The kidnapping trial of “Clark Rockefeller” the psychopathic con artist who is charged with parental kidnapping is happening at the time of this writing. The defense is claiming “insanity” and attacking Sandra Boss for having fallen for his lies. A survey of internet blogs reveals public abuse of Sandra. Please add your comments in support of Sandra to the blogs, particularly this one http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/06/rockefellers_2.html.
To watch the trial live visit:http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/specials/05_28_09_Rockefeller_live_video/
This is outrageous,Sandra was worked over by the defense. Someone (perhaps an attorney who reads this blog) explain to us why the judge and prosecution allowed this.
http://multimedia.boston.com/tn/1/featured_videos.htm?bctid=24902184001
I am astounded. It’s as if SHE is on trial for being conned by someone who, the article mentions, had conned aristocracy in Europe. Clearly no one in that arena has any idea of the emotional coercion that this creep could exert. And it should be apparent that he used their daughter as a coercive tool.
If this guy is diagnosed as psychopathic, my understanding is that he is still considered to be responsible for his actions, from a legal standpoint.
Everything the guy’s attorney was saying seems to point to his PD.
It is like the old “rape” trials where women were PROSECUTED and PERSECUTED and painted as “asking for it” when the guy was a stranger and had beaten them up.
If she didn’t “holler” (even though he had a knife or gun to her head) she didn’t “try to resist” so therefore “she must have wanted it.” And, God forbid she had EVER had sex except with a husband, because if she had, then she was obviously a “slut” or a “whore” and it was OK to rape them.
I’m sorry gang, I didn’t even go look at it, cause I KNOW I would be so pithed off that I would rant for days! The last trial I watched that was SO UNFAIR was the OJ trial and it broke me from watching that kind of crap! IT IS OUTRAGEOUS, and my heart goes out to this woman. I hope the judge has the fleas of a 1000 camels and the crabs of a 100 HIV infected psychopathic whores for the rest of his life, hang nails, infected ingrown toe nails, dental abscesses, hemmriods, anal fissures, holes in his ear drums, ingrown hairs on his balls, herpes outbreaks, and anything else —oh, yes, shingles attack on his eye balls and chronic stys, and when he dies, I hope there is a hot spot in hell for him, and the defense attorney too.
I LOVE YOU OXY!
P.S. I didn’t watch it either for the same reason.
i.e. because I’ve been in the chair in court and I get totally PTSD
That is why psychopaths are so scary.
It is not just the lies. It is the COMPLEXITY of the lies, and their ability to weave them all together to make themselves look favorable in the eyes of the courts, or anyone for that matter.
It is always the psychopath (abuser) who looks calm, cool, collected, and “in the right”.
It is the VICTIM who is frazzled, nervous, and on the verge of a breakdown.
I’ve been reading some of the testimony the last couple of days- hurray for criminal defense attorneys. Gack. I feel so bad for her. It’s bad enough dealing with the clarity when the fog clears, but a public flogging for not instantly noticing the fog is dreadful. Everyone is a street smart socio expert who would NEVER fall for a bag of tricks when faced with someone who was conned.
If I was able to get a message to her, it would be something like, “While seemingly all the world is chastising you for having the nerve to trust someone like we’re all told to trust, there were many of us, while reading your responses, nodding our heads and uttering, ‘Yup, that’s what they sound like. Miserable Lying B*st*rds.’ Hang in there Sandy, you’re not alone.”
One of the articles I read (might be one of the ones above) printed one of her responses, which said to the effect: I’m from a world where you don’t even jaywalk- why would I think someone was lying to me?” Ain’t THAT the truth!
PS- also keep in mind that public postings, such as those at the bottom of newspaper sites, are truly public. That kind of idiocy is largely filtered out and fizzles out when it shows up places like here. The same people you avoid by not going to carnivals have access to keyboards now. Despite the internet providing nearly unlimited information at lightning fast speeds, many people are just as ignorant, uninformed, and wearing virtual purple polyester double-knit pants 2 sizes too small as before…only they are harder to avoid.
Glinda!!!! YOUR PS IS GREAT!!!
BTW–what is wrong with purple polyester double knit pants 2 sizes too small? Have you been peeping into my closet? ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Well, in your case Oxy, if the matching t-shirt says, “MILF” or “Juicy” I’ll let it slide as a historical costume 😉