Character Disturbance—The Phenomenon of Our Age, the new book by George K. Simon, Ph.D., does two things really well: It paints a no-nonsense picture of how people with personality disorders, including sociopaths, behave. And it explains why traditional psychotherapy, in attempting to understand these individuals, gets it so wrong.
The basic problem, Simon explains, is that classic concepts in psychotherapy, like those advanced by Sigmund Freud, propose that people develop defensive strategies against a cruel, heartless world in order to protect their deep, authentic selves. This results in “neurosis,” defined in Wikipedia as “a variety of mental disorders in which emotional distress or unconscious conflict is expressed through various physical, physiological and mental disturbances, which may include physical symptoms.”
Many, many therapists follow the classic psychotherapeutic paradigm, which Simon neatly summarized. He wrote:
Let’s boil down traditional schools’ underlying assumptions about how people become disturbed, and how you help them heal: People are inherently good and geared towards health. They become unhealthy because bad or “traumatic” things happen to them. They develop fears and insecurities in response to their traumas. They learn to protect themselves, cope with stress or “defend” themselves against emotional pain in less than optimal ways. With unconditional positive regard, empathy and support they can heal their wounds, lower their defenses, overcome their fears, and become naturally inclined once again to lead healthy, loving, compassionate lives.
These ideas have been around for so long that they are ingrained in our culture and accepted as “truth.” It’s gotten to the point that everyone believes the concepts apply to all people. And that’s how we get into trouble.
Sociopaths don’t act the way they do to compensate for some deep internal pain. They are deceitful, manipulative and aggressive because that’s who they are.
Character disturbance
Simon describes disordered individuals, including those with sociopathy, psychopathy and antipersonality disorder, as having a “character disturbance.” He defines them as:
individuals whose problems are related to their dysfunctional attitudes and thinking patterns, their shallow, self-centered relationships, their moral immaturity and social irresponsibility, and their habitual dysfunctional behavior patterns.
Simon spends much of the book laying out exactly how character-disturbed individuals think, behave and view the world. Their characteristics include disregard for the truth, impaired capacity for empathy and contrition, deficient impulse control, impaired conscience, and more. The traits are all familiar to Lovefraud readers who have lived in close proximity to them.
A really important insight is this: Simon says that “the primary interpersonal agenda for aggressive and other character-disordered personalities is position, position, position.” In other words, these individuals always want to be dominant—an idea that’s hard for the rest of us to accept. Simon writes:
It’s incomprehensible for most of us to conceive that in every situation, every encounter, every engagement, the aggressive personality is predisposed to jockey with us for the superior position, even in situations with no recognizable need to do so. The failure to understand and accept this, however, is how aggressive personalities so often succeed in their quest to gain advantage over others.
Why we don’t get it
Those of us who are fairly normal, although perhaps at times unsure of ourselves, and those of us who are neurotic, are at a severe disadvantage when dealing with character-disturbed individuals. Why? Because we don’t understand the extent to which they are different from us.
Simon made several points that I thought clearly described how our lack of awareness gets us into trouble:
- He explains that we are concerned about how our character-disordered partners are feeling, and why they seem angry all the time, without realizing that anger is not a true emotion, but a tactic to manipulate and control us.
- He explains that the true reason predators are successful manipulators is not so much that they are good at it, although they are, but that the rest of us are reluctant to judge others harshly.
- He explains that people who intuitively sense aggression, but can’t objectively verify it, are prone to being manipulated and controlled.
The problem is, we don’t know how the character-disturbed people think and act, but they know how we think and act. Simon writes:
They know the attitudes neurotics hold, and the naiveties that make them vulnerable to tactics of manipulation and impression management. They often know the neurotics in their lives better than those neurotics know themselves.
This book can help you level the playing field. It can help you understand the tactics and games that sociopaths and other people with character disturbances use to manipulate you. It also explains why adherents to traditional psychotherapy concepts don’t understand sociopaths, and why their attempts at treatment are useless.
Character Disturbance—The Phenomenon of Our Age is available on Amazon.com.
20Years,
It seems to me that the spaths, lacking intuitive empathy, can’t “feel” our emotions. I think normal people can intuit each other’s emotions but spaths have to “work” at it by watching tv and learning which facial expressions mean what.
If they have a visceral response to another person’s suffering or happiness (the way you and I have), it is so suppressed that they don’t feel it anymore or they might interpret it as a stomach ache. Lol.
By the same token, it’s possible that they are numbed to other things. I did mention to my spath that I can smell fear on a cat. He said, “you can?” He was VERY interested. Well the reason I can smell fear on a cat is because they have scent glands on their butts that squirt pheromones when they freak out and poof their fur out. But spath never noticed this.
Spaths also don’t notice beauty – they are numb to aesthetics. I notice that they have no opinion on what is beautiful, though they DO pay close attention to what others think and then they appropriate that opinion as if it were their own. They don’t understand the deeper meanings of anything and they can only percieve what is on the surface. That is, they perceive with the left brain, in a calculating fashion, rather than with the right brain which is intuitive.
That’s why Gray Rock works. Spaths are the easiest to fool once you know what they are: babies.
Here’s a funny link about evil babies.
http://www.cracked.com/article_18404_6-shockingly-evil-things-babies-are-capable-of.html
As far as being subject to the effect of testosterone from another male, it would be a really interesting experiment to see if it works on humans the way it works on elephants.
Louise,
here’s a woman who did give up her left hemisphere for a while.
http://www.ted.com/talks/jill_bolte_taylor_s_powerful_stroke_of_insight.html
EDIT:
I forgot to answer your question if I’d ever had intuition and my friends disagreed with me. Yes. But I’m very convincing and logical when I argue, so most people – even the spath – will usually admit to seeing my point of view. So, when my spath was pulling the last con on me, and I saw it as clear as day I began to email my “friend” K and tell him all about it. I could not believe his responses!! It was pure word salad, accusations, meandering etc…
I couldn’t understand why he wasn’t seeing the truth in what I told him and why he was turning everything around.
It turned out that he was a spath too and my spath had already turned him against me (using sex no doubt – since K is a closet bisexual just like spath). I figured it out later, by remembering many “tells” and WTF? moments that suddenly made sense.
I read this book last year, when it came out. It is by the same author as “Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing”, which was the first book that woke me up to S/N/A/P’s basic personality.
I am amazed that every time I do defend myself against a bully’s (lies, rages, or put-downs etc) they BACK DOWN. They seem utterly confused.
I’m still not good at doing it “in the moment” . . so I just write them an e-mail (after I’ve digested it) . . telling them to STOP picking on me (or putting-me down, being abusive, lying etc). Then I say (or write) “YOU are a BULLY” . . (because they are, and they know it!).
I find that their accusations usually start with the word YOU, and LIKEWISE I respond with “YOU”. i.e. (YOU lied, YOU put-me down, YOU had a rage attack, YOU didn’t keep your commitment, YOU are a bully…blah blah blah). This book taught me to put the responsibility FIRMLY where it belongs…i.e., on the AGGRESSOR.
And then, get them out of your life (if you can).
Hehehe. Sociopathic babies… that one is a keeper. 🙂
Skylar, you could be absolutely correct about spaths being able to read facial expressions and that’s how they read us and choose to respond to it. I’m not saying I don’t believe you. But I am a curious person.
I’m wondering (really just exploring and musing, here), what DO they feel and what DO they get out of it?
I’m agreeing that they are the center of their own universe and we are just supporting actors, and they cannot put themselves in our place at all, take our perspective, etc. (i.e., lack empathy)
But I think they must feel *something.* I wondering/thinking that it might be some sort of pleasure, akin to a sexual pleasure, some sort of adrenaline (a hormone) rush.
And wikipedia gives this definition of pheromone: “A pheromone (from Greek φÎÏω phero “to bear” + hormone from Greek á½Ïμή – “impetus”) is a secreted or excreted chemical factor that triggers a social response in members of the same species. Pheromones are chemicals capable of acting outside the body of the secreting individual to impact the behavior of the receiving individual.[1] There are alarm pheromones, food trail pheromones, sex pheromones, and many others that affect behavior or physiology. Their use among insects has been particularly well documented. In addition, some vertebrates and plants communicate by using pheromones.”
What if there are spath/victim (predator/prey) pheromones?
So I’m following this train of thought… that there are pheromones operating under our (and the spath’s) conscious radar, affecting our behavior and emotions, and then the pheromones that WE give off, in turn, give the spaths their “supply.”
It’s not the same thing at all as proposing that they “intuit our emotions” in an empathic way that would lead to their having an appropriate or normal response or interaction with normal individuals… but I think, rather, it could be some sort of perversion of the endocrine or pheromonal system… something to do with receptors and addiction, that prevents normal hormonal/pheromonal response.
And Gray Rock may work just in the way you propose. Or, maybe (just wondering) it could have something to do with what PRECEDES the use of Gray Rock: namely, our dawning awareness of what we are dealing with.
I know for me the impact of realizing that my ex-husband was a spath (and all that that meant) created within me a different response to him or attitude towards him. He no longer had the ability to make me “react” emotionally because I saw that no matter what he said or did (Mr. Nicey Nice or the Smirking Liar or the Tantrum Guy) it was ALL a mask. I no longer needed to view any part of him as being “the real him.”
So that made doing Gray Rock a no-brainer. It made complete sense to just be as bland, boring and unflappable as possible.
But I also FELT it. I wasn’t just acting Gray Rock. I was BEING it.
It is very true that by not giving him any facial expressions, that might have been all there was to it. But I am also proposing that there might be more to this emotion business (namely, pheromones or whatever you want to call it) than all of us realize.
What got me wondering was that testosterone bull elephant story. That is really something! Imagine that the presence of another person can affect the levels of MY hormones! And then I got to wondering, did that bull elephant DO anything or FEEL anything in order to be the dominant testosterone male in the group? and what if we can control others’ hormones through something we put out there (whether conscious or unconscious). and if so, what would it be? what would we need to be putting out there (in our defense) and what would spaths be putting out there (in order to gather us into their web of torture)?
Maybe if the spath is thinking, “I want to dominate everyone” then he/she is putting out there some kind of alpha pheromones that affect the surrounding group OR a specific target.
I don’t think anyone knows if this is possible or if so, how it works exactly.
But I like to be open minded. 😉
Sherry Winter,
I’m glad that you are doing what you have to do in order to survive and thrive. It i s amazing the things that happen to us in the wake of the psychopathic attacks, isn’t it?
It takes a while to catch up. Good luck with your new job!
Wolves in Sheep’s clothing was a very good book, and I am awaiting my copy of this one, but in the meantime….it is nice to read a book by an author you already respect.
skylar:
I love the baby link! So true, yeah?
That stroke lady was like wow, how amazing!!! I loved that link…thanks for sharing that one.
20years and everyone:
I had this happen to me. It’s embarrassing, but here goes. On my flight to Hawaii at the end of December (long flight…eight hours), I started feeling very amorous. I just had a lot of that “hormonal” feeling if you know what I mean. I didn’t think much of it other than I had a spike in hormones for some reason. Well, a little while later, I figured it out. It hit me out of the blue…there was a man sitting next to me on the flight and I think I was picking up on the testosterone that he was giving off. He was flying with his family so it wasn’t like he was flirting or anything, but he was a very manly man. So funny!!! So to your point, 20years…yes, I think it is entirely possible for us to pick up on men’s hormones. I think I sure did! 🙂 The more I think about it, the more I think it to be true as I only had that spike in that “feeling” while I was on the flight sitting next to that man.
S-paths = babies… interesting. I was thinking more like toddlers throwing tantrums ;-D
This book sounds like a whole new angle – and I look fwd to reading it.
I haven’t posted on here in years, and only occasionally read them, yet something about this book review triggered the thought of how, having dealt with an s-path partner for 7 years in the past, and having had an NPD father and other partners has likely affected how I stand up for myself in the workplace – I have been the scapegoat on several occasions – it’s as if I attract the worst offenders in a group and they project their feelings about themselves on to me somehow, trying to make me responsible for their pain. I’ve almost always been a top performer in every task, so this also destroys my desire to do well, and makes me feel sullen and almost hopeless, altho I tend to hide my feelings well. I also wonder if being good at my job invites envy – something posted above was a lightbulb for me, that s-paths are all about ‘position’. In fact, I even wondered if their attempts to destroy my reputation [and more] is an effort to make me look bad so I won’t have a voice or an audience (credibility) when I try to expose their bad behavior, because maybe somehow they sense that I can see right through them and will blow their cover. I do see right through them when the behavior starts, and yet by then I have started to fear their tactics, or being jobless…
I really want to get to the source of this issue, and hope that by following some of the posts on here and sharing as well, I can come to some insights that will help. One counselor recently suggested that I learn feedback techniques that call ppl on their negative behavior in such a way that they are disarmed by the neutral place from which I deliver my questioning – “You seem to be angry, and that anger seems disproportionate to the fact that someone has taken your tool – is there anything you’d like to say about this?”, for instance…
Thanks, all, for the time and effort you all put into being here for each other, and ourselves.
20years,
I think I see what you’re saying: can people smell meekness and dominance? Do emotions have a smell?
Sex hormones probably do, have an affect that way. So testosterone, being a dominance hormone, very likely does carry a dominence scent. I read about an experiment in which the lowest ranking member of a group of chimps was given a testosterone shot. He beat up each member of the group til he got to the alpha male and beat him up and became the alpha. But when the testosterone wore off, a monkey came along and beat him up and pushed him back to his previous lowest rank. ( Reminds me of the story “Flowers for Algernon” 🙁 )
You asked, “did the bull elephant feel anything or do anything…”
Yep, the testosterone makes him feel entitled. He acted entitled. That’s what spaths do too. It’s amazing how your bearing, your attitude and your audacity can get others to respect you. Especially if those others are SHEEP.
Here’s proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeuL5IGimCQ
😆
You also asked, “what DO they feel and what DO they get out of it?”
Spaths feel envy when they first see the look of happiness on your face. They are envious because you ARE somebody and they are only empty shells. So they attack you. When you are brought down they feel “vindicated” and they say, “she deserved it” and “I’m justified”. This is the scapegoating mechanism in effect. Their sadism is a form of schadenfreude. They also feel powerful because they were able to cause your downfall. It feels cathartic to them.
Rene Girard explains it in “Violence and the Sacred” only he doesn’t understand spaths. He is explaining the cycle of violence in humanity. What he doesn’t get, is that not all humans are that way. Only the primitive ones and spaths.