By The Front Porch Talker
“Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins? Distinctly we see the difference of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other? So with sanity and insanity”¦the soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.” From Billy Budd (Herman Melville).
We all live the lie sometimes: everybody lies. Lying is part of the American social contract; a matter of civility and manners, in some circles. Culturally, we even eschew the truth sometimes, equating it with rudeness. Who wants to hear that they are looking old or that their appearance is less-than-stellar? While our American cultural values appear friendly—albeit naïve—to the world, we are fiercely private and “independent” about our deeper feelings. Nobody wants to seem powerless or out of control.
We all know why we lie: because it is convenient; or, maybe it is easier just to keep the peace—so we believe. Sometimes we lie by saying that everything is just fine when it really isn’t. We tell our friends that we are just fine to signify that our real feelings are private. I do feel a little better now, just saying I’m fine. In turn, they tell us the same lie—it’s quid pro quo social management. Sometimes we lie to protect others from our reality; or, to protect ourselves from our own reality. We tell ourselves that we should be fine and that by saying it aloud we will be fine.
The truth is: not all lies are equal. Some people lie because they can and because it serves them in some way. They don’t live by social rules—or any rules, except as it harms us and benefits them. They are not part of the social contract of civility or convenience. They are “people of the lie,” as Scott Peck calls them in his book of the same name. They are the narcissists and sociopaths who live among us, undetected, and wholly without a conscience. They imitate our emotions to fill the vacancy of their own. They pretend to care, to have feelings of remorse even, if it will serve their own ends.
Sociopaths run the gamut of the danger zone—from the trusted partner or friend who steals your identity and every dime you have, to the person who commits violent acts against innocent people who “trusted the wrong person.” They are the “people of the lie.” They will take everything you ever had, including your dignity, then move on to the next person, leaving us to wonder: what could we have done differently? But even that is part of the manipulation. The truth is: there was nothing you could have done, or that anybody can do, especially if they are well adept at evading the law, which most of them are.
They hurt everybody, and because we would like to believe that they are “just like us—”you know, with morals and a conscience, they continue to offend. I have known more than my share of sociopaths and others who have no discernable conscience. I’ve spent half of my life blaming myself for “letting them” harm me and people I’ve known. I always wondered why sociopaths do what they do—it’s because they can.
I am thinking now of the anniversary of the month that my college student was murdered, back in 1993. Lisa had been moving from one apartment to another, and had solicited the help of a stranger. It had been a violent death: and, it is still unsolved. She was only twenty-two years old at the time.
At a memorial service for Lisa I read the following quote, which I’d written as part of a eulogy for her.
“Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins? Distinctly we see the difference of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other? So with sanity and insanity”¦the soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.” From, Billy Budd (Herman Melville).
The truth is: we don’t know exactly where one color in the rainbow ends and the next begins. It seems that I’ve learned a lot about the colors, which I’d like to share with you. From Lisa’s death, I learned that fear is a good thing, unless you run with it. Many of us see a person whom we fear, for whatever reason, and we bypass our intuition to let them in.
For all the violent events that I have witnessed in my life, I will name a color. Yellow is for all the charming sociopaths who made their way into our apartments, and ultimately into our lives, then betrayed us—or worse.
Red is for the raging friend in high school, Barbara, who beat-up another girl, Aileen, in my presence and in the presence of the whole school. Aileen later died of a concussion. Barbara was never charged.
Green is for Tucson, Arizona where I witnessed a murder and a near-murder. For the man who lived next door to me while I was in graduate school—a gun lover. I heard the gun go off, then saw the man dragging a woman across the bare parking lot. I reported this to the police and even showed them a puddle of blood in the parking lot, but nothing was ever done.
The Green near-murder would involve me. While living alone in Tucson in a big house on Speedway Avenue, near the center of town, I was interrupted from my writing one day. My dog never barked. Something just told me to walk through my fenced back yard and look over the gate to the narrow space in the side-yard. A man was attempting to hoist himself up and into my kitchen window. The press had called him “The Prime-Time Rapist.” As my dog and I stood there staring, in shock, he jumped down and stared back. He was maybe twenty feet away. The moment we locked eyes was the pivotal moment. We both ran, in opposite directions. That night, he was gunned-down by the police.
Purple is for the female sociopath who stole my identity and everything I had in my life, then changed her name and found somebody else to steal from. I had been a “trusted friend” for over ten years. I had helped her through her years of disability. I knew her children and her grandchild. But nothing in the world prepared me for what she would do to me. I lost my job, my retirement account, my house, and all the money and credit I had worked so hard to earn, all because I had trusted a sociopath with a very long history of scamming people.
The most difficult part for me is the trail of tears we leave behind with all of this unfinished business and grieving—for what never was. Sociopaths steal our innocence, and perhaps our naiveté too, for no particular reason and with no particular meaning. They leave us unfinished too, at least privately.
Unfinished, but not defeated. We look to some higher power to finish what we cannot. We know that pain is inevitable in life—for all of us. But suffering—that is optional. We love who we love, because we are human and we have a conscience. We love people imperfectly, then when we’ve held too long to the outcome drawn somewhere in our imaginations, we detach with love and let go to a power that some call God. Fly high and free!
In the end, I tell myself this: there are plenty more colors in a rainbow, if you look closely. Some are nuanced or muted; some appear tinted at different angles, with more or less light than when you first had seen it. Some colors form hazy borders about exactly where the colors become “blendingly into the next,” just as “sanity and insanity does.”
Truths are blendingly complex too—a sign of intimacy. Whatever we reveal to others we are also revealing to ourselves, simultaneously. The pain is tacit and unspoken. But paradoxically, we are freed of suffering and that need to control or soften things with our lies. The only truth that we can know for sure borders on solipsism: that we know that our own mind exists; all else is speculation, at best. We can only know our own private and ineffable experiences of what is or isn’t the truth. The rest is beyond us to know for sure.
And, I will repeat the words I began with: we can never really know what is in the hearts of others. We can hope against hope, but never know for sure.
I will never be the same trusting person I once was. Thank God. The muted pinks and blues and greens are becoming clearer, with more defined lines now. I know that it’s time to finish my novel, and get on with the business of living, and to honor those who, for whatever reason, weren’t as lucky as me and didn’t survive.
We may not ever really know what is in another person’s heart, but now—now that we’ve seen that vacant look; and, now that we’ve heard the superficial stories and lies that never did quite add-up, because they didn’t. Now that we are older, and probably wiser, we can cut through the artifice, the faker, the liar and cheat, the approximation of humanity—like butter, and spread it over so many slices of proverbial bread.
Kim,
Those theories are right up my alley of interest. Tell me more.
Adamsrib and Constantine, In my current situation I identify more with Bertha, the crazy lady in the attic, than I do with Jane. LOL
I know they are. We talked a little bit about it several months ago, remember?
I saw one of your posts from, ohhh, maybe three weeks or a month ago when you were asking some questions about the sacrificial victim, and I knew you were still studying.
In my personal situation, lately, I googled, “scapegoating” and eventually came upon Rene Girard’s theory, again, but this time I found it more accessable to me, personally. I guess I’m just more ready for it than I used to be.
Would you like to correspond through E-mail? Maybe we could discuss it more in depth that way.
yes Kim, I really would love to correspond via email because as you know I don’t get to be on lf all the time (bf is coming back home today)
Lets ask Donna to exchange emails for us?
But on the other hand some of the stuff we talk about could be very enlightening to others here.
For instance, after I read your post, I googled the words you used: Girard scapegoat christ sacrifice true meaning
and I got this MIND BLOWING ARTICLE.
http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=16-10-040-i
OXY, I think you would really like it too. because it talks about the biblical stories that you have posted about.
BTW, I can’t seem to figure out how we request Donna to help us exchange email addresses…anyone?
Kim,
Part of the reason it’s mind blowing to me, is because I have not been on LF for a long while and have suddenly felt the need. Coincidentally, many of the posts I have written have touched on the biblical stories Girard mentions in this interview: the fall of Lucifer, Solomon and the two mothers.
Oxy has mentioned Joseph’s story and Abraham trying to sacrifice his son,( which btw, was quite commonly done in those days, so it was nothing shocking, what was shocking was an angel telling him not to.)
I would sooooo love to interview Girard myself and have him explain the sociopath from his point of view.
He talks about scapegoating as a “primitive” behavior that can be overcome with the realization that the scapegoat was COMPLETELY INNOCENT. Since only Jesus could be COMPLETELY INNOCENT, he was the only one that could make it undoubtably clear that WE are the sinners and that scapegoating does not redeem us at all. In that way, Jesus’ sacrifice doesn’t redeem us at all but IT OFFERS US REDEMPTION when we accept his innocence and our guilt. By confessing our sins we are forgiven.
But the sociopath IS INCAPABLE OF THIS. Could the sociopath ever admit his guilt? Could he ever be ashamed? No, he projects his own behavior and puts it on us. So What would Girard say? I’d love to know.
I have a friend who is doing a speaking tour for his book. He is interviewing all kinds of people on this tour to bring attention to the lack of trust in our society. I wonder if I could get him to interview Girard for me? oooohhhhh my gears are turning…..
Ox,
Yes I do remember vividly those days of people “remembering” abuses that never occurred because my half sister who died 16 years ago, was one of those “patients” who accused my father (her step father) of sex abuse.
Before he died she recanted saying it was never true but oh, did she cause problems in our family that to this day will never be healed. My poor dad was the salt of the earth and she knew it, but she later said her therapist told her it was true. He died not long after that and though he forgave her (on his death bed) he was never the same.
Can’t recall feeling like something was not right with my mom. She was just a typical mom in the 60’s a June Cleaver (God rest her soul-Barbra Billingsly) type or more like Lucy. More child than adult though she was a mature woman not really young when I was a child, just “under the thumb” as housewives were in those days. Dependent on the husband.
You say here:
“but I was having to back track and clean out the closets of my soul of the spath relationships I had left in place. Almost like lancing and draining deep abscesses of the soul. Just as I would finish with one, another seemed to be found, deeper still.”
So, well put Ox. I really need to do this work but not sure if I can handle it right now. The trigger from my Irish ex is still lingering and the spath from the gym, who is more and more each time I run into him, reminding me of Count Dracula and not because it is Halloween season just that he is beginning to give me the creeps. He never approaches me anymore just lurks and slithers and reeks of evil…
I am trying to get to the gym earlier so I won’t see him but my schedule has me there at the time he shows up. I leave within 5-10 minutes but just seeing him is traumatic in some ways.
Kim:
thanks for the links. The article on JE and the gaze is very telling. I am not a lit student but I get the gist of the piece and yeah it is heady stuff. The part about the gaze made me think of the spath in the gym- there he is again-because I used to joke early on in the relationship that when he looked at me I felt as if I had been tazered!! I used to think this was an attraction thing between he and I. I now realize it is a spath trait.
Constantine, do you think Rochester was a spath? I really need to read JE. My book list is growing 🙂
Skylar:
I’ve bookmarked the article you posted from Touchstone for later reading. I find it very interesting with my studying Theology and all. Just a comment on Abraham: OT scholars agree that yes, the human sacrifice narrative was a very common theme at that time period and made it into the OT but was pagan in origin. I find that interesting. I do take an academic view of the scriptures tho and not literal.
Take care all and thanks for the post and links. I find my days easier when I read all the encouraging words on LF.
And Oxy about the Zoloft. I took it years ago after the Irish ex and I split. I was on it for 4 years with no problems but it did numb me so I really couldn’t feel much emotion kinda like Spock on Star Trek. But I am 10 years older now and in menopause and it knocked me on my azz. I am going to see a medicine woman I know and she will make me a herbal tonic. I feel better about that.
YOU GUYS ROCK!!!
((HUGS))
Sacrificing a child was in that area and era usually to Baal, and was not a solitary event, but done as a community and the child was an infant. In the case of Abraham, we only know that the child was much older and of an age to be familiar with the rituals of his father’s religious practice, as he asked when they started out where the ram for the sacrifice was. Though Isaac was not the oldest son, he was the son of the legal wife, not the slave woman, and he was to be the heir, specifically, the HEIR. So to sacrifice this particular child, essentially an only child, for an elderly man would have been particularly odious.
But of course when Abraham had shown the willlingness to carry through with the sacrifice, the angel stopped him, and Abraham’s answer to the child that “The Lord would provide His own ram” was true, and a ram was nearby caught by thorns.”
I think to myself many times, that if I had to do “so and so” I would be able to do it. But until you get to the point of (almost) “no return” on something like Abraham did, it is hard to be sure if you would or could “carry through.”
I worked for a few months in a pediatric ICU where we had to do cut downs on babies to put in IVs and we did all kinds of painful procedures to the infants and we could not explain to them WHY we were hurting them. I had to quit. I could’nt do it any more.
I realized that I could cut your leg off with a rusty butcher knife no matter how bad it wouuld hurt you but I could say “This is going to be horrible but it will save your life” and you might not like it but you could endure it because you would know it was for the GREATER GOOD. The baby or an elderly person past knowing, but still able to feel—I just can’t “handle” doing painful things to them. Some one has to, but not me.
Rene Girard’s writings are very interesting and I agree with much of it. Most wars arre fought by designating a scapegoat, and the concepts of “us”(good) and “them” (Bad) is to some extent what we do here, Psychopaths are bad, we are good. LOL Recognnizing that I am not an INOCENT victim though is sobering. I realize I volunteered for some of the abuse. Doesn’t excuse them for doing it, just that I am responsible for allowing them to continue to do it.
Pretty simple concept really, but a difficult one to internalize.
As a practicing Catholic (tho not a RoboCatholic) I do appreciate the analogy of the heir being likened to the Messiah. It’s a beautiful allegory. It all ties into the Covenant made by Abraham to YHWH (I am using the tetragrammaton so as not to offend any practicing Jewish readers).
Human sacrifice, however adapted by a particular culture was still just that; human sacrifice and it’s roots are pagan.
I am eternally grateful that the God I love and serve does not now, nor will He ever, expect me to make a “Sophie’s choice” in any area of my spirituality. The majority of the OT are history narratives of the Semitic peoples later know as the Hebrews, though the Semites were not strictly Hebrews. Though there exists many important themes that can be gleaned for use today, what transpired in those times are (for the Christian), on the other side of the cross and were fulfilled by the Messiah. The New Covenant is on this side of the cross. New wine, not to be put into old wine skins. To use a legal phrase; adhering to OT teaching, for a Christian, is a moot point. However, for an orthodox Jew it is critical.
Anyhoo, this is my understanding in a nutshell of OT vs. NT thought.
Entire libraries are filled with theological studies on these issues. Very complex, but my favorite books are by Bart Erhman. He explains the academic approach so clearly and concisely.
To speak in medical terms, if I need open heart surgery, I am going to hope an academically trained physician/surgeon will perform the surgery. This same concept applies to how I view my spiritual needs.
I appreciate the scriptures and refer to them often but as an academic, I cannot take them literally. How I reconcile this with my belief system is to know in my deepest Soul that what Christ requires of me is the ESSENCE of His teaching. This is what I practice.
I can’t believe what I just got from the Spath:
I was wondering if you would be willing to allow our son to have 1-2 pictures of him and I together for his room at your house, and have you do the same, provide him with 1-2 pictures of you and him together for his room at my house? I would like him to know no matter what house he is at, both parents are always with him. I feel this would be good for him.
This, of course comes on the heels of my insisting that our son have a back pack instead of a grocery bag to take from house to house.
How should I respond and what should I DO?
PS; I know this is silly, but I don’t want him to “gain” anything from this.
Thanks
Could not help, Fight: I am in a similar boat. It made me laugh: such a caring father (really?) LOL
This is the P issue we face: to all others we are the crazy ones to have an “issue” with such a request. The request itself is quite caring, normal and logical. yet, I hear you and share your pain: hehehe. All you can do is comply and put the pic somewhere where you don’t have to see his face. Mine would know that I’d never put UP the pic, but i could see him try a similar trick. My child’s P father is behind on child support, has not taken any part in his life, but dutifully makes my life miserable twice per month. My child does not even think of him as his father…. Believe me, it takes more than a pic for a child to bond with a parent. If your son is bonding with you, it won’t matter that his dad pics are there. And – if they give him nightmares, you always have an excuse to take them down.
Since you ask how you should respond, I can share how I would respond now: “This is such a great idea. I thank you for caring about well being of (our) son. It is especially appreciated since you have also agreed to share a backpack. I am feeling safe when our son is with you”. You see, FightAnotherDay, they will fight only if we do. If you fly high, the s^&^t won’t stick to you. Smile, breathe and make it look like it did not matter. you will win on a long run: they are impulsive and unable to carry through .