A syndrome called post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can affect victims of sociopaths. The trauma of losing love, friends, family, possessions and of enduring psychological/physical abuse is the cause of this disorder. To fight the symptoms of PTSD, it is helpful to understand the symptoms and how they relate to loss and trauma.
As I read through the current literature on PTSD, I quickly discovered that there is a fair amount of controversy regarding this disorder. We can actually learn about the disorder by listening to the arguments. The first question on which there is much disagreement is, “What trauma is severe enough to cause PTSD?” There were several editorials by experts disparaging the fact that everything from giving birth to a healthy baby to a boss yelling at an employee is now said to cause PTSD. Most experts are in favor of reserving this diagnosis for people who have suffered truly unusual life experiences, like kidnapping, rape, war, 911, etc.
The problem is that many people do experience severe stress reactions to difficult life circumstances. It remains to be determined what we should call these reactions.
Those of us healing from our relationship with a sociopath often vacillate between accepting the trauma and minimizing it. Thus, the argument about what kinds of trauma are severe enough to cause PTSD has a direct effect on us. The argument can leave us feeling weak, like we should be able to get over this. After all it wasn’t as bad as 911, Iraq or Katrina—or was it?
The second question is “what symptoms constitute PTSD?” The following table shows the most common symptoms seen in a group of 103 British men and women diagnosed by psychiatrists with PTSD (Current Medical Research Opinion, 2003):
Symptom | Frequency (n=103) |
Insomnia | 98 (95%) |
Anxiety at reminder cues | 96 (93%) |
Intrusive thoughts, images, sounds, sensations | 94 (91%) |
Irritability | 93 (91%) |
Poor concentration | 93 (91%) |
Diminished interest in significant activities | 88 (85%) |
Recurrent dreams of trauma | 86 (83%) |
Avoidance of activities or places associated with the trauma | 85 (83%) |
Foreshortening of expectations about the future | 80 (78%) |
Detachment from others | 78 (76%) |
Avoidance of thinking or conversing about the trauma | 75 (73%) |
Poor appetite | 69 (67%) |
Hypervigilance | 55 (53%) |
Startle reactions | 46 (45%) |
Acting or feeling as if the event was recurring | 37 (31%) |
Inability to recall parts of trauma (amnesia) | 19 (18%) |
I put up this table because I thought that a number of you would also endorse these symptoms. Notice that “acting or feeling as if the event was recurring” was really not that common. But similar symptoms, like “Intrusive thoughts, images sounds and sensations,” were very common. Amnesia was also uncommon. Startle reactions were only seen in half of the subjects.
A feeling of a foreshortened future is a particularly debilitating symptom because it impairs a person’s ability to plan for the future and leads to a sense of hopelessness. I will expand on this further, but I strongly believe this feeling of a foreshortened future has to do less with our thoughts about our past, and more with our thoughts about our present.
As I look at this list of symptoms, I am struck by the fact that many, many of those writing into Lovefraud complain of these symptoms, particularly nightmares. There is something special about having had emotional involvement with an aggressor that seems to produce nightmares. Since so many have all of the most common symptoms, I think it has to be that the trauma of life with a sociopath is severe enough to cause this disorder in many people.
Here’s where defining exactly what trauma is gets sticky. Rachael Yehuda, Ph.D., said in a recent article published on MedScape, “One of the things that biology has taught us is that PTSD represents a type of a response to trauma, but not the only type of response. It is a response that seems to be about the failure to consolidate a memory in such a way as to be able to be recalled without distress.” Well, this is precisely the definition that is too broad. I personally have a lot of memories that I experience or re-experience with distress. Yet these memories are not accompanied by the list of symptoms in the table above.
For me what made the experience traumatic was the truly life course-changing nature of the trauma. The answer to the question, “Will I ever be the same?” for me defines trauma significant enough to cause PTSD. The trauma that causes this disorder redefines us in a way that is different from other emotionally significant experiences. This trauma strikes at the core of our identity.
The final controversy surrounds the treatment of PTSD. Interestingly, there is no question that medications (SSRIs, particularly Zoloft) are very helpful. The problem is though that when a person goes to a physician and receives a medication, he/she is by definition “sick.” Assumption of a “sick role” or “victim identity” is one of the many factors that slow recovery from PTSD.
Many therapists are of the belief that “debriefing” or retelling the story is necessary for recovery. One group of researchers reviewed the studies on debriefing and concluded that there is no scientific evidence that it prevents PTSD. Instead, the evidence points to post-trauma factors like social support and “additional life stress” being most important.
How can we put this all together? Considering last week’s post, those who experience trauma serious enough to have stress hormone overdose as manifested by dissociation, are likely to also develop PTSD. An examination of the symptoms of PTSD reveals that at the core of the disorder is the fact that the person really doesn’t believe in his/her heart that the trauma has ended. PTSD is about ONGOING, not past, trauma. For those of us whose lives were assaulted by a sociopath, there is ongoing stress. The stress is the social isolation, financial ruin, and threatened further losses long after the relationship has ended. Those who recover from this without PTSD work hard to put the trauma behind them in every way.
Putting the trauma behind you does not mean you can’t take medication to help with the process. It does mean facing those bills, former friends, and other personal issues you want to avoid. Remember AVOIDANCE STRENGTHENS FEAR.
Above all, stop the ongoing trauma by ending contact with the sociopath. Do not assume a sick role, instead, work to stay healthy. Fight to be the person you want to be. Don’t allow this single experience to define you. Make living for today the place you love to be. As Louise Gallagher says in her recent post, “This is, in many ways, the greatest challenge of recovery — to accept the past is simply the route I took to get to where I am today, a place I love to be. The past cannot be changed. It cannot be altered. It cannot be made ‘better.’ It can only be accepted so that it, and I, may rest in peace with what was, eager to accept what is true in my life today.”
Darwinsmom,
South American and Central American men have a very straightforward and uncomplicated view of sex, and their boundaries are very different. They will walk right up to a woman and ask her for sex, particularly white women. It is part of their culture. They do not have the reserved attitudes people do here. I don’t know if it’s a blessing or a curse. I had a brief one-night affair with a South American man a few months ago here. Come to think of it, he is from Peru and doesn’t speak any English. It was very uncomplicated and left me without any kind of emotional entanglement. He didn’t lie or pretend to be something he wasn’t. I actually found it refreshing, though obviously not the deep satisfying encounter I would have with someone I was in love with. I happened to hear from him again today after many months, so funny I should read your post. One thing with him is that when he contacts me, I know exactly what he wants. Unfortunately for him, once was really enough for me. But I enjoy writing to him because it helps me with my Spanish. To me, a man approaching me for sex does not make him a spath. It may not make him boyfriend-of-the- year material, but I don’t consider it a signpost of a spath. His energy was very very different from the real spath who targeted me back in 2008. That guy pretended to worship me and to want to marry me. He swept me off my feet. It was all a pretense because he was already married and lying about it. He “seemed” like real husband material, because he was pretending to be. Whereas the Peruvian guy never pretended anything.
Keep in mind too I am not being holier than thou as there was a time in my life when I smoked and drank. Also, I spent most of 2009 in a transitory lifestyle, but had an explanation…
I was just throwing out ideas of perhaps visual clues to stay away or at least be guarded. I will also add vulgar language to the list, even more so if racist or homophobic.
Darwinsmom
You’re misreading, or misinterpreting what I wrote. You are focused on one phrase and not perceiving the whole opinion.
Yes, Initial contact is assumed to be emotionally disconnected. Some LF members are seeking a way to ID spaths at the get go, at the initial contact. But it is my opinion that is not possible, there are too many possibilities. I think we stray into blame mode that if we had been educated enough or wary enough or didn’t dismiss red flags, then we could have prevented our abuse. Well, that can be true for some, BUT does not fit a great many spath abusers. Sometimes there is NO preventative, we just have to work on resilience after. I speak for myself and only for myself when I say that the lesson I learned, the growth I found, was in setting boundries. It would not have stopped me from getting involved with my spath b/c he is a FRAUD and many help him be that fraud. BUT I did find growth b/c as an abused child, I did not learn healthy boundries. I sure have learned them now. While I accept that healthy boundries would not have stopped him, they would have helped me leave him sooner and would have helped me not blame myself, hate myself, etc and I would have healed all the sooner. Resilience is the healthy marker, not avoidance b/c NO ONE PROMISES that we get to avoid that which we can not predict. Healthy boundries = healthy resilience.
Stargazer,
I do know that. 🙂 I’ve been traveling yearly in Latin America since 1998. I don’t mind the street copliments. I don’t even mind the accosting. But there are places where Latin American men do that, and there are situations where it’s inapropriate, even for them. I’ve had plenty of Peruvian guides who don’t act in that way at all, and instead make sure to remain respectful. He didn’t even try to attempt to get sex… but he tried to get an intimate rapport with me in general. The guide in question turned out to be married and had a daughter, while he lied to a tourist that he had no daughter. He managed to get himself in my head, and when he did not show up to the appointment he made with me to go partying after our trek with my group, I checked his name on facebook and found out he was married and had a daughter,, and in his comments acting the happily married man. I was able to shake him off my mind in 2 days. Is he a spath? No idea. But he was at the very least untruthful and selfish too.
And my x-spath is a Nicaraguan. The Latin American spaths often use the womanizing in their culture as an excuse or cover for their actions and behaviour. However, it ignores the plenty examples of Latin American men who do not womanize and remain respectful, even if they pay a compliment. Just like non Latin American spaths use infidelity generalisms about men to justify their actions
Uhoh… I think I might have ptsd…
True, behind blue eyes. I forgot to write that by themselves they may not be red flags if it remains isolated. But taken the whole list together in one person, there is enough material to tread carefully. A “recreational” drug user, who has no roots, no career, drinking and smoking heavily on top of that, while charming, etc…. it’s at least someone you wish to investigate for further red flags.
Yup. My x-spath was a flight attendant, smoked, drank heavily, hated his father…
Even my counselor was careful to make note of his profession…
In August, I met another sociopath. This time I was prepared. Left home at 18 and estranged from family. Lived in Europe, Asia and South America before coming to the USA. No higher education or career.
I dumped him after a week and he freaked out on me…
Katy, it was not meant as critique. I agree that we cannot remain detached all our lives, nor when getting to know someone over time. I only wanted to point out that initial contact is actually the best opportunity to get as much objective information you can get.
For the boundaries: it is very important to acquire skills to set your boundaries, but I do want to caution about possible expectations from them. I have not been abused as a c hild, except that I was an outcast or outsider from my peers in elementary school and early years of high school. But even then I was hardly ever bullied. Some of my kindergarten memories involve setting boundaries to other children. I slapped another toddler once, because she took my chair and refused to give it up after I asked for it back. The caretaker didn’t even punish me for it, though I expected it. She told the other child who came whining at her that she should not have taken my seat in the first place and give in to my initial request. I was otherwise a peaceful child, so I guess she assumed that because I was otherwise very docile I must have been truly provoked to have slapped the other child in her face. I’ve cut out friends out of my life after they meddled in my life, crossing the boundary of my right to decide for my own life as well as my right to solve my own issues. I am an assertive person and was supported by elders and teachers to be assertive. I’ve pointed a cowardly man I was involved with the door, because he could not choose between me and another woman, and after doig that I was even more angry at him for pushing me to make his choice, instead of making the choice himself.
And yet, I was unable to do it with my ex-spath. Well, I did set boundaries, like I do with any other person, but I’ve grown used to it that people will respect my boundaries after I give a first warning. He didn’t comply to my boudnaries, and did it again and again and again. I should have cut him loose much sooner. I just couldn’t. I was too addicted to him. Boundaries only work if you are also emotionally capable to cut the other loose. Again, I don’t write this as a critique to the point you are making, but as a caution from my own experience.
That’s why identifying the red flags as soon as possible is so important for me. No, I don’t think it’s always possible to unmask a spath at initial contact. And there might always be one that slips under the radar.
I think the solution lies in the combination of both:
a) remain neutral when making an acquaintance, because I think many of us (for different reasons) are prone to give someone we gain feelings for rapidly more trust than the situation warrants.
b) and each red flag you come across in this neutral period, ought to be used to remain neutral long enough until you know more sure.
c) even if you start to have feelings, do background checks
d) even if you get involved, at the first sign of disrespect (minor or major), set a boundary, which includes going no contact for a long enough period to get a clear head again, instead of a slave of your desire to be with the person
e) if you get warning signals from other people about someone you are gettig acquainted with, don’t ignore it
That’s basically how I dealt with the trek guide episode. Though I had started to be attracted to him, I did not push away the red flag signs and did a background check. Turned out he had lied about his family situation. Ding-ding-ding, sorry attraction, but it’s time for NC! (which is easier to do if you know someone for 4-5 days than if you know them for 4-5 years.)
Hi darwinsmom. I’m new here. It’s nice to meet you. Could I ask you a question if you don’t mind?
shoot