This week while reflecting on the writings that most influenced my thinking about psychopathy/sociopathy, I received a letter from a mother of a five year-old boy whose father shows many signs of the disorder. She wrote:
Do you believe that children can show signs of being psychopathic? If so do you teach them to suppress the way they really feel by masking the problems with fake feelings? Can feelings of love really be learned? Just because someone on the outside appears like they have feelings does that mean inside they have actually changed? As you know they are good actors. The skill is learned very quickly to lie to blend in with the others. I bought your book off Amazon I should be getting it today. And i am also reading Dr. Hares book. I will try to look at your book some more today.
Shortly after my son’s father was arrested, I sat on my bed, with our seven month old baby asleep beside me, with the psychiatry DSM manual open to the page containing the criteria for “antisocial personality disorder”. I asked myself “do any of these criteria relate to common themes discussed in the child development literature.” I had to answer that question to know how best to mother my own child.
Interestingly, all the criteria mapped onto three developmentally acquired abilities: Ability to Love, Impulse Control, and Moral Reasoning. I then vowed I would read everything there was to read about each of these.
I started with Ability to Love. In my opinion the most important book about Ability to Love is Learning to Love by Harry Harlow, Ph.D. He is the scientist who demonstrated that a baby monkey clings to his mother out of pleasure in affection and “contact comfort” not because mother is a source of food. Prior to Dr. Harlow, scientists believed that the child learned to relate to his mother because she was associated with food.
The profound conclusion reached by Dr. Harlow’s research team is that babies are born to “learn to love” just like babies are born to learn language. We don’t come into the world talking but as our brains develop and we are exposed to language we learn to talk. Similarly, we don’t come into the world loving, but as our brains develop and we receive the right input we learn to love.
There are other interesting parallels between talking and loving including the observation that both are disordered in autism and both are influenced by genetics.
My world completely changed when I read page 44 of learning to love. It is on this page that Dr. Harlow discusses a very important developmental sequence. Ability to Love starts to develop before pleasure in aggression and competition sets in:
“The primary basis of aggression control is the formation of strong generalized bonds of peer love or affection… All primates, monkeys and men alike are born with aggressive potential, but aggression is a rather later maturing variable. It is obvious that a one year old suffers from fear and is terrified by maternal separation, but the child neither knows nor can express aggression at this tender age…This lack of aggression targets accounts in part for the fact that “evil emotion” culminates during the age-mate stage, long after peer affection and love have developed. It is the antecedent age-mate love that holds the fury of aggression within acceptable bounds for in group associates.”
Love starts to develop before aggression does, and has a head start in the race for the brain connections that form the basis of our values.
Now back to our 5 year old boy. I am very disturbed by the recent trend of referring to children as “psychopathic” in the scientific literature. Not that she does not describe symptoms of psychopathy, but to call a 5 year old psychopathic, negates the importance of learning to love and acts like it is an inborn ability.
I would say that this boy is learning disabled and requires extra help when it comes to learning to love. Just like speech therapy would help him if he couldn’t speak, love therapy will help him if he can’t love. Studies of autistic children show that a mother’s love makes a big differences for many severely affected children. Why shouldn’t we at least give this 5 year old the benefit of the doubt and give him love therapy.
Many studies show that the parents of at-risk children struggle with loving them. It is hard to love an impulsive child who goes after the cat with sharp tools. These parents are also harmed by suggestions that psychopathy is entirely genetic and firmly in place by age 3.
The focus on “discipline” also hurts these families because children need to learn to love. How can they learn to love if the people who are supposed to teach them are constantly yelling at them and scolding them or spanking them?
What is the answer?
An at-risk child is a full time job! Parents have to love that child 24/7 and not leave him alone to go to the kitchen to pick up the knife and go after the cat. Preventive positive parenting means waking up before the child, being there when he opens his eyes and saying, “I love you”. It means giving him hugs and kisses, playing and having fun together.
Skylar, I don’t know if you were quoting from someone above (I’m behind on posts) or elsewhere, but what you said about the sense of humor, lack of smiles is sooooooo true.
Jill, don’t worry about writing back, you have enough on your plate! But yes, wonderful reaction and a very good sign. Kids are still very, very mold-able at this young age, and the best is yet to be!
http://braceanalysis.com/faq4/type_b_characteristics.htm
JAH,
It’s from this link I found. It completely describes my xP to a T!
I’ve read it over and over again because I’m just shocked. It’s as if he was interviewed for the article.
I am actually profoundly affected by reading the description. I’m not sure why, it’s as if it unlocked something in my brain but I can’t figure out what it is.
As I’ve mentioned before, for a few weeks before NC, I was recording my conversations with the P. Now, I’ve listened to a couple of them again. I felt I had to do that in light of this new profile.
I’m hearing new clues in his voice that indicate lies. Even certain breaths he takes are dead giveaways now. It’s interesting. When he says “What?!” It’s because I caught him and he’s trying to think up what to say. So he’s not as good as I remember him being. But at the time, i was emotionally involved so I would get triggered by his irrationality. Now, listening to it, it’s just bizarre.
So sinister how he speaks of his feelings. But it’s also amazing that he actually hears what I’m saying and trys desperately to refute my logic before giving up and using the deflection ploy (where he changes the subject).
Skylar and JAH:
I noticed years ago with the s that, when I asked a ‘hard’ question…and caught him off guard….the auto response was ‘WHAT’……or sometimes it would be jumbled and become ‘huh’.
Those two words are RED FLAGS to me!
I got wise……and started confronting the ‘huhs’ and ‘whats’…..I would immediately say…YOU HEARD ME….
I would mimik him…”HUH-WHAT”
then without thinking sometimes…he would throw out a response to me (w/o needing to repeat the question surprisingly)…..I knew it was always a lie and I would egg him on from there…..not backing down.
He had no idea I was on to him…..and would jumble and fumble….
This, I believe taught him…..she’s not going away…..and he needed to change his tactics…..He couldn’t much…he thought he was ‘on it’.
He developed this hand in mouth gig…..(soon to be foot in mouth) HAH!
He would put his fingers in his mouth or rub his face….
He only did it if he was sitting down……and he would start playing with his face…..and mouth….like he didn’t want you to see the actual words coming from the mouth….
HE DID THIS THE WHOLE DEPOSITION.
This also was a major red flag…because he ALWAYS called the kids or anyone around him out when they would touch thier face…..he’s say….DON”T TOUCH YOUR FACE……
His opinion on face touching was is caused zits or breakouts…
So when he evolved into this face touching….it was alarming to me…..
I would call him on that too…..DON”T TOUCH YOUR FACE….he quickly pulled his hands away and ended the ‘conversation’ with another gaslilghting comment….
I too taped calls or ‘conversations’ with the ex. AND I have listened to them…..to confirm behaviors and styles of speech….It was all part of the study of divorce…..and what I needed to say or HOW I needed to present things.
VERY HELPFUL and insightful, given all I learned here and in my recon and research of a S.
I could move forward without a shadow of a doubt of his weakpoints, styles etc……
I have one tape over an hour long…..with him cutting me off and at one point early on, I decided not to speak and just listen to the WORDS and twists he was spewing…..it wasn’t about a ‘conversation’ it was about him attempting to convince me of his lies….AGAIN! But….I picked up on it early on…..and it was confirmed….keep talking asshole….keep talking…
I always said to him he talks too much….I would say…..If you have nothing to say….SAY NOTHING!
He just couldn’t stop himself.
REMEMBER: Loose lips sink ships!
The bonus was, at the end of the talk fest…..I asked him about the kids and the drug house…..after being quiet for an hour without him even noticing he was the only one involved in the talk…..he then says….WHY, ARE YOU TAPING ME?…..I said what would it matter, with a laugh grunt, he said ARE YOU TAPING ME?…..I reapeated myself…..then click.
thanks for the link, yes, that is VERY validating! Thank you! And like both of you above, I remember the P I was involved with would say WHAT?! also….too, too funny.
Skylar, that description hit me hard too…I think it is just because it is so right on, and for me, it always makes me a little sick to really, really face the truth about these people.
JAH,
I don’t know what it is but i keep reading it over and over again. Like I’m mesmerized by it.
http://news.aol.com/article/john-tabutt-shoots-fiancee-day-before/712362
OK, I’m psychic or whatever, but I just know this guy intended to kill his fiance and he will never be prosecuted. the plan has all the simplicity of a P-plan.
huh-
Erin,
you think I’m just finding a P in every bush, don’t you?
But read the story. They lived together, why would he think there was an intruder in the house just because he heard someone walking in the hallway?
Everything he did is something my P would have done if he thought he could get away with it. First, propose marriage and set a date. PROOF THAT HE LOVES HER. Then just before the wedding, mistake her for an intruder and shoot her. Then, call the police crying. I have recordings of my P crying – pathetic. Then say, “oh she’s still breathing. Hang in there honey” – NOT.
Should’ve been SCREAMING “HURRY UP, GET HERE RIGHT NOW”. Then been doing cpr the whole time.
I wonder how the assets were set up for inheritance and how long til he has a new girlfriend.
It’s a simple plan that would need to prove motive. But his crying on the 911 tape will make them not even look.
I thought I had an intruder in the house,” he told the emergency dispatcher.” “Honest to God, she looks dead.”
why would he say, “honest to God, she looks dead” Was he afraid they wouldn’t believe him about “something”. Why say “honest to God”?
then the Oh, look, not dead, “hang in there honey”. sooo much BS, “HANG IN THERE HONEY?”, how about, “OMG, honey I love you so much, please live, I need you.”?
Skylar….
You crack me up….If you were with me, we would BOTH be laughing….. 🙂
NO…..but since you mention it…..stop looking in those rogue bushes…..
Actually, I read this article this afternoon…..and what struck me as odd……besides the whole ‘uncanny timing’ of day before wedding etc….
Was…..any time I have been scared and heard something,(when i had a bedpartner) I woke up that person (the s) and we layed quietly in bed listening, ready for ‘action’ if needed……when noises were confirmed….I went directly for the kids…..(They were older, so no little ones involved)
I can’t imagine not waking up a person that sleeps in a bed with you, if you are that frightened to grab a gun and go exploring around the house…..ARMED!
That is what stands out most for me.
BTW…I’m still LOL!