Character Disturbance—The Phenomenon of Our Age, the new book by George K. Simon, Ph.D., does two things really well: It paints a no-nonsense picture of how people with personality disorders, including sociopaths, behave. And it explains why traditional psychotherapy, in attempting to understand these individuals, gets it so wrong.
The basic problem, Simon explains, is that classic concepts in psychotherapy, like those advanced by Sigmund Freud, propose that people develop defensive strategies against a cruel, heartless world in order to protect their deep, authentic selves. This results in “neurosis,” defined in Wikipedia as “a variety of mental disorders in which emotional distress or unconscious conflict is expressed through various physical, physiological and mental disturbances, which may include physical symptoms.”
Many, many therapists follow the classic psychotherapeutic paradigm, which Simon neatly summarized. He wrote:
Let’s boil down traditional schools’ underlying assumptions about how people become disturbed, and how you help them heal: People are inherently good and geared towards health. They become unhealthy because bad or “traumatic” things happen to them. They develop fears and insecurities in response to their traumas. They learn to protect themselves, cope with stress or “defend” themselves against emotional pain in less than optimal ways. With unconditional positive regard, empathy and support they can heal their wounds, lower their defenses, overcome their fears, and become naturally inclined once again to lead healthy, loving, compassionate lives.
These ideas have been around for so long that they are ingrained in our culture and accepted as “truth.” It’s gotten to the point that everyone believes the concepts apply to all people. And that’s how we get into trouble.
Sociopaths don’t act the way they do to compensate for some deep internal pain. They are deceitful, manipulative and aggressive because that’s who they are.
Character disturbance
Simon describes disordered individuals, including those with sociopathy, psychopathy and antipersonality disorder, as having a “character disturbance.” He defines them as:
individuals whose problems are related to their dysfunctional attitudes and thinking patterns, their shallow, self-centered relationships, their moral immaturity and social irresponsibility, and their habitual dysfunctional behavior patterns.
Simon spends much of the book laying out exactly how character-disturbed individuals think, behave and view the world. Their characteristics include disregard for the truth, impaired capacity for empathy and contrition, deficient impulse control, impaired conscience, and more. The traits are all familiar to Lovefraud readers who have lived in close proximity to them.
A really important insight is this: Simon says that “the primary interpersonal agenda for aggressive and other character-disordered personalities is position, position, position.” In other words, these individuals always want to be dominant—an idea that’s hard for the rest of us to accept. Simon writes:
It’s incomprehensible for most of us to conceive that in every situation, every encounter, every engagement, the aggressive personality is predisposed to jockey with us for the superior position, even in situations with no recognizable need to do so. The failure to understand and accept this, however, is how aggressive personalities so often succeed in their quest to gain advantage over others.
Why we don’t get it
Those of us who are fairly normal, although perhaps at times unsure of ourselves, and those of us who are neurotic, are at a severe disadvantage when dealing with character-disturbed individuals. Why? Because we don’t understand the extent to which they are different from us.
Simon made several points that I thought clearly described how our lack of awareness gets us into trouble:
- He explains that we are concerned about how our character-disordered partners are feeling, and why they seem angry all the time, without realizing that anger is not a true emotion, but a tactic to manipulate and control us.
- He explains that the true reason predators are successful manipulators is not so much that they are good at it, although they are, but that the rest of us are reluctant to judge others harshly.
- He explains that people who intuitively sense aggression, but can’t objectively verify it, are prone to being manipulated and controlled.
The problem is, we don’t know how the character-disturbed people think and act, but they know how we think and act. Simon writes:
They know the attitudes neurotics hold, and the naiveties that make them vulnerable to tactics of manipulation and impression management. They often know the neurotics in their lives better than those neurotics know themselves.
This book can help you level the playing field. It can help you understand the tactics and games that sociopaths and other people with character disturbances use to manipulate you. It also explains why adherents to traditional psychotherapy concepts don’t understand sociopaths, and why their attempts at treatment are useless.
Character Disturbance—The Phenomenon of Our Age is available on Amazon.com.
WOW!!!!! Donna this book sounds great! I am putting my order in today! Might as well order it and put it at the top of the stack to be read first!
This is the book I mentioned in a previous post. It’s an excellent guide for navigating the horrible people we encounter. I like that George Simon calls the horrid creatures ‘the character disturbed’. So spot on. His first book , ‘In Sheep’s Clothing’ is very good too. He wrote some vignettes describing various aggressive manipulations employed in family and business relationships. His are the only writings that explain how I got bound and hog tied in the relationship with the psychopath. I’m neurotic, no question!
Oxy,
George Simon’s blogs are some of the first places I began to learn about NPD and his writing was like a breath of fresh air.
I think the appeal of his work is that you get the feeling that this guy really “gets it”, especially when you are new to understanding PD’s and you don’t have anyone else who believes you.
Here are 2 links to his blogging. I think you’ll love reading it while you wait for your book.
http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/10/01/disturbances-of-character-book/
http://counsellingresource.com/features/tag/series-on-thinking-errors/
I haven’t read the book but I get the feeling it is going to be one of those books that people will pass along to others in order to enlighten them.
My only tiny issue I have with his ideas is that he says that NPD is not based on repressed fears. It certainly seems that way, but there are many schools of thought that in fact the shameless behavior is based on shame that is so thoroughly repressed because it is unbearable that it comes out like complete shamelessness. The grandiosity is based on feelings of repressed low self worth. and the desire for power is based on feelings of powerlessness, etc… That’s why everything about spaths seem backward. They are experts at deception because they hide everything behind a mask of the opposite – so that you would never imagine the truth.
Still I like Dr. Simon’s blogs because he explains what can be observed so well. For most people it really doesn’t matter why spaths act like they do. Understanding the cause doesn’t really protect us from the behavior. And I doubt there is anyway to fix a spath. The armor is on too thick.
Well, you will have that same “tiny issue” with me too because I do NOT believe that NPD is based on repressed fears either. I think NPD is a subset of PPD and is primarily genetic with some environmental aspects, just as I do PPD.
Just as Baron-Cohen is finding out that the testosterone levels in the womb seem to highly correlate with the autism spectrum and the way the brain is actually FORMED as well as chemically influenced, the empathy aspect of both autism and PPD seems to be influenced by this T level. Is the T level caused by the mother? or the fetus? They don’t know at this point, but the correlation of the level of this hormone seems to show that the higher it goes the less empathy….hummmmmm. Interesting, huh? So “environment” starts at CONCEPTION not just after birth.
I will go read some of his blogs. I ordered the book already. and I think he is right “for most people it really doesn’t matter WHY spaths act like they do. Understanding the cause doesn’t really protect us from the behavior.”
I do think it is important for scientists to figure out WHY though, so possibly there can be something done to fix them in the embryo or as very young infants. Just a dream I guess, though.
Oxy,
I already knew your thoughts about repressed fears. 🙂
But that quote, “for most people it really doesn’t matter WHY spaths act like they do. Understanding the cause doesn’t really protect us from the behavior.” is MINE not his. That is MY reason for liking his articles so much.
My desire to understand further has more to do with understanding humanity in general, rather than any hope of fixing spaths. IMO, they can’t be fixed.
Still, last night I dreamt that the spath was back and I was trying to “fix” him by explaining to him where all his thinking was screwed up. LOL! I no longer “love” him, but it’s sad to see such a waste of potential, so I guess my dream reflects the regret that he just doesnt “get it” and never will.
As far as testosterone, YES, I do believe there is a definite correlation. A while back, someone on LF posted that the problem was so many boys being raised without fathers. They sited the case of the juvenile elephants that went on a rampage killing rhinos and destroying entire villages after the older males in their group had been killed off, as evidence.
I was “skeptical” to say the least. But then recently, I read some more about that story and it turns out that the juvenile elephants had their testosterone measured and it was thru the roof. Later, when some older dominent bull elephants were brought in, the juveniles became submissive to them and peaceful. When testosterone was measured again, it was MUCH lower. So apparently, the level of testosterone in young males IS affected by the presence of an older adult male. A young male probably automatically becomes submissive as a survival response and the testosterone is lowered that way.
I wonder if it works the same way that women who spend time together end up synchronising their periods….? As in a pheromone response.
Sky, I’m with you on that, I feel such a sense of grief, partly for what I thought I had and never did, but partly for him too, of what he coulda been.
Interesting on testosterone. Or, it could be related th the oedipal theory too.
Athena
Sky, that was me that posted the story about the elephants and they were being reintroduced to an area that the elephants had been killed off in and it was EASIER to move smaller younger males and females than move adults. The result was the young males packed up into “gangs” to go out and hurt things….so they decided to move in the larger bulls (BIG JOB to catch, crate and move them) but they did and it was a total success. The young males settled down. I hadn’t heard about the Testosterone levels being measured in them though. Thanks for that update on the story.
In different animals testosterone had different effects in the womb. Goats who usually have twins or triplets frequently have a male and a female kid, no problem, but cattle who usually only have one calf (twins are about 1 in every 90 births) if one is a male and one a female, the female baby born a twin to a male will never sexually mature or have babies of her own. The testosterone of her sib in the womb messes with her hormones and she becomes a “free martin” (never did know where the term came from though, so don’t ask! LOL) She may look normal or may not externally, but internally she is undeveloped.
It is odd to me that it works different in different species.
In goats, unlike cattle, you can never “breed the horns off” of them and make them naturally polled (without horns) because if a goat has 2 NO-horn genes they will have no horns but will not be sexually complete, if the have 1 no_horn gene they will not have horns but they will be able to reproduce but only half their offspring will not have horns and the other half will have horns.
The reason is, the horn gene is connected somehow to the gene for sexual completeness and the two can’t be separated. Not so in cattle.
So what is true for one species may NOT be true for another one concerning testosterone and its influences on behavior or other characteristics.
Oxytocin (the bonding hormone) seems to be pretty consistent across mammalian species though, and necessary for the mothers bonding to the offspring at the very least. Grooming behavior and stroking also releases this hormone as well. In humans, cuddling or sexual intimacy does as well.
Thank you for the book review, Donna.
Sky and Oxy,
I’m very interested in this hormone stuff, syncing up of periods, and also oxytocin released through grooming/stroking… I honestly think there is so much here that we do not understand about how we affect each other in these hidden ways…
for instance, with the syncing of periods thing, I really am not sure about this, but isn’t there something to do with one of the females being the “alpha” and the others sync up to her? If so… how does the group determine who is the alpha? Or is it the alpha who decides and imposes her hormones on the others?
Kind of like the bull elephants, in that study you mentioned.
I’m wondering… how does doing “gray rock” (a deliberate acting against one’s emotional inclination, perhaps, or one’s hormones) affect the hormones of the spath? Can we consciously manipulate our hormones (or pheromones) and affect the hormones of others?
I know those are off the wall questions. They just came to my mind so I’m musing…
20years,
great questions. You are intuiting that there are connections between emotional expressions and the permanent state of our brains (beyond mood).
As a kid, I could see some of my classmates faces and see that they were vulnerable to scapegoating. It made me fearful. I wondered if I looked like that too.
As a little tiny kid, I used to look at my aunt’s face and it scared me because she had a pinched, angry look. When I was about 22, her spath husband killed her with cancer. (you know what I mean) Now I know that she was in constant emotional pain. He cheated on her, he berated her, he was a big fat dick and still is.
Later, I realized that many people who are abused have a certain pained expression on their face. Many of them have auto immune problems even years after the abuser is gone.
So yes, I think spaths have a radar for facial expressions. The question, I think, is a “chicken or the egg” question.
The problem with this question is that most scientists and doctors are not in tuned with it. There is nobody doing double blind studies on facial expressions and spaths. LOTS of studies should be done on spaths and their victims but instead we execute the serial killers and sweep the victims under the rug.
I think that most abusers will pick easy victims. If the face expresses vulnerability they will go for it. My own exspath – is pure psychopath. I do know that he likes vulnerable victims, but I also know that he will go after anything that moves and has money. He likes the challenge of the con. Nobody is safe, not even another spath.