Editor’s note: Resource Perspectives features articles written by members of Lovefraud’s Professional Resources Guide.
Gary Cundiff is a marriage and family therapist based in San Diego, California
Through deception and mirroring, the sociopath exerts control
By Gary Cundiff, MFT
Gary Cundiff profile in the Lovefraud Professional Resources Guide
Having fallen victim to the very thing I had dedicated my life to protecting others from is my reason for writing. To warn others and feasibly aid some. The inevitable harm from interacting with a sociopath is definitive. For some, years have been spent recovering.
I am a mental health professional with years of experience and education, and yet I still was deceived. This encounter came close to ending my career, my life, my friendships and my marriage. However, God has been faithful in his grace, love and protection. The duration of the encounter was less than a year, from first attack to conclusion. Yet even very limited exposure to the pathological can cause serious damage. I hope to relate what I have learned regarding the sociopath’s and Satan’s schemes and to expose their mode of operation.
Why do some and not others fall prey to these predatory beings? My study of psychology led to a belief that sociopathy and other character disorders were developed primarily from childhood abuse and maltreatment. I do not intend to prove or disprove this theory. My intent is to describe my experience with evil, and how it functioned and found access to my life, the damage it did, and the effort it takes to repair.
Five phases
The sociopathic relationship involves five phases: Deception, dread, dependency, degradation, and discard. These steps might not encompass all the complex dynamics in the pathological encounter, but they serve as a basis for the victim.
The sociopath selects a target based on the victim’s best and most admirable qualities, with an explicit intent to exploit. Understanding that it was my best attributes that left me vulnerable helped enormously in the healing process.
If someone should judge you, you will know it. If someone tempts, criticizes or verbally attacks you, you will know it. But if someone deceives you, you will not know it, because the very nature of deception is to conceal. Many myths and stigmas are attached to being victimized, such as weakness, naïvete, mental dullness, or rebellion. These axioms are not, however, consistent with the census.
Targeting the best qualities
My personal experience in client/therapist relationships with hundreds of victims of the pathological encounters, over a course of 25 years, has shown me that the very qualities that made them vulnerable are the very qualities commonly held with the highest regard. The common characteristics of the victims I have known include: trust, compassion, forgiveness and generosity—the very attributes that Satan hates—making them natural targets for the sociopathic predator. People fall victim to the deceiver not because of weakness, but as a result of their strengths. Compassion is not a weakness; it is strength. The desire to love and to be loved is a natural human drive.
Whatever the precursors of victimization, the damage inflicted is the fault and responsibility of the one doing the deceiving and plundering.
Everyone becomes vulnerable at some moment in life, possibly as a result of sustained losses, or some crisis. There are many scenarios that may lead to vulnerability. Sociopaths do not discriminate regarding their prey: young, old, race, gender, rich or poor, with one possible exception—the hard-hearted, who are much less likely to show compassion or trust. There is no universal profile of a typical victim. There is only one distinction: the more sensitive and conscientious the victim is, the higher the probability of success. The abuser is always at fault; no one chooses to be harmed.
Exerting control
Sociopaths know if they can get you to accept a single lie, they then can exert some measure of control over you. No one lies better than the sociopaths. There was nothing about Satan’s approach that caused Eve to be suspicious or be seriously alarmed. His approach seemed innocuous, “Let’s have a conversation. I am spiritual too. I am like you.” Satan seldom comes as a dark angel. He doesn’t show up as a coiled snake. Temptation is never ugly, painful or bloody. He may very well come and say, “Let’s have a religious discussion, let’s talk theology. I know God too.”
Everything about the sociopath invites us in, says join me—the voice tone, smile, hypnotic stare—making them the most dangerous predator of all. All the posturing is done to create a false belief of interest and concern. The more pathological, the more rapid and intense the bonding.
Building the disguise
The disguise begins with studying you: your values, interests, beliefs, vision, goals, concerns, and any other information they can glean. From the trivial to the most significant, all is stored away for future use—testing and noting what pushes your buttons, what moves or excites you. Sociopaths are ardent students of human behavior, having spent much of their lives investigating the difference between themselves and the rest of the population.
Using each piece of information, they create the disguise—a mask carefully constructed to look like their prospective target. Flawlessly, they weave a canvas picture of their mark, a tapestry precisely reflecting the brightest, most honorable aspects of your personality, sewing in the most desirable and wanted details, literally stealing your persona, mirroring this image back, without the defects of character, flaws and shortcomings.
The pathological relationship is a one-dimensional interaction. You fall in love with yourself as presented by this reflecting object. The attraction is irresistible. People are attracted to those who are similar to themselves. By transforming themselves into a reflection of their prospective prey, the sociopath becomes the most alluring figure imaginable, and the propensity to trust that person becomes compelling, promising to meet whatever need or want may exist: friend, advisor, mentor, brother, mother, father. This personification is deception at its most radical level. It is interesting to remember that Eve was deceived before she ever sinned.
Empty shells
Sociopathy is one of the most extreme of the pathological disorders. They are empty shells, possessing nothing of value, no guiding principles, no shame, and no righteous principles. Therefore, this emulation of others for sustained periods of time is effortless: no conflict with their own beliefs or interests. They haven’t any, apart from their ruthless, selfish desire for domination.
This one-dimensional mirroring blurs and confuses the boundaries. You lose touch with where you end and where they should begin, creating an enmeshment that quickly suppresses any sign of personal autonomy. However, it is nothing more than an illusion. You experience a sense of oneness like none other. At the emotional center of this connection is intensity never felt before, making the appeal and apprehension addictive. My sociopath bragged of the capacity to leave people feeling extremely loved, describing her energy as a warm blanket of water flowing around them embracing and holding, while locating deep wounds and hurts for future reference, having a clear awareness of what she was doing.
Behind the mirage
The sociopath uses deliberate and premeditated deception. Since Satan himself appears as an angel of light, is it any less imaginable that his emissaries who serve him would be capable of resembling their master? Imitation is the purest form of flattery and the sociopath is an expert. The effects are intoxicating, like finding an oasis in a dry land—the nurturing and understanding you have longed for. You wish to believe, you succumb, and you give in. What could be more seductive than having all of your best attributes reflected back and praised?
But what exists behind this illusion is a savage, a brute beast, the incubus. They hide behind the mirage, assessing and evaluating your every weakness and strength. The sociopath who possesses the blackest heart may appear to be a person of eminent goodness, but one never bothered by shame, full of greed and deceit.
Jeremiah 6:15 refers to God’s punishment of such people. “They dress the wounds of people as though it were not serious. Peace, peace they say when there is no peace. Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? No, they have no shame at all: they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen. They will be brought down when I punish them, says the Lord.” This passage is self-explanatory.
Spathinator and Chelsea:
Spathinator: It is slow going…everytime I am feeling down about something even if it’s not about the X spath, all thoughts seem to come back to him. He is at the core of everything. He is just like all the rest…never takes responsibility for anything; left a path of destruction in his wake and just keeps going. He did tell me he was sorry, but it was via text and then he just continued to do what he always does. I cracked up when I read your comment about insurance…that is priceless!!! I love it!!
Chelsea: I feel A LOT like you do. I also feel like my X spath has just moved on with his life, but what about me? He still has the successful career, the nearly million dollar house, the fancy car, expensive clothes, the wife who takes care of everything for him. The list goes on and on. UGGGHHHH. It’s so hard to get over.
Louise, I would be the first to sign up as an insurance salesman if they offered spath insurance. I know I could sell it easily, because they’re EVERYWHERE!
Chelsea, if you’ve been on LF for a long time and you find that you’ve connected with someone here, whom you’d like to share more about your personal life, you just both have to agree to contact Donna and she will make the introduction.
Both of you will have to send her an email and wait. She is usually very busy and it might take a few days.
spathinator:
No kidding! We could make six figures easy!! 🙂
the religious comments are off putting and unnecessary. as a former mental health professional that spent 9 years with a sociopath, i’m much more interested in his actual experience than comments about satan’s work.
That’s the beauty of LF…..there is something for everyone here.
hello beautiful EB! good to see you!!!
umami_mommy – I wrote a longish post about the christian centrism on LF this past weekend. I am not christian and I find it challenging at times. I worry about those who come here and find it off putting.
So here’s what I know:
1. I do at times post about my own beliefs in the context of spathy and healing. Generally people are a bit interested, or don’t care (so there is room for other religions).
2. at the end of my post i just asked people to please think about what it might be like to come here who are not comfortable with all the *god talk*. The responses were kind, supportive and in no way dismissive of the concerns I outlined.
3. for some of us, the language of ‘evil’ is the only language we can find to adequately describe what has happened to us. there is just so little in our cultural lexicons that we can use to contextualize what they do, and what it has done to us.
4. I’d suggest you wade in. And if people cross your boundaries around this issue, let them know. This has been a very real difficulty for me, and yet I am still here, as the value prop. of LF is SO high. I cannot imagine the last 19 months of my life without it.
Sk – you did it and you have a plan – that’s success waiting to happen!
To you and Eden,
the spath has become an internet predator. She wasn’t always, and was still quite capable of pretending through letters and voice alteration to con people into believing she was more than one person. She never is herself, but always a host of characters. She completely hid her true identity from me, and in other cons, she she has revealed herself (but as one of her characters). Complicated.
my story is: I met her online on a community forum. Forums are her happy place – she was running at least one more con at the same time on another forum. some of these cons go on for years, until someone figures out something stinks and starts challenging her. This is usually prompted by the fake death of one of her fake characters. She is ‘spath stupid’; if she just left or broke off form people, she probably wouldn’t be chased (or sued), but she’s in it for the drama, so one or more people always die, and then the next drama is that they may in fact be still alive and hiding out from the person who loved them….on and on and on. ……
her main characters are usually male. sweet, kind, naive, adventuresome, travelers, noble, unusual (if only we knew how unusual!), eccentric, etc. hmmm, thinking about how we talk about how they try to catch us and what they are looking for….
they are also suicidal, mentally ill, dying, drug addicted, raped – all drama all the time. the auxiliary characters support the the main character, validate his existence. they are also the ones where we see the mask slip the fastest. they are her angry characters. usually know-it- alls, aggressive, entitled. she steals photos to be all these ‘people’. she alters her voice on phone to be more than one person on the phone (i had contact with 2). she takes people through a horrible journey of trauma and drama trying to support the fake characters. then she kills them. then she steps in as another character and starts planting seeds that perhaps the main character(s) are still alive…..and in my case she resurrected him. i knew that whatever whoever he was, he wasn’t dead (oh, after a few weeks of hardcore grieving and investigating) and baited ‘him’ to contact me. I talked to him one last time, and that was that. she threatened me for about a week afterwards – in the forum and through email. threatened the smear campaign if i revealed her. at the time that was a huge concern for me. now, ‘not so much’ (19 months out) putting it mildly.
all for now, gotta go. WAY more to the story. in fact there are at least three sotries on LF that she could have written – 2 of which recently disappeared. totally her ‘angry’ style. Her sweet style, well….
Honestly, I find it off-putting that certain parties would try to censor someone’s personal experience with a sociopath. If Gary has seen the damage of a sociopath within a spiritual context and his experience points to evil versus good in this world, then who we to judge that? The whole point of this newsletter/blog/site is to try and better understand sociopathy and what causes it, how it affects us, and how we can prevent it. As far as I know, nobody here has solved the problem of sociopaths yet.
So please don’t be so quick to judge other people’s views on their own brutal experiences. I know we’ve all had brutal experiences with spaths, but we all see the cascading damage in different ways and through different lenses. In fact, I think Gary’s spiritual interpretation is very necessary because it allows him to make sense of the chaos he’s gone through. A lot of these folks are damaged severely, and I don’t think it’s anyone’s place to judge anyone else’s methods of coping or their interpretation of the universe.
Someone posted earlier about “cultural lexicons” and how they were inadequate because “evil” is the only way we can describe sociopathy. Well, I have a question: What culture ever has been able to describe human destruction that doesn’t involve the language of evil? I’m not asking this to be a smart alec, I’m just wondering if there are any. Good versus evil seems to be to be a global theme.
And for the record, just so you know where I’m coming from, I’ve lived with a sociopath for roughly 25 years (my father). And in all my days on this pale blue dot, I’ve never encountered anything more vile and destructive. A person who’s entire function is to destroy the spirits and lives of those around them? If you have a better word for it, I’d love to hear it, but I’ll just keep thinking of them as the manifestation of evil on this planet. The fallen ones, the heartless robots, the human disease–the virus.
I’d send them all to another planet if I could. Let them live off of themselves, parasite on parasite, see how long that would last. I honestly don’t think we’ll ever be able to have a functional society with sociopaths roaming around.
The human condition is already flawed at best, and the best of us have our own tragic vices and dirty secrets. But spaths take it to a whole new level, a non-human level. I wrote a paper once in college about animal rights, and my thesis statement was basically that what separates animals from humans is the ability to respect personal rights. An alligator does not respect the rights of a small child who goes wading into the bayou, and, therefore, that alligator has no place in human society. I believe the same is true for the sociopath. They are more animal than they are human. Just rows and rows of sharp jagged teeth ready to tear into anything soft. Hence, they do not belong in society.
Gary says no one chooses to be harmed. But Dr Phil says there are no victims, only volunteers. He is so popular and people keep quoting him to me, esp about the part that the victim plays in allowing the abuse to take place.
So who’s right – people who say that victims have something in them that makes them susceptible and naive, or those, who like Gary, think that there is NO typical profile of a victim?
Also, Gary talks about a lack of shame and deliberate premeditated deception. So if an abuser does profess shame for what he has done, and commit abuse unwittingly or cluelessly, does that mean that that person is probably not a sociopath but some other class of abuser, maybe someone with NPD or BPD traits?