Are sociopaths who cry “sensitive sociopaths,” or just extra clever sociopaths? What’s going on when sociopaths cry? Is their crying ever sincere, or always insincere? Is it ever deep, or always superficial? Always calculated, or sometimes spontaneous?
In short, what’s the deal with sociopaths and the crying game?
There are some sociopaths—more classical, Cleckley-like sociopaths—who can “cry on demand,” by which I mean cry, as if spontaneously, from a consciously manipulative agenda. Many of these sociopaths can summon displays of emotional vulnerability, like tearful anguish and contrition, with the skill of the gifted character actor.
In some cases, to extend the metaphor, some sociopaths—in the moment—may be so in character as to “virtually believe” in the authenticity of their presentations. These sociopaths may conjure tears, for instance, and then see the tears they’ve conjured as evidence, as ratification, of the sincerity of their response.
I use the term “virtually believe” to denote the sociopath’s capacity, in these cases, to almost delude himself into believing that he’s as sensitive and vulnerable as his presentation would suggest, when in fact—that is, when in reality—he’s, of course, shallow and fraudulent.
Conversely, there are also sociopaths who, producing seemingly spontaneous displays of vulnerable emotion, remain aware of the inauthenticity of their theatrics. That is, these sociopaths recognize that they are acting even as they may be successfully convincing others that they’re not.
What partly covers, or protects, sociopaths who engage the “crying game” is the inherent challenge of separating spontaneity and authenticity. That is, we tend to assume that what’s spontaneous is also authentic—indeed, that spontaneity itself virtually proves authenticity.
But this is a fallacy, which is to say that what’s spontaneous isn’t necessarily authentic. The sociopath’s ability, for instance, to conjure tears spontaneously—that is, at any given, self-serving moment —certainly doesn’t certify his emotional display as authentic.
But is this to say that sociopaths’ tears and crying are always, by definition, inauthentic? I wouldn’t say so, at least not definitively. But I would suggest that where, arguably, the sociopath’s tears are not a product of sheer manipulativeness and inauthenticity, the emotion(s) driving his tears will, by definition, be shallow and invariably selfish.
So, for instance, the sociopath choking up in the courtroom upon hearing the verdict “guilty” that will lock him away for life, may be conveying real emotion—he may really feel bad, upset; however, to the extent that he’s really suffering, we can know that he’s suffering not from what he took or stole from his victim(s), but from what he feels has been taken or stolen from him (for instance, his freedom).
He will suffer, in a word, as victim, not victimizer.
And should he appear to “grieve” his situation—versus protest it with his narcissistic rage—again let me stress: he will be grieving as victim, not victimizer. And his grief, like everything else about him, will be shallow, and dissipate quickly; and then he’ll reinhabit his usual state of emotional nullity.
But again, even in cases where his disarming loss of emotional composure—his tearfulness, for example—isn’t purely manipulative and play-acting, we can surmise that, often, this will reflect less the sociopath’s genuine, deeply felt emotion, like sadness, than a buildup of tension and stress associated with developments unfavorable to his interests (for instance, a jury’s return of “guilty”)—all of which may culminate in an emotional discharge of tension, which occasionally may take the disarming form of a passing squall of tears.
(Thanks to Lovefraud member Newlife, inspirer and friend, for prompting my initial consideration of this subject, which I intend to expand in a near-term post. As always, my use of male gender pronouns is for convenience’s sake, and not to suggest that females are incapable of the behaviors and attitudes discussed. This article is copyrighted © 2010 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
I will take on a tornado before a spath anyday bedtime nite owls seeya later
Amen to that!
Hens, at least you can try to take shelter from a tornado! With spath, there is no shelter except walking away! LOL
How odd is that about the guy who claimed to have lost his daughter? That’s NUTS! Even if it were true, what would compel someone to stop and ask to talk to a complete stranger about it with sirens wailing? Hens, I think you were on the ball by trusting your gut instinct!
Off topic – I can’t stand to hear those sirens! It’s frightening to me! I remember the first time I heard the “test” sirens at the nuclear power plant not far from our home. I had no idea that it was a test, and I thought, “Great. Just great. We FINALLY found our oasis and it’s going to turn into a sheet of glass…” LOL!!!!!
Hens – i have never had anyone play me (that I know of) before the spath. t e a r s were the order of EVERY DAY.
…deleted…
she is such a…………….insert expletive here.
guy in car – mondo creepy. start carrying heat on john deere.
Uh……of all the cells in the human physiology, BRAIN CELLS are the one cell that does not – DOES NOT – regenerate. Other portions of the brain can compensate, but once they’re gone, that’s it.
Guy in car – agreed.
One_step…..I had to read that health “report” over again…
Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!! They’re ALWAYS on the verge of death, aren’t they? Oh, lordy….
buttons – we think we have found the ppath hanging out on ‘cancer’ sites – you know, pretending to be a survivor. she’s killed off many of her characters with cancer. seems she does do some medical research.
i learned a long time ago to take people at face value, and would not have questioned all that was falling apart in this character – the list above is just part of the whole mess.
a while ago someone posted here and said they had such and such a disease/ sydrome, and another poster bothered to look it up and respond- and this called the first person’s bs FAST. it was a lovely lesson for me.
just thinking about all that i did in my care and nurturing of the ppath. SO much energy and focus going her way. so much.
i need to think about that when i respond to others in trouble – i need to think about what i did, that i did it out of reflex, and that i need to think now, and just not be there/give, i need to thinkit over, see where those actions got me, figure out the new boundaries.
i am still the same person. and it doesn’t matter if the other folks in trouble are ppath or not, i need to get clarity about where i am going when i respond to people and not just start blindly down the road.
One_Step, as we’ve read in these articles and blogs over, and over, and over, the first weapon in their arsenal is the ability generate pity – sympathy – for whatever plight they’re portraying.
Aside from being physically attractive, the ex spath was quiet – brooding – mysterious to me. When its father passed, suddenly, I reached out to it out of sympathy. The rest is academia.
Like you, I really have to put some strong boundaries up with regard to reacting to another person’s sufferings – real or fabricated.
So today the narc/spath tried to pump out a few more tears but he couldn’t do it. It’s like he wants me to feel bad for him when he has been doing all the bad crap. Go figure.
My daughter asked when he is leaving the house, I said we are working on it and he is doing everything to stay. It’s pathetic really. She said that if he stays, she will have to go. She will never feel safe around him. That spells it out plainly for me, we will have to leave. He’s such a loser, doesn’t even care that his daughter doesn’t trust, much less like, her dad. I want to tell our son because he doesn’t realize the situation. I’ll have to wait.