Editor’s note: Resource Perspectives features articles written by members of Lovefraud’s Professional Resources Guide.
Gary Cundiff is a marriage and family therapist based in San Diego, California
Through deception and mirroring, the sociopath exerts control
By Gary Cundiff, MFT
Gary Cundiff profile in the Lovefraud Professional Resources Guide
Having fallen victim to the very thing I had dedicated my life to protecting others from is my reason for writing. To warn others and feasibly aid some. The inevitable harm from interacting with a sociopath is definitive. For some, years have been spent recovering.
I am a mental health professional with years of experience and education, and yet I still was deceived. This encounter came close to ending my career, my life, my friendships and my marriage. However, God has been faithful in his grace, love and protection. The duration of the encounter was less than a year, from first attack to conclusion. Yet even very limited exposure to the pathological can cause serious damage. I hope to relate what I have learned regarding the sociopath’s and Satan’s schemes and to expose their mode of operation.
Why do some and not others fall prey to these predatory beings? My study of psychology led to a belief that sociopathy and other character disorders were developed primarily from childhood abuse and maltreatment. I do not intend to prove or disprove this theory. My intent is to describe my experience with evil, and how it functioned and found access to my life, the damage it did, and the effort it takes to repair.
Five phases
The sociopathic relationship involves five phases: Deception, dread, dependency, degradation, and discard. These steps might not encompass all the complex dynamics in the pathological encounter, but they serve as a basis for the victim.
The sociopath selects a target based on the victim’s best and most admirable qualities, with an explicit intent to exploit. Understanding that it was my best attributes that left me vulnerable helped enormously in the healing process.
If someone should judge you, you will know it. If someone tempts, criticizes or verbally attacks you, you will know it. But if someone deceives you, you will not know it, because the very nature of deception is to conceal. Many myths and stigmas are attached to being victimized, such as weakness, naïvete, mental dullness, or rebellion. These axioms are not, however, consistent with the census.
Targeting the best qualities
My personal experience in client/therapist relationships with hundreds of victims of the pathological encounters, over a course of 25 years, has shown me that the very qualities that made them vulnerable are the very qualities commonly held with the highest regard. The common characteristics of the victims I have known include: trust, compassion, forgiveness and generosity—the very attributes that Satan hates—making them natural targets for the sociopathic predator. People fall victim to the deceiver not because of weakness, but as a result of their strengths. Compassion is not a weakness; it is strength. The desire to love and to be loved is a natural human drive.
Whatever the precursors of victimization, the damage inflicted is the fault and responsibility of the one doing the deceiving and plundering.
Everyone becomes vulnerable at some moment in life, possibly as a result of sustained losses, or some crisis. There are many scenarios that may lead to vulnerability. Sociopaths do not discriminate regarding their prey: young, old, race, gender, rich or poor, with one possible exception—the hard-hearted, who are much less likely to show compassion or trust. There is no universal profile of a typical victim. There is only one distinction: the more sensitive and conscientious the victim is, the higher the probability of success. The abuser is always at fault; no one chooses to be harmed.
Exerting control
Sociopaths know if they can get you to accept a single lie, they then can exert some measure of control over you. No one lies better than the sociopaths. There was nothing about Satan’s approach that caused Eve to be suspicious or be seriously alarmed. His approach seemed innocuous, “Let’s have a conversation. I am spiritual too. I am like you.” Satan seldom comes as a dark angel. He doesn’t show up as a coiled snake. Temptation is never ugly, painful or bloody. He may very well come and say, “Let’s have a religious discussion, let’s talk theology. I know God too.”
Everything about the sociopath invites us in, says join me—the voice tone, smile, hypnotic stare—making them the most dangerous predator of all. All the posturing is done to create a false belief of interest and concern. The more pathological, the more rapid and intense the bonding.
Building the disguise
The disguise begins with studying you: your values, interests, beliefs, vision, goals, concerns, and any other information they can glean. From the trivial to the most significant, all is stored away for future use—testing and noting what pushes your buttons, what moves or excites you. Sociopaths are ardent students of human behavior, having spent much of their lives investigating the difference between themselves and the rest of the population.
Using each piece of information, they create the disguise—a mask carefully constructed to look like their prospective target. Flawlessly, they weave a canvas picture of their mark, a tapestry precisely reflecting the brightest, most honorable aspects of your personality, sewing in the most desirable and wanted details, literally stealing your persona, mirroring this image back, without the defects of character, flaws and shortcomings.
The pathological relationship is a one-dimensional interaction. You fall in love with yourself as presented by this reflecting object. The attraction is irresistible. People are attracted to those who are similar to themselves. By transforming themselves into a reflection of their prospective prey, the sociopath becomes the most alluring figure imaginable, and the propensity to trust that person becomes compelling, promising to meet whatever need or want may exist: friend, advisor, mentor, brother, mother, father. This personification is deception at its most radical level. It is interesting to remember that Eve was deceived before she ever sinned.
Empty shells
Sociopathy is one of the most extreme of the pathological disorders. They are empty shells, possessing nothing of value, no guiding principles, no shame, and no righteous principles. Therefore, this emulation of others for sustained periods of time is effortless: no conflict with their own beliefs or interests. They haven’t any, apart from their ruthless, selfish desire for domination.
This one-dimensional mirroring blurs and confuses the boundaries. You lose touch with where you end and where they should begin, creating an enmeshment that quickly suppresses any sign of personal autonomy. However, it is nothing more than an illusion. You experience a sense of oneness like none other. At the emotional center of this connection is intensity never felt before, making the appeal and apprehension addictive. My sociopath bragged of the capacity to leave people feeling extremely loved, describing her energy as a warm blanket of water flowing around them embracing and holding, while locating deep wounds and hurts for future reference, having a clear awareness of what she was doing.
Behind the mirage
The sociopath uses deliberate and premeditated deception. Since Satan himself appears as an angel of light, is it any less imaginable that his emissaries who serve him would be capable of resembling their master? Imitation is the purest form of flattery and the sociopath is an expert. The effects are intoxicating, like finding an oasis in a dry land—the nurturing and understanding you have longed for. You wish to believe, you succumb, and you give in. What could be more seductive than having all of your best attributes reflected back and praised?
But what exists behind this illusion is a savage, a brute beast, the incubus. They hide behind the mirage, assessing and evaluating your every weakness and strength. The sociopath who possesses the blackest heart may appear to be a person of eminent goodness, but one never bothered by shame, full of greed and deceit.
Jeremiah 6:15 refers to God’s punishment of such people. “They dress the wounds of people as though it were not serious. Peace, peace they say when there is no peace. Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? No, they have no shame at all: they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen. They will be brought down when I punish them, says the Lord.” This passage is self-explanatory.
I just realized something important as I was posting to sk. The other posters and the ethos here on lf really do become our temporary ‘higher powers’; and this explains why I so hate it sometimes when people here talk lots of god. (And i would define ‘lots’ as whatever sets me or others over the edge with it. I know” absolutely subjective.) I relate the ideas of Christianity as it is practiced by many in NA, as relating to power and control, dominance and subservience. So, given the sheer volume of god talk on LF, most ends up lumped in the *not safe* bin for me: the one full of religion used in an irreligious way.
And it is painful and *almost* impossible for me to build deep trust with people who talk *a lot of god*, because of this. I respect many of you who talk about your (Christian) faith, and trust you ”“ but I see the limitations for me.
’god’ and Christianity do dominate a lot of the conversation on lf, and sometimes it is used in ways that I find exclusionary, (if not only for the sheer volume of it) and on occasion very disrespectful and bordering on abusive (for example ”“ people who have asked others NOT to quote scripture as them have had their wishes completely ignored, and met with long posts of MORE scriptures, or being told they just have to ’find god.’ Hooey.)
Recently, I responded to a post that was full of abuse the poster had suffered wrought in the belief of being a good Christian, with my take that THAT was not about religion, but control and dominance, because I cannot believe that THAT is the TRUE meaning of any religion. I try to separate the abuses of ’Christianity’ from the potential of the qualities of compassion and forgiveness in my own mind, but it is hard. I don’t want to be naive anymore ”“ not everyone and every religion (or every religion as it is practised) has good in it, and I cannot believe we are to suffer abuse in the name of religion ”“ but I see it all the time.
Sometimes people will post about how Christian lf is – i have seen a few posts about it, and basically these posts are ignored or people are told that it LF is in fact NOT this way. horse hooey. It has to be viewed as a totality, and it is a Christian centric blog. Men who show up here and write about how sexist LF is sometimes get the time of day; people who talk about the Christian centricity don’t.
If our cardinal rule on lf is to respect one another, I think we could all be a bit more sensitive to how it might be to come to lf and not be Christian and be scared away by the god talk. There *is* room on lf to be of another faith, I am not suggesting there isn’t; but I am saying, there is very little room for atheists, or people who have trouble with Christianity.
When we belong to the majority, we often don’t believe we have anything to examine or any ethical obligation to *check* our selves about. I am pretty white, although my background is mixed. I dated a very obviously mixed race woman ”“ and I had to examine some of my assumptions about what her experience must be like, and understand what it was like for her to not be within dominant culture, and what it was like to be outside of it. I know this dynamic personally from my own life experience as someone who is outside of the norm in sexual and other orientations.
Usually, I talk myself out of saying much about this on LF ”“ you all ARE AMAZING. I don’t want to attack you. I hurt over this stuff. A lot. I know that complaining without offering ideas or solutions is not the best way to go (especially when dealing with something as flashpoint as important issues such as religion). As I have written and rewritten this post, and almost not posted it, I have asked myself ’what are you asking for?’”so, here it is, I am asking people to just THINK about what I have said. That’s all.
I hope I haven’t been a jerk. I am trying to take responsibility for my own responses and to also try to communicate something that I think is truly important at a social level.
(((((((((((((((((((((( One J )))))))))))))))))))))))
I’m not offended at all by what you’ve mentioned here and I think there is validity to it. I think there are more threads than others where Christianity and God and scripture is put out there more than others. Perhaps the subject at hand, whatever it is at the time, brings out the faith bases of those who are posting. I apologize if I’ve offended you. I’m a “Christian” (I hate this label truly, but just for the sake of argument here), but I can tell you, that after the spiritual abuse I’ve suffered at the hands of my last spath, I have a tendency NOT to talk about my faith, other than that it’s still there or with regards to what spath did to me and how he used it. A lot of us here have experienced spiritual abuse.
Having said that, I’m not biased against other religions or how other people believe, or rather don’t. In fact, my household is rather diverse in this way. My eldest daughter is Catholic, my second and third child are Christian’s, my eldest son is a buddhist, my fifth and sixth sons are agnostics with number five bordering on atheism.
Yea, SO? I wanted them to find their own belief systems without my influence as they are all unique individuals that I preferred to allow them to decide. It’s been interesting. I’ve not been without disappointment however, LOL, given some of their choices, and when the kids were younger and i was married to ex P, we went to a foursquare church. But x p spent a lot of time either in jail, treatment or with other women and my “congregation” was nasty to me when he left. Of course it was my fault.
Anyway, One J, I respect your right not to have to hear this all the time. I also respect your right to be atheist. For whatever are your reasons. I’m not here for religious reasons and I do understand how you feel because there are times i become VERY irritated by faith based conversations that do get away from the issue at times and border on condescending or patronizing if one doesn’t believe the same.
I just choose to gray rock it, One. But I appreciate you’re speaking out.
LL
One Step: Nah, you were correct to post that. It was a FANTASTIC post. I haven’t had any problems on here so far with it, but it is something to think about. Think how I feel, being a MALE and ATHEIST and ASEXUAL. I haven’t had any hateful comments yet, but am still new. I have noticed people talking about religion, but it hasn’t bothered me yet. I’m willing to discuss as long as it remains respectful, and you didn’t seem like a jerk with that post. 😀
One,
thanks for the reminder.
It’s difficult not to speak of religion and God, when we are talking about the personification of evil, which is what this blog is about. The scriptures in the bible are about the same thing. So it’s a fact that we are moving from a religious perspective to a psychological perspective in discussing this PD. Yet we are still talking about the same thing: moral insanity.
Since it is the realm of religion to discuss morality we find many cues to understanding the embodiment of evil in religious scriptures. Even just the book of Genesis with the garden of Eden, is filled with examples of seduction, envy, shame, deceit etc…
Personally I love how the book of Job deals with the ideas of how to survive a spath attack instigated by envy.
If I may make a suggestion, you might find scriptures filled with wisdom and insight, if you read them SOLEY with the intent of seeing how earlier peoples percieved the sociopath. The description of Lucifer’s rebellion against God, how he was the “golden child” and became filled with envy when God loved the pathetic humans just as much, then how he turned many of the other angels against God, is an excellent story which portrays the thought process of the spaths.
Greek Mythology was also once a religion and it became a tool for Freud and others to understand the human psyche. Now many of our words in psychology are borrowed from that religion, yet psychology is considered a “science” so to speak.
I’m not saying that the people who post scripture here are doing it with this in mind. I’m sure they are doing it with the idea of religion as a salve. But not everything we do or say is conscious, much of it is subconscious, especially when we’re trying to comprehend something so ethereal as emotions, we grasp at ideas that might fit.
In my case, I’m doing both. I reach for ideas that can make sense of this PD and I take comfort in the thought of a heavenly father who can give me what my own father wouldn’t.
Hi all ~ First let me say that I appreciate what is being discussed here. Very often, I find people that claim to be “good Christians” to be the most hypocritical. Such as one that was posting recently and seems to have disappeared. All that scripture quoting was a bit much for me, so I did what is normal for me under those circumstances. I stayed quiet and read elsewhere.
Although I do believe in a higher power, and was raised to call that higher power God, I do not EVER try to convince someone else of his/her/it’s existence. I find it offensive when others try do push their beliefs on me.
On another subject entirely: Happy Father’s Day to any and all fathers out there. I lost my dad almost 11 years ago to lung cancer and am missing him today.
one/joy_step_at_a_time,
For the most part, I think that most posters are respectful of each other, not insisting that any one religion is the only way to go. Regarding your posts, I have never known you to be a jerk.
Hope – thinking of you on Father’s Day.
One joy
As with anything that’s posted here it is difficult to get a ‘balance’ but I think, on the whole, we are fairly objective. I’m sorry if you have felt excluded, it was unintentional. It must have been difficult for you to find the words without fear of offending others.
Many of the people here (not all) are from a ‘faith’ background, and maybe, that’s an indication as to why we were targeted by spaths. ((urrrrm thinking))
Everyone has a right to believe or not to be believe – or be somewhere inbetween.
I think your request for the people on LF ‘to think about what you’ve said’ is a valid one.
H2H:
My dad also died of lung cancer and it will be three years next month. I am also missing him today very much.
Louise – sorry to hear about your father. For some of us it’s a sad day tinged with happy memories. I say that because my ‘kids’ are missing their dad. It’s not been an easy day here. Glad it’s over if I’m honest.
Candy ~ I hear you. I too will be glad when today is through.
Louise ~ For my family it was almost a relief that the suffering was over. A blessing to him, for sure. It’s nice to remember the good times before the illness though. God bless!