By John Hunt, MD
All who read Lovefraud.com know that sociopaths lie, cheat and steal, manipulate, control, defraud. Sociopaths seek out positions of power over others. The low functioning sociopath does this on a small scale—just ruining the life of an unsuspecting spouse, perhaps. The high functioning sociopath does this on a much grander scale, perhaps through the political system—ruining a country.
Sociopaths seek power. What better way to accomplish this than through politics? Think how much politicians have to lie to get elected. It is hard for a good person to get elected, in part because they don’t lie well. Sociopaths lie with practiced ease and no guilt. They concentrate themselves in government, quite naturally.
Ever wonder why government messes up so much? Why Congress is despised? Why presidents so often lie and mislead, strive for control over others, and somehow get away with it? Ever wonder why the government is so internally contradictory, so confusing, so incomprehensible, and yet somehow retains its total power over the people? Ever wonder why the largest debtor in the history of the world—the US government—which is an utterly bankrupt entity, somehow convinces people to loan it large sums of money, and the people accept loan repayment in the form of counterfeit currency printed out of thin air by the Federal Reserve? Do you see how sociopathic the government has become? A walking lie, a talking contradiction?
It is because the government is filled to the brims with sociopaths.
Force against fellow man
Politicians and bureaucrats have reserved for themselves the legal right to initiate force against their fellow man. Think about that for a moment. Anyone else who initiates force commits a crime, but not government! They are special! Moral law doesn’t apply to them! Sound familiar?
It doesn’t matter which party is in charge. Most recently they have compelled us to purchase really crappy and expensive financial products from their large corporate buddies (e.g., health insurance). But consider also the bipartisan support for forcible military conscription in the past, unconstitutional/illegal taxation and fees, the protection racket of the IRS, the spying and monitoring by the NSA, mandates for prescriptions for medications sold over-the-counter everywhere else in the world (the effect of which is to keep prices high for the profit of big pharma).
And fraud too. Consider the largest fraud in human history—the Federal Reserve—which creates money without work and doles it out to its morally bankrupt friends. Consider the ponzi schemes of Social Security and Medicare; and the totally illegal accounting methods of the federal government which artificially lower the government’s debt from $90 trillion to “only” $18 trillion, the justifications for which are so willingly accepted by a population in denial of obvious truths. The government is a giant con artist. A giant sociopathic monster. It’s all about control and manipulation. And they systematically gaslight us like crazy starting from kindergarten, to try to make us accept all this blatant criminality as appropriate!
No one knows what percentage of politicians and bureaucrats are sociopaths, but there is assuredly a high concentration of them in that realm. There are two reasons for this: 1) the sociopath’s skill set is perfect for politics and bureaucracy; 2) a position of legal unrestrained power over other humans is simply too intriguing for a high-functioning sociopath to let pass by.
The opposite: Libertarian
The political opposite, and social opposite, of the sociopath is the libertarian. A libertarian ascribes avidly, completely and thoroughly to the Nonaggression Principle. The Nonaggression Principle states that never, NEVER is it acceptable to initiate force or fraud against another human being. Wow. To a libertarian, no end ever justifies the use of an immoral means.
Now, this doesn’t make a libertarian a wimp. If someone attacks a libertarian without provocation, the libertarian wouldn’t hesitate to pop the dude in the face. But the libertarian wouldn’t attack, unless attacked first. The libertarian won’t lie, cheat, steal or defraud, excepting to take back something stolen. The libertarian will not initiate. But the libertarian will defend.
In a world in which cronyism is so dominant, it is easier to be successful by lying, cheating and stealing, or by rent seeking (convincing a politician to give you someone else’s money or property). Libertarians cannot do these things. They are incapable of doing them. How refreshing is that? Libertarians strive for a political system which allows their honesty to be rewarded instead of punished. We are a long way from that society.
Each of us has suffered from the actions of the sociopaths in our lives. Yet we are also the confused and willing victims of the sociopaths in government. We remain in denial about these controllers, manipulators, liars and cheaters. We give them unearned authority and unearned credibility because we are taught to believe that they have the right to tell us what to do. We stick their names on our bumper stickers. We send them money. We vote for them. What are we thinking?
My recommendation? If you want the opposite of the sociopath to be your partner, seek out a libertarian. If you want the opposite of a sociopath to be your representative in congress, to be your senator, or to be your president, seek out a libertarian.
Libertarians and sociopaths
Libertarians are likely to trust any individual who claims to be a libertarian or is a Ron Paul supporter. This is because libertarians abide by a personal code that makes them, by definition, principled and honorable people. However, libertarians are human. They have no greater education about sociopaths than anyone else. They can be faked out by sociopaths too, although usually not for long. Because sociopaths are such effective liars, you of course need to beware that they can put on the act of being a libertarian, the same way that sociopaths often pretend to be Christian—to take advantage of people’s desires to trust others. Indeed, sociopaths can infiltrate any philosophy. But the libertarian doctrine stands so adamantly in contrast to the sociopath’s hardwired and distorted brain, that the sociopath cannot hold to a fake libertarian act for long. Sociopathy used to be called “moral insanity”, and maybe it should be called that again. True libertarians are the opposite: they are morally rational.
To a libertarian, there is nothing more dangerous than lying to oneself. Sociopaths absolutely rely on the ability of their victims to lie to themselves. Libertarianism therefore is a vaccination against the infection and the cancer of the sociopath.
Just in case you have some false impression of libertarians, they are not on the fringe of society, although they are on the fringe of politics! They can be found in the Democratic or the Republican party (always as reformers), or as members of other political parties, or most commonly not as part of any political party. Libertarians are most aptly described as Americans of the style we usually consider the country’s founding fathers to be, except that they are also exceedingly tolerant.
Characteristics of a Libertarian
As a quick introduction to your study of what a libertarian is, here is my list of characteristics. Libertarians are above all individuals, but most all ascribe to these concepts.
- They don’t initiate force or fraud against their fellow man. They are principled.
- They are tolerant people. Tolerant of anything other than force or fraud.
- They don’t use government power to commit force or fraud to benefit themselves or others.
- They don’t use propaganda or gaslighting to manipulate the people.
- They don’t vote for politicians who want to use government power to commit force or fraud, or to compel people to behave a certain way, or to compel people to buy certain products. They only support politicians who recognize the only job of government is to protect people from the force and fraud of others. To a libertarian, neither democracy nor the voting booth should be considered or used as means of compulsion.
- Libertarians favor a strong defense, but don’t attack unless threatened.
- Libertarians are commonly described as “fiscally conservative and socially liberal”. Libertarians do not oppose gay marriage. The don’t believe that victimless crimes are crimes. They think marijuana should be legal. They do not think that anyone’s money should be stolen from them and given to another through the tax code. They don’t believe that forced giving is either charitable or moral, but rather “forced giving” is just a form of theft. They never support bailing out Wall Street, nor giving power to one group over another. They don’t ever lend government power to special interests (Special interests are the opposite of the “general welfare” of the Constitution). Libertarians think that government is supposed to work for the people, not people work for government. They are opposed to the NSA spying on American citizens. Libertarians like immigrants. They think that America is not a geographically imprisoned nation-state, but rather a philosophy that can be found all over the world. Libertarians want to put a wall around the welfare state, not a wall around the country. Many libertarians are highly charitable. Many libertarians righteously fight against anyone who uses force against them or defrauds them.
- Libertarians are thoughtful people who above all respect the dignity and freedom of the individual to live as each individual chooses.
- Because of the moral principles to which libertarians ascribe—which are consistent and predictable based on the Nonaggression Principle—they can, better than most, recognize the fraud that permeates society.
If you want a world in which the sociopaths are not messing with your life and wreaking their havoc on society right and left, learn about libertarianism. If you want a partner that is the entire opposite of a manipulative sociopath, find yourself a libertarian.
The trend in society toward libertarianism is a wonderful thing for those who recognize that sociopaths are the embodiment of evil in the world. The central defining characteristic of a libertarians is moral sanity. Sociopaths, in absolute contrast, are morally insane.
John Hunt, MD is a pediatric lung physician and author of the novel Assume the Physician, which teaches about the medical system through constant humor, as well as Higher Cause, and a soon to be released guide for childhood asthma management.
Oh Dr.Hunt…You make it sound so easy and practical!!!
In full disclosure I am a very proud bleeding hearted liberal!!! I endorse the live and let live philosophy whole heartedly but also believe that the role of government is to provide services that promote the greater good.
Unfortunately the idea that Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely holds as true for Libertarians as it does for members of both other parties. Moral sanity can be nurtured only if as a society at large we endorse the old values of helping the needy and vulnerable…keeping accountable individuals that perpetrate hurt not just in a corporate setting but also within our family structure.
Part of the intense pain survivors of non physical hurt and fraud experience is because society as a whole does not emphatically and strongly oppose actions of abandonment and cheating. Emphasis on individualism as opposed to group and family structure makes our culture much more vulnerable to excusing predatory behaviours. Family is our best institution for raising a healthy next generation. Why do we excuse individuals who inflict deliberate harm within the family structure only because they can? In those ways Libertarianism does provide a mixed message. And from experience I can say that any inconsistency is breeding ground for psychopathic predation.
Rather than endorsing any one ideology I wish that we could put our effort into protecting the family unit with social policy . The social fabric of our nation seems to be fairly damaged because of the excusing of bad behavior in the name of entitlement to search for individual happiness.
My partner does not need to be Libertarian…just a kind giving loving human being!!!! I do tend to find those on all ides of the aisle!!!!
Sounds good! Let’s just make sure that we don’t let sociopaths determine what is the “greater good” and force us to accomplish it for them!
Reading this – George W. Bush comes to mind…..
Hello Hello Hens!!!
Expound please!!! I love living in a very conservative part of Texas because I love a good debate!!!
Truth be told ( and of course we all know that the first casualty of any involvement with a psychopath is the truth)anyone who would expose themselves to the nastiness of Presidential elections in these days has to have more than a smattering of Narcissism don’t you think??
Numerous commentators have characterized Obama as a narcissist…
Malignant Narcissist.
I am very upset and disappointed to see this article on LOVEFRAUD. i don’t think that articles promoting one political ideology over another is an appropriate thing to have on this site. While i agree that many politicians are probably sociopaths, i actually find the libertarian stance to be one of the most sociopathic and least humane economic/political ideologies. i certainly don’t think it is the opposite of sociopath. if i were to pick any economic system to be the opposite of sociopath it would be, socialism. So, rather than getting into a political/ ideological argument, i would like to respectfully request that this article/post be removed and that such articles not be on LF but should rather be posted in a different forum.
It is clear the good doctor does not know very many Libertarians, meaning those especially involved in the political party. The percentage of psychopathic individuals may be lower but they are there, and many of them in leadership positions.
Or maybe he does know many in the political party but knows how the news media uses their power to smear those that don’t agree with their political perspectives.
However, I agree themelinda, that many psychopathic individuals seem to be in leadership positions. It seems the only way to get elected is to be gifted at charming people and saying what they want to hear. Gladhanding. Individual politicians who stand on principal are smeared and get their heads handed to them. Vague and charming? That’s what Americans vote for. Arghh.
They are everywhere. They are estimated to make up 10% of the population. Fewer is better. I doubt we can create a psychopath free political party but we can try.
philomela–the article is my responsibility and you should only be upset with me please. I am grateful that there is a willingness to allow speech of various viewpoints on this site.
Libertarianism is not simply a political ideology, although there are political components to it. You might have a common misunderstanding of libertarianism, otherwise you would not consider it not humane. It is the philosophy that involves no force and fraud, and most respects the human being as a worthy creature. Remember that socialism was the breeding ground for Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and others of the most severe sociopathic nature, because socialism requires that the people accept force as a means to accomplishing ends. Libertarianism does not.
One point in this article was to help defuse some of the profound misunderstandings (gaslighting?) that has placed libertarianism into some people’s minds as “inhumane” just because it DOES NOT force people to do things or live a certain way. Libertarians can be very generous, but they don’t force others to be generous. They don’t support forced welfare, but do support voluntary generosity/ true charity. That does not make them inhumane. That makes them respectful.
The other point of this article is to raise in people’s minds the potential significance of the infiltration of sociopaths and sociopathy (a trickle down sociopathic behavior in non-sociopaths) into the political controls of society.
In any event, we should all occasionally realize that what we choose to read and what we choose to believe may not all be truth. We need to be reflective and rational and appropriately skeptical, but without losing our trust that good people ARE out there, as well as knowing that bad people are too.
Primary victims of sociopaths know that they have been fooled into believing lies. What other lies are we fooled into believing? Socialism has led to more loss of life and human dignity than any other concept in the history of the world. Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and their national socialist policies resulted in over a hundred million deaths and profound loss of human dignity. Libertarian Americanism brought the industrial revolution to the US, massive reduction in poverty worldwide, and the modern ability to have these conversations without too much fear of being punished by the all-powerful ruler as a subversive. This may not be what you have heard before. Many people have been taught in school and by the media (as one example) that fascism is the opposite of socialism. That is one example of a lie that too many believe. “Nazi” after all meant “National Socialism” and is certainly NOT the opposite of socialism.
Conversations should be ongoing about such important sociopathic influences on us all, so we can be better immunized to protect ourselves and our children.
Imara, I used to view myself as a “bleeding heart liberal” and proud of it, as I thought that was the most generous and kind way to be, and it was what I had been taught (and also what got me into the position of being a vulnerable target to sociopaths).
As part of my learning journey, a friend sent me to The Political Compass website, it is not the be-all and end-all but it did get me thinking about the axis of power/control vs. freedom/autonomy, which is exactly the dynamic of the sociopath (power and control over others). I had been taught that politics is “left vs right” but seeing this way, on an axis, really opened my eyes to some new viewpoints. When I took the test, I was astonished to see that I fell more in the “libertarian” part of the graph. While that offended me (!!!) because of what I had been led to believe about libertarianism, it also intrigued me enough to lead me to research further.
Along the way to where I find myself now (politically unaffiliated and independent), I felt the need to “identify as” something. So identifying as libertarian was temporary and tentative, but it did help me break with the left-right paradigm which I discovered to be false and misleading.
There are many more viewpoints out there, than conservative vs. liberal (as but one example) and you will find that there are many humane and generous viewpoints as well.
Since my experiences with a spath ex-husband, I am becoming more and more freedom loving and respectful of individual choice in most every matter, so long as it does not hurt anyone else. I abhor power and control over others, in ANY form, including socialism. I have no wish to control others, nor would I want them to control me. Is this “anarchy?” no, but that is another political term worth truly understanding — what it IS. And what it is NOT.
These “isms” are fascinating, once you start delving into them. I predict you will be truly astonished to discover how far the wool has been pulled over your (and most everyone’s) eyes all this time.
I am very interested to see this type of article on Lovefraud, and I don’t post often, but I am motivated to share my views on why. First, I understand why this topic (and the comment section) might offend some Lovefraud readers. Offending people is a very interesting topic in and of itself (the phenomenon of “taking offense” and what that tells us about ourselves).
My own experience with my spath ex-husband took place many years ago, and I have gone through a long process of healing from it, learning lessons from it, evolving, changing my views (sometimes 180 degrees), being challenged by coming into contact with new sociopaths, absorbing the lessons from those interactions, and taking some of those lessons learned and applying them to my wider world view.
That is where “politics” comes into it. And why I find this article interesting and appropriate. Although, I would say, I once would not have found it appropriate, and I once would have turned away from it, feeling kind of offended. So, to those Lovefraud readers who have that response, I suggest skipping this article, as it is not intended for you. We are all at different levels of healing and awareness. One reason I have not been on Lovefraud as much recently, is that I have done quite a bit of healing and evolving and am just in a different place. And have found not as much here that resonates with where I am at now (though of course the articles continue to resonate with where I was, when I was going through the spath experience). I love this website and all of the contributors. It helped me greatly.
After learning so much about sociopaths from my own, intimate experience, it was a natural (though surprising to me) evolution to apply those lessons learned to the sociopaths in society, including our World Leaders. There are some ugly truths to be learned, if a person is open-minded and curious and discerning. Beware though: it is like turning over a rock, and you find stuff under there you might wish you hadn’t seen.
I am just saying that, I spent considerable time several years ago really focusing intently on my own relationship with the spath, working at understanding the dynamics of it from as many angles as possible. It was personal. But once I finally got that figured out, it opened my eyes wide and — not that I could “see” spaths everywhere I looked — but with my knew knowledge, I was much more able to take the blinders off and see the world for what it actually is.
However, until I had my own intimate spath experience, I was one of the trusting, blind people who believed that everyone has some good in them (etc. etc.) and applied that to the entire world. I used to view our world leaders as benevolent and working for the people. I have since learned otherwise.
It became impossible for me to finally accept that my husband did NOT have this “good inside him” and then not be able to extrapolate that to the world. The cognitive dissonance was too obvious. I knew that feeling too well. It is shocking to learn that we have also been betrayed by our world leaders, but it is true and it was much more pleasant to believe otherwise for the first 45 years of my life, but once your eyes have been opened, you cannot close them.
So I can no longer find articles like this “offensive” because while they are one person’s opinion (politically speaking), I can tell that this author does see quite a lot of what is going on in the world. I do not have to agree 100% with all of his conclusions. And I think it is important information. Scary information. But it is one more step along the path of seeing things clearly.
So thank you for posting this. Please do not remove it. Try not to be offended by it, but just try to understand where the author is coming from. Try to be open minded. Ponder what it means to be offended… and that is just a “hint” because I surely did not get that lesson very easily. It took me years and years of pondering and thinking deeply and trying, and finally it dawned on me and I was able to move another step forward along my path. But I will emphasize that I could not learn this lesson until I was ready to — until I had done the preparatory work. Until that point, this info would not have been intended for me. I could not comprehend it. And I might have been offended by it.
Blessings to all of you in your journeys. I am still of course on my own, still with lots to learn (I hope).
20 years, so glad you posted. I could be named 40 years and I sometimes wish I had never looked under that rock. But once you do there is no going back. Just like with realizing sociopaths exist the first time shakes your life, realizing they are in positions of high power and seeing it is a life changing event. Snakes in Suits is a great book on the topic and it is free to download at: http://auntieimperial.tumblr.com/post/48055117399/snakesinsuits
I have become an activist on exposing The obama/ clinton psychopathy and treason but so many eyes are blind to it.
20years
I appreciate your post, esp your next to last paragraph, “try to understand where the author is coming from… ponder what it means to be offended.”
Rape offends me. Pedophilia offends me. A cheating husband offends me. Ridicule of sociopaths/minions victims offends me. The smear campaign offends me. Parental Alienation offends me. Bigotry offends me.
When people lump a whole group of others into one definition and then condemns them, esp based on UNTRUE smearing and biases, that offends me. It’s picking individuals and sorting them in this group or that, and then condemning them, not on who they actually are, but based on a formula… that’s persecution based on OPINION. That’s what happened to the Jews in WWII. and to certain skin color by the KKK/Supremacists. They use their judgment of whole groups of people as their excuse to hate and act on their hate.
I hope Donna does not remove this article. I think it serves a powerful lesson for LF, to discern what is offensive. EVIL is offensive. People who chose a different diet, a different church, different sexual partners, different political parties, etc. are NOT offensive. They are NOT equal to EVIL SOCIOPATHS.
Sociopaths are the EVIL ones and that’s what matters to me here on LF.
I am loving the understanding and compassion here involved with the axis of evil, psychopathy. We who once knew no evil came to know it and understand it in a very painful way, bu being a target. Psychopathy when not doing evil can be seen as either charming, superficial or pathetic. But the evil will be done based on the nature of the psychopathic mind which is different than a normal mind. It is missing empathy, compassion and an ability to love. Psychopaths can range in intelligence just as the rest of us but they cannot use that intelligence in a productive way because they are never being but just mimicking. They can appear charming, honest, upstanding but they have no concept of what that means. In reality, they use lies, deceit, manipulation to get power over other people, money or positions of power. They really do not care about other people, they just want to suck them dry and dispose of them. We need to get every one out of power before we can have what our founding fathers gave us and they took away, simply life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Dr Hunt,
Since we seem to be speaking in absolutes in terms of your personal political viewpoint: libertarian = amassing personal wealth whenever possible, and an ‘I’ve got mine, screw you’ attitude towards society’s most vulnerable members. We cannot call our selves civilized if we step on the backs of our weakest in our quest to reach the top of the wealth heap. That said, all political parties have their share of sociopaths; they can be found across every stratum of society, from our poorest to our wealthiest. They are CEO’s, airline pilots, bank presidents, teachers, law enforcers, haircutters, garbage collectors, and so on. No political party can proclaim to be ‘sociopath free’. This is not a forum to advocate any political party.
mustard55, I am certain you are right about sociopaths being found across all stratum of society.
I meant to advocate a philosophy, not a party. I would like to point out again that the libertarian philosophy has nothing to do with (from your note above) “amassing personal wealth whenever possible and I’ve got mine, screw you attitude towards society’s most vulnerable members.” If you examine libertarianism, you will see that sort of description is very misleading and inaccurate. I would ask you to investigate a bit more, because to me it seems you are spreading a mistruth that is used to demonize libertarians. One wonders who created such a mistruth, and why they did… Perhaps those most threatened by libertarians? –the sociopaths?
More accurately, libertarian philosophy can be described as tolerant of all points of view and all lifestyles and all choices as long as they don’t involve forcing or defrauding others into abiding by those lifestyles, choices etc too. Freedom to choose how and with whom one wants to live, and how one wants to live, entirely unaffected by the force and fraud of others, is a libertarian goal that is of course hard to reach when the philosophy is mischaracterized by those who oppose the philosophy (the controllers).
I hesitantly give an example: I am a libertarian whose job is running a non-profit in Liberia, West Africa, helping children get health care and education. It would be a gross mischaracterization to describe me in such terms as you have described libertarians. I use this example to humbly suggest you analyse where your information about libertarianism has been garnered. I’m quite sure you have a false viewpoint, the spreading of which may be a disservice to the people who most need to consistently hear verifiable truths.
We are all victims of the mistruths out there. My exposure to sociopathy has taught me much that I didn’t suspect about why the world works (or fails to work), why poverty exists, why wars happen, and for that I suppose I am strangely grateful to the s’path that with intense and blatant fraud intruded into the life of my family.
You are correct. Do not forget lawyers, doctors ministers and judges. Psychopaths seek out jobs where they can hide their callous corruption behind a career path. Politicians have become the top of the pile. A third party is necessary because the two dominant parties are so corrupt trying to change them is futile. Libertarians are at least trying to clean up our corrupt government as was the Tea Party before it was purportedly taken over by the radical religious right and then vilified into extinction by democrats. The status quo means defeat for all of us.
agreed Delores. The status quo means defeat for all of us.
Dr. Hunt,
With all due respect. the term “libertarian” has become in common language to refer to a specific political ideology and political party. I am very aware of the history of both the libertarian philosophy aside from its current political meaning and reference to a political party.
Further, I do not have a problem with people posting views I may disagree with. Nor do I wish to silence anyone from expressing their point of view or experience. However, I believe that there are appropriate forums for expressing certain things. This site is about psychopathy/sociopathy, and while I agree that we have both a political and economic reality inthis country which has become increasingly supportive of and accepting of a narcisstic or psychopathic kind of functioning, my reading of your article is that it is political and not simply philosophical, and that even your explanation is a back handed manipulative approach to promoting a political position (as the election cycle is beginning) in the guise of writing about sociopathy whether individual or systemic.
So, my point is that regardless of whether I agree or disagree with your political views, I think that there are other, and more appropriate forums to have a political discussion, and I am extremely upset to see this site manipulated into a political forum, when most of us who come here do so in search of healing and information and not to be proseltyzed to, or to have political debates.
As for your feeble attempts to insult me, question my knowledge, and call me a sociopath for voicing my objection to your article on this site, they simply reinforce my original impression and objection to your article on this site.
By the way, I see you use the heading “Dr.” to reinforce your credibility as a writer on this site. So i would like to ask you what kind of doctor you are, and what your credentials are.
Philomela
I see you were offended by mention of the Libertarian Party. But when psychopaths are in charge of our government using their psychopathic charming fake veneers to glean votes and then lie, cheat, manipulate, commit treason and ignore the Constitution they have taken an oath to support, is it not rationally sound to discuss it here on a forum about psychopathy. Americans as in “we, the people” need to unite to stop allowing both major political parties to destroy our American freedom and way of life. Both parties promise good things and deliver more taxes, more regulations, more government agencies, more control over the people. That is exactly what psychopaths do. I was married to one who was a lawyer. It would be difficult to be a lawyer without being a psychopath. It would be almost impossible to be a politician in either major party without being a psychopath. Libertarian is yet to be so defined. The Tea Party which was not even a party but a movement named after “The Boston Tea Party” that began the revolution was vilified out of existence by both major parties. So let’s not call it talking political parties but political psychopathy. Forget George Bush, Bill Clinton, psychopaths and cowards both. What we need to do is reclaim our Constitution from all of the treasonous corrupt psychopaths on Capital Hill. That is the foundation of the Libertarian Party I believe. If not, call it the Constitutional Party, The American Party, a name is just a name. The cause is critical to keeping our freedom.
Hi Philomela,
I noted my pediatric specialty by my name in the posting so as to not accidentally be considered to have any particular psychological expertise with sociopathy beyond the same sort of challenging experiences others on this site have dealt with, plus maybe a bit of understanding gleaned by being a pediatrician. I’ve been reading this site for years and have been influenced and helped by the comments of many people. I probably have a bit more expertise in classical liberal (libertarian) thought than some, but judging from the comments on this site, there are others here too who are educated in classical liberal philosophy.
Please accept my apology that my analysis presented above has not been helpful to you. I have sought to understand why the system so often fails to help the victims of sociopaths, and indeed often protects the sociopaths from consequences of their actions. I presented what I believe to be one important reason for this failure of what should be healthy societal function. Although not helpful to you, I believe that this discussion of why broader society enables sociopathy might be helpful to at least some people struggling to understand why society fails to work correctly to resolve injustice. That my presentation has not resonated with you is clear. I don’t recognize in my words why you might think I feebly attempted to insult you or insinuate you were a sociopath. Such things did not even cross my mind. But that may represent a failure of this form of communication. Again, what I write is my responsibility, and I do take responsibility for it. Please do not hold anyone else or this site to blame.
I wish you the best.
philomela,
You almost make my hair stand on end!
I have re-read Dr. Hunt’s response to your comments above and I must defend him…for I can’t find the slightest trace of what you have accused him of! There is simply NOTHING AT ALL that could rightly be described as “back handed”, “manipulative”, “insulting” or “feeble”.
There, I said it. I didn’t want to get involved but hey, the world might explode around us, and I can’t let such distortions stand…can’t bear to witness another good person and another honest thinker get smeared, yet again!
Dr. Hunt,
I just looked above and see that you are an MD. What is your speciality? where did you study? what particular expertise do you have /
Philomela – Dr. Hunt’s specialty is listed right under his article. He is a pediatric lung physician. He also posted in a comment that he is running a nonprofit in Liberia, West Africa, helping children get health care.
Dr. Hunt submitted the article to me and I posted it. I believe it is important for all Lovefraud readers to recognize that sociopaths are everywhere. Although this website is primarily about sociopaths in romantic relationships, we also post about sociopaths in the workplace, in extended families, and yes – in government.
I believe Dr. Hunt’s article is thought-provoking and I am very glad that he sent it to Lovefraud.
i just read your post that you must have posted while i was writing my questions above. most of my questions . i think most of my questions were answered in that post. in spite of your answers, i think you are wrong on many levels both about the appropriateness of your post on this site and on your views regarding what it means to be a libertarian. i respect your right ti have and voice your political views, however wrong and misguided i may feel they are and no matter how vehemently I may disagree with them. however, i believe that doing so here is a serious misuse of this forum. So, i would like to respectfully request that you remove your post.
thank you,
Philomela