Are sociopaths who cry “sensitive sociopaths,” or just extra clever sociopaths? What’s going on when sociopaths cry? Is their crying ever sincere, or always insincere? Is it ever deep, or always superficial? Always calculated, or sometimes spontaneous?
In short, what’s the deal with sociopaths and the crying game?
There are some sociopaths—more classical, Cleckley-like sociopaths—who can “cry on demand,” by which I mean cry, as if spontaneously, from a consciously manipulative agenda. Many of these sociopaths can summon displays of emotional vulnerability, like tearful anguish and contrition, with the skill of the gifted character actor.
In some cases, to extend the metaphor, some sociopaths—in the moment—may be so in character as to “virtually believe” in the authenticity of their presentations. These sociopaths may conjure tears, for instance, and then see the tears they’ve conjured as evidence, as ratification, of the sincerity of their response.
I use the term “virtually believe” to denote the sociopath’s capacity, in these cases, to almost delude himself into believing that he’s as sensitive and vulnerable as his presentation would suggest, when in fact—that is, when in reality—he’s, of course, shallow and fraudulent.
Conversely, there are also sociopaths who, producing seemingly spontaneous displays of vulnerable emotion, remain aware of the inauthenticity of their theatrics. That is, these sociopaths recognize that they are acting even as they may be successfully convincing others that they’re not.
What partly covers, or protects, sociopaths who engage the “crying game” is the inherent challenge of separating spontaneity and authenticity. That is, we tend to assume that what’s spontaneous is also authentic—indeed, that spontaneity itself virtually proves authenticity.
But this is a fallacy, which is to say that what’s spontaneous isn’t necessarily authentic. The sociopath’s ability, for instance, to conjure tears spontaneously—that is, at any given, self-serving moment —certainly doesn’t certify his emotional display as authentic.
But is this to say that sociopaths’ tears and crying are always, by definition, inauthentic? I wouldn’t say so, at least not definitively. But I would suggest that where, arguably, the sociopath’s tears are not a product of sheer manipulativeness and inauthenticity, the emotion(s) driving his tears will, by definition, be shallow and invariably selfish.
So, for instance, the sociopath choking up in the courtroom upon hearing the verdict “guilty” that will lock him away for life, may be conveying real emotion—he may really feel bad, upset; however, to the extent that he’s really suffering, we can know that he’s suffering not from what he took or stole from his victim(s), but from what he feels has been taken or stolen from him (for instance, his freedom).
He will suffer, in a word, as victim, not victimizer.
And should he appear to “grieve” his situation—versus protest it with his narcissistic rage—again let me stress: he will be grieving as victim, not victimizer. And his grief, like everything else about him, will be shallow, and dissipate quickly; and then he’ll reinhabit his usual state of emotional nullity.
But again, even in cases where his disarming loss of emotional composure—his tearfulness, for example—isn’t purely manipulative and play-acting, we can surmise that, often, this will reflect less the sociopath’s genuine, deeply felt emotion, like sadness, than a buildup of tension and stress associated with developments unfavorable to his interests (for instance, a jury’s return of “guilty”)—all of which may culminate in an emotional discharge of tension, which occasionally may take the disarming form of a passing squall of tears.
(Thanks to Lovefraud member Newlife, inspirer and friend, for prompting my initial consideration of this subject, which I intend to expand in a near-term post. As always, my use of male gender pronouns is for convenience’s sake, and not to suggest that females are incapable of the behaviors and attitudes discussed. This article is copyrighted © 2010 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
style1-I feel the same way. It did rip my heart out but not the same as losing this last relationship. This was as close to a complete breakdown as I could ever have been. Last summer was the biggest hell of my life. Now I’m still angry at him but when I think of our lovemaking, it makes me cry. I still have flashbacks about it. He was my first true love, my first orgasm and the most intense relationship and longest one that I ever had.
hens – ”“ he sat with a seat between us and acted like he didnt know me ….whoa.
i was ignorant back then – no chit!
there is a very well known series that the ppath was really into – and she met one of her other dupes on an online forum dedicated to it. then she messed with her for a couple of years.
recently, i watched the whole damn series and REALLY enjoyed it and the ppath can suck …
Erin… I am sorry. I had one of those intense sexual relationships.. the love of my life up until now.. and he was doing drugs behind my back and turned crazy and I left and never saw him again.. after dating four years and after he bought me a house and after I spent a month placing all the furniture just so and after he told me that he was so glad that I was there and after telling me that I was the love of his life.. and after a night of holding and touching.. that was so romantic and lovely that I can still feel it today.. that next day, he was out working.. owmed a company and worked out of the house.. and it was my first day to rest after the move and he came home and began acting so strange, hyper, angry, criticizing.. by later that evening he threaten to kill me.. I slept upstiars with the door locked and after being ther only five days, I left.. and had movers come the next week and I was gone and never saw or spoke to him again…
He was the love of my life but had I stayed he would’ve destroyed me.. I found out from his ex that he would go through phases of doing coke and pot and I never knew this .. and I detest drug use…
I saw THE NOTEBOOK about four times after that and I cried and cried and cried.
So, Erin .. I get it.. and I am sorry….
Steve:
Tears are ‘contorted’ emotion in a spath.
It’s like a rapist….showing ‘care’ for his victim after he kidnaps her. Asking permission for a sex act…..twisting it in his mind that ‘it’s okay’ because he asked permission…..he’s a contortionist.
Completely dismissing the fact he kidnapped his victim…..
Maybe even ‘holding ‘ her after he raped her crying with her….saying I’m sorry, i didn’t want to do this.
Fake emotions /fake meanings.
Contorted into something society will accept.
thanks for this article, your knowledge and insight is greatly appreciated!
EB
Erin72 I am so sorry for you but if he was the only one and your first orgasm and your first love then sweetie you have nothing to compare it with…. there will be a love number two and three annd lots of orgasms in your life..not to make lite of your pain but you will heal from this i promise now get your chit together love number two is waiting on you and they say third times a charm – life aint always fair – and beside your not gettin over your first real love – your gettin over a big lie – sex and makin love is in your future…you will love again and just think all this bad stuff will be behind you…time is on your side
Dear Steve, WOW! This was an excellent post and you nailed one of the most confusing behaviors that these people exhibit. For a long time, I thought I was with a “sensitive man who was loving and caring”. I was dead wrong.
“But this is a fallacy, which is to say that what’s spontaneous isn’t necessarily authentic. The sociopath’s ability, for instance, to conjure tears spontaneously—that is, at any given, self-serving moment —certainly doesn’t certify his emotional display as authentic.” I GET THIS COMPLETELY! This statement really struck home with me. It’s him all the way.
Tears were just another weapon in his arsenal and it reached the point where I finally would tell him to quit the damned crying! I realized, after some time, that the tears only came when he was busted for doing something that had hurt someone. He would tell me, “You can’t imagine how I feel right now.” Well, NO, I couldn’t because the reality was there was no feelings within him at all. The only “authentic” part of his act was that the tears were for him, not for those he had hurt and the consequences he was going to face.
When I was in the process of getting him out of here, he would go to my sister’s and cry about how much he “loved” me, so on and so forth. It was a great act and she bought it. He wasn’t crying because he loved me! He was crying because he was about to be on the street, thereby turning himself into the “victim” as you so aptly described. I became the bad person for wanting him out of here. This is the SAME sister he also stole thousands of dollars of jewelry from and when confronted by my brother-in-law, his response was that he had asked for a small loan and my BIL had said no. So, in the ex spath’s eyes, that made it OK to take the jewelry. Classic case of the spath turning himself into the victim.
For those of us who don’t think as they do, tears are something that come when we are truly affected in our heart and soul. Sometimes we cry out of happiness and many, many of us have cried because of the pain and chaos these people brought to our lives. NORMAL people can’t conceive of a person using tears to manipulate others. I understand and can conceptualize the difference today.
NULLITY-great word to describe them. I looked it up and the definition was “zero”. There’s nothing there and ain’t that the truth?
Thank you, Steve, for another excellent article!
Hugs,
Cat
hens,
Mine did the same. When the tears didn’t work, the ugliness came out. He would be extremely angry that I didn’t buy into the crying bit and call me a cold b****. The interesting thing is that he kept trying and trying with the tears bit long after I had called him on it. Presumably, in his mind, I was pretty ignorant.. NOT.
Steve:
This article interested my greatly since I often wondered about this topic. I used to work in television and became knowledgable about the process actors use. Oddly enough, I think it is the same process actors use with a twist.
When an actor accepts a role, they have a two step process they use to break down a script line by line.
The first step is “intention.” Each line has a stated intention the actor uses in delivering the line — for example, an actor who is trying to convey a point to another actor will write, next to he line of dialogue his stated intention “to nail it to his forehead.” Sociopaths have no trouble with this part of the exercise, since there is always an intention behind everything that flies out of their mouths.
The second step is called “partnering.” The actor draws a box next to the dialogue and puts in the emotion they’re trying to connect with. For example, if they’re trying to convey sadness, they’ll put sadness, and then partner with the emotion, thinking of something that triggers saddness — for example, their dog dying. This presents a problem for sociopaths, in my opinion, since they lack an emotional core or at best have extremely stunted emotions.
My theory is that the only thing they understand is loss or frustratation through being denied something. So, to take my example above of the dog dying, a sociopath is not saddened about the dog dying. Instead the sociopath is upset about losing possession of his dog. And that is the trigger for him.
If you watch a talented actor, you get caught up in his performance because it rings true. If you watch an actor with a limited emotional range, you often feel like they’re phoning in their performance — they know the words, but they can’t convey the message. Compare a performance by Meryl Streep with one by Joan Crawford. The latter’s emotions ran the gamut from a to b. Not a lot going on below the surface, unlike the former, where you buy every performance Ms Streep churns out.
When my S-ex cried, I now realize it was because he was threatened with loss — generally my getting so fed up I was going to cut him off. The first time the tears flowed, was several months into our relationship and he stood me up for a date and after not calling, then fed me some bullshit excuse. He turned on the waterworks in a very public setting and my heart melted and I truly felt for him. The last time he turned on the waterworks, again in a very public setting, was when I was refusing to give him 10 grand. I remember watching the sturm and drang in a very detached manner and thinking “there’s not a hell of a lot going on below the surface.” And a minute later the cloud burst ended and he went on about his business as thought nothing had happened.
And like a typical S, when tactic A (crying) didn’t work, that night he tried tactic B — putting out in bed. Such a tired, trite cliche, now that I think back on it.
OMG…this article answered my last question about the NP going on a remorse performance…That was exactly what I was looking for..and I know for sure its right..it been niggling me even though on the surface all is well and peace reigns..as soon as I read this, I felt at peace and more sure then ever.
I can relate to Joan Crawford when it comes to wire hangers, though.
As far as I’m concerned, she hit the nail right on the head when it comes to wire hangers.
Because everytime I see a wire hanger, I just want to scream, “NO WIRE HANGERS!!!!!!”
Nobody should have to deal with wire hangers….they are just flimsy & useless.
Sociopaths are the “wire hangers” of society….that’s a metaphor.