Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
Oxy,
“but due to the fact that the Muslim world has stayed pretty illiterate and pastoral and with the “strict” interpretation backing up the CULTURAL norms, the inequity toward women and servants has continued with a 7th century mentality.”
For fundamental Muslims this is true. In all religions there are progressive movements including Islam. The media (depending on what you watch) tends not to focus on liberated women in Muslim countries. Years ago in the 70’s!!, I had a friend from Egypt and she was studying to be an engineer her mother was a lawyer and they were originally from Syria but had moved to Egypt. They are Muslims.
There are many, many educated progressive Muslim women we just tend to focus on the oppressed ones and YES there are many oppressed women in the Islam faith just as there are many oppressed Hassidim Jewish women. Mennonite and Amish women (and MANY fundamental Evangelical women ) are oppresed Christian women . I know, I was one, A conservative Mennonite for ten years (long story) and an evangelical since I was 15.
I am now full circle back to the Catholic faith but as a PROGRESSIVE Catholic.
As for the idea of the founding fathers (I LOVE the way you use the “small c” GOOD ONE!! 🙂 ), being native I cannot go along with the idea of our country being “founded on the bible by our venerable Christian forefathers”. BS to a Native American. This country was founded on genocide and on the blood of my people. It was given the glorious (PUKE) name of Manifest Destiny but we call it REMOVAL and GENOCIDE.
OK no politics and/or religion. I am off the soap box just had to say that!! 🙂
p.s yes I forgot to mention WHITE women were given the vote in what the 1920’s? Natives of all genders could not vote in many states (including mine) until the 1960’s.
one more thing…sorry..:) I am VERY happy that Osama got Obama’d. It needed to be done. BUT I am part Apache and I am not happy that the operation was referred to as operation Geronimo. I heard that they were referring to the stealth like nature of Geronimo but we natives are not buying it.
There is a difference between a psychopath like Osama BL and a WARRIOR like Geronimo. He was a defender of our people. He was responding to WOUNDED KNEE and other atrocities. OBL is well we know what he was. In Ireland the IRA and the UVF are freedom fighters. Some say they are terrorists. Again back to the sheep- it is all in how you look at it-what dog you have in that fight.
I can imagine what the response would have been if the operation had the name Operation Al Capone and he was A THUG.
Ok NOW I am off the soap box.
Good day to everyone. Got to get back to my Saturday. 🙂
Adamsrib, I agree terrorists are not in general psychopathic but people brainwashed and trained to hate.
In Spain we have Basque country, a little region in the North that has a terrorist group that fights for independence. They kill from time to time, some times a bunch in an attempt.
I do not agree with their methods but i know they’re a bunch of fanatics who were raised on that idea of the “independence” and not bloody psychopaths as some want to label them.
Eva,
I just read today that some crazy guy cut off a woman’s head in a supermarket in spain. He was a nut job and she was from the UK.
Did you hear about that?
Adamsrib,
http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/hanging.html
I only learned about this recently. It was 2 weeks before the emancipation proclamation.
I no longer just accept history or any “knowledge” from the feed tube. I question everything, because spaths are everywhere and they always have been. It’s best to look for patterns.
Skylar hahaha Yes. An english woman that worked in a shop in a touristic area, in the Canary Islands. Poor woman. It did it a beggar from Bulgaria.
These English have published the incident in several papers. Now they’ll say “Look Spain how insecure it is with their soft immigration policies blah blah. They have the country full of illegal beggars that are dangerous” 😀
I don’t know if the beggar is a psycho or a lunatic but he took the head with him and later left it on the street.
Eva, I have heard of the Basque group in Spain. When I was in N. Ireland the guys talked a lot about the Basque paramilitary group. They are the ones that planted the bomb in the Madrid train station right?
I think many terrorists are psychopaths I just don’t think all freedom fighters are terrorists, if that makes any sense!! One person’s freedom fighter is anothers terrorist. The guys I worked with in N. Ireland call themselves an army and believe they are fighting for the freedom of their homeland. Many would say they are terrorists. Now the splinter groups that’s another story all together. They tend to be much more violent than the group that they broke off of because they feel the original group has sold out.
Warriors like Geronimo would be, in my opinion, classed as freedom fighters.
In any event, I don’t like violence and I am a peace loving person-I don’t hate anyone and I try to be as tolerant as is humanly possible.
Skylar, thanks for the link. Lot’s of information there and I will take time to really look at that site. U.S history is so twisted it is hard for the average American to view things from the lens of the Native American experience. Hollywood did not help in promoting a healthy Native perspective the exception being Costner’s “Dances With Wolves”. The religious right community surely does not help by trying to force feed Americans ideologies that are TWO HUNDRED YEARS OLD!! yikes…
Skylar, looks as if the spirit of AIM lives! Thank you for posting this-it is an important piece of information that many Americans do not know about.
Most Americans also don’t know that the Texas Rangers lynched and murdered innocent Mexicans by the hundreds. They were as feared by the Mexicans as the KKK at the turn on the century and early part of the 20th century. TV shows like “Walker Texas Ranger” are TOTAL BS!
I wish more Americans would really research the histories of the marginalized peoples of this nation. Thanks again 🙂