Character Disturbance—The Phenomenon of Our Age, the new book by George K. Simon, Ph.D., does two things really well: It paints a no-nonsense picture of how people with personality disorders, including sociopaths, behave. And it explains why traditional psychotherapy, in attempting to understand these individuals, gets it so wrong.
The basic problem, Simon explains, is that classic concepts in psychotherapy, like those advanced by Sigmund Freud, propose that people develop defensive strategies against a cruel, heartless world in order to protect their deep, authentic selves. This results in “neurosis,” defined in Wikipedia as “a variety of mental disorders in which emotional distress or unconscious conflict is expressed through various physical, physiological and mental disturbances, which may include physical symptoms.”
Many, many therapists follow the classic psychotherapeutic paradigm, which Simon neatly summarized. He wrote:
Let’s boil down traditional schools’ underlying assumptions about how people become disturbed, and how you help them heal: People are inherently good and geared towards health. They become unhealthy because bad or “traumatic” things happen to them. They develop fears and insecurities in response to their traumas. They learn to protect themselves, cope with stress or “defend” themselves against emotional pain in less than optimal ways. With unconditional positive regard, empathy and support they can heal their wounds, lower their defenses, overcome their fears, and become naturally inclined once again to lead healthy, loving, compassionate lives.
These ideas have been around for so long that they are ingrained in our culture and accepted as “truth.” It’s gotten to the point that everyone believes the concepts apply to all people. And that’s how we get into trouble.
Sociopaths don’t act the way they do to compensate for some deep internal pain. They are deceitful, manipulative and aggressive because that’s who they are.
Character disturbance
Simon describes disordered individuals, including those with sociopathy, psychopathy and antipersonality disorder, as having a “character disturbance.” He defines them as:
individuals whose problems are related to their dysfunctional attitudes and thinking patterns, their shallow, self-centered relationships, their moral immaturity and social irresponsibility, and their habitual dysfunctional behavior patterns.
Simon spends much of the book laying out exactly how character-disturbed individuals think, behave and view the world. Their characteristics include disregard for the truth, impaired capacity for empathy and contrition, deficient impulse control, impaired conscience, and more. The traits are all familiar to Lovefraud readers who have lived in close proximity to them.
A really important insight is this: Simon says that “the primary interpersonal agenda for aggressive and other character-disordered personalities is position, position, position.” In other words, these individuals always want to be dominant—an idea that’s hard for the rest of us to accept. Simon writes:
It’s incomprehensible for most of us to conceive that in every situation, every encounter, every engagement, the aggressive personality is predisposed to jockey with us for the superior position, even in situations with no recognizable need to do so. The failure to understand and accept this, however, is how aggressive personalities so often succeed in their quest to gain advantage over others.
Why we don’t get it
Those of us who are fairly normal, although perhaps at times unsure of ourselves, and those of us who are neurotic, are at a severe disadvantage when dealing with character-disturbed individuals. Why? Because we don’t understand the extent to which they are different from us.
Simon made several points that I thought clearly described how our lack of awareness gets us into trouble:
- He explains that we are concerned about how our character-disordered partners are feeling, and why they seem angry all the time, without realizing that anger is not a true emotion, but a tactic to manipulate and control us.
- He explains that the true reason predators are successful manipulators is not so much that they are good at it, although they are, but that the rest of us are reluctant to judge others harshly.
- He explains that people who intuitively sense aggression, but can’t objectively verify it, are prone to being manipulated and controlled.
The problem is, we don’t know how the character-disturbed people think and act, but they know how we think and act. Simon writes:
They know the attitudes neurotics hold, and the naiveties that make them vulnerable to tactics of manipulation and impression management. They often know the neurotics in their lives better than those neurotics know themselves.
This book can help you level the playing field. It can help you understand the tactics and games that sociopaths and other people with character disturbances use to manipulate you. It also explains why adherents to traditional psychotherapy concepts don’t understand sociopaths, and why their attempts at treatment are useless.
Character Disturbance—The Phenomenon of Our Age is available on Amazon.com.
Hi 2shiny,
I’m sorry about your work situation. It sounds like you’re surrounded by spaths.
The book Violence and the Sacred does explain the scapegoat mechanism very well but it’s a difficult book to read and very long. You can learn as much by googling: Girard scapegoat mechanism. Also, mimetic rivalry. Read as much as you can on that and you’ll see the connections between envy and scapegoating.
According to Girard, it is because people are so competitive and envious that there is violence. In order to avert reciprical violence, they don’t attack each other. Instead, they choose the innocent one, the one who has no violence in them, to attack (scapegoat). This polarizes the group’s violence against the one who will take responsibility for the sins of the entire group. Once they drive you out, they will all feel better for a while.
sick huh?
I think the only way out of it is to NOT participate. Gray Rock them.
G1s –
The author is describing the approach of traditional therapy, which he thinks is flawed. He doesn’t believe the approach.
Louise, yes! That is pretty much what I’m thinking about. How there is something (hormone-like) coming from the other person, which we pick up on, but without conscious awareness that that sort of thing is even possible, we will misattribute our response to something else, something more concrete, or less to do with a sixth (or seventh) sense and more to do with one of our five senses.
And vice versa.
Sky, that is very interesting about competition and envy as a trigger for attack. And especially the scapegoating part of it. Though where spaths are concerned, I think there is also a pleasure aspect to bringing someone down. I know you said Girard doesn’t get spaths, so does he mention the enjoyment part (as opposed to or in addition to the vindication part)?
G1s,
In my opinion traditional therpy is effective, though likely not completely developed, for NON character disordered people.
I know I benefitted from the persistent non-judgement, kindness, and encouragement from my therapist, while I examined my past and my own issues and behaviors. The key (to me) is that I was, deep down, a decent and kind person, who was injured by my upbringing.
It was a long process, and painful, bringing up lots of feelings and realizations. It did help me find my authentic self and not just be my ‘reactionary’ self.
Of course this would never work with a character disordered person. There is no ‘deep down good person’ lurking in there.
My therapist explained it thusly: She said I was like an onion and we were peeling layers to get to the core of my difficulties, and expose my ‘true’ self.
She said personality disordered people were like scrambeled eggs. The yolk and the white could NEVER be seperated and put back into the shell. That the ‘disorder’ is thoroughtly mixed into the TOTAL person and cannot, through therapy, be fixed. She did understand.
So some do. But it seems the larger culture of therapy is still to catch on.
Wow, skylar, Girard is fascinating…. lost on youtube at the moment… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HS3wD0HNfI
Thank you all – what a great blog thread… Pheremones and Gray rock – think there is definitely something in the pheromones and testosterone theory. I am only now beginning to get a wider picture of my ex spath and the long view of ‘our’ life together. I only fully realised what he was 7 months ago and broke all contact then …we are in our second year of divorce proceedings, and he’s still doing the run around …about 8 years ago I did performance coach training, part of which was neuro-linguistics. I recall at the time being fascinated by the fact of body language, facial expressions etc and lying and remember long conversation with the ex s . Around this time his face changed expression, previously when he directly lied he’d shut his eyes when talking to you ( I’d known this man since we were 9 years old and he’d always done this…) but he developed this odd wide open stare where his face seemed inactive and immobile – I laughed and said don’t change your facial expression it still looks like your lying, of course I didn’t know then, he lied about everything but the way he lied was the key – he’d talk in a kind of circle, you’d be confused and in the end it seemed he never really said anything cos you couldn’t pin down what he actually said as it was so circular. So you ‘presume’ you understood what he was getting at and he’d let you believe it without actually saying it and when you found out it was a lie he denied he’d said it – which ironically was true he’d let you believe it till it suited him – does that make sense ?? He also used to watch a tv series called ‘lie to me’ – the programme was a crime drama about a profiler who could work out crimes by watching people and there body language , the ex s was mad about this programme, recorded it watched it over and over – must have been like a class in how to avoid being detected for him, as it showed you how you could tell someone was lying… I passed my coaching, and as you’d expect our ‘relationship’ got worse pretty fast. I challenged all the time about the ‘lies’ – it was bad… We had 4 sons, I thought he was ill. The ex s was in the military, I contacted them saying I believed he was ill. No joy there – ideal place for a spath I realise now. To deal with him, his moods, his aggression even when he then turned on the charm, I didn’t realise it at the time but I went what I now know as grey rock… I showed no emotions ever. Even when he went on tours of duty abroad , I’d say good bye, wave him off. Then sob my heart out after he’d gone. Racked with guilt, racked with worry. But alittle releived the pressure was off. My boys and I would post him mail and parcels, he’d phone and beg me not to leave him, he was sorry – I believed him, it was circular then… Till he came home and it started again. I didn’t know then about the other women a kid with someone else even, debts you name it he did it… 30 years married .. I called a halt two years ago. Our last family holiday I remember well , I was still grey rocking it, he said ‘ You know how I feel about you (?), I don’t think we haven’t got a future (?) I need to know who you really are, your dreams everything, you never show any emotions , do you care? I need to see your tears, I’ll always be here for
you, but you need to let me in..’ on and on he went … I did the cracked record and repeated over and over ‘… At this present time this is who I am, at this present time this is who I am…’ he inevitably lost his temper and showed his colours – I was boring, repulsive, old, unattractive, stupid, physically disgusting, you name it and I just said ‘… At the present this is who I am…’
He couldn’t read me anymore. ‘grey ROCK ON’ He definitely fed off my emotions – I’d have a great day, or the sun would be shining, and he’d come in and it was like someone had turned the sun off – I genuinely thought it was me, only now in no contact do I realise it was him. And pheromones – birds play dead when a cat gets them, cat gets bored walks away, bird flys off safe…my ex s was funny about smells and scents and he’d say something smelt fausty or damp when it clearly didn’t, maybe cos their normal sense of right and wrong have no working function – maybe there sense of smell is heightened regarding pheromones… Just an idea. Sorry to have written such alot. Thank you all so much , you have kept me going in the past 8 or 9 months.
… I should have explained clearer – when the ex s ‘ lied’ it was about silly things, did you eat the cheese, move my book, seen my bag … Hence the, what I thought childish eye shutting … He’d shut his eyes and say no I haven’t seen so and so ( he had had a very abusive childhood and i imagined the silly lies was still an imprint from this.. I guess I thought it was his way of surviving…the ‘ big lying’ was another thing….looking back you realise how foolish you were but at the time – you just can’t see it your sucked into a vacuum…you survive till the seal is broken , and you have to face it all..
Tin-angel:
It makes perfect sense. My X spath did the exact same thing as far as talk, talk, talk in circles and never said a thing. I think he just liked to hear himself. Yep, let you believe it as long as it suited him. Oh, yes…I have seen it all.
Welcome Tin Angel, and post away! Glad you have been lurking and learning because KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, and we must take back the power over ourselves that we gave them.
Keep on reading and learning, and POSTING!
20 years,
Girard considers the scapegoat mechanism as a way to focus violence and release it. So the result is catharsis and peace.
That is why the scapegoat becomes a “god” after it has been killed, because it brings the miraculous peace between the rivals who couldn’t find peace any other way.
With spaths, it can take a different form. One spath will pick out a victim. This victim usually reminds him of his mother, who is the actual person he wants to kill but can’t. Then he slanders the innocent victim to get other spaths and fence sitters to join in on the attack. Once he kills his “mother” he feels justified (though he has no idea it is his mother that he wants to kill) for a while. His minions are just sickos with their own infantile feelings of powerlessness. So the spath and his minions were never actually rivals to begin with, they are all just degenerates with a need to blame others for their feelings of worthlessness.
2shiny,
I saw the first of those videos. I’ll have to see the rest. Glad you are liking Girard – he’s awesome.
Tin Angel, your post made perfect sense and it is NOT too long. I loved your broken record, ’” At this present time this is who I am, at this present time this is who I am”’ That’s one for the anti-spath TOOL BOX! THANKS!