Editor’s note: Resource Perspectives features articles written by members of Lovefraud’s Professional Resources Guide.
Gary Cundiff is a marriage and family therapist based in San Diego, California
Through deception and mirroring, the sociopath exerts control
By Gary Cundiff, MFT
Gary Cundiff profile in the Lovefraud Professional Resources Guide
Having fallen victim to the very thing I had dedicated my life to protecting others from is my reason for writing. To warn others and feasibly aid some. The inevitable harm from interacting with a sociopath is definitive. For some, years have been spent recovering.
I am a mental health professional with years of experience and education, and yet I still was deceived. This encounter came close to ending my career, my life, my friendships and my marriage. However, God has been faithful in his grace, love and protection. The duration of the encounter was less than a year, from first attack to conclusion. Yet even very limited exposure to the pathological can cause serious damage. I hope to relate what I have learned regarding the sociopath’s and Satan’s schemes and to expose their mode of operation.
Why do some and not others fall prey to these predatory beings? My study of psychology led to a belief that sociopathy and other character disorders were developed primarily from childhood abuse and maltreatment. I do not intend to prove or disprove this theory. My intent is to describe my experience with evil, and how it functioned and found access to my life, the damage it did, and the effort it takes to repair.
Five phases
The sociopathic relationship involves five phases: Deception, dread, dependency, degradation, and discard. These steps might not encompass all the complex dynamics in the pathological encounter, but they serve as a basis for the victim.
The sociopath selects a target based on the victim’s best and most admirable qualities, with an explicit intent to exploit. Understanding that it was my best attributes that left me vulnerable helped enormously in the healing process.
If someone should judge you, you will know it. If someone tempts, criticizes or verbally attacks you, you will know it. But if someone deceives you, you will not know it, because the very nature of deception is to conceal. Many myths and stigmas are attached to being victimized, such as weakness, naïvete, mental dullness, or rebellion. These axioms are not, however, consistent with the census.
Targeting the best qualities
My personal experience in client/therapist relationships with hundreds of victims of the pathological encounters, over a course of 25 years, has shown me that the very qualities that made them vulnerable are the very qualities commonly held with the highest regard. The common characteristics of the victims I have known include: trust, compassion, forgiveness and generosity—the very attributes that Satan hates—making them natural targets for the sociopathic predator. People fall victim to the deceiver not because of weakness, but as a result of their strengths. Compassion is not a weakness; it is strength. The desire to love and to be loved is a natural human drive.
Whatever the precursors of victimization, the damage inflicted is the fault and responsibility of the one doing the deceiving and plundering.
Everyone becomes vulnerable at some moment in life, possibly as a result of sustained losses, or some crisis. There are many scenarios that may lead to vulnerability. Sociopaths do not discriminate regarding their prey: young, old, race, gender, rich or poor, with one possible exception—the hard-hearted, who are much less likely to show compassion or trust. There is no universal profile of a typical victim. There is only one distinction: the more sensitive and conscientious the victim is, the higher the probability of success. The abuser is always at fault; no one chooses to be harmed.
Exerting control
Sociopaths know if they can get you to accept a single lie, they then can exert some measure of control over you. No one lies better than the sociopaths. There was nothing about Satan’s approach that caused Eve to be suspicious or be seriously alarmed. His approach seemed innocuous, “Let’s have a conversation. I am spiritual too. I am like you.” Satan seldom comes as a dark angel. He doesn’t show up as a coiled snake. Temptation is never ugly, painful or bloody. He may very well come and say, “Let’s have a religious discussion, let’s talk theology. I know God too.”
Everything about the sociopath invites us in, says join me—the voice tone, smile, hypnotic stare—making them the most dangerous predator of all. All the posturing is done to create a false belief of interest and concern. The more pathological, the more rapid and intense the bonding.
Building the disguise
The disguise begins with studying you: your values, interests, beliefs, vision, goals, concerns, and any other information they can glean. From the trivial to the most significant, all is stored away for future use—testing and noting what pushes your buttons, what moves or excites you. Sociopaths are ardent students of human behavior, having spent much of their lives investigating the difference between themselves and the rest of the population.
Using each piece of information, they create the disguise—a mask carefully constructed to look like their prospective target. Flawlessly, they weave a canvas picture of their mark, a tapestry precisely reflecting the brightest, most honorable aspects of your personality, sewing in the most desirable and wanted details, literally stealing your persona, mirroring this image back, without the defects of character, flaws and shortcomings.
The pathological relationship is a one-dimensional interaction. You fall in love with yourself as presented by this reflecting object. The attraction is irresistible. People are attracted to those who are similar to themselves. By transforming themselves into a reflection of their prospective prey, the sociopath becomes the most alluring figure imaginable, and the propensity to trust that person becomes compelling, promising to meet whatever need or want may exist: friend, advisor, mentor, brother, mother, father. This personification is deception at its most radical level. It is interesting to remember that Eve was deceived before she ever sinned.
Empty shells
Sociopathy is one of the most extreme of the pathological disorders. They are empty shells, possessing nothing of value, no guiding principles, no shame, and no righteous principles. Therefore, this emulation of others for sustained periods of time is effortless: no conflict with their own beliefs or interests. They haven’t any, apart from their ruthless, selfish desire for domination.
This one-dimensional mirroring blurs and confuses the boundaries. You lose touch with where you end and where they should begin, creating an enmeshment that quickly suppresses any sign of personal autonomy. However, it is nothing more than an illusion. You experience a sense of oneness like none other. At the emotional center of this connection is intensity never felt before, making the appeal and apprehension addictive. My sociopath bragged of the capacity to leave people feeling extremely loved, describing her energy as a warm blanket of water flowing around them embracing and holding, while locating deep wounds and hurts for future reference, having a clear awareness of what she was doing.
Behind the mirage
The sociopath uses deliberate and premeditated deception. Since Satan himself appears as an angel of light, is it any less imaginable that his emissaries who serve him would be capable of resembling their master? Imitation is the purest form of flattery and the sociopath is an expert. The effects are intoxicating, like finding an oasis in a dry land—the nurturing and understanding you have longed for. You wish to believe, you succumb, and you give in. What could be more seductive than having all of your best attributes reflected back and praised?
But what exists behind this illusion is a savage, a brute beast, the incubus. They hide behind the mirage, assessing and evaluating your every weakness and strength. The sociopath who possesses the blackest heart may appear to be a person of eminent goodness, but one never bothered by shame, full of greed and deceit.
Jeremiah 6:15 refers to God’s punishment of such people. “They dress the wounds of people as though it were not serious. Peace, peace they say when there is no peace. Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? No, they have no shame at all: they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen. They will be brought down when I punish them, says the Lord.” This passage is self-explanatory.
i can’t believe you described my situation almost exactly. Thank you so much. You have helped me immensely! I am trying to not have contact with him but he is calling, writing all the time trying to apologize again,[ as he has done for the last 20 months]
for his foul language and spreading slander to my friends, minister, and members of several churches. He is as you describe an agent of satan and he knows how to get me to respond. I know from what you wrote, that he knows how to manipulate and control, but i now realize what is happening and will be more diligent to not respond.
comment to ‘not too late’ –your key words ‘he professes shame’. that is exactly your answer– they easily profess sorrow and shame for their horrible behavior, but that is part of their game. my sociopath professed over and over and continued to get worse in his horrible behavior–not better. Therefore, he was never sorry– or he would have tried to change.
Not too late…..
NPD and BPDs ARE “abusers” in that they do not respect the BOUNDARIES of other people in a “normal” was, they are PERSONALITY DISORDERED and people with a PD (of whatever kind) over lap with Psychopathy/sociopathy (it isn’t a case of “you is or you ain’t” it is a range of behaviors and there are overlapping behaviors, it is complex, not simple.
A person without any kind of personality dsiorder can be an abuser though, but all people with PDs are abusers because they don’t respect the boundaries of others. Or other’s rights.
Dr. Phil has A POINT, but I don’t agree with him totally. If I hit you in the nose (for example) and then sayy “Gee, I’m sorry not too late, I shouldn’t have done that, I won’t do it again” and then a week later I HIT YOU IN THE NOSE AGAIN….and again I say, I’m sorry, but you really shouldn’t have made me mad again so I wouldn’t have hit you if you didn’t’ make me mad” and then AGAIN, YOU GOT CLOSE TO ME…..and so on.
Yes, at that point you ARE ALLOWING me to continue to hit you in the nose—-but the human psyche is not un-complex itself. If we love people, if we are related to them or sexually involved with them there are chemical compounds released in the brain of the human that makes us want to forgive them (how else would society have survived?) It is called TRAUMA BONDING and it is pretty complex too, and breaking away from this bond is difficult…that is why 85% of physicvally abused women go BACK to their abusers.
Read the books recommended in the Love Fraud book store and that are REVIEWED here (go to the LF search function and search for “Book Review”—KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, and the more we learn the more power we have. Good luck.
Blutopaz,
Welcome to LF and you are ON THE RIGHT ROAD…..they PROFESS shame and sorrow, but their ACTIONS are not the same as their words. Read about King Saul and how he apologized to David when he had been trying to kill him, but he never quit trying to kill david.
Sphaniator,
Welcome to LoveFraud, haven’t seen your posts before but I have hear the others talking about you—you came in with a bang! That’s great! Again, Welcome!
Sons.of.sociiopaths,
Welcome to you as well! Your post was an excellent one. There is room here for many spiritual belief systems….and I firmly believe that the devastatioon done to us by the psychopaths is a SPIRITUAL injury as much as a physical, emotional, financial, mental, etc.
That is one of the things that I really like about LF is that each of us has a different spiritual belief system, but everyone here is tolerant and accepting of those different beliefs, just as we are tolerant and accepting of different sexual orientations. No one here “preaches” to someone else that “if you don’t believe what I believe you are going to hell”—we simply share what OUR beliefs are and if you don’t believe that way, that’s okay, you are not required to read any further.
The diversity of the LF community is wonderful! Every once in a while someone comes here and gripes that they don’t like this or that spiritual comment, but they don’t usually stay around long.
Oh stop the sarcasm Oxy, before I boink you! 🙂
Personally I wonder if Dr. Phil is a spath. They do often disguise themselves as therapists. And he does have glib and superficial charm…but the biggest red flag is that he says there are no victims, only volunteers. That takes the responsibility off the spath and puts in squarely on the victim. The victim was lied to. The victim didn’t sign up for abuse. If the victim volunteered for anything, it was to love and be loved. Since love often requires sacrifice and responsibility, then what Dr. Phil is saying is that nobody should ever volunteer to love, because if they are victimized, well, it’s their own fault for volunteering to love.
We could say the same about investment fraud. If you invested in Maddoff’s Ponzi scheme, it’s your own fault for volunteering, there are no victims, only volunteers, so why did the government get involved? Why do we have the SEC regulating investments? Shouldn’t we just use the “buyer beware” rule of thumb for investments?
Something is just not adding up here….
quite likely each person is unique. and each victim will have to define their own reaction to such an experience.
so would it not be helpful to have a long-term set of standards by which to judge?
judgment being, by definition, a very slippery slope…
and evil being, by definition, that most slippery of profiles?
the power of belief in jesus is such that, after my own experience with spaths, which occurred primarily in the late eighties and nineties, when there apparently was very little awareness of sociopaths – that much later, groping my own way to an understanding, i saw quite clearly that if i had openly professed christianity, those spaths would have steered clear of me.
does that not resemble the definition of a “shield”?
at one point, i kicked my own “spath” out of my house, my life; and as he made his way down the stairs of my house, i saw that he had no being of his own, but was an empty and jello-like person with nothing at his center. i had provided his strength, his purpose, his emotional directions….
does that make ME the spath? and if i were, would i know it?
what that did provide, was my own determination to never again “give energy” to such a person…to never again allow my being to support and encourage such negative traits…in whatever walk of life or career or financial endeavor. having made that determination, close inspection of “financial endeavors”, “career”, has provided some startling insights.
insights that support gary’s concurrence with the existence of evil.
flags waving in the wind all round me today.
Skylar, I was NOT being “sarcastic.”
Here is the definition of sarcasm from wiki
Sarcasm is “a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter jibe or taunt.”[1] Though irony is usually the immediate context,[2] most authorities sharply distinguish sarcasm from irony;[3] however, others argue that sarcasm may or often does involve irony[4] or employs ambivalence.[5] Sarcasm has been suggested as a possible bullying action in some circumstances.[6]
In fact, I was being VERY sincere in my comments in that post.