“When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail.” Abraham Maslow
I have a book in my library by J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., called The Psychopathic Mind—Origins, Dynamics, and Treatment. I struggled through about half of it, and finally gave up. Meloy is a forensic psychologist, and the book appears to be for professionals in the field—he’s written 10 books and authored or co-authored 180 peer-reviewed papers. Meloy’s specialties include stalking, violence, threat assessment, mass murder, serial killing and sexual homicide.
When mass murders go on a rampage, the media often turn to Meloy for commentary. After the Fort Hood shootings in 2009, for example, ABC news quoted him:
Mass murderers tend to come in two types, according to academic articles authored by forensic psychologist J. Reid Meloy. One type is predatory, premeditated and emotionless. The other acts out from anger, fear, or response to a perceived imminent threat or trigger.
Timothy Masters case
Back in 1999, Meloy testified in the case of a murder that took place in 1987 in Fort Collins, Colorado. A 37-year-old woman named Peggy Hettrick was killed, and her body sexually mutilated. Twelve years later, Timothy Lee Masters, who was 15 at the time of the murder and lived next to where the body was found, was charged.
There was no physical evidence connecting Masters to the crime—the case against him was purely circumstantial:
- Masters was the first person to see the body lying in a field, but he did not report it. Masters said he thought it was a mannequin, and a prank.
- Masters’ mother, who had red hair like the victim, had died, and the murder took place close to the four-year anniversary of her death.
- Shortly after the murder, police searched Masters’ bedroom and found 2,200 pages of writings and drawings depicting violence and gore. Masters said he created them because he wanted to be a horror writer like Stephen King.
But J. Reid Meloy looked at some of those drawings, and testified in court that they were a “fantasy rehearsal” for the crime. Masters drew a picture on the day he saw the victim. It depicted one figure dragging another that appeared to be wounded or dead. The body being dragged was riddled with arrows.
Ignoring the arrows—there were no arrows in the actual murder—here’s how Meloy interpreted the picture, according to FortCollinsNow.com:
“This is not a drawing of the crime scene as seen by Tim Masters on the morning of Feb. 11 as he went to school,” Meloy wrote. “This is an accurate and vivid drawing of the homicide as it is occurring. It is unlikely that Tim Masters could have inferred such criminal behavior by just viewing the corpse, unless he was an experienced forensic investigator. It is much more likely, in my opinion, that he was drawing the crime to rekindle his memory of the sexual homicide he committed the day before.”
Based in a large degree on the testimony of J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., who said he fit the profile of a sexual predator, Timothy Masters was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Cop indicted for perjury
This story is in the news again because Lt. Jim Broderick of the Fort Collins police department, the lead investigator in the 1999 case against Timothy Masters, was just indicted on eight counts of perjury.
The indictment includes exactly what Broderick wrote in his application for an arrest warrant for Masters about his obsessive fantasies, the impulsive nature of the crime, the fact that the teenager was a loner. The indictment says that although Broderick wrote the statements in the arrest warrant application, he did not believe them to be true.
Masters had served nine years in prison, until 2008, when he was released. DNA evidence proved that he had nothing to do with the murder.
Later that year, Masters filed a civil suit against Broderick and the Larimer County prosecutors in the case—Terry Gilmore and Jolene Blair, both of whom had become judges. The suit charged that they withheld evidence from the defense team and other experts, including Dr. Reid Meloy.
Larimer County settled the suit for $4.1 million. The city of Fort Collins settled for $5.9 million. The two judges were reprimanded.
And now, Broderick may go to jail.
Forensic error
Why did Dr. J Reid Meloy get it so wrong in this case? For one thing, the police apparently did not give him evidence that might have cast doubt on Masters’ culpability. For another, Meloy never interviewed Timothy Masters in person. He based his conclusions on Masters’ violent short stories and crude drawings.
For more on the role that the famous psychologist played in this tragedy, read The Tim Masters Case: Chasing Reid Meloy on FortCollinsNow.com.
For more about the doubts other police officers had in the case, read Police split over conviction in Colorado slaying, on CNN.com.
Be careful
Why am I writing about this terrible miscarriage of justice? It is a warning to all of us to be careful. If someone like J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., the respected forensic expert, can be wrong, so can we.
Knowing that psychopaths exist, and being able to spot them, is important. It can save our lives. But we have to be careful in deciding who is a psychopath, and who is not. I clearly remember receiving e-mail from a woman, and a separate e-mail from the man she thought might be a psychopath. After reading the e-mails, I could not tell who was the abuser, and who was the victim.
Personally, I think Meloy’s mistake was that he did not meet Masters. Perhaps if he had, he would have felt that something was amiss—Masters never deviated from his claim that he was innocent, and never deviated from his story.
Our intuition is probably our most accurate tool in evaluating the possibility danger. If we listen to it, without clouding it with preconceptions, it will steer us in the right direction.
But in order for our intuition to work, we need the right input. Whether we’re reading police reports, news stories or comments in the Lovefraud Blog, the information our intuition needs may very well be missing.
Hopeforjoy, there are plenty of anti-social personalities in higher degreed people. That’s what the righteous professionals are up against every day of their career. Having to decipher who’s righteous (meaning who does what is right) versus unrighteous characters that hold said degrees.
The best thing to learn is the difference between PREFERRING versus DEMANDING.
Demanding anything allows pain into your life that will and can overwhelm you.
Preferring allows you to stay focus, but doesn’t allow that pain to knock you to your knees.
I learned this back in the 80s. It took me many years to get out of the demand mindset and switch over to the prefer mindset.
I demand this person NOT be an ash hole.
versus
I’d prefer this person weren’t an ash hole, but it’s OK if they are.
At least that’s the basics of the concept.
Finally, Jesus never told us we’d have a smooth life. There will always be peaks and valleys. He only told us that it would be interesting.
No matter what happens to us, good times and bad … He’s always with us. He will never leave us.
Keep the Faith!
Donna, very interesting article and on-time.
The fact that a qualified professional could be 100% wrong simply reiterates the point that we, as UNqualified individuals, don’t have the knowledge to “identify” someone as being a socipath. If they “fit the profile,” that’s one thing, but I personally don’t have the education to distinguish a sociopath from ordinary people.
Having said that, given all that I’ve learned and all that I’ve experienced, I’m beginning to actually pay attention to that gut instinct – if something seems amiss, then it usually is. My boundary issues are also being intensively repaired and maintained. If someone begins to demonstrate any/all of the red flags, I make my departure quietly and without naming soneone AS a sociopath.
Where the spath son is concerned, he was clearly diagnosed by a team of professionals, and he clearly fits the profile.
Brightest blessings.
Buttons, there is a difference, too, in a “qualified” and “licensed” individual making a LEGAL “diagnosis” or giving an “expert opinion” on a witness stand and you or me or anyone else THINKING “that person is a psychopath”—-
Sure, anyone can make a mistake no matter HOW QUALIFIED they are, and especially in psychology…as there are few if any OBJECTIVE TESTS. Like a blood test for liver failure or kidney failure or infections, or for HIV or Hep A,B, or C. Those can be diagnosed by either one or more tests that are either Positive or negative, either you do have or you don’t have it. Not psychological problems, so mostly we have to go on how the person acts on the outside, what they say, some INDICATIVE AND SUBJECTIVE TESTS and so on.
Meloy uses the “ink blot” tests a lot and he has interviewed a lot of “famous” nut-jobs and killers and done their “ink blot” tests where they look at a blot of ink on a paper (like looking at clouds and seeing animals) and describe what they see.
A lot of the “tests” like this, frankly I have LITTLE OR NO confidence in, and they are so HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE (meaning that the person giving the test has to decide what they mean and two people giving the test might come up with completely different ideas) Like the question. “is it too hot in this room?” you may say yes, and I may say No in the same room. The same with the “tests”—-and frankly as yet there are few tests for psychological problems. They are coming probably, but not yet. The early research is ongoing and I hope will give some clues and objective yes/no tests.
The problem is too, with Ps, some are violent and some are just jerks that you dont’ want to associate with or be married to. One needs life without parole and the other one needs divorcing. LOL
Actually,, though, I think you and many other bloggers here are probably as much as or more qualified to make an informal “opinion” of who is a psychopath and who is not. Unfortunately I know for a FACT that some of the most well known names in psychopathic research can’t recognize a psychopath unless it has on a striped prison suit and has been a serial killer. They do not recognize a Psychopath in the “wild” and are pretty easily fooled by a P with social skills and education.
The boundary issues that WE (I am talking about me and you here) have and that we have discussed before, are the things that you and I need to work on. We need to get our canoes out of DE RIVER DENIAL and plant our feet on solid ground. BTW I am not sure If I missed it or whatever, but WHY did Mike decide to go back to P-bro’s and what happened on that that P-bro said NO you can’t come back?
I think it’s critical that the normal ordinary person in the street who is not be educated with MA ,PhD, blah de blah… aspires to distinguish psychopaths and sociopaths from other categories, with a built in awareness we can always get it wrong… we are NEVER qualified to be infallible….but never ignore that feeling within, that gut instinct…you do not have to have a PhD to have razor sharp intuition…ignore it at your peril….I guarantee that if everyone around that guy listened to their gut and acted on it…Mr PhD would have been prevented from harming another human being…NEVER think that educated people have the monopoly on the the truth…education can be another manipulation tool…another scam…a front…make you think you are less than if you have not got a qualification…Street wisdom is a force I respect more..even though I am educated…I do not rate that as my badge of expertise….it’s the school of hard knocks that educates best of all…ACT on it like you had a PhD
Frank Lee you are so funny with the psychic psychopath idea…I do tend to believe having sex with someone does bond you at a psychic level and if it’s not treated with respect it will attach to you…but WE are in charge of what we do with that…I’d suggest to you to look into cutting psychic cords and get that womans psychic energy off you…it’s like she was a cat and she sprayed you with pheremones that render you HERS….nah not a chance fight back..regain your psychic integrity!!!
I think the best diagnostic tool is to look at the many lives that surround the person in question….if they are damaged, wounded, confused, angry, f’d up, in chaos, frustrated ill, etc. etc. etc…well than that’s good enough for me. In the spirit of Lady Macbeth, Out damned spath…
this is why i continue to study the sociopath, it’s too easy to get it wrong. There are many misogynist racist men AND Women who Hate and behave with malice. Like vampires who have been bitten by a bigger vampire, these are often schizoids who lack social skills, and have obvious narcissistic traits that they don’t bother hiding. This makes them perfect prey for the sociopath who wants to turn them into other malicious sociopaths. I realized this when i was speaking with tim. He seemed to have no problem with the immorality of the evil things that my exP did to women but when i mentioned that my ExP Would often say ” i hate all humanity”, His reply was ,”i know i keep telling him that’s wrong” It was clear that tim thinks it okay to hurt women but not men. I remembered when i met the green river murder, But he did not kill me because i was not a prostitute. Later in prison he would talk about how much he hated prostitutes. In my mind this is not a sociopath this is just someone with a lot of hatred and anger looking for scapegoat to vent his rage on. The true sociopath is my exP. It hates all of humanity but hides it very well. His mission is to spread hatred and suffering. Every part of his life in a lie. And the only pleasure he gets is out of manipulating others. there is no other pleasure for him. But this kind of sociopath goes undetected. He will wear many masks depending on who he is now with. When he is with a misogynist he hate women but when he is with a racist he hates another race. When he is with a gay person he’s gay . But when he is with a gay hater he despises gays. I think the chameleon quality is what defines a sociopath. That is why doctor scott peck called them ” the people of the lie”. It is this quality which makes them the most dangerous. All of the others are just malicious.
Skylar,
your comment on the spath being a chameleon is so true. They change their manner and responses to reflect the audience. Mine is always joking and quick witted. He changes his flavor of humor depending on who is listening. Like he doesn’t have a center, any insides, because he changes to adapt to the situation. A chameleon.
Bulletproof,
My grandpa used to always say that he graduated from the school of hard knocks, I loved that little phrase. We can’t decipher a spath or disordered until we have actually encountered one. That is why it is so bloody useless to warn their friends, family or next potential whatever, you need to see it for yourself to completely believe it. I denied what was in front of me for so long, it was asking me to believe in the unbelievable. Experiencing people who don’t care about the harm they do, justify it and act like they are the victim? Freaking unbelievable!
Hi all!
Donna, thank you for this intriguing article. It’s a “thinker”. In my case, when it came to my ex spath, I had a long list of behaviors, attitudes, intents and motives that I couldn’t give a name to. Once I read the list of characteristics a sociopath possesses, I felt ENORMOUS relief. There was a NAME for what my ex’s behavior, his lack of remorse, all of it. In my mind, after so many years of watching the same thing over and over again, there is NO doubt what my ex is. His ability to lie over and over again is still staggering to me and clearly reemphasizes what he really is.
The tendency to look at everyone else as a possible sociopath is something I didn’t experience, yet I can see why and how that would happen.
Kim, I agree with what you say in regards to those around the person in question.I have been told my ex has moved 4 times in the last 8 months alone. He, and everyone around him, are nothing but chaos.
It’s such a relief to not be in that anymore! I also reached a point, just recently, where I finally told those who know my ex to please not talk about him. I don’t care what he’s doing, who he’s doing it with, his latest arrest, nothing. And so far, they have respected that. No news truly is good news in this case! 🙂
I want to take some time and go back and read this story in its’ entirety, but I SO appreciate the point that we be careful as to how we label others.
Hugs!
Cat
Upsetting as the injustice this article illustrates may be…it makes me feel a bit better the last therapist to evaluate me and my ex-S thought I was the one with a personality disorder and he was fine!
She was no Rock Star…but was relied on to provide an unbiased, professionally conducted and comprehensive evaluation none the less. Turned out she’d seen him for a year about 10 years prior and had completed her evaluation of him before my first appointment. I suspected about 15 minutes into my first session she thought she already had me pegged.
At times, I recall the situation with some bitterness. I do think her assessment was a product of her experience and skills…in which I personally put little stock. Especially when I’ve had a handful of good therapists over the past 18 years help me to understand and navigate being a completely different person then the one she summarized in three visits. I feel let down by her and the “system” that was engaged to protect my four year old son. When that kicks in, I remind myself of how this man was able to manipulate me for three years, to include having his child and marrying him. How easy it must have been to manipulate her, especially after having spent a year in therapy with her and knowing well how I might present myself.
People are fallible…it’s part of what makes us human. I’m thankful I’m not in a position where I must judge AND such judgments have the potential to damage lives…at least in ways I don’t have regular opportunities to amend! In fact, these days, I try to judge as little as possible. Life’s much less stressful that way.
Duped
I couldn’t really read what this is about.
I had to get the gist of it and jump in with something totally unrelated, or maybe it is related.
The police showed up at my door. They showed me violent drawings on a notebook page and said my son drew this.
The drawings were meticulous, and showed artistic talent. My son is NOT that at all. My son doesn’t doodle ever. He plays on computer.
The little stick people were carrying chain saws and other weapons. The weapons were perfectly in proportion to the size of the little stick people. The hand that drew the pictures pressed down hard on the pencil and the drawings were thick pencil marks. I didn’t think of that when the police were here. I was so blown away that I believed it cause the police were saying it.
It wasn’t until the police left that I collected myself and I noticed a note my son wrote to me on the front door. My son wrote a grocery list. His print was scrawled across the page. The spindly print was scrawled across the page, and the letters were different sizes. It looked like work of a 5 year old, not of a 15 year old. Meaning it was done in a rush.
This was not the same hand that drew those meticulous drawings.
Here, I was willing to turn-in my old son, just because the police thought he did something.
Shame on me.