Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
Pinky Doodle
Weiners back atcha!!!!
Constantine, you make some good points, and while psychopathic people and those high in the traits (lack of empathy etc) there are some differences and degrees among them. Not all are out right criminals or killers, but some are. Not all take GLEE in doing dirt to others, some just do it and either are not aware or don’t care if someone else suffers because of their actions.
Those like my P son who seem to take GLEE in hurting others, in WINNING, or what they think is winning, is one “class” or kind of psychopath, and their entire life seems to be based on “winning” over others, putting one over on someone else…even when they “lose” (like go to prison) they don’t see it as a “loss” but a minor, temporary set back that is some one else’s fault, so they do not learn from their mistakes or failures because they never see it as a failure. LOL Catch 22
Others are able to focus on education and ambition, and may acheive high positions in politics, or careers. Some become rabid dictators (Hitler etc) and others become Ted Bundy or the BTK killer and appear “normal” (more or less) in social settings.
Some are “sneaky” and some are “blatant” —but they all lack the empathy, compassion, honesty, or moral compass…it is all about THEM and what they want.
A really low level of a disordered person might eat the last piece of cake knowing you had none, and not feel guilty, but the higher level would kill you to get it and feel justified.
Just as there are similarities with them, there are similarities in us as well…we may have too much empathy, lack of boundaries, or be enabling or feel too much responsibility for making others happy. Doesn’t ‘mean we are all alike totally, but there are some patterns in us, and in them.
In order to keep ourselves safe we need to learn to recognize the patterns in them, and in ourselves as well…our tendency to fall for the “pity play” or to allow abusive behavior and not set boundaries that are solid and self protecting. It starts out about them, but ends up about us. Our learning, our self protections. Our growth, because they are not going to grow or change, or develop a conscience or empathy. They are set in concrete for the most part, not because they could Not change, but because they see no need to. We have experienced enough pain that we now see a NEED TO CHANGE how we react, act, in order to minimize th epain from the most current encounter and to avoid future encounters.
Constantine
Thank you for the encouragement yesterday. I read it three times. I know in my heart that you are right. I’m waiting for the three month mark. Every day that I don’t have him in my life is a gift.
Yesterday was the worst. Today is better. I woke up thinking of my spath as I always do, but the thoughts I had today were different.
“Thank you for lying to me, you’ve demonstrated your inability to perform moral reasoning”
“Thank you for sleeping with her and rubbing it in my face, you’ve demonstrated your inability to control your impulses”
“Thank you for being unkind, you’ve demonstrated your inability to love”.
All of these things show me the real YOU, and now I know who you really are. You’re nasty.
It’s not about me.
(if only now I can keep my head straight about this, and not be sad about the guy I thought I had. There is no yellow brick road down to happily ever after with THIS guy).
Superkid10
Superkid,
this will help.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOgpT5rEKIU
Alanis Morrisette’s “Thankyou” song got me through those first few months. One trait of a spath is the utter inability to feel gratitude. Our growth gives us the ability to be grateful even for the painful parts of our lives.
You are soooo getting it!
Hi Kim, thanks for the hi 🙂
It’s strange… it seems my healing goes incredibly quickly. I’ve noticed this morning for example how sensitive indeed I have become to media portrayal, especially regarding relationships. In a way it would be part of the trauma to hear lyrics and movies within the context of the abuse I experienced and how hearing or seeing it gives me the chills or make my hair rise. And yet, I feel as if I got my head out of the clouds, not just regarding my P, but have a stronger conviction on what shit I won’t put up with any more. In the past I “knew” in my head stuff was bad, but still felt it a pity. The pity-this and pity-that is gone for me. And it actually makes me feel stronger and purer.
I’m certainly not interested or looking for a romance (that would be silly after just 2 weeks of being shown and seeing reality). But I know already that I won’t be any guy’s prize or comfort cushion anymore, whether because they are a spath, or complex, or searching themselves, or not sure what they want in life yet, or have a hard time being sure, or whatever crap excuse anyone can come up with to be and not be with someone, or need me to help me put their life on track. I know I’m walking as soon as there is something that tells me a man wants to have his cake and not pay for it.
Yea. Alot of them are really good at getting you to REALLY want a relationship with them, then pulling the rug out and suggesting a freinds with benefits kind of thing. Ah no. Thanks, but I get along fine with my friends with batteries solution. I also like to say,(even if it is a bit vulgar, it gets the point across) I don’t F@.......#$ my friends. Sorry. 🙂
Hee hee, Oxy, if I didn’t know better I’d say this was part of a campaign to sell as many of Barbara Oakley’s books as possible! 😉 Particularly when I take this determined stand of yours together with the content of your excellent review. I must say this review is a superb TEASER that could well have been crafted with precisely that object in mind: to encourage readers to buy the book!
On the one hand the review makes plain that Oakley’s Cold Blooded Kindness has many important observations to make about the Carole Alden case, none of which I was aware of myself. On the other hand the review leaves many key questions unanswered—such as what Alden’s precise motives were, what really went on between her and her husband, how she succeeded in making herself look like a “victim” even to those closest to her, what view Oakley has of “codependency,” and many other aspects.
To get those intriguing questions answered, I decided I had to buy the book. Still, if a lot of people do buy it I must say Oakley thoroughly deserves the support, since she seems to be addressing questions whose public importance ranges well beyond this one murder case. I would point out to others that although the book has only been out a few weeks, so far the handful of readers’ reviews it’s received on amazon.com have all been glowing ones.
I WAS going to add a bunch of comments to this post, prompted by the remarks in your review. However, on this occasion amazon.com’s delivery was lightning fast (from a warehouse quite close to me), and after ordering the book on Sunday evening I found it already in my mailbox last night! So I should delay any further comments until I’ve found time to read the book. Take care!
Skylar
Wow, lady, you really rock. I listened to the song and I cried. I printed the lyrics and I have them up on my wall in my office. I’m going to read them every day.
The “Thank You India” piece really fits in an ironic way – my spath cheated on me many times, the two times he made me aware of it, it was with Indian women. I thank them too for letting me see the truth.
THANK YOU !!!!
Superkid10
Redwald, enjoy the book, I really did. Yes, Oxy wrote a teaser!