Before I became entangled with the sociopath, I was an avid consumer of self-help books and programs. Although I was successful in my career, I could not get the relationship thing to work. This, of course, was the vulnerability exploited by the sociopath I married, but I get ahead of myself.
In my quest for answers—Why was I alone? Why couldn’t I find love?—I once participated in a weekend seminar called “Understanding Yourself and Others.” After some initial skepticism, I found the program to be helpful. One of the things I remember from the weekend is a pithy little motto:
“The truth will set you free—but first it will piss you off.”
In reference to sociopaths, truer words were never spoken. When we finally learn the truth about these people, after months, years or decades of deception, we are hurt—but we are also enraged. Then, as we try to dig ourselves out of the hole, we learn more infuriating truths about the inability of other people in our lives, and of society’s institutions, to help us. Let’s take a look at what we learn.
Truths that make us angry
1. The sociopath never loved us. We were used. He or she wanted our money, or sex, or a place to live, or business connections, or a family to make him or her look normal, or whatever. All the promises of eternal love were bald-faced lies. We were supply, that’s all. They toyed with our hearts, and we are furious.
2. Other people just don’t understand. Those who have been lucky enough to avoid entanglements with sociopaths cannot fathom how we fell for it. They don’t comprehend the elaborate deception, the psychological manipulation and our inability to extract ourselves. We hear, “Just get over it already,” and are angry at the callousness of people who say they are concerned for us.
3. Credit card companies don’t care that we’ve been defrauded. The con artists talked us into paying their expenses or giving them money. Unless we can prove identity theft, the credit card companies don’t care how many lies he or she told. Even if a court finds the sociopath guilty of fraud, we’re stuck with the bills—which is patently unfair.
4. Legal authorities cannot cope with sub-criminal sociopaths. Unless the sociopath commits murder or robs a bank, chances are slim that law enforcement will take action. Fraud and domestic violence charges are difficult to prove, so they often don’t get investigated. But even if the police do take action, much of it is undone in the courts. Between manipulating the legal system and lying under oath, sociopaths rarely get the punishment they deserve. Sometimes they actually get away with murder, and we are fit to be tied.
5. Media images of sociopaths are wrong. On television and in the movies, sociopaths are equated with The Sopranos and psychopaths are portrayed as Hannibal Lecter. Some disordered people are, in fact, demented murderers and serial killers, but the vast majority of them are not. By promulgating myths and not reporting reality, the media do a tremendous disservice to everyone. As a trained journalist, this one really pisses me off.
Truths that set us free
6. Evil exists. Many of us got into our predicaments because we did not realize that human beings are capable of the evil that sociopaths perpetrate. Now we know, and knowledge is power. We know to be on the lookout for these predators, so that we do not fall into their traps again.
7. Our intuition knows better. Most of us felt something was wrong with the predator early in the game. We got the tickling in the brain, the twisting in the stomach, telling us to get out. But we let the sociopaths explain away our concerns. Now we know—when it comes to protecting ourselves from evil, our instincts are usually right.
8. We cannot save the sociopath. Sociopaths do not seek treatment. But suppose, due to a court order or fear of losing their gravy train, they do submit to medication or therapy. Suppose the treatment makes them 50 percent less abusive. That’s still 50 percent too much abuse for a healthy relationship. No matter how hard we try to save them, sociopaths are incapable of empathy or love. Adult sociopaths will not suddenly develop a conscience. So we can put down the burden of rescuing them, because it is not possible.
9. We must learn discrimination. An important meaning of the word “discriminate” is “to distinguish accurately.” Our mission in life is to learn when to say yes, and when to say no, so that our decisions support our wellbeing. We cannot abdicate this decision to others, even to people in authority. Some of them are sociopaths. Even if they aren’t, the people in charge do not always have our best interests at heart.
10. We are responsible for our own healing. We’ve been exploited, injured, used, and now we are struggling to overcome the pain. But where did the pain actually begin? There may have been some vulnerability or desire within us—something as normal as wanting to be loved. Somehow we felt we were lacking, and that gave the sociopath an opening. He or she ripped open our hearts, and whatever old wounds were hidden in them. Now we must look within, force ourselves to take stock of everything that’s there, and heal. Even when we have support, it is a lonely journey that we must undertake ourselves. But it is the journey that truly sets us free.
I think it is his way of getting back at me for no contact. I have only had 2 encounter’s with his new friend by email. I need to change email address scince i am unable to turn off the internet complety at this point. But why is his new friend involved in this? I seiously think the new friend want’s me to come over for a three way. I want more than that, I want a 2-way on a one way road or I can take care of things my way…..
Henry, I know you loved M, but he was far too windy for you. You so deserve a much better calibre of man, and now you have the wisdom behind you, and you know what you dont want. Now you can concentrate on what you DO want. You’ve done all the other stuff and its empty. We want more fulfilling partnerships that enhance our lives – with a bit of sparkle thrown in (thats what I would like!!)
Yea, Henry, I think he is trying to get at you from a distance. The No Contact must be needling him and he wants to devalue you even further. Say ‘My Way or the Highway’!!
Yes I keep asking myself if I really loved M. I guess I did but , keep asking myself why? There really was nothing to love…
Lets face it, Henry, any email his new partner sends you, is going to be provocative. Personally I wouldnt even open it. And Im sure you dont want to be involved in the fallout from their relationship, when M has trashed that one.??
Henry, I keep asking myself the same question, I think it was a case of Beauty and the Beast. I believe in fairy tales because I think they tell good stories.
I put a block on his mail but it went to my spam folder. No I don’t EVEN want to know about them. I just resent that I helped a homeless sociopath better his life and circumstances and is moving up as far as his deceit goes. Before me he never had acsess to a computer so now he has learned a new way to find victim’s. I am not poor, just a simple guy with a simple life and money and wealth has never been my God. Now M is with a guy that has alot of that, and will prolly continue to move up the ladder in his victimization. Guess that doesnt make sense but I kinda feel responsibe for giving him that …..and resentful, but not one bit jealous….
Henry, I was going to say the same thing, but as I wrote it I deleted it. I was going to say that I felt responsible for bringing him out of the dark into society. He was literally like a vampire, working nights alone, and had a skin condition that reacted in the light or sunshine. He shut himself away in his squalid room like a leper and I brought him out into the open. At the time I thought I was doing the best for him, now I realise that I have ‘activated’ him, because I got him a day job in with mainstream people.
Dear Henry,
Enabling behavior (doing something for someone that they SHOULD be doing for themselves) gives US a “high” because it makes us feel “superior” to be the “fixer”—“You poor baby, you can’t be a responsible adult and provide yourself a car, so I will purchase you one, to show you what a good person I am.”
Then, he takes the car and goes out to visit some one-night stand. You then become insensed and angry.
“Hey, I bought you that care, (and therefore you owe me) and you use it to go see other guys! You low life you”
“He replies (either thinking or verbally) “Hey, it was just a car, you don’t OWN ME. I can do what I want”
So the “pay off” is that you BOTH end up feeling abused.
I had a therapist tell me once that “the ONLY legitimate rescue is to pull an unconscious person from a burning building.”
When we try to “rescue” someone who has mired themselves down in a bog of poor decisions, all we accomplish is to get mud on ourselves and they go right back to the mud.
The Bible gives an example of “washing a sow” as useless because she will go right back into the mud again, so why bother. A rescue of someone who isn’t trying to help themselves is just like washing that hog, USELESS, and just makes them and ourselves mad.
LIke trying to teach a pig to sing, frustrates you and pisses off the pig. It just ain’t gonna happen.
There is a fine line between helping someone and enabling them. I HELPED that girl who lost the pasture for her horses in the tornado, but she NOW feels like I owe her a free place to keep her horses because she really can’t afford to have the horses at all (and is not able to feed and care for them properly) so she is upset at me for saying “Move your horses”–she wants me to “enable” her now. It is NOT MY RESPONSIBILITY to provide her a free pasture forever. It is NOT my fault that she cannot afford to take care of her horses. So, if I allowed her to continue to keep them here to “help” her out, I am ASSUMING responsibility for her horses, which I WILL NOT DO. One reason being that in the shape they are in, the humane society could come out here and attack ME because they are on my property. Also, one of the horses is a viscious biter (it almost amputated it’s owners breast once already) and doesn’t even know how to lead, and they are destroying the fences (which the owner is not fixing) and if they get out on the highway (which the way they are tearing down fences is sure to happen) and get hit by a car people could be killed, and I could be held liable.
So, it is clear to me that I had to set a boundary. When we do for others what they SHOULD do for themselves, we are ASSUMING responsibility for the OUTCOME. So if we give advice and it turns out to be bad, it is “our fault.”
Sometimes we also leave ourselves legally responsible for their actions, and the consequences become ours. Like if you loan your car to someone and they get it seized hauling drugs in it, the cops take the car, and even though you didn’t know your friend planned to use your car to haul drugs, toooooo bad, Bozo, you lose your car.
Why did you love M? Maybe some how “enabling” him under the excuse of helping him made you have a sense of being “good” and that he would repay your goodness with “love.” (which he obviously didn’t) But what you saw (at the time at least) as “helping him get a better life” was enabling him to have the better life without HIM DOING ANYTHING to provide it for himself. Since he had a long history of NOT PROVIDING these things for himself it should have been “apparent” that he wanted to BE PROVIDED these things. However, as I know from my OWN ENABLING BEHAVIORS, if people don’t want to live that way, they do provide for themselves except for a few acts of God like storms and tornadoes. Very few people who are willing to work have enough “bad luck” over and over and over to keep them “living out of cardboard boxes” unless they have contributed to this life style by not taking care of their own needs. It took me a LONG time, Henry, to save my empathy and sympathy and my “helping” to people who aren’t just mooches.
Just like the girl with the horses. She hadn’t been able to afford the horses in the first place (she and her husband have custody of 4 kids between them, and he pays support on another one) and both work hard but have little money, she has problems with her Borderline Mother, but the mother was supporting the horses, not the girl. Now, she wants ME to provide for the horses. Not gonna happen. Not my responsibility. I just got involved because the tornado did wipe out her mom’s farm, fences and all buildings except the house. But now that I SEE clearly the situation, I’ve set the boundary. MOVE the horses. (and I did have a bit of a guilt trip about it, because I too love horses, but I’m smushing that guilty feeling down! LOL)
But Henry, lets face it, we were naieve about antisocials. How could we have known at that time? I also do not put money on my list of requirements for a partnership – but as a friend so aptly said ‘ You expected nothing – and you received nothing’. I think in choosing a prospective partner, we have to look at where THEY are putting their energy.