Editor’s note: This is the first post by Lovefraud’s newest blog author, Kathleen Hawk. She previously posted many thoughtful comments under the screen name “khatalyst.”
Last year, 2008, was a year in which we faced the cost of sociopathy in our economy. Huge financial firms were destroyed or deeply damaged by their own corporate cultures. Their employees were encouraged to pursue personal gain, without concern about the messes they left behind or the damage they did to other people’s lives. The results are loss and suffering, even for people who had nothing to do with these companies.
It sounds familiar, doesn’t it? Sociopathy taken to a grand scale. But there are people and institutions that didn’t buy into the subprime mortgage debacle. There are people who turned down the opportunity to invest with Bernard Madoff. Likewise, there are people who don’t get involved with sociopaths. They don’t attract them, or if they do, they get rid of them before any damage is done.
This article is about my suggestions for New Years resolutions that will help make us like those people.
About 20 years ago, I was fortunate to attend a week-long training at Brain Technologies, a consulting firm founded by the authors of Strategy of the Dolphin.* This book — written for business managers but also useful for people wanting to better manage their own lives — divides the world into sharks and carps. Both act out their addictions. Sharks are addicted to winning. Carps are addicted to being loved.
There was a third type of character in the “pool.” That was the dolphin. The dolphin learned in action, adapting its behavior to what was required at any given moment. If threatened, it might act like a shark. At more comfortable times, it might act like a carp. One of my favorite dolphin strategies described in the book is “tit for tat.” That is, if a shark takes a bite out of a dolphin, the dolphin takes an equivalent bite out of the shark. Not to escalate the fight, but just let the shark know that it was not dealing with a carp.
You’ll notice the dolphin doesn’t cringe and say, “Please don’t bite me.” It doesn’t pat the shark on the head and say, “You must have had a difficult childhood and you clearly need more love.” It absolutely doesn’t lie down and say, “I can see you’re hungry, and I can spare a part or two.” What it does is communicate in concrete terms that a dolphin lunch is going to be very, very expensive for the shark.
Which brings me to the New Year’s resolutions we might consider to makes ourselves sociopath-proof.
1. Eliminate pity.
This may sound very strange to those of us who were taught that we are responsible to help the less fortunate. But pity is not what we were supposed to learn. Pity is an emotion that places us in a one-up position to someone we view as less than us. It is also dangerously linked to feeling sorry for ourselves. In acting on pity, we get into emotionally tangled situations of entitlement and debt, which leave us feeling unappreciated and resentful.
Empathy and compassion are much more functional and respectful emotions. Empathy is extending ourselves to understand another’s circumstances. (“That must be difficult for you.”) Compassion is extending ourselves to understand how they feel. (“That must be painful for you.”) Both of them can lead to bonding experiences. Neither of them requires us to take action to help. In fact, “dispassionate compassion” is the respectful recognition that other people are following their own paths, which have nothing to do with us. This doesn’t mean that we won’t help, but it keeps things in perspective.
As most people who have been involved with sociopaths know, the ability to elicit pity and then take advantage of our knee-jerk inclination to help is one of their greatest manipulative tools. It can be particularly seductive, because they seem so strong and confident, except for this one little weakness. If we practice offering empathy or compassion without offering to help, we can short-circuit the pity play, and gain control over where we place our helping efforts.
2. Demand reciprocity.
“Demand” doesn’t mean trying to make people do what is unnatural to them. It means making choices to pursue relationships in which reciprocity clearly exists. If we are generous to someone who seems to have an unlimited appetite for our generosity, but little inclination to give back, we cut that person out of our life.
In demanding reciprocity, we become clear about what we’re giving and what we want back. For example, if we are open about our feelings, then we may want the same in return. If we are willing to provide emotional support, we may want that back. If we are providing financial or material support, we may want something material or financial in return for it. (If we’re paying money for emotional support, this is a professional relationship, not a personal one.)
Reciprocity exists in real time. This is not like being good all our life, so that after we die, we go to heaven. This is being good and getting good back. Here and now. People act out of their characters and also out of their real objectives. If the other person’s real objectives don’t include being fair to us right now, then we are in an unfair situation. This is the year we abandon unfairness in our lives.
3. Trust conditionally.
It’s a basic human need to trust and be trusted. Like love, we want it to be perfect and forever. Like love, maintaining trust often takes shared effort, and it can lead to disappointment. Some of us hope that we if treat people as though they were trustworthy, they will rise to the occasion.
As those of us who have been involved with sociopaths know, treating them as though they can be trusted is equivalent to asking a burglar to watch our jewelry box while we make a pot of coffee. What we got back for treating them as though they could be trusted is loss.
But this isn’t just about sociopaths. In day-to-day living, we are continually learning new things about the people we know. Sometimes, we learn good things that make us trust someone more. Sometimes we learn troubling things that make us trust someone less. When we trust them less, it means that we are more guarded in sharing ourselves and our resources. When we trust them more, we are more relaxed.
Diminished trust is not the end of the world. There are ways that we can work with another person to rebuild trust, if that person is worthy of trust. And there are ways to deal with untrustworthy people if we can’t get rid of them, as in a work situation. However it plays out, the important thing is to be honest with ourselves about how trusting we really feel. It has everything to do with our survival and well-being.
4. Value what we have.
Other than pity, the sociopath’s best tool of manipulation is identifying our dissatisfactions with our own lives, magnifying them, and then claiming to have the solution. They set their hooks in the voids in our lives, the lacks that we worry over, dream over.
If we wonder what kind of person is invulnerable to sociopathic wiles, it is the kind who invests time and energy on what he or she has, rather than what’s missing. That doesn’t mean they aren’t working on improvements. But when they look at themselves and their lives, they see something they own, planned and built by they own efforts. It doesn’t mean they never made a mistake, but they survived it and learned from it.
That kind of attitude is fundamentally positive. It looks at what exists in the environment — internal and external — and says “What good thing can I do with this?” How can I use it to make me happier or my life more interesting? What can I do with it to make the world a better place for the people I care about?
For those of us who are still raw from a brutally exploitive relationship, it may be hard to focus on anything but what we’ve lost. We are wounded and we feel pain. But in healing, we learn that pain is one of our valued resources. It motivates us to learn. It can even keep us from learning the wrong thing. For example, deciding to never trust anyone again is a premature learning, and we feel pain whenever we go in that direction. Pain is one of the voices of our inner wisdom. It keeps us from settling for the wrong thing.
5. Self-validate.
In other words, care less about what other people think. Turn within for encouragement, approval, comfort, inspiration and kindness.
Sociopaths have been called “soul killers,” because they separate us from our inner wisdom. First they seduce us with our own dreams, then they cause us to question our ideas and our values, and finally they beat us down with disloyalty and denigration while telling us that we asked for it. The longer and deeper our involvement, the more we lose ourselves in self-questioning and ultimately self-hatred.
If there is one good thing about a relationship with a sociopath, it is the clarification that we are our own primary support. In dealing with someone who is dishonest, undependable, untrustworthy and viciously unkind, most of us discover that we know better. We know that we are not what they think of us. We are not even how we are behaving. There is something in us that knows better. Knows who we really are. Knows how we really want our life to be.
We also discover that no one else — not the sociopath, not our friends, not our advisors —knows us better than we do. It doesn’t mean that we know everything about the world. We still collect information. We still seek role models for things we don’t know how to do yet. We’re not proud or over-impressed with ourselves. We just know rationally that we’re our own best counsel, our only decider of what we think, feel, believe, want and choose to do.
When we learn how to self-validate, it changes our lives. For those of us who hear the denigrating voice of the sociopath in our thoughts, self-validating is a way to bypass it. To say, “Oh, shut up. You’re not me, you’re just a bad memory” while we move on to explore our thoughts and feelings. It takes practice to self-validate. We have to make a decision about wanting to be independent in creating our own lives. We have to train ourselves to find our inner wisdom and push aside anything that gets in the way of hearing it.
This year, 2009, is the year that all of us get better. Better friends with ourselves and others because we’re cultivating compassion and empathy. Better lovers because we’re learning to love out of choice, not need. Better partners of every sort, because we give and demand kindness and respect. Better members of our community because “dispassionate compassion” enables us to select our helpful efforts, rather than feeling forced into them.
Should a sociopath show up, we are learning the best way to be sociopath-proof. That is, to value ourselves and our lives. And to exercise our options — to be a ruthlessly determined shark or a sweetly generous carp — depending on what our circumstances require.
Namaste. The dolphin in me salutes the dolphin in you.
Kathy
* Strategy of the Dolphin, Dudley Lynch and Paul Kordis, 1989. Out of print, but available from sellers at Amazon. More information on additional books and personal assessment tests can be found at Brain Technologies.
While these suggestions are great for evaluating relationships and circumstances, I think one big piece of advice is to avoid reengaging.
If Hollywood and popular media has done two disservices to the public, it either lionizes those with sociopathic tendencies as a superhero (i.e. House or Dexter) or it puts forth this get even scenerio.
WALKING AWAY is the only way to succeed with a sociopath. It’s a key lesson of the Sociopath Next Door.
Unless you are tied to the individual by child custody or other other unavoidable circumstance, WALK AWAY.
And by unavoidable, I don’t mean “I still love her” or “I don’t have closure.” Making your “closure” dependent on them just makes them more powerful.
Also, don’t fall into the trap I did. If they say, “Sometimes I wonder if I’m a sociopath.” Don’t logic yourself into thinking if the individual is worried then they must not be.
Sociopaths are master manipulators. This is a ploy like any other.
SEVERE the relationship if at all possible.
Bob
Absolute !
Wisdom !
Yes, I believe – and have learned, that walking away is the only thing. For a long time I hoped he would apologize or finally, somehow recognize and care that he hurt me. PLEASE. He’s not capable of it. He did say “I’m sorry” but it rang completely hollow – and if I asked what he was sorry for, he really couldn’t answer. Because he wouldn’t admit to anything – wouldn’t admit to stealing the jewels while they were right there in his hands. Wouldn’t admit to a damn thing.
And getting in a match of insults never works. They are ruthless. They will cross lines that we just wouldn’t. Sometimes they are clever with insults, but I found that my ex S was really just cruel. He fancied himself a clever debater, but the truth was that he was just the loudest and the meanest. His arguments were never very smart (how could they be? They were always based on lies, and hence inherently nonsense), he was just willing to go to cruel places that I wouldn’t go. Mostly he was just really loud and scary. Interactions would end because I became afraid he would hurt me. He would.
Detaching is the only way. Its hard, especially as I learn more and more about how much he lied and cheated. I want to call him and give him a piece of my mind. He’d take it. He’s already renting (as a squatter, not a paying rentee, of course) a lot of space up there.
Walk away! I’m saying this to myself as much as anyone else. We all know, don’t we?
BobTheCopywriter , Indi, Healing Heart: Yes, when our EXs … all our EXs watched movies such as Midnight Cowboy, Body Heat, Black Widow, Oceans 11, 12 and how many sequels … and all the other movies of how to use and abuse others and take them for a ride and get what you want. We ignorantly … just enjoyed the entertainment it gave us, the actors skills, the sets, the color, the action, the directors, the producers … but our EXs were watching the same movies and taking note how how how they could have a better life by using others in this way or that way to get what they want. Our EXs are all PRETTY WOMAN … the WHORES of the world, who will do anything, say anything, be with anyone to get what they want! Period.
And now you know the rest of the story!
On a positive note, how is everyone’s day going?
Peace.
I have to work today. So just a couple of quick comments before I disappear:
Change wrote: “So, I have learned to lose my empathy for these people and watch out for me and my children because the court sure isn’t going to do that.”
Empathy is different from sympathy or pity. It makes no requirements on us to help anyone. It’s just making the effort to understand what’s going on with the other person.
From a purely goal-oriented perspective, empathy is a good thing because serves two purposes. First, it makes us smarter about who and what we’re dealing with. Instead of just appearances, we get hints about underlying motivations and root causes. Second, being smarter, we can devise better strategies for achieving our objectives.
For example, if a “root cause” is that law enforcement and the legal system are not educated about sociopaths, maybe a good tactic would be to educate them. Write a book review for the local paper about a book on sociopaths. Find out about the schedule of writers of these books, and alert the local press if they come nearby. If your own case is getting press attention, hand out books about sociopaths to the journalists.
This may not be feasible for many of us, but it’s just an idea that indicates how working at a higher level may help us.
Another thing that might be useful is creating a support group for people recovering from experiences with cons, betrayers, etc. I’ve been thinking about this since I’ve been reading Lovefraud. There are grief support groups. Why not for the grieving process associated with our experiences?
This might help in several ways, beyond giving us a safe place to share our feelings. The group can educate itself about sociopaths, and the pervasiveness of these experiences, so they can spread the word in the community. There is also strength in numbers. So many of the people fighting legal battles on this blog are alone, reinventing the wheel every time they have to talk to a therapist, policeman, attorney or judge. With every additional person who understands this issue, the credibility of the complaint grows.
I know that these ideas might not be feasible for people who are up to their ears in legal and personal battles. But perhaps some of us have the resources now to begin to expand on the purpose of this blog — which is to get the word out.
My other comment is for Wini.
Wini, you don’t understand about my work, and I probably haven’t been clear enough. I work with organizational systems as a change agent. Sociopaths can present problems, but they are just a factor, not the whole picture in the work I do. My objectives are larger and long-term.
I deal with sociopaths in whatever way enables me to accomplish what I was hired to do. Usually there’s no benefit in confronting or discrediting them publicly, because that would make the management have to choose between the project (me) and an entrenched executive. It’s a good way to kill the project.
If you read the book “Verbal Judo,” you’d get some ideas about how I handle these situations. And yes, sometimes I do have to “stroke” a sociopath, as you put it, because they have major issues with power and status. One tactic is to make sure they have tons of facts and statistics, and then ask them for their opinion on everything so I can credit them for their contribution to the project. This makes them feel important and in control, and they go off to find other problems to solve.
Of course, they don’t actually want to help. And they don’t have much to say, except whatever supports their grandiose view of themselves or their current plan for world domination. It’s easy enough to work this stuff into the project without damaging its fundamental intent, because none of it is about improving ethics or processes — which is what my projects are about.
And no, I’m not doing anything about saving their poor tortured subordinates. It’s not my job, and it would be frankly disrespectful to my clients if I did. They hired this guy. My opinion of him is immaterial. If you were one of those subordinates, and you asked me to talk to management about his behavior, I probably couldn’t help you.
However, the good news is that frequently change projects sift out the dead wood in a company. And sociopaths are often just that, figureheads who take credit for other people’s work and contribute little. They can seduce people, but they can’t keep up when systems change around them. That’s not always the case, but I’ve seen it happen.
If you’re working for a sociopath, there is only one tactic I’ve ever seen that works, unless you’re prepared to be ruthless. And that’s to get away from him. Get transferred or find another job.
If you’re prepared to be ruthless, you can get close to him and gather evidence until there’s enough to turn him in to the tax people, the company accountants, the equal opportunity people, or the police. In other words, do you own “long con.” I frankly don’t recommend the latter course, because it means that you’re motivated by revenge for a long time — not emotionally healthy for you or your family.
In fact, obsessing over discrediting a sociopath is something like staying in contact with them. Except they’ve taken up residence in our minds. I think that this obsessive thinking is part of the healing process, but eventually we decide to clean house mentally and get on with our lives. They only have the power we give them, and we can decide to take it back, mentally as well as in our lives.
Kathleen Hawk:
One, I was just voicing my opinion about how others played the game with the anti-socials … pretending that there was nothing wrong with “them” and look what has happened to our companies and institutions today … all because people don’t have an agency to go to and report abusive bosses or co-workers. There should be a database of all these characters that play everyone for their own gratification … and certainly do not produce anything for their paychecks and bonuses.
Two, I’m retired … hey earlier than I thought, but I’m retired.
Three, I was willing to transfer, asked for a transfer, tried to transfer … except, my Big boss was going to use me as an escape goat … so transferring was out of the question … even though I had to go through the humiliating motions of looking for a transfer … all those bosses no longer are sucking off your TAX Paying Dollars. Problem resolved … no more 90 + blood sucking managers collecting your tax dollars!
Four, the world is witnessing today how many selfish, self centered, self absorbed anti-social personalities are out there … look at all the collapses of industry (private and government) … hence, bailouts … all the anti-social personalities asking for a hand out. Watch those politicians insisting these companies get money! They too should be forced out of office aka retired! And guess what state I’m from and our senator is out their with his mug in all your TV sets. My Ex’s father was friends with this senator and his father before him!
Your ideas are good … but, Obama’s team needs a place that can be written or called for people to voice their concerns about anti-social personalities. A database needs to be devised to track these folks … X amount of complaints come in … most likely it’s true that this person is anti-social (our country’s terrorists by the way) and stop this crap because they are the son, nephew, niece mistress or lover of some big shot … it does our country no good.
Now all of us are paying for playing the safe game with the likes of anti-socials.
Peace.
Thanks for the clarification, Wini. I thought you didn’t like me.
Kathleen Hawk: LOL … no … you just hit a very raw nerve of what happened to me and how so many people play “the game” with the psycho personalities. You are different if your job brings you in contact with the psycho and are helping businesses elevate the devastation of these personalities.
Now to figure out what business would be good that all the anti-socials can go in to that doesn’t damage the rest of us. Acting comes to my mind (LOL). We could all have playhouses in every city USA … come out and see the anti-socials with a straight look on their faces, telling us a story.
Good luck.
Very good idea. The I’m More Important than You Are review.
I like the idea of just shipping them all to one place. We could call it the Very Exclusive Island Resort for Masters of the Universe, or something like that. And then see how well they can take care of themselves.
Can you just imagine the fun as they tried to talk each other into being the servant.
It would be a very good reality show, I think.
Kathleen Hawk: I was thinking we could build them an island in Dubai. One, we get them out of this country (LOL), two, after a few years the island slips back into the ocean. Sand to sand, or was that what God meant by dust to dust?
Like my sister says “Oh, well”!