Heroin and oxycontin belong to a class of drugs called opiates. Lovefraud recently received a letter from a reader that raised the issue of heroin addiction in sociopaths:
For nearly two years after my relationship with him ended, I was on the web researching heroin addiction because I assumed this was where all of his abusive behavior came from, but I stumbled upon information on sociopaths, and realized that he fits every trait”¦I know substance abuse behavior can mimic sociopathic behavior, but it is clear that the man I was in a relationship with is a sociopath, and was able to use his addiction as an explanation and excuse to further manipulate the many people who offered help to him”¦ The man I dated definitely went beyond the regular lying and stealing that takes place and went far into the realm of sadism- taking great joy in manipulation and emotional devastation of others. He was breaking into cars and taking great risks to his physical safety as a child/young man, well before his drug use started. It makes sense to me that people who are sociopaths and do not have a conscience would be more likely to become heroin addicts, as seeing others being hurt by their behavior would not be a deterrent. Whereas someone with a conscience would feel just as good when they take the heroin, they would be more likely to think about its effects on others, and stop the behavior.
I trained in three public urban hospitals where the prevalence of opiate addiction was so high that I treated countless numbers of these patients and encountered them on a daily basis. That nearly all were sociopaths was an inescapable reality. It did not seem possible that all these people were sociopaths prior to becoming addicted, so I have long believed that heroin especially makes people into sociopaths.
My beliefs have been confirmed by a number of scientific studies. One particularly thorough study was published in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology in 1998 (Vol. 107.p 412-422) entitled, A Typology of Antisociality in Methadone Patients by Dr. Arthur I. Alterman and colleagues of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
These researchers studied 252 men in methadone maintenance programs. Their average age was 40. The researchers looked extensively into the backgrounds and histories of the subjects and had them complete a number of personality tests. They also interviewed them using Robert Hare’s PCL-R.
The study identified 6 groups of subjects, each with a unique psychological profile. 72 percent of the sample were sociopaths. That means that only 28 percent were not significantly antisocial. The researchers believed that in perhaps 17 percent of the sample the sociopathy was due to the addiction. The take home message though was that 55 percent were highly psychopathic as measured by the PCL-R. About a quarter of the total sample were married and we can assume the rest had relationships of some sort.
Government statistics indicate there may be as many as 2 million opiate addicts in the US. There are only 650 methadone maintenance programs in the US with an estimated 120,000 clients. These clients are likely similar to those of the reported study, but it is reasonable to believe that non-sociopaths are over represented in treatment programs, so the 28 percent figure may be an over-estimate with regard to the total addict population.
One of the most interesting findings of the above study was that Machiavellianism was high in the 55 percent of methadone clients who were sociopaths. Machiavellianism was measured by the 20-item MACH-IV which measures egocentricity, a lack of concern with conventional morality, and interpersonal manipulativeness. These symptoms would predict a great deal of distress in the spouses and romantic partners of the subjects- not to mention the children born to these parents.
The results of the study raise other important points I have made on this blog. First, among the very antisocial and manipulative opiate addicts there were a range of PCL-R scores. This means that you should not be concerned with trying to decide if the person who is hurting and manipulating you meets some magical cut-off score. Instead look at the list of traits Donna has posted and see if the description more or less fits.
Also, childhood and teen problems cannot always be identified in people who are very psychopathic. Things happen in late adolescence and early adulthood that change people. Furthermore, just because we can’t prove a given person had antisocial tendencies early in life, doesn’t mean they weren’t there. The other implication of this is that at-risk young people require careful, loving, hands-on parenting even if they seem OK. Addiction may be an event that tips at-risk individuals into the realm of psychopathy.
The brain opiate systems are central to love and attachment in humans. This fact may account for the propensity for sociopaths to use heroin. It may also be that opiate drugs specifically poison a person’s ability to love, making him/her egocentric, grandiose and manipulative.
HH I think you are right about some psychopaths being predisposed and that some start out as psychopaths and others are switched on and become psychopathic due to environmental influences. I also think there is a third group that has psychopathic behaviors but are not psychopathic.
Here is a link to a study that is not about psychopaths but it does show how social interactions can alter gene expressions in the brain and vice versa. One part from the study says:
The picture that is emerging from these and other studies suggests that social signals can have a profound effect on when and how genes function.
An organism’s genes, its environment, the social information it receives, “all these things interact,” said Clayton. “Experience is constantly coming back in to the level of the DNA and twiddling the dials and the knobs.”
This is one resaon why the discussion/research of this topic is so difficult. It is complex and the subjectivity involved makes it even harder to tease out objective data.
Oops I forgot to post the link to the study:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-11/uoia-sic110608.php
I seen S/P use both chemical imbalance as the reason for their personality behavior. They will claim to have a drinking drug or some other chemical addiction or will use the bi-polar scheme to gain sympathy from someone new. This will work in the beginning of any relationship so if ever used on me I just take note of it and then watch and learn. I still see it as a pity play but still some of these people who suffer from these chemical imbalances do need help. What I do is look for what they themselves are doing to deal with it. Anyone who really wants to deal with any type of problem will do so continuously and will be honest about what they want to do about it. This is what I look for, what are the things they are doing to deal with it? And how often do they use it as a excuse for bad behavior and/or missing time? One thing to remember is when even one does suffer from any type of “chemical imbalance” they are all still responsible for our actions and decisions. This of course goes for anyone that would suffer from an addiction albeit alcohol drug and/or being bi-polar. Also one should also remember about the issues concerning an “dry drunk” and how when alcohol or drug is no longer the problem in your life (and theirs) but their “personality” type is. This becomes yet another issue to deal with. Whenever we deal with anyone that has a “chemical imbalance” we run the chance of helping them deal with that problem only to see “other” problems that they would want us to help them deal with. This is where being an enabler starts to hurt me (and them) and I must be careful to watch it and deal with that issue about myself.
For me it’s irresponsible for anyone to get involve with someone new if that person has so many issues for them to deal with. For me that is the “first” major red flag. That person needs to deal with themselves first and foremost and then after dealing with “their problems” try and have a healthy relationship with another person. If you meet anyone that has so many issues I would ask them to first deal with that and then maybe we can start our relationship.
I have dated a few “ladies” that are bi-polar so I’m learning as I go, but anyone that has a drug problem for me personally is just that. “Their problem” and not mine. In short I get out of these type of relationships very quickly.
“they are all still responsible for our actions and decisions.”
Sorry…
Should be “They are all still responsible for Their actions and decision”…
Really could use a edit on this blog site..
🙂
BloggerT – this is very interesting, thank you. I have read studies like this and have wondered if it is possible to “rewire” the brains of Sociopaths by having them perform positive and kind acts over and over and over so that new neural pathways and connections would form that would help them rewire. Of course there are a million holes in this “plan” both big and small – but I wonder, since environment can impact brain structure, if we manipulate the environment of the S, could we change their brains?
But in what context could you “force” an S to do good over and over again?
Sadly, probably the ones who have been S’s for years are way too far gone. But maybe if we could get to the young ones………… and I am most certainly NOT suggesting that as individuals we try to change them as personal projects. But maybe as a broad community we could create some “rewire” programs.
I agree, James. No matter what they are ingesting – their behaviors are their behaviors, and they are responsible.
BloggerT, Healing Heart and James: I believe that they’ve conditioned themselves into their negative thinking, truly believing it is the correct way to think. I believe since they’ve conned even their parents or guardians at a young age, their behavior wasn’t or couldn’t be corrected during these young ages… allowing adults to show them the positive way to conduct their lives, they therefore, continue on this negative, destructive thinking (e.g. learned behaviors). They surround themselves with like minds … and it continues to take off, one negative mind to the next negative mind… group mentality concept.
I know where I worked, negative thinking and behaviors were considered the “norm” and positive creative thinking was frowned upon and looked down upon as if the person was a freak of nature.
As I just wrote in another post, two positive thinking tools are:
1. Fasting from Wrong Thinking
From “Pastor Gregory Dickow”
pastordickow@changinglives.org
He’s on chapter 5 today, but there is a search for archives.
2. Reading E. Tolle’s book “A New Earth” … and a added bonus is logging onto Oprah.com to search her spiritual site for Tolle’s free tapes of all 10 chapters of his book.
Peace.
HH – Sadly I think you are right in mmany if not most of the cases. Early intervention is so important yet many of these folks (not all though) come from households in which intervention would be unwelcome to say the least. And then there are the ones that just like being the way they are and would not change it for the world.
Wini I agree with you in that some of the anti-social youth I have seen over the years fit your explanation. But there are others that are/were in positive environments that would have “conditioned” them into not being psychopathic yet they still were. Genetics play a big role here also.
BloggerT: I would love to call it a day and say it’s genetics. Unfortunately, I can’t. I still believe it’s the individuals ego run amuck.
If we lived in a perfect world … with perfect parents (that loved each other to then turn around and love their children) … perfect teachers in a perfect school setting (including college), perfect corporate environment with perfect friends and relatives … and all were engrossed in positive-creative thinking … then would there be anti-social personalities?
Peace.
BloggerT: I worked with people who believed in their own egos and crossed the lines of decency all the time because they wanted to. Theu could act normal when it was convenient for them … they could cry, the could get upset… especially if their lives were affected by a negative action. Same with my EX. He could act loving, kind, considerate, feeling person, yet crossed the line because it was convenient for him to do so. But, if his life was affected by an offense as he did to me, he’d have a nervous breakdown.
Reminds me of OJ during his last trial … telling the judge “your honor, I wasn’t going to to harm anyone, I just wanted my stuff”.
It’s not genetic, it’s learned behavior … and our society’s laziness and NOT doing their jobs that they are paid to do has allowed this behavior to flourish.
It’s 2009, do you think the FBI has a database of all the anti-social personalities out there in the world? NO. Why not?
Peace.