A syndrome called post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can affect victims of sociopaths. The trauma of losing love, friends, family, possessions and of enduring psychological/physical abuse is the cause of this disorder. To fight the symptoms of PTSD, it is helpful to understand the symptoms and how they relate to loss and trauma.
As I read through the current literature on PTSD, I quickly discovered that there is a fair amount of controversy regarding this disorder. We can actually learn about the disorder by listening to the arguments. The first question on which there is much disagreement is, “What trauma is severe enough to cause PTSD?” There were several editorials by experts disparaging the fact that everything from giving birth to a healthy baby to a boss yelling at an employee is now said to cause PTSD. Most experts are in favor of reserving this diagnosis for people who have suffered truly unusual life experiences, like kidnapping, rape, war, 911, etc.
The problem is that many people do experience severe stress reactions to difficult life circumstances. It remains to be determined what we should call these reactions.
Those of us healing from our relationship with a sociopath often vacillate between accepting the trauma and minimizing it. Thus, the argument about what kinds of trauma are severe enough to cause PTSD has a direct effect on us. The argument can leave us feeling weak, like we should be able to get over this. After all it wasn’t as bad as 911, Iraq or Katrina—or was it?
The second question is “what symptoms constitute PTSD?” The following table shows the most common symptoms seen in a group of 103 British men and women diagnosed by psychiatrists with PTSD (Current Medical Research Opinion, 2003):
Symptom | Frequency (n=103) |
Insomnia | 98 (95%) |
Anxiety at reminder cues | 96 (93%) |
Intrusive thoughts, images, sounds, sensations | 94 (91%) |
Irritability | 93 (91%) |
Poor concentration | 93 (91%) |
Diminished interest in significant activities | 88 (85%) |
Recurrent dreams of trauma | 86 (83%) |
Avoidance of activities or places associated with the trauma | 85 (83%) |
Foreshortening of expectations about the future | 80 (78%) |
Detachment from others | 78 (76%) |
Avoidance of thinking or conversing about the trauma | 75 (73%) |
Poor appetite | 69 (67%) |
Hypervigilance | 55 (53%) |
Startle reactions | 46 (45%) |
Acting or feeling as if the event was recurring | 37 (31%) |
Inability to recall parts of trauma (amnesia) | 19 (18%) |
I put up this table because I thought that a number of you would also endorse these symptoms. Notice that “acting or feeling as if the event was recurring” was really not that common. But similar symptoms, like “Intrusive thoughts, images sounds and sensations,” were very common. Amnesia was also uncommon. Startle reactions were only seen in half of the subjects.
A feeling of a foreshortened future is a particularly debilitating symptom because it impairs a person’s ability to plan for the future and leads to a sense of hopelessness. I will expand on this further, but I strongly believe this feeling of a foreshortened future has to do less with our thoughts about our past, and more with our thoughts about our present.
As I look at this list of symptoms, I am struck by the fact that many, many of those writing into Lovefraud complain of these symptoms, particularly nightmares. There is something special about having had emotional involvement with an aggressor that seems to produce nightmares. Since so many have all of the most common symptoms, I think it has to be that the trauma of life with a sociopath is severe enough to cause this disorder in many people.
Here’s where defining exactly what trauma is gets sticky. Rachael Yehuda, Ph.D., said in a recent article published on MedScape, “One of the things that biology has taught us is that PTSD represents a type of a response to trauma, but not the only type of response. It is a response that seems to be about the failure to consolidate a memory in such a way as to be able to be recalled without distress.” Well, this is precisely the definition that is too broad. I personally have a lot of memories that I experience or re-experience with distress. Yet these memories are not accompanied by the list of symptoms in the table above.
For me what made the experience traumatic was the truly life course-changing nature of the trauma. The answer to the question, “Will I ever be the same?” for me defines trauma significant enough to cause PTSD. The trauma that causes this disorder redefines us in a way that is different from other emotionally significant experiences. This trauma strikes at the core of our identity.
The final controversy surrounds the treatment of PTSD. Interestingly, there is no question that medications (SSRIs, particularly Zoloft) are very helpful. The problem is though that when a person goes to a physician and receives a medication, he/she is by definition “sick.” Assumption of a “sick role” or “victim identity” is one of the many factors that slow recovery from PTSD.
Many therapists are of the belief that “debriefing” or retelling the story is necessary for recovery. One group of researchers reviewed the studies on debriefing and concluded that there is no scientific evidence that it prevents PTSD. Instead, the evidence points to post-trauma factors like social support and “additional life stress” being most important.
How can we put this all together? Considering last week’s post, those who experience trauma serious enough to have stress hormone overdose as manifested by dissociation, are likely to also develop PTSD. An examination of the symptoms of PTSD reveals that at the core of the disorder is the fact that the person really doesn’t believe in his/her heart that the trauma has ended. PTSD is about ONGOING, not past, trauma. For those of us whose lives were assaulted by a sociopath, there is ongoing stress. The stress is the social isolation, financial ruin, and threatened further losses long after the relationship has ended. Those who recover from this without PTSD work hard to put the trauma behind them in every way.
Putting the trauma behind you does not mean you can’t take medication to help with the process. It does mean facing those bills, former friends, and other personal issues you want to avoid. Remember AVOIDANCE STRENGTHENS FEAR.
Above all, stop the ongoing trauma by ending contact with the sociopath. Do not assume a sick role, instead, work to stay healthy. Fight to be the person you want to be. Don’t allow this single experience to define you. Make living for today the place you love to be. As Louise Gallagher says in her recent post, “This is, in many ways, the greatest challenge of recovery — to accept the past is simply the route I took to get to where I am today, a place I love to be. The past cannot be changed. It cannot be altered. It cannot be made ‘better.’ It can only be accepted so that it, and I, may rest in peace with what was, eager to accept what is true in my life today.”
Dear TruthBTold,
I hope the best for you and your new life! It sounds like you’ve been through quite an ordeal, and survived it! Hugs.
darwinsmom;
My 4th date with the x-spath was unlike any previous or since. That night, as we parted, I swore I would not contact him. Two days passed and I figured that was that, then he starting emailing and text-bombing me.
I was only with him a short time, but in that time I saw the entire range of sociopathic behaviors, other than over violence. He was one WTF moment after another. I trauma bounded both due to an illness (he spent a night in the hospital with me) and his push-pull behaviors. When he dumped me, I was in such a bad state that I could not see the obvious, and thought that I lost something truly special.
Now I say thank god. If he treated me that way early on, I could only imagine what being in an LTR with that Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde would be like.
Don’t think it always is necessarily worse in a LTR, you’re just exposed to it longer and longer. He started to gaslight me as early as our 3rd night. He started to be unpredictable as early as our 4th night. He stole money from me around the same time. Heck, he organized a robbery with assault on me on the second week. It was a roller coaster from the start and it remained a roller coaster, no more and no less, until the end.
BBE and Darwinsmom
“if you stay emotionally unconnected, sociopaths are identifiable early on.” Once educated about spath charactertistics, yes, they are identifiable early on… I just wanted to point out that’s different than my subject, seeking a way to ID them upon INITIAL contact. (Of course, it’s also true that staying emotionally unconnected (a boundry!!!), you can avoid all kinds of entanglements but who wants to live that way.) 🙂
“Of course, it’s also true that staying emotionally unconnected (a boundry!!!), you can avoid all kinds of entanglements but who wants to live that way”
If you don’t know a person at all, then how can you be emotionally connected? And I don’t grow feelings for people either on first acquaintance (when I think of friends). It takes several meetings for me to develop emotions about it, which would need to include some personal conversation and exchange. Sometimes, more quick than the other.
So, when you meet people, you normally are in an emotional neutral state. This is easy to picture, when you think of making friends (not dating).
The weird thing is that when it comes to love, the world seems to have this idea that we must be smitten with someone the moment we meet. And I used to be one of those. When I think of it now, that just seems idiosanctic.
So, yeah, I think it’s best to remain emotionally unconnected at INITIAL contact. You’ll observe more objectively that way, and quicker to decide whether the person is worthwhile meeting again or not.
Skylar: Ditto the many thanks for your very informative link!
Blue Eyes: Thanks for reminding all of us to “stay emotionally unconnected” until we absolutely, positively know that there are NO ignored “red flags.” Early on…? That’s one of the reasons why I’m here. I need to learn how to be smarter about cunning, deceptive people who would place a bead on me.
The big question is how to stay emotionally neutral long enough to decide if the person is not “toxic” and I have no answer to that. Sociopaths have a remarkable way of defusing “issues” when raised or creating a mask to create the impression they are ideal for you. For example, prior to the sociopath, I had no idea what “mirroring” meant. Now, when I look back over the people I have dated, the x-spath is the only one who ever “mirrored” me.
One could stick with some obvious red flags:
1) Lack of employment or employment history, education or a transient lifestyle.
2) If not a transient lifestyle, an occupation that involves significant travel.
3) The combination of smoking and drinking.
4) “Recreational” drug use.
5) Excessive or inappropriate trendiness, i.e, multiple tattoos or body piercings.
6) Expatriate.
7) Demeanor: charming but otherwise cold.
At the earliest possible moment learn about their childhood history, relationships with parents and siblings. Hates dad probably hates self as well.
“He started to gaslight me as early as our 3rd night. He started to be unpredictable as early as our 4th night.”
Like I said, I saw WTF behavior from about the same time on. First three times together, completely charming but cold. The 4th night, WTF?
If I was not so needy at the time…
I think a red flag for me purely in behaviour is how they come on to me:
– the predator stare
– or like the guide in Peru who suddenly purposefully stepped into my physical area saying something suggestive about physical closeness solving the cold, while I was having a totally neutral conversation from tourleader to guide. Even at the time I thought it was an odd thing to do when I had given no lead and just unprofessional. Basically, he came on to me while I was doing my job, while he was supposed to do his job, and I had not invited him at all to step into my personal boundary sphere. And when I think of it that way… that was a red flag that he had no respect for physical boundaries for a total stranger, just because it was a woman. The predator stare can be classed under the same disrespecting file. We are taught as children it’s impolite to stare at people. It is disrespectful, they just try to cover it up with fancy words and tell us it’s because they’re attracted to us.
As soon as the radar says “hmm, that’s odd,” it’s time to watch for red flags. Confident, respectful people will not enter your physical boundary area without invitation, without enough acquaintance, or need for it.
Another hint for me is when they seem to show themselves off in a calculated manner. Example: Ok, so someone can take off their sweater and wear a t-shirt that may have a meaning to you. But if they then walk 10 minutes without putting on their backpack until everybody noticed and commented on the t-shirt, then they wore the t-shirt on purpose to get attention and status and made sure everybody could see it. That’s calculated. Another hint to look for red flags.
Oh yeah, the family history may be a red flag. Ex-spath first hated his father, and then later his mother. His father tried his best with him and was an honest man. I’ve heard his mother was experienced as a kind woman too. I only met her for 10 mins and had her on the phone only twice. And if they were hard on him at times (as in not helping him out), I’m sure he deserved it.
That guide in Peru mentioned something of a bad relationship with his father after his parents divorced. He had no contact with him.
Pity play is another red flag, and twisted logics (word salad) to deflect responsibility from behaviour.
I don’t totally agree with all of the above you posted, behind blue eyes. I have used drugs recreationally (that is, it can happen between 1-5 times a year). When it’s weekly or daily, it’s habitual, not recreational. I’m a smoke addict. I’m off with the backpack at least once a year for at least a month, though I come back in time for the schoolyear. I have a large tattoo on my inner thigh and a navel piercing, which I can both cover up (don’t teach in front of the class in a mini skirt or a bikini 😉 ) And some of the gentlest, good hearted guys I know are tattood from head to toe. Not that I’d date them though 😉
Darwinsmon;
Many consider weekend use “recreational” and this is what I consider to be a red flag. Backpacking is not transitory lifestyle, by which I mean somebody who moves from city to city, country to country without any permanent roots. One tat and one piercing is not excessive and while perhaps there some people with many who are ordered persons, the majority of people I have encountered with such have issues. Same with the combination of heavy drinking and smoking — studies show that 40% of people who drink and smoke have a diagnosable mental health disorder. While this means 60% do not, the combination is a red flag worth noting…