sexual harrassment, or a situation where you can’t afford to have even the slightest emotional freedom. There is a rule of the universe — love cannot coexist with fear. All of us have tried, at one time or another, to prove that this rule isn’t true. Eventually all of us learn that we can’t get around it.
Kathy, your PS to Skylar is SPOT ON!!! Great to have you back here posting! Stay around a while won’t you!~!!! Love Oxy
Sara:
This ones for you.
http://firstwivesworld.com/community/house-bloggers/lust-damned-if-you-give-it-damned-if-you-don't
Hi Kathy,
I was exagerrating I don’t work 24/7. I just feel the pressure 24/7. It’s hard to explain without revealing too much and I hate to say bad things about someone I care about on a public blog. He’s very nice to me and I’m grateful for the job. We are trying to get his invention to market and it’s a very interesting job working from home and I get up whenever I want, he actually spoils me, we spoil each other – but it’s hard to enjoy it when you’re paranoid.
It’s just that he has so many of the redflag characteristics, that I spend all my time reminding myself that at any moment it could all go poof! If I didn’t know all the red flags of psychopathy, I would be in heaven. But I do know them and at first they were much worse: constant, inexplicable outbreaks of anger. I managed to train him to acknowledge his emotional outbursts. He’s not very good at hiding his rage like my exP was. He says he wants to do better and he is 60% better – we laugh at his narcissism and mine. But I can’t help wonder if this is just like a preacher who hides an immoral side, despite preaching against and complete knowledge of evil. The reason I wonder, is because I know about his past behavior, I see selfishness, hatred and I’ve seen dishonesty and obsession with keeping up appearances. Maybe he is just learning what he can get away with and what he can’t.
He’s definitely different from your average Joe.
Being able to spot sociopathic behavior is almost harder than not. Living was easy with eyes closed.
Kathleen;
How does what you describe here differ from being passive-aggressive?
I really needed to read your latest post as it confirms what I have been telling myself over this past few weeks since I initiated NC with the spath.
Its hard for a person like myself (a sap,”floppy” as you say describes it perfectly!) to learn to do this. I lived for years in pacifist communities and I feel really guilty “being mean” but I realized something: it’s not mean, but WISE to re-act to the uncomfortable place you describe so well.
Just yesterday I was reading an article on Matteiu Ricard the Buddhist monk who is thought to be the happiest person in the world and even he says it is necessary to be firm!
I have to say that I am proud of myself as I exercise NC with the spath and have even back spathed him on occasion!! Also, this morning being able to say I feel uncomfortable okaying very destructive behavior (in myself and others). I desire to be as respectful as I am firm. I hope it shows.
Take care and thank you again for you clarity. It is a beautiful gift you possess!
EB,
RE: the link on love vs. lust post above.
I read the article and can’t seem to find any mention of the possibilities of STD’s (practicing this philosophy). With all my respect, I am no prude as you all know but I completely disagree with the author. It takes a bit of time to develop enough of a connection with a potential sexual partner to have the STD talk, I would think.
Also, one would need to exercise control if the man was married right? Why would it be different to exercise control if we want to be safe health wise?
Sounds like what this author is promoting is “free love’ and didn’t that go out with the eight track player? 🙂
Just sayin”…
Adamsrib, I’m not EB but I’m going to comment on the link anyway.
Lust vs love—we know that sex releases oxytocin (the bonding hormone) and that though it is possible for either sex to have intercourse without “bonding” in a normal human relationship sexual intercourse is a “bonding” ritual meant, in evolutionary terms, to keep the parents together to raise the offspring.
Psychopaths have poor receptors for the hormone oxytocin though research seems to indicate they have the hormone, just not the receptor sites for it (and this may vary from individual to individual).
In today’s world, sex can be a deadly past time, because condoms even if used don’t completely (by any means) make sex “safe”—safe-r, maybe but not safe. There are also several STDs that condoms don’t protect from at all because of the way they are spread.
It isn’t just a “moral” question of having sex before you learn their last name or not, like it used to be when I was a kid “do nice girls kiss on the first date?” It is a question of what do you want from interactions with this person?
Do you just want a quick roll in the hay with a relative stranger? If that is what you want, who am I to tell you this is risky or wrong? You are an adult and can do whatever it is that rings your chimes.
Do I think it is wise for me to have an intimate sexual encounter with a relative stranger I met (A) on line (B) in a bar (C) some other place?” Nah, not for me.
What would I want in a sexual relationship (if I had one) with someone? Well, I would want it to be a bonding ritual in a relationship with someone I cared about and trusted. I would want it to be monogamous and STD-free. But, that’s just what I want, not what everyone else in the world wants.
Yea the days of “Love-ins in Griffith Park” are long gone, along with the 8-track, but in the meantime, there are a lot of things that antibiotics won’t cure hanging around! I think I’ll pass on the “free love” as there are too many hidden charges! LOL