Old time psychoanalysts connect a young child’s desire to share experiences with caregivers to the development of a healthy personality. The idea that any pleasure is better if we share it starts shortly after the first birthday. That is also the time language starts to develop. Words then become a way to share experiences. Healthy people use words to share their feelings, interests and desires. A little child who has just learned to walk will bring her toy over to dad to share it. She is delighted when he makes some comment about it. We take for granted that everyone has this desire to share and take mutual delight.
As I write this I am sharing with you truths I have found deeply meaningful, so you are getting a part of me when you read what I write. If you read the many posts I have written you can get to know me to a certain degree. But what if my writing was not a reflection of anything I personally care about. What if I wrote only to cause some sort of reaction in you? I am not capable of that kind of writing because it is only my desire to share what I think is interesting and compelling that at all motivates me to write. If nothing interesting happens to me I find I have nothing to share and nothing to write. For me the sharing is everything, I wouldn’t write without it. After reading a new book, I thought about sharing this week and realized that if I didn’t want to share, I wouldn’t communicate at all. I like teaching at the university because for me teaching is a form of sharing and I feel affection for the students.
It has been nearly 6 years since I said goodbye to a sociopath, but I am just now coming to grips with many aspects of the disorder. This week I understood on an emotional level this idea of sharing through verbal communication.
Regarding psychopaths, Elizabeth Howell wrote in The Dissociative Mind page 251:
Used instrumentally, words do not share the self or communicate with the other, but function as triggers to effect targeted behavior in another person. Even when the psychopath uses words imbued with a highly symbolic meaning, such as religious words or words evoking trust, he is not operating in the realm of symbolic thought (because his/her words are not functioning to symbolize any inner feelings). Thus psychopaths may appear or seem to be involved with symbols, as others are, but they are using their knowledge of others'(use of words) ”¦and manipulating through them.”
Rather than for sharing, a sociopath uses words instrumentally or for effect. His or her words have no real relationship to anything on the inside”¦ truly remarkable if you ask me; a reality that completely blows me away when I think about it even after all these years.
Howell further writes:
Unimpeded by any concern for the other or considerations of conscience, the psychopath uses language in a manner that can be highly effective in achieving the desired ends. And to the degree that instrumental behavior is effective it will be repeated.
As I consider what Howell wrote I am reminded of the card Gem’s father wrote to her for her 18th birthday (see last week’s blog). The card was purely instrumental, designed to have an effect on the reader.
Consider the profound implications of the instrumental use of language. You will likely come to two conclusions regarding what your sociopath says. First you always have to wonder what the sociopath is trying to achieve with his words because it ain’t sharing. Second you realize that no real communication is possible.
If you are stuck in life with a sociopath or are trying to decide if a continued relationship is possible please consider that every word that comes from the sociopath is instrumental. The sociopath has never shared herself with you. The sociopath has never really shared a pleasure with you. Even the sex was not about sharing. The sex was about the sociopath’s pleasure and his or her prowess as a lover.
On words and the sociopath:
It took me quite a while to really understand that, although the S/P uses words as tools to manipulate a victim, words in and of themselves HAVE NO MEANING to them. Mine, in his own crude and sociopathic way, let me know this early on, when he was setting me up.
Love, he said, is a four-letter word, just like s**t or f**k.
Because it was so early in the “relationship,” I rationalized that statement thusly: “Oh, he is bitter and cynical because he has been hurt by other women.” But what he meant is that “love” has equal weight, meaning and depth to him as a big pile of dog doo.
They are lazy, though, the disordered. They recycle the words/tools that have worked in the past. They reuse the same phrases and constructions on victim after victim, changing only what they absolutely must. For example, in speaking with my daughters following their disclosures of molestation and rape, I learned that he used the same phrases on each of us.
To me, he said, “When I reach the (landmark) each day as I am driving home, I am the happiest man in the world because I know I am coming home to you.”
To my adult daughter, in convincing her that she was his one true love, he said, “When I reach the (landmark) each day as I am driving home, I get so depressed I want to die, because I know I am going home to that bitch (me, the mom).”
Words have no meaning to them, no meaning at all.
Mine expressed disdain for the word love early on as well. I excused it. I wish that I had paid more attention. Nothing they say matters , they don’t care a bit.
Here’s a great example of what Dr. Leedom is talking about. I kicked this guy out 10 months ago, and I just got this email from him last week. A year ago, when I was still caught in his web of manipulation, this letter would have moved me deeply. I have learned from experience with this particular man that these words are literally designed to elicit a response from me. I have no idea what his motive would be at this point, unless he is hoping to get another dip into the well of the little financial resources I have left. I have copied and pasted the letter for all to see just how well a sociopath can imitate real emotion. I am sure most of you know from your own experience, but it still blows my mind. See below.
“I really wish I would not have thrown our relationship away.
I still love you very very very much, as much or more than I ever did. It is because I can fully appreciate you now, since I have had plenty of time to think, and realize where I went wrong, many times. I have been studying my problems, and know they came from childhood. I’m so sorry Robin, I hope you can forgive me.
Its all I can do to stop myself from giving up everything here and moving back to Denver, just to try to spend every other week with you, if that’s all I could have. I love you.”
Robin: Golly, and that doesn’t sound like “true love”? Huh! “As much or more than I ever did.” Well, at least that part is true!
Good for you. I doubt you have “every other week” to spare on this loser.
Robin,
I think his current victim must have gotten on to him and given him the boot! LOL So he is trolling all his previous victims hoping for a hit! PSychopath Playbook: Page 110, paragraph 3. “When you are without a victim, go back through your old black book and seen sweet emails, letters, or voice mails telling them you’ve seen the light and realize how wonderful they were”
He’s obviously playing “BY THE BOOK” LOL
Doesn’t it just make your heart melt? NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT!!!!!!
LOL. I think you are right! It’s the sociopath’s recycling program!
Thanks for your comment. 🙂
Good point, Rune. Isn’t it just like a sociopath to slide in a little truth among the lies…another overused tactic that works until it doesn’t and then the whole effort just seems pathetic!
DEar Robin,
Truth and lies are interessting.
RAT POISON is 99.9% PURE CORN MEAL, but it is POISON none the less.
A statement can be 99.9% “true” but that 0.1% of falsehood makes the WHOLE THING POISON! They are hoping they can fool us with the 99.9% “truth” and we won’t notice the 0.1% “lie” that poisons us.
Robin_Hoffman:
Good to see you back. Haven’t seen you post in awhile.
Love the letter. I’m sold on his sincerity. NOT.
OxDrover is probably right — he’s screwed up with his new victim and he’s about to be given his walking papers.
However, here’s an option B — I recall you were exploring taking legal action against him. If memory serves me right, he took you for 200 grand. I think he may be getting nervous and head you off by sweetening you up.
Not that anything they do makes sense. Mine also sent me a letter last week. If he were smart, he would have played nice and I might — just might — have been inclined to cut him some slack on what he owes me. But, he wasn’t. And you can guess the rest.
Hi Matt,
This guy is so full of himself that I don’t think a threat of legal action scares him one bit. He set it up so my name was on everything, so there is no way to isolate his actions in the paper trail. Smart, callous, and calculated.