“How did he really feel?” and “What did he want from me?” are two questions that often haunt victims of sociopaths. The reason we are haunted by these questions varies but often stems from the habit of over-focusing on the sociopath instead of ourselves. That being said, victims also have a healthy ”˜need to know’ that can help with recovery and healing.
I struggled with these questions in my own healing. I remain baffled by my observations of enjoyment of affection on the part of sociopaths. Early on, I told my own therapist that I had come to the conclusion that sociopaths exploit those close to them to the point of death, then, cry at the funeral. At the moment the tears are shed, I believe they do represent a grief of sorts. The feelings of loss experienced by sociopaths are however, short lived. Victims also have to beware because, although sociopaths are said to be incapable of feelings for those in their lives, they do become obsessed with them. Psychologists have not yet explained this obsession. If they don’t attach, why are they obsessed? Those who have read my other entries know that I believe that sociopaths do attach. It is what they do with attachments that is disordered.
How did he really feel?
In response to the picture of a sociopath crying at his victim’s funeral, my therapist said, “He feels what he tells himself he feels.” To help you understand what my therapist meant, I will explain what is known about how people usually experience feelings.
There are two components to feelings. The first is a physical sensation. When we experience a feeling we feel something in our bodies in relationship to that feeling. Think about loving someone close to you and sense how your body feels. Is it warmth in your heart? That is usually what people report.
There is much evidence that these physical sensations are disordered in sociopaths. Sociopaths do not generally experience the physical and hormonal changes that go along with feeling emotion. If they do experience them, it is to a lesser degree. Physical responses are blunted.
The second component of feelings is called attribution. Attribution is a cognitive process. When I feel that warmth in my heart as I see my children, I attribute the sensation to my love for them. Thus the physical sensation alone does not make emotion. Emotion is physical sensations and our interpretations of these sensations. There is also evidence that the parts of the brain responsible for attribution do not function properly in sociopaths.
There is one emotion that many sociopaths experience in a not so disordered way. This emotion is anger. Sociopaths do have blunted physical responses to anger. Despite this blunted responsiveness, they seem aware of angry feelings and make correct attributions about what makes them angry. Again, science has not even addressed, much less explained this observation.
Since the physical sensations and attributions that allow for the experience of emotion are disordered in sociopaths, their inner world is very different. They are left to make sense of themselves and others without the tools most of us use. Other parts of the brain fill in the missing processes. The person who is credited with first describing sociopathy in depth is Hervey Cleckley. He proposed that sociopaths are at least of average if not above average verbal intelligence. This makes sense because they have to use their verbal intelligence to make up for their lack of emotions. They do indeed feel what they tell themselves they feel. Scientists say they mimic other people’s emotions, yet again there is no real proof of this.
What did he want from me?
This question is easy to answer intellectually, but very hard for victims to accept emotionally. There are three pleasures we get from our love relationships. The first is pleasure in affection. The second is sexual pleasure. The third is pleasure associated with dominance and control. Sociopaths experience sex and dominance as enormously more pleasurable than affection. Therefore, they are in relationships to get sex and power, pure and simple.
If you love deeply and feel affection for others, you cannot fathom the inner world of an emotionally disordered person whose primary pleasures are sex and power. To understand another’s world you have to imagine yourself experiencing what the other experiences. You can’t do this with a sociopath.
Louise Gallagher said in her post The six steps of healing from a psychopath that the first step is acceptance. We have to accept that we can only know in part how sociopaths really feel and what they want from us. We can understand intellectually, but never emotionally.
Athena,
I’ve heard many people say that about spaths, they take on different appearances. I do believe that you nailed it. They morph into whatever they imagine.
Maybe that’s why my spath always wore the exact same thing: blue jeans and a teeshirt and a dark baseball hat. It was like a uniform. Maybe he was trying to maintain his identity. Even a change of clothing left him unanchored to any identity.
It was peculiar. I know that he chose that ubiquitous look because he wanted to blend in and be harder to identify. True psychopaths don’t like to stand out all the time, only when they are doing a con.
I have talked many times how the spath’s face that I knew would change, literally. Sometimes it was longer and more angular and sometimes it was actually pointy just like that picture we see of the devil with the pointy chin…with that glee in his eyes and on his face…no kidding. I could never figure out how a face “shape” actually changed. FREAKY!! I have seen people’s faces change of course when they are angry, but not the actual whole shape of their face…something is not right!
skylar:
UGGHH, mine, too! The last two times I saw him before the very last time, he had on the exact same thing! Weird. And this is a guy with money who could probably wear whatever he wanted. What he did wear was very expensive, but he wore the same thing all the time. He had one blue dress shirt that is probably worn out by now.
skylar:
You know that walking on tippy toes is a sign of autism?
Louise,
yes, I recently read that. Also, Milo says her spath daughter walked on tip toe. It could also be a spath trait.
He was not autistic in that he could mimic emotions and he can READ peoples’ emotions like a bloodhound can read the scent on a trail. Interestingly, he could “read” machines in much the same way. No machine was a mystery to him, and he used all of his senses to understand it: sight, sound, smell and feel. For example, when I drove up in my car, he might smell the air and say, “your engine is running rich.” He taught me a bit about machines that way.
I also know that he thinks in pictures. He taught himself to do CAD drawings.
So there are those components which seem to be autism in him. He definitely feels little or no emotions, and he can focus on the workings of a machine, not just in it’s static state but the function and the end result.
Still, I would call him pure spath.
skylar:
This tip toe thing is very interesting. Hmmmm. Something to watch for.
He sounds brilliant actually, but so was mine. I think it just makes them more dangerous…
OK, that’s weird.
My spath also has a “uniform”. Seriously. He wears exactly the same thing all the time.
White shirt, black pants, or sometimes khaki pants. That’s it.
Very few items of clothing, and the ones he has are identical.
I asked him once, why. And he said it was because he didn’t want to be noticed, he didn’t want to be humiliated.
LOL!
I wonder if we can call this “uniform” a red flag? Anyone have a spath who dressed more gaudy?
Louise, I suppose you could say he was brilliant, but he can’t spell…
He does seem more like an autistic savant. An EVIL autistic savant.
skylar:
I think the “uniform” could be a red flag.
Mine could spell. He was actually very good in writing.
Yeah, because of the tippy toes thing, I am wondering if yours is like an autistic savant?
I think we know that there is a spectrum here, and that autisim and sociopathy are on the “spectrum”. My spath could spell very well, and was a brilliant organizer systemitizer which I attribute to his lack of interest in human beings/emotion. It was something he COULD do.
You know, after all this time, I am still befuddled. I still think about the mixed messages and I am still wondering, did he love me? Was he really a spath?
I point to the great things he said
“I love you”
“I have this great big ragged hole in my heart when you’re gone”
“I can’t live without you”
and then
“I’m evil”
“Somebody’s got to die”
I just can’t understand it. If he loved me like he said, why did he only act like it like once a month? Why did he lie to me, sleep with other women? Why did I believe it? Why do I still believe it?
Jesus. This is the worst part of having the experience of a spath, it’s still trying to figure out WTF because they are so damned believable.
Athena