I’ve just travelled back from the UK today, and during my journey I read an article that made me sit up and take notice. It’s the story about a teenage girl, Gemma Barker, who created three separate male aliases in order to dupe her female friends in to sexual relationships with her. She had made enormous efforts to develop and maintain these aliases. She succeeded so well, in fact, that not only the victims but also their families were fooled in to believing that Gemma was a boy. Whilst it’s claimed that she suffers from autism spectrum disorder and ADHD, the judge still called her “Cunning and deceptive” and the report states that she showed no remorse when handed her sentence. Ring any bells?
The thing that really struck me, though, was a quote from one of her victims who was 15 or 16 at the time. Gemma was 18, so legally an adult. Saying that she felt “repulsed and dirty” after learning that the boy she loved was actually her female friend, the victim goes on to say
“Nobody understands what it’s like to be told that the person you love and want to spend the rest of your life with isn’t real. It’s like you have disappeared. I just want to stop hurting” She also asks the poignant rhetorical question I know many of us will have asked ourselves: “What did I ever do wrong to you?”
It’s heart-breaking isn’t it? The shame of deception runs deep. Left untreated it can grow, multiplying like a cancer in the soul of those whose only crime was to love someone else. People who trusted what they were being shown, and treated the other person with care and compassion — while the other person just looked on and laughed. While in some cases there may not be any physical scars, the emotional and spiritual damage hits hard in every case. It is far more damaging — and can last so much longer.
I would have hoped that in this day and age, perhaps there might be a little more understanding and compassion for people who have been duped. After all, there are plenty of stories. Accounts from people who have been deliberately deceived and misled. People who, like us, gave all we had to people we believed and loved with all our heart.
You know what, though? Reading through some of the comments that have appeared online after the article, I am disheartened that so many still seem more focused on blaming the ”˜stupidity’ of the victims, or urging us to ”˜take pity’ on the person who deceived the girls. For many people, I know it may seem hard, almost impossible to believe that someone can get away with such a deception. But for those of us who’ve been there, once we work through the pain and shame, we know we were not to blame! We know we were not stupid, gullible, needy, blind or any of the other stinging veiled questions that stab at our soul as we try to make sense of what has happened.
It’s not just deception in romantic love that causes the pain. The hurt of betrayal can hit just as hard when it’s about relationships of trust between friends and family, or perhaps misguided loyalty to bosses or colleagues. Whatever the connection, when hit with the cold hard truth, the horror can be almost overwhelming.
And”¦ in the same way that I had absolutely no comprehension of these sorts of behaviors before it happened to me, I guess the question is how on earth can we reasonably expect other people who haven’t ”˜been there themselves’ to have any level of understanding? Well? It’s a reasonable question”¦. But then, in recent times I”˜ve realized that our natural propensity to be reasonable and understanding is just another of the ways people are exploited while predators continue to thrive. It’s by thinking “Oh, they’re just under pressure!” “Well, you know, we all make mistakes!” or “It’s ok, I know they didn’t really mean it — I won’t say anything it’s not that important” that the abuse is allowed to continue, right under the noses of ”˜reasonable’ people who just can’t begin to comprehend that the attacks are deliberate!
It’s the same reasonable, caring approach by ”˜normal’ people that keeps these heartless creatures free to continue what they are doing. It’s also the thing that hurts the victim time and time and time again — because there is no reason behind why these predators do the things they do. There is no explanation. They’re just like that — and they’re darned skilled at what they do. And that’s all there is to it.
So, these days I’m becoming stronger and more determined in what I am now beginning to see as a crusade to educate and help others. Yes, the numerous judgments and barbed comments from people who don’t know what they’re talking about can grate and often rattle me. But you know what? I’ve also decided that there is little or no point in getting frustrated at those people. It’s fair to say that we don’t know what we don’t know”¦. It’s also fair to say that I now have an unreasonable passion to do something about it whenever I come across a situation where people are being hurt and the perpetrators are getting away with it. I’m determined to help people remove their blinkers and recognize that yes, there is such a thing as ”˜bad people’ who live among us. It’s tough. Because it means inviting people to consider that they have been conned. That they, too, have been taken in by someone who tells lies as easily and effortlessly as you and I breathe.
The more I get to understand this subject, the more I believe that the self-righteous outpouring from people who have never been in that situation, stems from fear. The fear that perhaps, in the same shoes, they may not be quite so streetwise as they’d like to think. Perhaps they are not as invincible to the surgically accurate deceptions of a person who does not have the same emotional wiring as we do. A bit like children hiding under the covers when they’re afraid, it’s a good short-term fix but it doesn’t get rid of the bogeyman!
The thing is, though, hiding away or going in to denial will never get rid of the bogeymen — or women. All of us here know that from our own experiences. I’m determined to do all I can to ensure that ”˜first hand experience’ does not remain the only way to be certain that the person who is causing the harm is usually a harmful person. I know there’s a long road ahead — I also know it’s a road that’s well worth travelling.
“Nobody understands what it’s like to be told that the person you love and want to spend the rest of your life with isn’t real. It’s like you have disappeared. I just want to stop hurting.”
Oh my God, that takes me back to the fundamentalist religious guy who “disappeared” my very self, and the recriminations from my own “liberal” church that I was just stupid in thinking he’d treat me well. Nothing is worse than a group of people you thought were on your side using your experience to make their political point. Thanks, guys! I’ll see you ALL in Hell. Both sides.
I really, really liked this article because it is so well written. Congratulations on that.
SPATH ALERT!
Okey-dokey. Now I know why my b.s. detector keeps going off.
We’ll call him Jay. Jay says he can’t imagine why he likes me so much, but he does. He calls every day, but we only go out for drinks or a walk. Honestly, I’m having a good time, but I keep thinking there’s something wrong with me for being such a snob, not getting into a real relationship with him. Just no “chemistry,” I think. What is it?
Now I know.
Didn’t I say that it usually takes about 20 minutes for someone to grow fangs in my presence, if that’s their potential?
Let the “gaslighting” begin!
To-wit: He calls at 6:30 to say he’d like me to join him for a dinner he just cooked. Sorry, I’m in Manhattan and can’t make it back to Brooklyn in time. But I can meet for drinks later. I will call him at 8:30 to let him know I’m back in the neighborhood, and we can head out at about 9.
So I call at 8:30. He’s out and about, heading back in to his apartment to shower and change clothes. He’ll meet me at 9. All according to our plan.
Then he calls shortly after 9 — 9:10 — to say Why haven’t I called? I was supposed to call him at 9. Really? I was supposed to call? Anyway, we agree I’ll meet him at 9:30.
At 9:25 he calls from downstairs. I take about 5 minutes to come down, and he’s understandably impatient about that — calls again — OK, I’m on my way down in a minute. I arrive downstairs to find him gone.
Upstairs again, I call him. Where is he? Down at the corner, he says, because it was embarrassing to be waiting a whole half hour in front of my place.
Go back and read again: He wasn’t at my place at 9:00. He called at 9:10 to say he was on his way, remember?
And he says, “Look at that. And already we’re arguing. It’s just the way you are. So argumentative. But that’s OK. I like you anyway.”
What???!!
I let it go. Just keep gathering information. It’s my way with spaths, keeping the curiosity channel open until they really screw it up. Oh boy, what comes next will knock you sideways.
We’re having drinks and he says he wasn’t always a good person. I ask him about that, and he says he . . .
DID 22 YEARS IN PRISON.
For what? “It was RICO-related,” he says.
Oh my God.
These days, he’s a lawyer on contract with the state, apparently, helping the mentally ill who are in prison get into hospitals or other situations. He says he studied law in prison, and a couple of years after he got out, and I believe him. I can check that out, anyway. But his behavior is getting weird.
He owns a Brooklyn condo and says he paid cash. Huh? He says he has seven grown children. When? A mighty busy boy before he went to prison. This story is starting to smell.
GASLIGHTING. Whoa.
Take me an open field and shoot me. What is amazing is the degree to which I am NOT taken in — no chemistry, no desire — but how I keep watching the show anyway.
Sister-sister,
OMG!!!! LOL ROTFLMNAO what a “catch” a guy who spent 22 years in prison with 7 kids before he went to prison. A real CATCH! NOT!
Well, we know he has a 25% chance of being a psychopath (25% of all convicts are psychopaths with a 30 or above PCL-R) Okay, and there is a good chance he has AT LEAST a score of 22 on the PCL-R as that is the average score of the convicts. LOL
Also, a 22 year sentence is AVERAGE for murder, so there is probably a good chance his prison sentence was for some heinous crime and probably violent and/or murder. RICO without murder probably wouldn’t get him that much time.
Get AWAY from this guy ASAP. I would not have anything else to do with him if I were you. He is BADDDDD NEWS!!!!
ps It is my understanding that a person with a felony conviction can’t be a lawyer or admitted to the bar. So studying law in prison wouldn’t let him BE a lawyer or an officer of the court, which lawyers technically are.
I thought I also understood that thing about felony convictions “barring” joining the “bar.” I’ve worked in the legal field. So that raises a red flag, too. He said that he did pass the bar, but I’m not sure he’s actually licensed as a lawyer — more like a social worker. That STILL might be problematic.
I doubt that a guy who spent 22 years in prison is going to murder someone again — but at least I’m keeping our contacts in the public domain. Besides that, he’s fixed things in my apartment, but no suspicious behavior there at all.
He’s acted with perfect integrity in other areas. But isn’t that typical? Spaths bait us with that other self.
I think my other boyfriend just moved back to town . . . the retired cop. Uh-huh. For sure.
Strangely enough, I wouldn’t have been really concerned without the gaslighting. I just would have kept looking into it. It’s the gaslighting that really creeps me out. Are there really people who buy that? Honestly? Maybe there’s some truth to deserving it, then. Because I can’t imagine being THAT stupid. Stupid enough to date an ex-con, but not stupid enough to buy into a gaslighting.
I have a friend who is a private investigator, and I could probably have him checked out. But the gaslighting tells me all I really need to know.
This is interesting:
<>
Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/admission-to-the-bar#ixzz1ow2jykXS
This is what I meant to post:
“In regard to the effect of criminal conduct upon the evaluation of an applicant’s character, a conviction for the commission of a felony is not, per se, sufficient to demonstrate a lack of good moral character. It will be incumbent upon the applicant, however, to prove complete rehabilitation. Although a conditional pardon is insufficient to remove objections to bar admission, a felony conviction will not prevent an applicant from practicing law if he or she has received a full pardon and is otherwise qualified.”
Sister sister, a FULL pardon is only granted by the President or a governor….so I doubt he has one…but it is possible. But you know, like I said before, any CONVICT is a convict, there are in my opinion no EX convicts…LOL
What all that word salad up there says in effect is that A FELONY CONVICTION WILL NOT PREVENT AN APPLICATN FROM PRACTICING LAW **IF** HE HAS RECEIVED A FULL PARDON AND IS **otherwise** qualified.
If he spent 22 years in prison for anything it was a heinous crime, rape or murder, bank robbery or something nasty. “complete rehabilitation” LOL ROTFLMAO YEA, RIGHT!!! COMPLETE Rehabilitation. BRAYYYYY!!!
Yes, pretty unlikely. But possible. I find it interesting to look at all possibilities. I’ll check it all out from top to bottom — before he gets a chance to sample the goods himself. Another example of how spaths are impatient suckers, huh? Hardly the clever type. A clever man would wait until he’s grabbed the cookies.
SISTER-SISTER
I doubt that a guy who spent 22 years in prison is going to murder someone again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayne_DuMond
Besides that, he’s fixed things in my apartment,
(so, you are getting something out of this guy? Do you think the fixing things is worth the risk of associating with this kind of CRIMINAL?)
He’s acted with perfect integrity in other areas. But isn’t that typical? Spaths bait us with that other self.
IT’S CALLED LOVE BOMBING, BEING NICEY NICE AT FIRST
I think my other boyfriend just moved back to town . . . the retired cop. Uh-huh. For sure.
Strangely enough, I wouldn’t have been really concerned without the gaslighting.
LET’S SEE HOW MANY RED FLAGS YOU NEED TO DUMP THIS GUY? 1) GASLIGHTING 2) RUDE 3) EXCONVICT WITH LONG RECORD OF INCARCERATION___that”s three serious ones, now how many did you say you need?
It’s the gaslighting that really creeps me out. Are there really people who buy that? Honestly? Maybe there’s some truth to deserving it, then. Because I can’t imagine being THAT stupid. Stupid enough to date an ex-con, but not stupid enough to buy into a gaslighting.
WHO ARE YOU CALLING “STUPID ENOUGH TO DATE AN EX CON”??
I have a friend who is a private investigator, and I could probably have him checked out. But the gaslighting tells me all I really need to know.
WHY? There are already 3 SOLID BIG RED BANNER FLAGS? What more do you need?
(head shaking here)