Certain personality types are at high risk of perpetrating domestic violence. I want to emphasize physical domestic violence here. As in my last article, the borderline, narcissistic and sociopathic personalities lead the risk pack here.
Let’s look first at the borderline personality. The borderline personality is a powder-keg of rage prone to detonate at any experience of a perceived wound, insult, threat of abandonment or (as a less appreciated match to their rage), threat to their malignant pride. Sound pretty narcissistic? Welcome to the synergy between these two personality types.
The borderline personality, much like many narcissists, is littered with “rage mines” that can “tripped” in a flash with a wrong step, which is exactly why it can be so nerve-wracking to be involved with one.
“Walking on eggshells” may be an understatement in describing the unnerving experience of dealing closely, or intimately, with a borderline personality.
I might suggest that even more metaphorically apt than “walking on eggshells” is the experience with borderlines as of “walking through a rage-littered minefield.”
Again, make the wrong the step and beware the rage that can follow with disorienting, sometimes frightening and bewildering intensity. The borderline individual may even goad you, provoke you into stepping on a “rage mine;” indeed, she may salivate at the chance to righteously “go off” with an utter lack of accountability for her provocation, depicting herself, in the process, as having been victimized by your insensitivity.
In any case, her abuse and violation of YOU will be remarkably self-excused as she positions herself, pathologically, as the victim.
I emphasize: Because this is such a narcissistic process, it’s often challenging, as I stressed in my last article, to distinguish the borderline, narcissist and sociopath, all of whom may present similar, if not identical forms, of disturbing “acting-out” fireworks.
As I’ve suggested, when the borderline is “borderlining” in her violent raging, she is acting-out utterly pathological narcissism, even sometimes at sociopathic levels. I’ve previously written about the borderline personality as “transient sociopath,” because in her rages she can be as callous and destructive as the sociopath, not to mention sinisterly vindictive and totally remorseless in the expression of her rage.
Now how about the narcissist? In the narcissist’s case I would designate the state of “outrage” to be a very typical trigger of his rage, which can lead to domestic abuse. The narcissist, it should be noted, often feels “outraged.”
His “outrage” leads to his “rage.”
The narcissist feels outraged to be ignored, disregarded, offended, insulted, misunderstood. States of outrage, in general, are conducive to very poor emotional self-control; because the narcissist is so often outraged, he is often “out of control” emotionally. His rages often have the timbre of a wounded, tantrumming child thrashing at a sibling or parent for recompense at having been mistreated. The problem is that he is not a child, he is often a big, strong adult, thus his tantrums are proportionately more extreme and infinitely more harmful. A raging child is unpleasant and stressful to deal with; a raging narcissist can be scary, destructive and dangerous.
As we know, in the narcissist’s case, and underlying all pathological levels of narcissism, we enter the terrain of “over-entitlement,” really the bane of all interpersonal psychopathology. The narcissist believes that the world should treat him fairly, sensitively; he believes that the world—that is, everyone—should give him his due (whether he’s earned it or not); he has the underlying belief that he should be protected from, really excused from having to endure, the “slings and arrows” that others have to suffer with composure.
Deprive the narcissist of these protective, catering experiences and you are inviting his wrath and retribution. Consequently, the narcissist is at high risk to abuse his partners and others, domestically and otherwise.
The sociopath’s view of the world, in general, is somewhat different from the narcissist’s, which is to say that at sociopathic levels of narcissism, the sociopath is viewing the world from a somewhat different perspective than at the narcissistic level of narcissism.
Here’s the difference: whereas the narcissist, as I just noted, tends to regard the world, and all in it, as owing him unwavering respect, attention, recognition, sensitivity and the like, and will feel outraged to be denied this experience (his outrage leading directly to his rage), the sociopath, while he may be comparatively less obsessed with feeling appreciated, understood and getting his “due,” will be highly, uniquely oriented to viewing the world—and everyone in it—as existing to supply him with whatever he wants to “take” from it.
The sociopath, in this sense, feels entitled to “take” from others whatever it is he wants. Others do not exist as individuals with legitimate personal boundaries. There really are no boundaries sacred to the sociopath: if he can transgress boundaries to “take” what he wants, and “get away with it,” he will do so, because he feels absolutely entitled to have what he wants; if others have what he wants he feels absolutely entitled to take it or steal it from them; and the impact of his incursions on others’ space and dignity means nothing to him because the sociopath relates to others as “objects,” and thus feels no more remorse ransacking a human being than he would an empty room full of things he covets.
This obviously primes the sociopath to be a high-risk domestic violence offender. He will abuse easily, without compunction, because you are merely an “object” to him; in his frustration or rage, for instance, he might kick you in the stomach and bend you over in agony, and feel no more remorse than if he were to kick and dent his car door in a similar discharge of rage. As a matter of fact, his subsequent reaction is less likely to be genuine sorrow than regret, or worry, at the consequences or inconveniences that might ensue from his violent action. In any case, he is likely to stand over you and watch you writhe in pain on the floor as if he’s kicked a car door.
This summarizes some of the features and dynamics of these troubling personality types and what puts them at high risk to domestically abuse. I hope it’s a helpful summary.
(This article is copyrighted ©2012 by Steve Becker, LCSW. My use of female and/or male gender pronouns is strictly arbitrary and not to suggest that males and females aren’t both capable of exhibiting all the attitudes and behaviors discussed.)
DawnG, I’m grateful that you got out, got the picture, and “got it.” Your frank discussion on your experiences is very reassuring – the ability to call it what it was and speak truthfully about it gives me courage (even though the second exspath was not violent), and will definitely give others who are STILL enmeshed in the cycle of domestic violence hope.
Freedom. It’s something to celebrate, really.
Brightest blessings
You know, my egg donor is very dysfunctional and though I have worked in psych for quite some time before my retirement, I have never been able to come up with a diagnosis that “fit her”
Her control issues only seemed aimed at me ONLY.
Her enabling issues were focused on the male bad boy in the family, first her brother and then Patrick.
Her “scape goat” was me, and only me.
You can explain her bad behavior in terms of “family role theory” and as “adult child of an alcoholic” (though by the time she was born no one in her family drank except her brother when he got older) and her grandfather….but she learned that PATTERN of functioning in a family.
With me, she was sometimes physically BRUTAL….emotionally brutal, and spiritually brutal…but I can’t remember her ever mistreating or manipulating or trying to control anyone else.
Why me and ONLY me? she was jealous of my relationship with my grandparents. She was envious of the TIME they spent with me because when she was growing up they were focused on getting enough food to feed her and enough clothing to cover her nakedness, but by the time I came along, they were in a position to buy me the “coat of many colors” and to especially SPEND TIME with me.
She was neither the older MALE HEIR and she wasn’t the golden child of their old age, so she was in effect the neglected (she perceived) middle child even though I was a grandchild not a child.
Since she did not have any sons, and sons were valuable in my family, as many were in that culture…she emotionally took over my sons (taking in Patrick against my will when he started getting into trouble with the law)
I have thought and thought about a diagnosis for my egg donor, and have not come up with any PD that fit, but only the jealousy of a middle child raised in a dysfunctional family who still at 83 years old is functioning under the things she learned and internalized at an early age.
Maybe she had “C-PTSD” (her brother abused her physically choking her unconscious from birth to age 7) or any number of popularly ascribed abuse syndromes, but the bottom line is that the diagnosis doesn’t matter with her…what does matter is realizing that I can’t trust her and that she is a hard core ENABLER and will punish anyone who doesn’t go along with her.
Oxy,
Why do you think your mother isn’t a P?
Don’t a lot of Ps learn their behavior from their families of origin?
Dr. Martha Stout claims that 75% of Ps are also alcoholics so there would be a lot of the dysfunctional family dynamics present in their families as well.
I’m confused. I know that you’re not saying that these are mutually exclusive. I’m just not getting what it is that you are saying.
Dawn: 🙁 *huggles* ^_^ That sounds awful. Did your eye become infected from the dirty water? I’m too scared to look at photos. I can’t stand even reading about abuse cases of any kind, whether spouse, child or animal. 🙁
I remember my dad’s rage. One time he came back home in a fit of rage and tried to slit my mom’s throat with a painting tool. I think it’s called a five in one. Anyway, he knocked her out cold and stood over her and actually put it to her throat. I stopped him with my hands, but they were shredded by that tool. I still remember this.
His rage mostly happened when he was drunk, but he was sober during that five in one incident. Dawn, was this man sober?
Does their true personality show when drunk? Is it just the beer, or their true colors? I know it was my dad’s true colors, but I’ve always wondered.
Now I’ll leave you all with a quote from a video game!
“Dangerous types tend to flaunt it. Think of poisonous plants that show off distinctive colors, but the truly dangerous never reveal themselves. The most innocuous façade often conceals the most vicious personality.”
I think that fits rather well here.
Oh, and GOOOOOO CELTICS!!! ^_^ Revenge for our fallen Patriots!
G1S,
She is not unable to bond, and she does have a conscience….she doesn’t have any of the other things on the PCL-R. Her “problems” with her control and abuse are limited to ONLY ME.
Sure many psychopaths are also bi-polar, ADHD and/or substance abusers as well and have had chaotic up bringings, and it is difficult to determine which came first, the chicken or the egg.
She doesn’t fit the criteria of a P at all she only does her abuse toward ME and me only when I did not “toe the family line” and lately when I did not assume my my assigned role in the family (taking over her throne as it were) of being the enabler of the family bad boy. she wanted me to enable Patrick (the family golden child) even though he had quit being golden in behavior as an adolescent and had started being the family bad boy.
The TRADITION went back generations on her mother’s side of the men being alcoholic psychopaths and abusers (mostly of their wives etc) and the women had the roles of protectors of the men and cleaning up the messes they made (enablers) and my mother’s mother was great at that role only she did not PUNISH you if did not go along with her enabling. Her mother (my great grandmother) was also the family enabler and I have court records going back into the 1840s of the male in that line being a drunken abuser of his wife and his slaves—he tied one slave woman up by her toes to beat her according to the court records…my egg donor is a bit different to her mother, in that she has picked a scape goat (me) and then when I did not go along with being the family enabler role, she tried to get my DIL to go along with that role, but she didn’t realize the DIL was a psychopath herself and would not continue that role for long, and in fact, hated her husband (my son C) and was having an affair and intended to steal from her when my murder became impossible because they couldn’t find me.
I think egg donor was desperate to find someone to fill the FAMILY ROLE of enabler. In family role theory there are appointed different roles in the family and if one person either dies or opts out, the family as a whole will try their best to pressure the person into getting back into the role but if that is impossible they will appoint another family member to assume the role which may be 180 degree reversal of the role they are already in. If the scape boat leave the family, a new one will be chosen and expected to assume that role.
When an alcoholic gets sober in these families, the family will push them back into drinking because it throws the family dynamics off. The dysfunctional family has a sort of predictability about it that the other members who are not healthy can know what to expect…if someone who has been ‘sick” gets healthy and starts behaving in a healthy manner it just throws everything off kilter and they don’t feel secure.
A dysfunctional family may be unhealthy and the various members gripe about what someone else does, but at least they have drama which is something that they can relate to.
When a woman (usually) gets a divorce from one dysfunctional man and then marries another dysfunctional man who replicates the drama rama that she had with the previous one you can realize she is not healthy.
Actually I have replicated my dysfunctional relationships with psychopaths many times in various ways, fortunately i didn’t marry one with my late husband. But I did date one after he died. Again, I had grown some over the years in that aspect and had a boundary about sexual cheating and when I found out my BF was a cheat, as well as a “secret” drinker, I dumped him. So I wasn’t totally without ANY boundaries…but in other aspects I had NO boundaries where my egg donor and my P son were concerned. My family was dysfunctional but it was STABLE until I rebelled when egg donor tried to push me into further “enablement” (I just made up that word) of my P son Patrick. I did have SOME limits and him trying to have me killed was one of them. LOL
Oxy,
Thank you for the explanation.
Certainly you know your family.
I didn’t understand, as I said.
“I have never been able to come up with a diagnosis that “fit her” ”
Thank you, Oxy because me too! Very hard for me to label my mother as well. I can’t tell you how many books and articles I’ve read, trying to find “the diagnosis”. I think the research & literature just doesn’t capture the reality, complexity & contradictions of the behavior. Thank goodness, I’ve finally reached a point where I no longer care about finding the exact diagnosis. Today, I accept she was a cluster of Cluster Bs.
In her latest radio interview, Donna talks about how the Cluster Bs all kinda smush together: http://www.lovefraud.com/blog/2012/05/14/donna-andersen-on-the-marjority-united-radio-may-14/
I also found Dr. Becker’s latest article very helpful because it draws some crisp distinctions: http://www.lovefraud.com/blog/2012/05/18/domestic-violence-and-the-high-risk-personality-disorders/
Yea, there is a pattern of dysfunction in these “cluster Bs” that over lap and I think the whole personality dysfunction thing is on a CONTINUUM rather than each one fitting into a square or a round hole, I think they are all Xs on a scale like a ruler.
There are also co-diagnoses as well…with many of them being bi-polar, ADHD, substance abuse etc.
Then you have to factor in the dysfunctional patterns that are LEARNED in the home/community as well as the things that “come naturally” to them because of lack of empathy and consciences.
I no longer see these “cluster Bs” as distinct diagnoses but as a continuum on which the lowest might be someone who is somewhat self centered and might eat the last piece of cake not realizing that you hadn’t had any—but the full blown P would eat all the cake he could hold and then trash the rest just so you couldn’t have any.
But, Oxy, even Ps fall across a spectrum.
In my little world, I call a S an S because I feel there is some ability for bonding and compassion. Not a whole lot, but there is some.
A P is entirely, or just about entirely, incapable of that.
That’s according to the G1S dictionary of “What Do I Know?”
G1S yea, some people say that a socio-path was caused by bad environment and a psycho-path inherited most of it, but the professionals can’t agree on a name for it. LOL
I prefer Bob hare’s term Psychopath and Donna prefers Socio path because most people think all psychopaths are serial killers and that has some validity to it. The bottom line is though that there is no professional agreement on what causes it, can it be cured, or how to determine it or define it.
So I think you can have your own dictionary on it if you want to! LOL In the end, you probably know as much about it as the professionals do and in some cases know more.