Editor’s note: Resource Perspectives features articles written by members of Lovefraud’s Professional Resources Guide.
Gary Cundiff is a marriage and family therapist based in San Diego, California
Through deception and mirroring, the sociopath exerts control
By Gary Cundiff, MFT
Gary Cundiff profile in the Lovefraud Professional Resources Guide
Having fallen victim to the very thing I had dedicated my life to protecting others from is my reason for writing. To warn others and feasibly aid some. The inevitable harm from interacting with a sociopath is definitive. For some, years have been spent recovering.
I am a mental health professional with years of experience and education, and yet I still was deceived. This encounter came close to ending my career, my life, my friendships and my marriage. However, God has been faithful in his grace, love and protection. The duration of the encounter was less than a year, from first attack to conclusion. Yet even very limited exposure to the pathological can cause serious damage. I hope to relate what I have learned regarding the sociopath’s and Satan’s schemes and to expose their mode of operation.
Why do some and not others fall prey to these predatory beings? My study of psychology led to a belief that sociopathy and other character disorders were developed primarily from childhood abuse and maltreatment. I do not intend to prove or disprove this theory. My intent is to describe my experience with evil, and how it functioned and found access to my life, the damage it did, and the effort it takes to repair.
Five phases
The sociopathic relationship involves five phases: Deception, dread, dependency, degradation, and discard. These steps might not encompass all the complex dynamics in the pathological encounter, but they serve as a basis for the victim.
The sociopath selects a target based on the victim’s best and most admirable qualities, with an explicit intent to exploit. Understanding that it was my best attributes that left me vulnerable helped enormously in the healing process.
If someone should judge you, you will know it. If someone tempts, criticizes or verbally attacks you, you will know it. But if someone deceives you, you will not know it, because the very nature of deception is to conceal. Many myths and stigmas are attached to being victimized, such as weakness, naïvete, mental dullness, or rebellion. These axioms are not, however, consistent with the census.
Targeting the best qualities
My personal experience in client/therapist relationships with hundreds of victims of the pathological encounters, over a course of 25 years, has shown me that the very qualities that made them vulnerable are the very qualities commonly held with the highest regard. The common characteristics of the victims I have known include: trust, compassion, forgiveness and generosity—the very attributes that Satan hates—making them natural targets for the sociopathic predator. People fall victim to the deceiver not because of weakness, but as a result of their strengths. Compassion is not a weakness; it is strength. The desire to love and to be loved is a natural human drive.
Whatever the precursors of victimization, the damage inflicted is the fault and responsibility of the one doing the deceiving and plundering.
Everyone becomes vulnerable at some moment in life, possibly as a result of sustained losses, or some crisis. There are many scenarios that may lead to vulnerability. Sociopaths do not discriminate regarding their prey: young, old, race, gender, rich or poor, with one possible exception—the hard-hearted, who are much less likely to show compassion or trust. There is no universal profile of a typical victim. There is only one distinction: the more sensitive and conscientious the victim is, the higher the probability of success. The abuser is always at fault; no one chooses to be harmed.
Exerting control
Sociopaths know if they can get you to accept a single lie, they then can exert some measure of control over you. No one lies better than the sociopaths. There was nothing about Satan’s approach that caused Eve to be suspicious or be seriously alarmed. His approach seemed innocuous, “Let’s have a conversation. I am spiritual too. I am like you.” Satan seldom comes as a dark angel. He doesn’t show up as a coiled snake. Temptation is never ugly, painful or bloody. He may very well come and say, “Let’s have a religious discussion, let’s talk theology. I know God too.”
Everything about the sociopath invites us in, says join me—the voice tone, smile, hypnotic stare—making them the most dangerous predator of all. All the posturing is done to create a false belief of interest and concern. The more pathological, the more rapid and intense the bonding.
Building the disguise
The disguise begins with studying you: your values, interests, beliefs, vision, goals, concerns, and any other information they can glean. From the trivial to the most significant, all is stored away for future use—testing and noting what pushes your buttons, what moves or excites you. Sociopaths are ardent students of human behavior, having spent much of their lives investigating the difference between themselves and the rest of the population.
Using each piece of information, they create the disguise—a mask carefully constructed to look like their prospective target. Flawlessly, they weave a canvas picture of their mark, a tapestry precisely reflecting the brightest, most honorable aspects of your personality, sewing in the most desirable and wanted details, literally stealing your persona, mirroring this image back, without the defects of character, flaws and shortcomings.
The pathological relationship is a one-dimensional interaction. You fall in love with yourself as presented by this reflecting object. The attraction is irresistible. People are attracted to those who are similar to themselves. By transforming themselves into a reflection of their prospective prey, the sociopath becomes the most alluring figure imaginable, and the propensity to trust that person becomes compelling, promising to meet whatever need or want may exist: friend, advisor, mentor, brother, mother, father. This personification is deception at its most radical level. It is interesting to remember that Eve was deceived before she ever sinned.
Empty shells
Sociopathy is one of the most extreme of the pathological disorders. They are empty shells, possessing nothing of value, no guiding principles, no shame, and no righteous principles. Therefore, this emulation of others for sustained periods of time is effortless: no conflict with their own beliefs or interests. They haven’t any, apart from their ruthless, selfish desire for domination.
This one-dimensional mirroring blurs and confuses the boundaries. You lose touch with where you end and where they should begin, creating an enmeshment that quickly suppresses any sign of personal autonomy. However, it is nothing more than an illusion. You experience a sense of oneness like none other. At the emotional center of this connection is intensity never felt before, making the appeal and apprehension addictive. My sociopath bragged of the capacity to leave people feeling extremely loved, describing her energy as a warm blanket of water flowing around them embracing and holding, while locating deep wounds and hurts for future reference, having a clear awareness of what she was doing.
Behind the mirage
The sociopath uses deliberate and premeditated deception. Since Satan himself appears as an angel of light, is it any less imaginable that his emissaries who serve him would be capable of resembling their master? Imitation is the purest form of flattery and the sociopath is an expert. The effects are intoxicating, like finding an oasis in a dry land—the nurturing and understanding you have longed for. You wish to believe, you succumb, and you give in. What could be more seductive than having all of your best attributes reflected back and praised?
But what exists behind this illusion is a savage, a brute beast, the incubus. They hide behind the mirage, assessing and evaluating your every weakness and strength. The sociopath who possesses the blackest heart may appear to be a person of eminent goodness, but one never bothered by shame, full of greed and deceit.
Jeremiah 6:15 refers to God’s punishment of such people. “They dress the wounds of people as though it were not serious. Peace, peace they say when there is no peace. Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? No, they have no shame at all: they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen. They will be brought down when I punish them, says the Lord.” This passage is self-explanatory.
sons.of.sociopaths:
I said in a post to another lf poster who foudn god talk on LF ‘off putting’:
“I wrote a longish post about the christian centrism on LF this past weekend. I am not christian and I find it challenging at times. I worry about those who come here and find it off putting.
So here’s what I know:
1. I do at times post about my own beliefs in the context of spathy and healing. Generally people are a bit interested, or don’t care (so there is room for other religions).
2. at the end of my post i just asked people to please think about what it might be like to come here who are not comfortable with all the *god talk*. The responses were kind, supportive and in no way dismissive of the concerns I outlined.
3. for some of us, the language of ’evil’ is the only language we can find to adequately describe what has happened to us. there is just so little in our cultural lexicons that we can use to contextualize what they do, and what it has done to us.
4. I’d suggest you wade in. And if people cross your boundaries around this issue, let them know. This has been a very real difficulty for me, and yet I am still here, as the value prop. of LF is SO high. I cannot imagine the last 19 months of my life without it. ”
you said: ‘Someone posted earlier about “cultural lexicons” and how they were inadequate because “evil” is the only way we can describe sociopathy. Well, I have a question: What culture ever has been able to describe human destruction that doesn’t involve the language of evil?’
I said, ’for some of us, the language of ’evil’ is the only language we can find to adequately describe what has happened to us. there is just so little in our cultural lexicons that we can use to contextualize what they do, and what it has done to us.’
I can actually use the language of the DSM and psychology to describe sociopathy and its affects on me, but the reason I wrote this is because I wanted to explain that some of what might be perceived as *god talk* was actually more anthropological than specifically religious.
To answer the question you posed: yes, eastern cultures that are predominantly Buddhist don’t use ’the language of evil’ to describe this sort of destruction.
Ahhh…
help me get a grip!
Please see the conversation below and suggest what I need to do/say.
From Jerkface:
“FAD
I want to thank you for your patience at this time of transition with my new job. I am very frustrated that I do not have a set schedule yet, as I am sure you are too. I am going to try and contact my supervisor by phone tomorrow to see if he can somehow get me a set schedule as soon as possible. If not, I will see him on Tuesday for in class training. This is ridiculous and very upsetting that this new job has impacted my parenting time this past weekend. I assure you, you will know my schedule as soon as I know. I am hoping the reason was just because it was my first week, and they were pairing us up with a technician to do on the job training/ride along on top of the classroom training. I had to work around the technicians schedule. But, my technician I am working with told me to bring my supervisor our custody agreement, in hopes that he will set my schedule around it.
This company does not seem very organized and lacks communication thus far. With that said, I did go on another interview for a security/asset protection job. I am hoping the security job will work out instead.
I would like to have some make-up time with Jr. at a later date per agreement, since I lost 2 days over the weekend with him (especially father’s day), through no fault of my own. The make-up time does not have to be consecutive. But, I would like to wait until my schedule is set first.
Jerkface
P.S – Thank you for meeting Jerkette the past 2 days. I was able to be out and be home around the same time they got home, without losing more time traveling. It really helped especially since I am working all over in opposite directions.”
Jerkface gets a new job. He tells me this 2 days before he starts (6/14). He Then tells me Thursday night that he got Friday off.
Then Friday night he tells me he JUST found out he has to work Saturday (His custodial weekend) I pick up Jr. from his WIFE at her convenience.
Jerkface does not tell me when his shift begins or ends, but proposes his wife meet me at 9 and 3:30.
Then today I get a text message at 7:48 am this morning telling me he JUST got a call that he has to work. That the wife will meet me at 11 am and 3:30.
I ask what his hours are, he says, “Don’t know.”
I feel like I should just go along with all this since I am getting more time with Jr.
The agreement states, “If the father loses a full day of his scheduled parenting time with Jr. through no fault of his own or not through his own choosing, there will be make-up time as agreed by the parties so long as he can establish that missing the time was not of his own choosing.
Then…while I am STILL figuring out how to respond regarding the make-up time, I get this TODAY:
“FAD
As of right now I will be having Thursdays and Fridays off starting this week, hopefully this does not change again. I think this will most likely change after training is done, but I will keep you posted.
Following our custody agreement [His old job gave him Thursdays and Fridays off every 3 months], I will have Jr. from Wednesday at 3:30pm to Saturday morning at 6:20am. I do realize this does cut into your every other Friday, but you will now be getting every weekend (Saturday and Sunday) with Jr. instead.
Can you let day care know tomorrow when you drop Jr.off that tomorrow will be his last day?
I know originally you said I could call Jr. on Tues. Thurs. and every other Sat. and Sunday”But my schedule changed since I got a job. I did call last night since I did not have Jr. like I usually did on Mondays and you did not answer. I would like to be able to call Noah on Monday, Tuesday, Saturday, and Sundays”Whatever days I do not have him overnight.”
Additionally, I have PAID $121 for FULL Time day care at the beginning of the last two weeks because he informed day care and I that Jr. would be attending full time! I only get $260 in CS/mo.
I need to get a grip, but I keep getting these schedule changes with less than 24 hours notice!
How do I respond react?
OneJ,
I told my BF about what you said about impoverished states in Buddhism. He was interested, as I am. The idea itself, isn’t so revolutionary, but the fact that it’s part of the spiritual teachings of buddhism, was quite surprising to me. It gave me additional respect for that religion.
You said “yes, eastern cultures that are predominantly Buddhist don’t use ’the language of evil’ to describe this sort of destruction.”
Can you give me an idea as to how they discuss malicious destruction, if they don’t use the word evil? I’m very curious.
FAD,
DON’T.
DON’T EVER REACT. ACT, BUT DON’T REACT.
If you react, he is controlling you.
Set a schedule. Stick to it. If he can’t have jr on those days, too bad. If he needs to rework the schedule then set a schedule to do that. Agree to reworking the schedule at certain intervals. every 3 months or every 6 months.
He does not have more right to have his scheduling needs met than you do. Why are you cowtowing to him at all.
SET A SCHEDULE. IN WRITING. IN THE JOURNAL and only respond in the journal.
STOP REACTING. SET A SCHEDULE.
The earth doesn’t stop revolving and the sun and moon rise and set, regardless of spath’s schedule. Be as they are. SET A SCHEDULE. Review it at a SCHEDULED time. NO exceptions. If spath can’t be with his kid then let jerkette babysit or keep jr yourself, don’t give him make up days.
I’m going to butt in here, skylar, and ask a question. Sorry for the hijack, FAD, but I empathize with your situation. I just read your post and although I have no court orders, ex is also messing me around with changes without sufficient notice.
So last week I emailed him saying that if he doesn’t get confirmation from me, he should not change anything. And if he refuses to use text messaging or the email (he doesn’t use or respond to them because he is trying to talk to me), then I will no longer let the boys see him.
Problem is, after sending that, he didn’t reply but turned up at son8’s soccer practice and son4 ran to him to play with his phone and spent all his time there. He has probably thought that if I deny him the kids, he will simply turn up everywhere.
Today they are supposed to go there for a few hours (4 to 9) but he still hasn’t agreed in writing to use texting or emailing to communicate any changes to me. So I will not send them. But what if my kids, who have been heavily groomed and love-bombed lately, protest and want to see him? How do I explain it?
Oxy – you said: ‘The diversity of the LF community is wonderful! Every once in a while someone comes here and gripes that they don’t like this or that spiritual comment, but they don’t usually stay around long.’
I wholeheartedly disagree with your general view of LF’s diversity as being ’enough.’ We are not inclusive. Your above words proves the point – some people leave because they feel uncomfortable. That would put us in the not so inclusive category.
I DO believe there is a lot of respect here, and room for other religions. (see my above post that contains another post I made to someone who was put off by the religious references.) These things were never my point when I made a call out on the weekend that started this whole conversation – and i think people responding to responses to responses (we know 3rd hand news usually takes us!) have rather taken the conversation there, so i want to bring it back around to the points I was trying make in my call; one of which is, that true inclusivity does require reflection on our part (on the part of the dominant religious culture), about how the sheer volume *god talk* be excluding some people who need LF.
In regard to people ’preaching’ at others, I have had scripture quoted *at* me by former posters who were here for a long time, and have watched other people who have said, ‘please don’t quote scripture to me’, have their boundaries violated, also. No, it’s not always respectful. Some of the worst haranguing posts I have seen have been people forcing their religion on others. Now, that’s the ’grosser’ example; but there is also this sort of ’fine’ example: having a poster write another poster, who they do not know the religious beliefs of, or know that that person does not practice the same or believe the same, give reassurance that *god* will show the way. This is usually done with the BEST of intentions ”“ but still, it does beg the question, how inclusive are we really? Diverse, yes ”“ but there are atheists, and other non theists who don’t stay long, because the blog is overwhelmingly, unabashedly, full of *god talk*. And we all know how thin skinned we are when we get here. It makes for another impediment for some people.
I made a sincere call out (and it met with respect and consideration by the people who replied) on the weekend for people to just think about how off putting the sheer volume of *god talk* on LF (AND IT WAS NOT IN RESPONSE TO THIS ARTICLE ON THIS THREAD – I HAD NOT READ THIS ARTICLE) can be difficult for some people.
I am one of them. I did stick around, and i am still here.
FAD – don’t. don’t respond.
break it down – #1 ignore all the blah blah, i am so blah blah
#2 do not make quick decisions. do not make quick decisions. DO WHAT IS NECESSARY, NOT WHAT IS URGENT. LAY YOUR GROUND WORK!
#3 write down each of his requests seperately and see how they stack up against your agreement
#4 now write down how each of these impacts on your schedule and daily routines and $.
#5 stick to your schedule.
#6,7,8 He is a manipulating p**** and don’t forget that. don’t react to his ‘stuff’ – view it with a cool eye.
In light of the recent schedule change, I am ignoring his request for make-up time.
In the journal I plan to write:
“Regarding your e-mail; I can accommodate your new schedule with the exception of my scheduled vacation weeks; (July 25-29 and August 8-12: Chosen Dec. 2010), which as per the agreement, are to coincide with our weekends.
Since our weekends begin at Friday at 3:30 pm, I had already incorporated this time into my plans. Jr. and I need to leave Friday at 3:30 pm on July 22, and August 5.
Please confirm.
Additionally, will you be taking your scheduled vacation in July or will you have to work? I am willing
to watch Jr. during the day and you can have him for the overnights. Please let me know and forward a
copy of your schedule.”
my attorney informs me this could become an issue.
I don’t want to go to court, but I bet I’d win.
Problem is, he will have Jr. Wednesday-Friday (Saturday?) each of those weeks.
My only hope would be to withhold Jr. for the entire time…not a good idea.
Hi Sky – just saw your response to FAD, and we both started our responses to her with the word, ‘don’t’.
Man, you are going to make me work, failed budddhist that I am! 🙂
about malicious destruction:
– my lama teaches in a lot of catholic and christian countries, and of course a lot of his students come from these traditions, so the question of the concept of evil comes up often. i have always heard him say that ‘absolute evil can’t exist as it would self destruct.’ IF FREAKING ONLY!
– everything is explained as cause and effect: karma. Anything we experience in this life we have the karma for. Everything another does, they have the karma for. Everything we do accumulates Karma. Karma is however, not moralistic. This is a really hard concept to grasp for most people not raised in eastern cultures. Basically, I think one needs to view the ’law of karma’ as a ’law of physics.’
In the buddhist tradition it is said that we have no beginning or end, so we are accumulating Karma since ‘begingless time’. Karma is ’ripening’ (coming to fruition) all the time. The things we experience in this lifetime are probably effect from many many life times ago. And it would be the same with spaths.
Now, I haven’t had a chance to ask my lama about spaths, and I would like to. I haven’t even tried to sort out what spaths might be through the lens of Buddhism. I suspect that they are something like the hungry ghosts, but I don’t know. So, I am going to take a shot at it:
There is a hierarchy of realms in Buddhism (BIG cosmology!), and being born is supposedly the highest unenlightened realm (having had cats, I find this hard to believe), and it is so because we have the capacity to reach enlightenment through our abilities. Now, as I don’t think spaths can change, I don’t think they are ordinary humans. As being a spath is really a disgusting life, I would think that that would mean that they have done many horrid things over many kalpas (one kalpa = four hundred and thirty two million years) and will continue to do so”.for endless time…passing from earthly realms to unearthly hell realms.
but, i really don’t know (i spent all my time meditating and not asking questions, and not studying the cannons. the lineage i belong(ed) to stresses ‘sitting on the cushion’ as being most important. 🙂 . i will write my teacher and ask. may take 5 months to get an answer back.