Most of the people who will be bad for us are not sociopaths, and so we want our radar to be sharp, not specifically for sociopaths, but for wrong, bad people of every stripe.
True, sociopaths will be terrible people with whom to enter relationships; in the end, though, they will represent a small fraction of a much greater majority of very wrong people for us.
As I suggested in a prior post, there are two keys to protecting ourselves from Mr. or Mrs. WRONG: The first is developing intelligent radar; the second is acting wisely on that radar.
After all, good radar, no less than good CIA intelligence, is useless if it’s ignored or devalued.
Now, are there cases of sociopaths (and the lot of devious personalities) so slick as to be undetectable until after they’ve wreaked their havoc? Of course there are; to suggest otherwise would insult anyone unlucky enough to have crossed paths with such destructive individuals.
Nevertheless, in most cases, the wrong person—sociopath or not—will and does leave clues much sooner than most of us want to admit (until much later).
WRONG, by the way, for whom? The answer, of course, is, YOU!
It is tempting and, at some point, I suggest, unfruitful to get stuck on the suspected psychopathology of a partner (present, or ex). Because when you get right down to it, there are only two diagnoses that really matter: Is this person, for me, RIGHT, and GOOD? Or WRONG, and BAD?
Only we can make this assessment, and it’s our responsibility, of course, to make it as soundly as possible. By soundly I mean being as honest with ourselves as possible, and keeping our best long-term interests uppermost in mind.
What, then, is the first—and, for that matter, second—telltale sign that someone is wrong, and really bad, for you, sociopath or not? (And speaking honestly, should we really need more than a sign or two?)
The answer is, ANY EXPRESSED BEHAVIOR or ATTITUDE that leaves you feeling disarmed or disoriented by its inappropriateness, selfishness and/or insensitivity.
Take great heed of such an experience, because almost always, it is a sign that more are sure to follow. In other words, preparing to bail at this point is a wise consideration.
Specifically, what behaviors and attitudes am I referring to? For starters, how about the first, surprising flash of rage, contempt, arrogance, selfishness, coldness, presumptuousness, dishonesty, indifference, ungratefulness, even denseness; shocking acts of abuse, verbal or physical; and startling failures of empathy, or compassion.
It is really less the behavior or attitude, per se, that screams ALARMING”¦prepare to BAIL!, than the experience of it as, “Where did that come from?”
I stress: It is our job, first, to register these signs; and then immediately to register them as alarmingly ominous.
The question is, Will you be willing to see what you’ve seen? Will you be willing to acknowledge the sobering portent of the display? Or instead, for any of a hundred conveniences, will you find ways to pretend you didn’t see it, and/or minimize the ramifications of what you’ve seen?
It is perfectly fine to ask, What, in a new relationship, should I be watchful for? What are the signs that my new interest may be someone different than advertised? I hope I’ve addressed these questions.
Then again, such questions tend, I think, to promote a view of the world as waiting to unleash upon us ruinous new bogeymen and predators, instead of encouraging us to examine what can be harder, but perhaps more honest, useful, retrospective questions, like, What did I miss? Why did I miss it? And if I registered it, why did I choose to ignore or minimize it?
Insight into, and resolution of, these latter questions can confer the best insurance against future exploitation.
In most (certainly not all) cases, it may be less important to be wary of the next nightmare disguised as Mr. or Mrs. SENSITIVE, than more careful of our always lurking capacity for defenses like denial, rationalization and minimization to blind us to what we don’t want to see, and do.
(This article is copyrighted (c) 2008 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
StarG: Stripping … just another example of human’s exercising validation!
StarG: Maybe he meant to say “JIM” and you naturally thought he meant “GYM”.
Just a thought … don’t write back … I was only kidding.
Sorry Wini but the whole “bible” bit gets really old for me on here. There are billions of people on this planet that never read the bible and yet are not sociopaths nor even close nor will be. There are numerous people who do not believe in God at all who are not sociopaths nor even close and are caring compassionate humble people. And to be blunt here Wini you are oversimplifying things. It is like saying if an alcoholic would just stop drinking…Ego is of course part of it but only a part of it. Plus it seems to me you are distorting the picture somewhat. It is your ego that allows you to say with such conviction that it is all about ego and they need to get humble and find God. Is that a bad thing then? It could be or it could be a good thing. Is it any different if I think that my religious beliefs are the only right ones and every other ones on the planet are wrong? That is in fact no different and not humble at all yet it is widely accepted by millions of people as being “good”. I wish it was all so easy, so simple as just stopping but it is not.
StarG I am sorry that you have experienced these things. The craniosacral therapy you mentioned is flat out quackery and if any licensed mental health therapist used it on you they are, in my opinion, acting in an unethical manner.
In 1999, after doing a comprehensive review of published studies, the British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assessment (BCOHTA) concluded that the theory is invalid and that practitioners cannot reliably measure what they claim to be modifying. The 68-page report concludes that “there is insufficient evidence to recommend craniosacral therapy to patients, practitioners, or third party payers.
As for the other therapist you mentioned, wow! That is the kind of unethical behaviors that cause harm to clients and they know it. And while they may be “nice” I am happy that you have NC with them because they were using you to meet some of their own needs, at your expense of course. I am truly sorry you have had this happen. I would also say that if you have been harmed and are in a place where you are able, that you consider filing a complaint on them so that it can be stopped before more people are hurt.
Stargazer: With regard to your comments about “no self introspection” — that is so true — it didn’t take long for me to see that “Dashing01” had no sense of “self” — everything he spoke of was to relate stories he had read, seen on TV, or saw other people do — he never once related an experience from “inside” himself — in other words, he didn’t seem to be able to internalize anything, apply it to himself and then extrapolate and put it into practice in his outward life… he was ritualized but without reason except for his physical appearance…??? He also had OCD traits (first time I encountered) that — from reading on this site, it appears that OCD is quite often coupled with APD….it must bring some kind of comfort???
This article has some interesting points:
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/55051
Blogger: the article was enlightening, confirming, scary. I need to take a break — I’m getting “lost” in this stuff and am identifying too much with it.
But it helps me to understand why I “sensed” that in some way he “cared” and that in some way he “hurt.” I will also note that I sensed absolutely no violence in “Dashing01”
But I thought quite often that he was in therapy to help guide his behavior and that perhaps he was on medication…but he always denied both.
Thank you. Please send links to any other articles you think might be helpful.
BloggerT, how would I go about reporting those therapists? I don’t know whether they are licensed or not and are no longer practicing here.
For licensed therapists you can contact the agency covers that. For example here is a link of lists of boards for counselors for the various States http://www.counseling.org/Counselors/LicensureAndCert/TP/StateRequirements/CT2.aspx
Different states have different requirements for different professions and some have unlicensed people doing therapists. Without knowing what state it is difficult to get into specifics. I would go to your State’s regulatory website or home page and search for the agencies that cover therapists.
Dear God, SG. I just read your post about what happened with the therapists. I’m with Blogger – WOW – that is an outrageous violation of boundaries! If the PhD is licensed in your state, you go to the Board of licensure for your state (just google it – I think you’ll find it pretty quickly) and they will give you instructions on how to file a complaint. I’m so sorry that happened to you. Terrible breach of ethics. Beyond “breach” into outright disregard for ethics and abuse of client.