“When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail.” Abraham Maslow
I have a book in my library by J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., called The Psychopathic Mind—Origins, Dynamics, and Treatment. I struggled through about half of it, and finally gave up. Meloy is a forensic psychologist, and the book appears to be for professionals in the field—he’s written 10 books and authored or co-authored 180 peer-reviewed papers. Meloy’s specialties include stalking, violence, threat assessment, mass murder, serial killing and sexual homicide.
When mass murders go on a rampage, the media often turn to Meloy for commentary. After the Fort Hood shootings in 2009, for example, ABC news quoted him:
Mass murderers tend to come in two types, according to academic articles authored by forensic psychologist J. Reid Meloy. One type is predatory, premeditated and emotionless. The other acts out from anger, fear, or response to a perceived imminent threat or trigger.
Timothy Masters case
Back in 1999, Meloy testified in the case of a murder that took place in 1987 in Fort Collins, Colorado. A 37-year-old woman named Peggy Hettrick was killed, and her body sexually mutilated. Twelve years later, Timothy Lee Masters, who was 15 at the time of the murder and lived next to where the body was found, was charged.
There was no physical evidence connecting Masters to the crime—the case against him was purely circumstantial:
- Masters was the first person to see the body lying in a field, but he did not report it. Masters said he thought it was a mannequin, and a prank.
- Masters’ mother, who had red hair like the victim, had died, and the murder took place close to the four-year anniversary of her death.
- Shortly after the murder, police searched Masters’ bedroom and found 2,200 pages of writings and drawings depicting violence and gore. Masters said he created them because he wanted to be a horror writer like Stephen King.
But J. Reid Meloy looked at some of those drawings, and testified in court that they were a “fantasy rehearsal” for the crime. Masters drew a picture on the day he saw the victim. It depicted one figure dragging another that appeared to be wounded or dead. The body being dragged was riddled with arrows.
Ignoring the arrows—there were no arrows in the actual murder—here’s how Meloy interpreted the picture, according to FortCollinsNow.com:
“This is not a drawing of the crime scene as seen by Tim Masters on the morning of Feb. 11 as he went to school,” Meloy wrote. “This is an accurate and vivid drawing of the homicide as it is occurring. It is unlikely that Tim Masters could have inferred such criminal behavior by just viewing the corpse, unless he was an experienced forensic investigator. It is much more likely, in my opinion, that he was drawing the crime to rekindle his memory of the sexual homicide he committed the day before.”
Based in a large degree on the testimony of J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., who said he fit the profile of a sexual predator, Timothy Masters was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Cop indicted for perjury
This story is in the news again because Lt. Jim Broderick of the Fort Collins police department, the lead investigator in the 1999 case against Timothy Masters, was just indicted on eight counts of perjury.
The indictment includes exactly what Broderick wrote in his application for an arrest warrant for Masters about his obsessive fantasies, the impulsive nature of the crime, the fact that the teenager was a loner. The indictment says that although Broderick wrote the statements in the arrest warrant application, he did not believe them to be true.
Masters had served nine years in prison, until 2008, when he was released. DNA evidence proved that he had nothing to do with the murder.
Later that year, Masters filed a civil suit against Broderick and the Larimer County prosecutors in the case—Terry Gilmore and Jolene Blair, both of whom had become judges. The suit charged that they withheld evidence from the defense team and other experts, including Dr. Reid Meloy.
Larimer County settled the suit for $4.1 million. The city of Fort Collins settled for $5.9 million. The two judges were reprimanded.
And now, Broderick may go to jail.
Forensic error
Why did Dr. J Reid Meloy get it so wrong in this case? For one thing, the police apparently did not give him evidence that might have cast doubt on Masters’ culpability. For another, Meloy never interviewed Timothy Masters in person. He based his conclusions on Masters’ violent short stories and crude drawings.
For more on the role that the famous psychologist played in this tragedy, read The Tim Masters Case: Chasing Reid Meloy on FortCollinsNow.com.
For more about the doubts other police officers had in the case, read Police split over conviction in Colorado slaying, on CNN.com.
Be careful
Why am I writing about this terrible miscarriage of justice? It is a warning to all of us to be careful. If someone like J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., the respected forensic expert, can be wrong, so can we.
Knowing that psychopaths exist, and being able to spot them, is important. It can save our lives. But we have to be careful in deciding who is a psychopath, and who is not. I clearly remember receiving e-mail from a woman, and a separate e-mail from the man she thought might be a psychopath. After reading the e-mails, I could not tell who was the abuser, and who was the victim.
Personally, I think Meloy’s mistake was that he did not meet Masters. Perhaps if he had, he would have felt that something was amiss—Masters never deviated from his claim that he was innocent, and never deviated from his story.
Our intuition is probably our most accurate tool in evaluating the possibility danger. If we listen to it, without clouding it with preconceptions, it will steer us in the right direction.
But in order for our intuition to work, we need the right input. Whether we’re reading police reports, news stories or comments in the Lovefraud Blog, the information our intuition needs may very well be missing.
I think in the early days of “this experience” we all have a tendency to label anyone who offends us as being “sociopaths”. Some of us become almost evangelical in our quest to expose sociopaths that we in some cases lose the run of ourselves and point the finger constantly. Then a kind of maturing sets in were we are less likely to hysterically scream “psychopath!”, “gaslighting!!!!” or “projection!!!” at the drop of a hat.
I have a relative who was savagely beaten up by gypsies when he was a teenager and to this day hates them all. Although his suffering was real, I do feel that his quality of life has been greatly diminished by holding all gypsies responsible as he is constantly held in a state of low vibrationary fear energy when dealing with them. The ones who attacked him, still are attacking in a way when you think about it. He can’t let go.
I can honestly say myself that the people I thought were sociopaths are indeed without question. No doubt. But for a while I did have a tendency to label every a***hole I encountered a sociopath.
It’s only natural I guess. For a while…
Donna, thanks for writing about this very interesting case. First of all, before I forget it, CRS, apparently from what I read, Masters mother actually did NOT have red hair, but it was reported that she did.
You are truly right that from what we know, there may be some very important information MISSING.
I have several of Meloy’s books and the last one I tried to read, notice I said TRIED to read, when I got done with it, I went back through it and there is a GREAT DEAL I think of WORD SALAD.
All of his books are “for professionals” but at the same time, he writes I think purposely in DIFFICULT sentence structures, and though I am not a psychiatrist, I am a retired advance practice nurse with quite a bit of mental health experience, and his writings in many cases I think are just that, WORD SALAD and saying “nothing in 10,000 words or more.”
For him to even make a diagnosis like this, from looking at drawings etc. I think is a total miscarriage of justice. I no longer “worship” at the feet of Meloy as this BIG expert. I am beginning to think that he is more expert in his own mind than anywhere else. And I may be misjudging him by a mile, but I’m not stupid, and I do have a college education and post college, I have experience and I have read a great deal on a good many varied subjects and just finished a book on the most recent research on studies of the brain that is being used at the U of Ark for Medical Sciences first year medical students, and I understood them in spite of my CRS and short term memory problems, but I’ve decided a great deal of what Meloy says is garbage and just wordy to confuse the issue and make him appear “really smart” and “expert” when I’m beginning to think he is neither.
I know that everyone makes mistakes and God knows I’ve made my share, and it is easy to be fooled pro or con by a psychopath or disordered person, but I think for Meloy to go off in “all directions” and declare this kid’s drawings proof he was disordered is not something an “expert” would do. I saw the interview with Meloy on the television show about this case.
I have no doubt (making a snap judgment here) that the cop deliberately withheld evidence from the defense, and lied on the stand to make it look like Masters was guilty when the physical evidence showed otherwise. I think the cop is a psychopathic narcissist who had to “prove he was right” and if lying was what he had to do, okay.
Also the cop lied about things that could EASILY have been proven lies, like about the FBI checking evidence when it didn’t. (which to me indicates that he is a pathological liar like a psychopath) I mean come on, he could easily have been caught with his pants down on that one, and was in fact, as that is one of the counts against him, and it is absolutely air tight. If that isn’t an indication of a man who is high in psychopathic traits (even if he doesn’t “qualify” by PCL-R points) I don’t know what would.
Personally I hope Roderick spends day for day in prison for the amount of time that his LIES caused Masters to spend in prison.
He will probably have to spend the time in segregation (essentially solitary confinement) since he is a cop and the other inmates will kill him, or WORSE. But that really doesn’t break my heart either. When people deliberately pervert the “justice” system for their own “reasons” I think the penalty should fit the crime. As for the judges, I think they should be in cells next to him, and right down the row from the one that gave Dr. Amy Castillo’s X husband unsupervised visitation though she had warned the court that he had threatened to kill the children, which he DID as soon as he got a visitation unsupervised with them. I better get off the rant or my blood pressure will go through the roof, but this kind of thing does make me very angry. This case in particular.
Frank Lee, even though your post makes sense, it doesn’t hold water in my opinion. At my age, and going through the experience of working with EVIL folks every day for over 24 plus years, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s easy to do EVIL and be an ash hole. It takes courage to be a righteous person (meaning one who does what is right under any circumstances) and stick to your convictions.
EVIL folks want or insist (by bullying techniques) righteous folks to do evil so they can justify to themselves that everyone will and does EVIL eventually.
That’s the same theory why EVIL folks will promote other EVIL folks … tormenting the righteous folks … unless you buckle under and become EVIL like us, you won’t go anywhere.
I don’t believe survivors of EVIL see EVIL every where because they were victimized. I believe survivors of EVIL see EVIL when there is EVIL to be seen. They are NO longer blinded by the smoke and mirrors of the EVIL ones in this world. And yes, EVIL folks are cowards.
I was talking in terms of the early days of the sociopath victim experience when there is often a tendency to declare all and sundry “sociopaths”. It is completely understandable why people in this situation would be terrified and be seeing other potential “sociopaths” everywhere. It’s part of the experience. I have done it.
A part of me believes that the sociopath wants us to feel this way. That “life’s is a bitch and then you die” – they want us in a state of paranioa forever with our emotional state always in a low fearful vibration. They relish the emotional scars they leave in us. That’s why we must work to get out of the “everyone is a sociopath!” stage as soon as possible.
Call me nuts but I sincerely beleive that sociopaths are a different form of humanity and a highly psychic one at that. They use their psychic awareness to find us and hook us and they still use it after we are gone. The someone “know” or feel the anguish which we are going through even when we are on the other side of the world, and out of contact with them – they are loving every moment of our pain.
The proof for me is the day I met my beloved and instantly forgot about the sociopath I check my email the next morning and for the first time in 8 months the sociopath had sent me an email saying she “missed me”.
You tell me that is all by chance. They know about us even when we are nowhere near them. Can’t explain it – but it is true. I am sure I am not the only one who experienced this ‘sociapaths sudden return’ just as the moment when you had forgotten them. Like we are being tested or something.
I think the most painful thing we can do to the sociopaths is; in our hearts is just casually declare them sociopaths without a single inflection of emotion when we do it. That I would imagine kills them. Part of getting to this stage is to focus exclusively on their own verifiable sociopathy and not calling everyone who annoys us “sociopaths”.
The day we reduce our sociopath predator to the level of a specimen, a curiosity, an idiosyncratic spasm of disruption in our life’s journey, that’s the day we win.
– The someone “know”-
sorry, I meant “They somehow “know”
I really did , in the early days experience the feeling everyone was a possible psychopath until proven innocent. But I kept it to myself until I sensed my intuition properly…and began to see how it worked.
We perhaps should talk sometimes about the signs of a genuine person…how to spot an empathic normal person too!!
I totally distinguish between someone who kills because they are frightened, emotionally driven to it and someone who murders sadistically without emotion…the latter is terrifying and beyond words…the former is someone I could perhaps relate to given the set of circumstances they found themselves in….but there is a difference…cold and calculating..passionate and impulsive… both murderers….
a sociopathic cop could cause havoc and feel nothing about accusing someone even though they were not really sure…. simply because it fits into their plan….so just think of a vulnerable person being at the scene of a crime being handled by a sociopath cop…merciless..uncaring…devoid of a conscience…that person is screwed….and God puts this situation in front of us time and time again….to wake us up to evil and how it operates.
Back to me….my intuition is a very sensitive thing, it is affected by many things…my mood, my situation, my distractions… but I swear I will listen to it, Act on it and apologise if I get it wrong…
There is a new dilemma now….sociopathic cops and judges….we need to formulate an assessment that will tell us a person is devoid of conscience….it’s a start that has to be made.
back to me….I am suspicious, I am hurting , I am frightened and I make mistakes…judging people in n oversenstitive way….and I am listening to my intuition….and I’m not sure there is anything missing when it comes to pure intuition, whether you meet the person or not…..in this case I smell a rat and the reality could be a man was imprisoned by a psychopath that’s enough..and that is horrific…and we either learn from it or pretend it didn’t happen if you start doubting intuition because you haven’t ‘met’ a person then you are ignoring the danger and opening the gate to disaster…
Frank Lee,
You are right. I am a bit sleepy at the moment and am having a hard time trying to recall the name of what you are describing. It is like what some folks call the “blue car syndrome”. I am thinking it is similar to the availability heuristic, confirmation bias, or maybe some form of cognitive bias. Whatever we attend to seems to loom larger or more significant than it really is.
When I used to do the work with high risk sex offenders we would witness this anytime a new person was started. They would (among other things) often become paranoid about other people and their actions/intentions for a period of time because they had never before been exposed to this or even given much thought to what they were learning from the offenders.
Or as the AA Big Book might describe it, Magic magnifying mind. That also seems to be close to what you are describing. (I think Wini might like that piece http://www.alcoholics-anonymous.org.uk/BigBook/pdf/theystoppedintime16.pdf, it talks about it on page 12)
The day we reduce our sociopath predator to the level of a specimen, a curiosity, an idiosyncratic spasm of disruption in our life’s journey, that’s the day we win.
I would say the day you “win” is the day that you become indifferent to them and they mean nothing more to you than some stranger living on the other side of the planet. The more you scratch the more you are going to itch and itch and itch.
edit – Ok where is Oxy with her skillet, I just said basically what you said Frank. I think that is my signal to head off to bed.
Just when I finally and completely conclude I was dealing with a sociopath…
I am telling you, these creatures are clairvoiant, psychic, remote viewers, mind readers call them what you want. They may not even know it themselves, but they have it and can read what we thinking of them regardless of distance.