Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
(((SuperKid)))
I’m glad you liked it. I did the same thing – printed the lyrics. AWESOME LYRICS. and her voice is like an angel’s.
I haven’t said this enough to people here: GRATITUDE is a lifesaver when you are feeling hopeless. It completely changes your perspective and that song brings the attitude of gratitude into focus.
Speaking of gratitude, thank you so much for the book. I’ve yet to finish it. (it recommends to read it slowly and practice the exercises. I like what it says about allowing the pain to surface and accepting it. Not wallowing in it, but simply accepting that it is there.
Oxy talks about Victor Frankl’s book and how he says that pain is all encompassing because it’s like a gas that fills you completely. This book seems to take it a step further, by recommending EXPANSION. He says we don’t struggle with pain, we make more room for it. Allow yourself the space to observe the pain and soon it stops stressing you because it is no longer completely filling you. I’m not sure I understand that very well or if it meshes with the Victor Frankl’s idea. Any thoughts on the subject? Did you read both books?
Hey Oxy –
Great points and well-said. I suppose you’re right that we too have any number of “profileable” tendencies and characteristics: To your list I would add “overly idealistic” – though, of course, that was only originally and once upon a time: we’re cured of that now!
Still, I think diagnostic tools like the PCL-R focus a bit too much on things like “irresponsibility”, “failure to follow a consistent long-term life plan” and so forth. There is a definite value to this when it comes to identifying a SPECIFIC type of P or S, (and maybe it is worth keeping unmodified for it’s predictive ability in this regard), but it really does have a blind spot for what we have been calling the “high level psychopath.” At any rate, I KNOW people like this, and they are in all outward respects eminently capable, professional, and highly-disciplined (the latter even to a striking degree). They might create havoc on some level in their personal lives, but otherwise they never seem to miss a beat. And yet, they are just as sociopathic/psychopathic as the rest of them!
Superkid –
Glad you are having a better day today! But don’t worry if you have a lot of ups and downs before getting this out of your system altogether: even after a few months it’s enough perhaps that your good days start to outnumber (or at least equal) your bad ones.
Hi Skylar,
What is the name of the book you’re discussing (the one that refers to EXPANSION for dealing with pain. Some of these threads are so active that it gets difficult to follow unless you spend all day online! It sounds like an interesting concept, and similar to what my trauma group was talking about recently.
Edit – putting this into two separate posts.
I agree on the thank you and gratitude. It was one of the first feelings I turned towards. And I’m feeling more grateful every day about more and more stuff.
I feel grateful that I didn’t get pregnant.
I feel grateful that the legalisation of his divorce took so long
I feel grateful that I could not find full time employment this schoolyear and therefore could not spare a dime on him anymore for the last 8 months (well 290$ I sent spread out over the months) if I wanted to be able to buy food and pay off my bills and loan.
I feel grateful for all the weird money issues I ran into the past 2 years, even plenty he had nothing to do with, because otherwise he would have just used more of it for himself. (I was flabbergasted by all of it happening constantly, but I kinda think life wanted to protect me from otherwise being financially ruined in a way that would have been too disproportiante in comparison to my foolishness)
I feel grateful that I needed a knee operation, which forced the issue of his unreachibility to the point that I was able to say, “no, it’s nobody else’s fault that you don’t know about it and therefore failed to be a supportive partner. It’s your own.” (Weirder even, my knee trouble started around the time he regressed back in his hometown and started actively chasing for new victims to replace me)
I feel grateful that I needed a week of revalidation sick leave from work and that he happened to put his mask off at the start of that revalidation week
I feel grateful he lives at the other side of the world, and hope he will be for longer
And I start to feel even grateful a little bit that I experienced a P because I feel like I won’t put up with crap anymore, I’d really rather be by myself then.
Yea. I feel grateful for that kind of stuff, too. Even becoming homeless and going to a shelter…It was my saving grace, because it removed the supply I provided and put me in a place that he could not get to. I had time to heal the trauma bonds and get through the withdrawal, so that I could remain NC.
I feel lonely sometimes, but when I remember the chaos, I am gratefull for my solutude.
Constantine,
Don’t have time to comment properly (shouldn’t even have logged in now!), but wanted to tell you that I particularly appreciate your posts re: low/high functioning psychopaths/sociopaths/etc…, and *completely* agree with the thoughts you’ve expressed so far. I’ve posted in the past that I thought Hare was a nice guy – the type that just never considered evil people existed before he met “Ray” (the first one who held the shank on him in that B.C. prison), and he’s been forever fixated on that type since, which unfortunately is what got codified in the PCL and PCL-R. Oddly though, he was overly influenced by Cleckly (completely agree with you there too) and not only did he overemphasis impulsivity, he also completely missed *predation* and *sadism* in his checklist, even though both of them appear to be attributes of Ray’s.
And (don’t get me started) he completely missed females (I can hear the other LF members groaning!!!). Would love to hear more of your throughts.
On another note, I seem to miss so many comments/subject threads due to volume – I wish there were an easier way to catch up/keep up to some of these discussions!
Darwinsmom and Kim,
I think Alanis was able to get to “Thank you” because earlier on she’d allowed herself to throughtly vent all her anger (“You ougta know”).
Oh yeah. Agreed. You can’t skip the grief or the anger. Gotta work it through.
Eventually you come to equalibrium, or what we call the Nirvana of indifference. Then you can start being grateful.
Yeah… I never bought any of her following CDs, but her debut was chucked full with a lot of songs regarding dealing with pain.
And then there’s of course Sinead O’ Connor. Troy was the first song I put on after I received the break-up news… At first she expresses the wish and longing and the hope of him coming back to her, then it goes to taking the blame onto yourself, once she acknowledges her jealousy of the new one, she refocuses on herself and starts to doubt more and more whether he loved her, and then comes the anger of what she did for him and how he discarded it. Finally she gets the spirit to be reborn like a phoenix out of the ashes from her troy, finally realizing it was not her fault at all, but his.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-zHwkPnr3c
Annie,
Superkid sent me “The happiness Trap” which is based on ACT. From the website:
ACT breaks mindfulness skills down into 3 categories:
1) defusion: distancing from, and letting go of, unhelpful thoughts, beliefs and memories
2) acceptance: making room for painful feelings, urges and sensations, and allowing them to come and go without a struggle
3) contact with the present moment: engaging fully with your here-and-now experience, with an attitude of openness and curiosity
http://www.thehappinesstrap.com/about_act
I experienced this myself a few times when the spath had me on the brink of the precipice. My mind just stopped wallowing in the grief and I looked around and took note of myself, my situation, and my feelings, with curiosity instead of emotion. It was a wonderful release and very grounding. This book takes it even further. It discusses the idea of having values and committing to acting each day based on your values REGARDLESS of how you feel. Notice your feelings, accept your feelings and then ACT on your values.
I have always had trouble with this because my parents gave me no values – except money. They are narcissists and their values change depending on who benefits – it’s always about them. So the book discusses several topics that benefit me.