Are sociopaths who cry “sensitive sociopaths,” or just extra clever sociopaths? What’s going on when sociopaths cry? Is their crying ever sincere, or always insincere? Is it ever deep, or always superficial? Always calculated, or sometimes spontaneous?
In short, what’s the deal with sociopaths and the crying game?
There are some sociopaths—more classical, Cleckley-like sociopaths—who can “cry on demand,” by which I mean cry, as if spontaneously, from a consciously manipulative agenda. Many of these sociopaths can summon displays of emotional vulnerability, like tearful anguish and contrition, with the skill of the gifted character actor.
In some cases, to extend the metaphor, some sociopaths—in the moment—may be so in character as to “virtually believe” in the authenticity of their presentations. These sociopaths may conjure tears, for instance, and then see the tears they’ve conjured as evidence, as ratification, of the sincerity of their response.
I use the term “virtually believe” to denote the sociopath’s capacity, in these cases, to almost delude himself into believing that he’s as sensitive and vulnerable as his presentation would suggest, when in fact—that is, when in reality—he’s, of course, shallow and fraudulent.
Conversely, there are also sociopaths who, producing seemingly spontaneous displays of vulnerable emotion, remain aware of the inauthenticity of their theatrics. That is, these sociopaths recognize that they are acting even as they may be successfully convincing others that they’re not.
What partly covers, or protects, sociopaths who engage the “crying game” is the inherent challenge of separating spontaneity and authenticity. That is, we tend to assume that what’s spontaneous is also authentic—indeed, that spontaneity itself virtually proves authenticity.
But this is a fallacy, which is to say that what’s spontaneous isn’t necessarily authentic. The sociopath’s ability, for instance, to conjure tears spontaneously—that is, at any given, self-serving moment —certainly doesn’t certify his emotional display as authentic.
But is this to say that sociopaths’ tears and crying are always, by definition, inauthentic? I wouldn’t say so, at least not definitively. But I would suggest that where, arguably, the sociopath’s tears are not a product of sheer manipulativeness and inauthenticity, the emotion(s) driving his tears will, by definition, be shallow and invariably selfish.
So, for instance, the sociopath choking up in the courtroom upon hearing the verdict “guilty” that will lock him away for life, may be conveying real emotion—he may really feel bad, upset; however, to the extent that he’s really suffering, we can know that he’s suffering not from what he took or stole from his victim(s), but from what he feels has been taken or stolen from him (for instance, his freedom).
He will suffer, in a word, as victim, not victimizer.
And should he appear to “grieve” his situation—versus protest it with his narcissistic rage—again let me stress: he will be grieving as victim, not victimizer. And his grief, like everything else about him, will be shallow, and dissipate quickly; and then he’ll reinhabit his usual state of emotional nullity.
But again, even in cases where his disarming loss of emotional composure—his tearfulness, for example—isn’t purely manipulative and play-acting, we can surmise that, often, this will reflect less the sociopath’s genuine, deeply felt emotion, like sadness, than a buildup of tension and stress associated with developments unfavorable to his interests (for instance, a jury’s return of “guilty”)—all of which may culminate in an emotional discharge of tension, which occasionally may take the disarming form of a passing squall of tears.
(Thanks to Lovefraud member Newlife, inspirer and friend, for prompting my initial consideration of this subject, which I intend to expand in a near-term post. As always, my use of male gender pronouns is for convenience’s sake, and not to suggest that females are incapable of the behaviors and attitudes discussed. This article is copyrighted © 2010 by Steve Becker, LCSW.)
We were all talking about tear-jerking movies the other day and how tears cleanse us and make us heal. I watched The Notebook tonight. I hadn’t seen it in years. I thought that it would completely rip me up, but I was wrong. I cried a ton during the beginning teen-age part of their relationship because I had flash backs of my ex making love to me. The sex scenes tend to bother me the most. I still do have flashbacks from my relationship. Some say it is PTSD-I’m not sure if that’s really it.
The scenes between James Garner and Gena Rowlands bothered me more this time. I can’t stand to see James Garner cry. He has always reminded me of my daddy. I saw my daddy cry only a handful of times, but it always ripped me up. I can’t stand to see a grown man cry. I really liked the end of the movie-that they died at the same time in each other’s arms. What an incredible way to go. All I really got from this movie was that I really hope that I have the type of relationship that was portrayed by the older couple at some point in my life. I am totally NOT ready for that now but I do want it. It made me realize that I have time left to have that. I also realize how sad my ex spath really is.
Yes, his wife took him back. He actually bought her back.I know that he has never been emotionally invested in her since he has done nothing but cheat on her since the beginning of their marriage. I feel ashamed that I had a part in that. It’s sad that he will never have that kind of love that was portrayed in the movie. Even if they stay together, the damage had already been done. At least I still have a chance for that later on. I feel hopeful about that.
We all get over these things in our own way. Just because I may handle myself differently doesn’t make it wrong. We all have different goals for ourselves and plans and things that are important to us. I know it doesn’t seem like I’ve come very far but it’s getting better slowly. I was told my someone that it may take at least 18 months for me to get over this man and what happened with us. It’s been a year now so I have some time left. I’m working on my self esteem now. There are two things that I need to happen for that and I am working toward it. I have learned a lot.
I realized today that all of my spath relationships were with people in the medical field. From now on, I have rules.
–no one in the medical profession
–no one married and if divorced must produce the divorce papers
–no relationships with anyone on the job that I work with everyday
–no sex until I have a committed relationship and until I am 100% ready. Any guy who won’t wait, isn’t THE guy.
A wonderful friend of mine, honest, caring, well-educated professional woman whom I truly respect, took pains to tell me she’d seen the S recently.
“He’s in so much pain. He’s so ill.” Obviously, he tugs at her heartstrings. She cannot understand how I can seem so indifferent.
He may be in pain, and he may be ill. It’s hard to know for certain. He’s a very good actor. The point is, it doesn’t make any difference. Anyone who reaches out to lift him up will be dragged down. His brothers and in-laws know it. His close associates of the past know it. I know it. We keep our distance. There’s a dwindling circle of current dupes, and an even larger circle of people who know better than to get sucked in.
What do I say to her? She doesn’t get it. She’s so sure that a good Christian would take pity on him. She thinks my avoidance of him is revenge or lack of forgiveness. She doesn’t understand that where she sees a pathetic, broken man, I see quicksand.
He taught me that a Sociopath will find a ways to victimize me that I cannot possibly anticipate or guard against. He taught me that my ONLY defense is distance. There is NO safe contact with him. I wouldn’t risk visiting him on his deathbed, because of the possibility he’d use that last brief contact against me somehow. How? I don’t know how, but then I never was able to anticipate his seemingly random attacks on other people’s sanity, peace, reputation or persons. Just when I thought things were settling down, he’d do or say something utterly insane – over and over and over again.
Whatever you do, never get drawn in by tears or any other pathetic display a sociopath might muster. The emotions may or may not be genuine, but that hardly matters. He’s still a sociopath. He’ll still harm you if given the opportunity.
Elizabeth! YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Someone said that recently about the spath son to me, “You know, he’s hurting too…” and I thought to myself that she just doesn’t “get it.” Any “hurt” that he’s experiencing is of his own doing. His girlfriend left him because of his abuse! Wow….good post, Elizabeth.
erin1972,
I watched parts of one of my favorite movies last week, The Green Mile. Favorite is a misnomer actually. The Green Mile is too intense to be a favorite of mine. I freely confess that I like my movies silly and fun. I like to leave the theater relaxed and happy, having laughed heartily and long.
The Green Mile is a movie that makes me think long and hard about the nature of sociopathy. The character of Percy Wetmore strikes me as the most frightening psychopath in the story, and yet he wasn’t a convict. Percy Wetmore was a socially well-connected young man who enjoyed tormenting others. He was creepier than any of the people in the cells.
Elizabeth, I read the books before the movie came out, and it haunted my sleep, often. Yes, it is a powerful statement – the whole story was a powerful statement of predjudice, sociopathy, redemption, and letting go of something good and gentle that also suffers untold horrors because of those beautiful attributes. Percy – yes, that character sums up every spath that I’ve encountered because most of them had never even seen the inside of a jail cell.
Ever see Matt Damon in the talented MR Ripley?
Shudder. That movie is full of disorders!
Buttons,
I see the S’s pathetic displays as his latest slander against his wary family and previous associates.
The dupes are like us. Like us, they’re people striving to consistently do the right things for the right reasons. The dupes are our peers, in every way except one. They don’t know that this pathetic man they’re trying to help is by nature user. They think it’s their duty to bring about a “reconciliation” between the S and his victims. They don’t get it. They’ll never get it. Somehow we have to learn to live with their disappointment in us.
Erin1972, what an amazing place you’re in. Read back on some of your posts and see where you were and look at where you are, NOW!!!! You’ve set forth clear boundaries, and you’re sounding so very, very self-assured. It’s a beautiful thing.
Brightest blessings!
Well said, Elizabeth. The people who “don’t get it” I believe are people who don’t WANT to “get it.” They can’t comprehend that another human being deliberately trolls for victims and maliciously uses them up until they no longer have any value to the spath. They don’t WANT to “get it.” It’s too hard to wrap one’s head around the fact that these people are without conscience, remorse, or souls.
I agree with you, Buttons.
People don’t want to “get it”.
They cannot handle this truth about the human condition, for whatever reason.
Plus, it makes people take a look at their OWN relationships.
They might come to the harsh realization that they may also have been duped by someone in the past….or even in the present.
People don’t want to admit that they’ve been duped, or that evil could be so close.
It’s something that happens to other people, but never them.
It’s a little narcissistic and arrogant, if you ask me.
But, there are people out there with that mindset…..it’s something that happens to OTHER people.