This week the Connecticut Medical Examining Board restored me to the full practice of medicine. Due to the fact that my ex-husband Barry Lichtenthal impersonated a physician and examined female patients in a clinic that I directed, my license was restricted. I am not going to retell the full story today but I am going to comment on some things I have kept silent about. For more details of the story you can read Barry Lichtenthal: Sexual predator ruins the career of Dr. Liane Leedom. Donna Andersen is an excellent journalist and did her own investigation in order to report the story. She uncovered details even I was unaware of.
I want to address the question of whether or not I was Barry’s “accomplice” and the question of what I was aware of in terms of the goings on. The precise answer to the question is that I was an unwitting accomplice. I knew that he told people he was a retired doctor and that he called himself “Dr. Taylor.”
This behavior on his part began shortly after the clinic opened. The first I was aware of it was when I was negotiating a contract with an insurance company. He got on the other line and started schmoozing with the executive. I do not remember exactly what he said but he told the man he was a retired doctor and proceeded to tell funny and entertaining stories. Although I laughed, I was disgusted at this because it seemed infantile on his part and a waste of time. I did not understand this was his “foot in the door” with me and these stories.
I correctly recognized these stories as being pathological lies (pseudologica fantastica). However, I did not understand that all people who are pathological liars are predators. I am now sure that this is the case, though if you read the Mask of Sanity by Dr. Hervey Cleckley, he says that not all pathological liars are psychopaths.
I thought Barry told these stories because he has an ego problem and was threatened by his wife’s status. Again that interpretation was correct, but again I missed the significance of it. I let it go because I thought his pathological lies were harmless entertaining stories that no one really believed any way. Several patients indicated to me they were aware that the stories were entertaining fabrications.
I never told anyone Barry was a doctor. In fact I told every patient I was the only physician at the practice. I realize now this must have been very upsetting and confusing for some people who were being told one thing by me and another thing by Barry. Since he is a professional con artist who do you think was believed?
Because of this terrible judgment on my part, I deserved all the punishment that I received. Since I was part of other people’s victimization, I sought to do everything I could to make amends. The victims were compensated by my malpractice insurance carrier after I provided hours of truthful testimony regarding what happened. The officials of the insurance company believed my explanation that I never intended any fraudulent or criminal activity. I made the wrong decision regarding coping with my husband’s story telling.
Shortly after Barry’s arrest, I had the good fortune to speak with Annie Mcguire from fraudaid.com. It was she who made me aware of Donna Andersen. She and I also had a discussion of the unwitting accomplices of psychopaths. She said this is very common and pointed out that psychopaths could not do what they do without witting and unwitting accomplices. She has written step by step instructions for what to do if you are the unwitting accomplice to financial fraud.
I am speaking out about the fact that I was an unwitting accomplice to fraud to help to bring attention to this phenomenon. Psychopaths con and manipulate people into helping them do their dirty work and sometimes also into doing their dirty work for them. If we can raise public awareness of psychopathy and stop non-psychopaths from helping psychopaths we will be able to do a great deal of prevention. Do not ever help a psychopath in any way or you will be tricked into becoming an accomplice.
Now that gets me to telling the rest of the story. You might be wondering, “What ever happened to Barry Lichtenthal?” It is no surprise that he went to Connecticut State prison where he continued to tell his pathological lies. Prison staff members became his unwitting accomplices when they too did not prevent him from calling himself “doctor” or “doc.”
A law enforcement official told me that it was not illegal for Barry to call himself “doctor” in prison. He said this after I verbally reprimanded him for allowing this to go on. I told him I believe prisoners like Barry need to have a special designation “psychologically dangerous” so that prison staff will not be psychologically harmed by them. It seems odd that if a prisoner is more physically dangerous than average, staff members are warned, but there is no appreciation of the concept of psychological dangerousness.
Now enter another set of accomplices, family members. Even after they knew that Barry is what he is because I told them while also fully explaining the concept of psychopathy; and even after they witnessed his destruction of my life, members of his family participated in his seduction of his next woman. They sent her flowers on his behalf while he was incarcerated. They also did nothing to warn her even though I begged them to.
I was told by inside sources that the prison nurse who married Barry at one point believed he was a doctor. But I have not spoken with her myself to verify this. Donna and I have known about Barry’s new relationship because we both received letters from him while he was incarcerated, and the letters were not all stamped with the prison stamp. I received several letters addressed in a woman’s handwriting and postmarked “Hartford, CT.” Upon seeing the letters I knew that he had yet another person manipulated. I did my own investigation and found out he married a nurse who worked in the prison.
Donna and I did not write about our investigation of Barry and his marriage to the prison nurse because although I have all the documentation of the events that went on in the prison, we have no proof Barry and the nurse were actually married. Donna is a very good journalist and you can trust that she will not tell a story without possessing proof. For more information regarding Barry’s recent activities see Probation department wants access to sex offender’s computer
I pray every day that Barry, now in his 60s has mellowed and become less predatory. I believe that the best person to deal with him is an experienced prison nurse so I hope that situation is going well. I also pray there will be no more victims and no more accomplices.
Dr. Leedom;
Congratulations!
Your post is strong and clear; the character that shines through is truly strong and wise. Respect.
Thank you all for those comments. As soon as is was over the whole world looked different. The fall colors more vibrant, a weight was lifted. Then the next morning I felt the pressure of unfinished papers and books to help our cause.
StillHaveMySoul asked about her partner who is not fully affected. Cleckley described what he called “incomplete manifestations” of psychopathy. He said he believed these people were also unable to love. Remember this disorder has three aspects, inability to love, impulse control and moral reasoning are all affected.
Even if the ability to love is permanently impaired the other two aspects might be amenable to treatment. I think there are people who have a partial and not complete inability to love in addition to the other two impairments. The only way to make it work is to have a very strict behavioral contract and a lot of accountability and treat this like an addiction.
Is he willing to turn over his access to the finances to keep you safe financially?
Is he willing to make his whereabouts always known?
Is he willing to be accountable to someone other than you?
A psychopathic individual might have reasons to say yes to these questions.
As you may have detected I hope Barry is saying yes to the above. Wynona Rider (sp?) was on Joy B last night. I don’t know the details but her ex was jailed for a sex crime. She also said it was an addiction but claimed “there is good in everyone” and hoped for his recovery. While I think that the addiction model is very useful here, I think we have to be careful about believing there is good in everyone.
Our reality is constructed by our brains, so saying there is good in everyone really means we have some pleasant memories of the person. I too have fond memories of my time with Barry. That is my construction and may not have anything to do with him!
Dear Liane,
I can’t even begin to imagine the relief, joy, and even anxiety, you must have felt (be feeling?) about the changes this long awaited and anticipated event has made and will continue to make in your life.
Re: your above comments to SHMS and your cautioning her about the “there is good in everyone” line of thinking, I totally agree with you that we should be careful with that.
I can’t remember who said it here or where the original quote came from but it was “Yea, he’s a really great guy when he isn’t robbing banks.” I think this quote is really quite profound if we stop and think about it. Even Ted Bundy was apparently a very “nicely behaving” person and appeared to have good manners, when he “wasn’t raping and killing women.”
While we all know that not all psychopaths rob banks or rape and kill, do the calm times between the incidents of “bad behavior” and “abuse” that they do exhibit cancel out the chaos and the constant need for vigilance on our parts? In other words, is it (the relationship) worth it over all?
My experience with captive wild animals, especially large cats, makes me wonder if a relationship with even a low level psychopath isn’t sort of like keeping a pet tiger? Most of the time it may be quite calm and apparently loving, but you just never know when it might “go off” and if and when it does go off, the damage can be severe, even life threatening. For me, living with that kind of vigilance and risk is not worth it, for the pleasure of keeping even such a marvelous animal as a “pet.”
Just as most species of wild animals (especially predators) are never truly safe to be around, even if raised from birth by humans, I’m not sure that psychopaths, on even the low end of the scale, are ever truly safe to keep around in an intimate personal relationship. Even animals that have been long domesticated, cats, dogs, horses, and cattle for example, can still “revert” from time to time to their wild instincts.
Again, congratulations on you license restoration, I know it has been a long hard uphill battle for you, and you must feel a tremendous sense of relief that this part of the battle is over. God bless.
Ox Drover, I absolutely agree that any relationship with a psychopath/sociopath is unsafe, no matter her/his degree of affectation.
While many nopaths go through their entire lives not ever having directly caused the death of another human, and I am no professional, with no studies to back my belief, I am firmly convinced by the logic, anecdotal stories, and my own experience that any nopath will kill if it becomes more beneficial to do so than not. Without love, without the ability to emotionally attach or feel any empathy for others, the restraint that keeps the rest of us from ending or injuring lives of others simply does not exist in them.
Furthermore, all nopaths inflict harm on other living, feeling creatures, more harm than good by any measure. And they consistently take far more than they give, draining their targets and all of society.
Dear Sociosibs,
I think that JUST ABOUT any human can be pushed into a situation where they could/world kill for that matter, but the psychopaths have less inhibition than the rest of the human race about stopping that sort of high level violence. I’m reading an interesting book right now about “The Psychopath, Emotion and the Brain” in which the authors make a distinction between the two basic kinds of violence, the “reactive” violence which is a threat response that we all have. (in three levels) They also say “The crucial aspect of psychopathy is not the display of antisocial behavior. Instead it is the emotional impairment.”
Statistics from one study about criminals released from prison is that within 3 years 25% of non-psychopaths have been re-incarcerated, but 80% of psychopathic individuals have been re-incarcerated. Other studies have found 65% had re-offended, but these higher levels of violent re-offenses are borne out in European as well as American studies.
Instrumental aggression, which is “goal-directed behaviors performed in expectation of receiving the particular desired reward” (i.e. “hunting” behavior say in a cat or willingness to rob or mug someone to get their money, or rape them to get sex etc. in a psychopathic human.)
The authors also make a distinction between Antisocial Personality disorder which is NOT in their minds the same as psychopathy, but instead is just bad behavior that is more of a social nature, but the person has a conscience of sorts, and some ability to love, in their view the ASPD is not devoid of the basic ability to feel empathy or to bond with other humans.
I’m not yet sure if I totally agree with them, but I can see their point. The behavior may be pretty much the same (say robbery or murder) but they are BOTH dangerous, and unlikely to change much if any, but ultimately the psychopath has no chance of change. They also make note that therapy seems to make psychopaths worse while some ASPDs profit somewhat from therapy.
I’m not sure if their construct is correct, but it is another way of looking at things and I am open to learning more, and the authors seem to have a wide range of studies that they have quoted. Psychological studies do not always agree with each other, and there are so many variables that it is difficult to get a direct focus on cause and effect. I think most researchers now are coming to realize though that there are some genetic links and some tendencies for co-morbidity with ADHD, bi-polar and other mental illnesses. Interestingly enough, these guys say that depression is not one of the main co-morbidly-found mental illnesses. Come to think of it, that seems to be true in my experience as well. Even the bi-polar ones I’ve known seemed more manic than depressed.
So many of the behaviors expressed in a manic episode though, such as the grandiosity, etc., tend to be “SOP” for psychopaths as well.
I wish I could be around in 100 years when they have finally figured out how to objectively diagnose and/or treat PPD. Would make the world a better place.
I
Dear Onajourney,
I am so sorry that your daughter has been hoodwinked by this evil person, and that you are also suffering as collateral damage. I wish I could tell you “she will wake up some day” but that may or may not happen, but I am glad that if and when that day comes, you will be there for her…you may be the only friends in the world she has left. Psychopaths get their power by dividing families and victims from friends and supporters.
I am pretty sure he lied to your daughter about the ring and why it was not on her finger. God bless.
onajourney, I am so sorry to read what this man has done to you and your family, sorry that you have not heard from your daughter, I hope somehow she will figure out what he is and get away from him. I wasn’t “aware” at all, I thought that 99.9% of people had some “good” in them, that others were like me… how do we know about N/S/P’s unless someone teaches us? I’m learning about it now, it’s changed who I am.
Amen.He deserves to go down in flames.Unfortunetly I have found out that no matter how much you try to warn the next victim thay only look at you like your the one who is jealous and spiteful.His new wife is going to learn the hard way.Congrats on your reinstatement.
Thank you for your story Dr. Leedom. Sharing your story shows that no matter how smart a person is – a sociopath will wiggle their way into your life. It’s not just the person who may work at a store or school – anywhere – they are prediators. I am very happy your license is restored – you worked hard and long for it. God Bless and your journey will be easier now.