Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
Dear Darwin’smom,
I will get that book, it sounds interesting to me, the problem I have right now is I have about 3 feet of shelf space on my “TO BE READ” shelf, and am sleeping better now so not as much time in the evening to read…so am ordering faster than I am reading. Got side tracked into reading the Chinese history book and got to restart the next Barbara Oakley book “evil genes”—and have a couple more books just ordered in the pipe line that friends have recommended. LOL
Adamsrib, in our living history group there is a lot of cooperation between the native Americans and the “settlers” but once I started a “war” (practical joke) one night I was going to sleep about 10 o’clock at an event that would start early the next mornin with scads of school kids coming in, and the “Injuns” cranked up a BOOM BOX with drum music, now they were NOT playing the drum, just a BOOM BOX with a tape of drum music and they kept it up til 3 in the morning.
So I decided the next event was WAR!!!! I got one of my college student friends who played the trumpet to record a “charge” for me, and I recorded horses running and got some lady finger fire crackers that sounded like gunfire, and made this tape of a cavalry charge with gun fire, the bugle and the horses and men yelling “charge” and I waited til the “Injun” camp was quiet and then about an hour later when I figured they would be sound asleep and I crawled up outside the teepee with my boom box and CHARGED the camp!!!!!! LOL
Teach them to mess with a tired old woman! LOL That’s been 10 or 15 years ago now and I still get kidded by them about making “war” on their camp in the middle of the night!
Oxy that is a funny story!! Humor is soooo important. As long as the participants know there is genuine love and camaraderie present, I say HAVE FUN!!
You are too much lady….:)
Adams rib,
GOOD practical jokes (not mean ones) that are WELL thought out and well planned can be some of the best times of your life and our group is really funny on some of the greatest practical jokes ever.
We have some absolutely wonderful story tellers too, and with the joke being “amplified” a bit it makes great camp fire story telling as well.
One morning a a huge encampment (500 people) everyone had been up late the night before (and a few were probably hung over as well) several of us re-enacted the Scene from the Monty Python movie “bring out your dead” by moving through camp with a small two wheeled cart pulled by young oxen, with a “body” laying feet up, and we did this at DAY LIGHT waking everyone else up, with one kid dressed in a brown, hooded cape like a monk, ringing a huge cow bell yelling “bring out yer dead” and about half the folks got it and were pithed off the other half didn’t get and were pithed off and it is still one of the favorite stories 10-15 years later! LOL
During the day we teach history to school kids and the public by “living” it—at night we sing, dance, tell stories, and get rowdy and just have a good time around the camp fire. I’ve made some wonderful memories with this group of folks!
Guns, germs and steel is a classic, to understand the causes of the Caucasian domination in the world.
Basically he theorizes that
a) the best and easiest developed staple food (grain) that gives the most nutricients was to Eurasia’s advantage. The agricultural corn is very different from its original wild version. It took much more time for the Mexican cultures to genetically alter it. And it doesn’t give as much nutricients as does grain. Same reasoning goes for rice in Asia as with the American mais. Or the manyok in Africa.
b) the geographical layout of Eurasia was also a great benefit for trade and getting the highly nutricient grain harvested in other areas aside from the fertile sickle.
It only needed to travel from east to west along a similar climate belt, the mediterranean. But the Americas and Africa are North-South orientated, and partly covered by a tropic climate belt. What you can grow north of the tropics, you cannot grow in the tropics, etc. Similar problems exist for the island cultures in the Pacific, mostly because of the different heights on the islands. The higher you go, the colder it gets… you get another climate.
c) for some unknown fluke most herd animals in Europe and the fertile sickle are the easiest domesticable. Less so in Asia, only the camels in North Africa. Just take for instance horses versus zebras. They look alike, but zebras are undomesticable. In Asia they learned how to work with Asian elephants, but they are undomesticable. That means: you have to go get the animal in the wild, you can’t really breed them. In Africa the most dangerous animals are not the predators, but the bovines. If an
Asian elephant is trainable but not domesticable, an African elephant is untrainable. So Eurasia was lucky to have plenty of wild animals they could domesticate into farm animals. The only equivalent of domesticable animals in the Americas are the lamas. But again here, the lamas never ended up in Mexico, because the lamas would not have survived the tropics as tribes migrated to Central America.
Without herd animals to ride or used for pack carrying, it becomes more difficult for large groups of people to move. And with the domesticated animals came along the invention of the wheel. Mexico had nothing bigger than the naked dogs, hence no wheel usage.
d) the living with domesticated animals is important for the germ part of the theory. Most of our epidemic illnesses stem from herd or flock animals we live with. The houses in Europe used to be barn and house at the same time to protect the flock from being stolen by bands of thieves as well as predators. Yes, many people died from those epidemics, but the survivors grew immune for them. So, the multitude of more docile species of animals in Eurasia is the direct reason why Europeans grew plenty of immunity to epidemical germs. In comparison, the diseases you might end up having in the tropics such as malaria are not spreadable from human to human. An individual may grow immunity to malaria, but the infection cannot be spread as easily as the germs from living in close proximity with bovines, pigs, sheep, goats, geese, etc. And we all know that during the conquistas most indegenious people died because of European epidemic diseases spreading at an alarming rate, rather than the actual killings and enslaving. Sure, plenty of conquistadores died of malaria, but upon returning home, they could not spread the malaria back to the whole of Europe.
e) Europe also had plenty of iron ore mines, and iron weaponry was developed in that continent, fastly replacing the bronze weaponry for its more deadly result. You can kill with bronze weapons, but the use of a bronze sword is not as general cutting as an iron sword. In comparison, most of the other cultures around the world remained in a type of stone age, or a soft metal stage.
f) Europe had one big weakness… apart from grain, domesticable animals and germs and steel, it was mostly a rainy climate with mostly forests and nuts. Gold, silver, herbs, color pigments from plants was in big shortage. The only way to get it was by active expansion and stealing it. They had all that rich refined stuff in Asia, and Asia certainly was a competitor to Europe. And Asia was able to trade their riches along the east-west silk route, the caravan from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran to Turkey and along the Northern African countries. Because Asia was so rich they traded, but did not have an expansion thrive, so they cooperated together with the Arabian and Euroasian people along the silk route.
So, the only way for the Europeans to either get those riches for themselves, was either to trade their steel and animals for the riches. But why trade if you have the weaponry to take hold of the trade route itself. The Crusades were nothing more than economical aggressive expansion to be the master of the silk trade route. With the silk route also came the Asian knowledge of gunpowder.
g) the same expansion went global once they mastered the ability to sail around the globe. The germs, the guns and the steel did the rest. The Americas were very rich in gold. But they had no defences against the germs, against the guns, nor the steel. So, the riches of the Americas were plundered and went straight into European pockets. The plundering of the Americas is basically what funded the industrial revolution in Europe.
RE: Oakley’s book.
I think one must first define what genuine altruism really is and understand what it is not. Given the chameleon like nature of the spath/narc, it is not too far of a reach to comprehend how they can “fake” being altruistic.
Doing a simple comparative study on real altruists, Mother Teresa of Calcutta, the Dalai Lama etc one can then see the disparity. There is a saying, “you can clearly see how crooked an arrow is when it is laying next to a straight one”.
Some would say Amma, the hugging saint of India, is false and her organization a cult. Yet many swear a hug from Amma has tremendous healing power. The items her followers hawk at her Darshans would suggest otherwise. I do not know enough about Amma to even begin to suggest she is a charlatan. I understand her organization has helped many, many people but then again so did People’s Temple under Jim Jones. Initially, that is.
One must be observant and as I believe it was darwinsmom who said we must look with the third eye (which is a gift I believe but yes we can also train spiritually to see with the third eye).
It never ceases to amaze me how a very simple observation can be turned into a scientific study. Not that that is a bad thing. Intrinsic study is always valuable if it betters our experiences here on earth.
A very good review Ox!
Darwinsmom, wow you and Constantine!! Whew, you guys are brainiacs to the max!! I will need to re read your post. AWESOME!!
Ox LOL OMG my kids loved Monty Python’s Life of Brian!! They are grown now but gawd they still would have gotten a huge kick out of that!! LOL!!!!
You are VERY BLESSED to have such an amazing group like your living history group. And the kids are too 🙂
Love the practical jokes!!!!
Yea, I like the practical jokes too…the really good ones that are thought out and have a point, not just doing mean things to embarrass folks or hurt them. My husband was great with the practical jokes but his were a bit rougher than I would have gone with…he knew better than to pull one of those on me though, so he reserved them for his men friends. LOL
My paternal grandfather was a practical joker too, but I got EVEN with him once when I was 13 with a WELL THOUGHT OUT one (too long to tell here) that was exactly what he deserved for a semi-mean one he pulled on me, and after that he never pulled another one on me at all….I think He was afraid to. LOL At first it made him angry, but when I told him that it was in revenge for the one he had pulled on me, he SAW THE JUSTICE in it and acknowledged he got what he deserved. LOL So that was at least good.
The best part of the practical jokes in our living history group are the STORIES the jokes generate and how they are told over and over around the campfire…and of course, grow with each telling sort of like a fisherman’s story—it isn’t really lying, just embellishing the story line! LOL And some of them don’t need much embellishing to be side-splitting funny.
I’m starting to get interested in doing more stuff with the living history group now…and have signed up to help the museum staff in June, july and august with some demos for the public.
Spent the day today gardening and decorating the garden, cleaning up around the place, just enjoying the beautiful sunny spring day with a nice breeze. We trimmed some more branches off trees around the studio and the hangar, and moved some potted plants (real ones) that were not getting enough sun on my back deck to a sunny spot out by the raised bed gardens…and made the “cat-quarium” for the new kitties to have room to play and be happy and be safe at the same time. Then stood and watched them play for an hour and laughed ourselves sick. (if it was an AQUA-Rium it would have water in it, but with cats in it it is a CAT-quarium where you can watch the cats.
I had plastic barf that I fooled several people with.
Guess that didn’t take much thought!!!!!! HA
Your living history group and the camping sound wonderful!
Yes, good memories and telling stories are most enjoyable.
I enjoy being with family and remembering fun times!