Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
hey oxy, can i have the ‘cat house’ when the kittens are done with it? sounds like about everything i need.
cheers 1steprs – have not drank tequila in over twenty years, I ruined a a great date by throwing up on the guy, dont remember his name but he was Hot, never have had a tequila sunrise since then… I am not a good drinker, i get sick and puke, so i really dont drink much anymore, maybe a beer or glass of wine occasionally…..
hens – i never even had tequila until i was in my 40’s – so well past the time that i would have gathered any embarrassing stories with it. but i really do love it – it’s really a drug; my body responds to it differently than other alcohol. and then there is the salt and lime..mmm.
but, this isn’t a drinking blog – and well, EB isn’t here, so i’ll leave that subject for now. 😉
Thanks for the info Oxy. We’ve been looking for some rib-sticking food. I stared doing massage full, full time and I burn up so much energy, I’m like the incredible eating machine! We also got our jucier going again. That’s been collecting dust..small changes a little bit at a time.
Sounds like you are having a good time with those girl cats!
One, ahhh that’s what we have in common, tequila is my drink of choice. only the silver patron. other than wine i no longer drink anything else.
I just had a thought and had to post it.
spaths seem to create poverty everywhere they go. It’s like they prefer poverty to wealth, as long as the poverty impacts others too.
Yet, there are so many spaths that gravitate towards positions of wealth and power… how to reconcile those 2 different kinds of spaths? Could it be that there are two different kinds of spaths? I understand that genetically all the spaths have different IQ’s and upbringing, just as normal people do. What if, though, there are two different kinds of spaths genes? One spath gene prefers poverty and the pity ploy and the other spath gene prefers authority and power? Eventually the power spaths would outnumber the pity ploy spaths because they would end up in power and don’t need other spaths mucking up their works.
JUst a thought, I had never considered this possibility, but it works for many other genetic traits so why not a spath phenotype? It would also explain why our world is becoming increasingly spath dominated. The spath genes for power would naturally dominate since they can spread their seed with less infant mortality.
Adamsrib,
Sorry I couldn’t respond to your posts last night: I just got Internet here and then my computer cord broke! (I’m on someone else’s computer now and can only type a few words until next week….)
Anyhow, as I said before, your story resonated with me from the beginning because it is so similar to my own. But it really does sound like you are on the path to genuine healing; and I like the way you’ve turned the experience into a spiritual journey: that’s ultimately what it’s all about. At any rate, my impression from talking to you is that you are made of much finer stuff than this Irish guy, let alone the other creeps you’ve mentioned!
Okay, just wanted to say hello: I hate when someone asks me a question in a post and then I am unable to respond! (Talk more later when I’m “plugged in” again!)
C.
one/joy I can only drink the golden tequila. Love it! The Nicaraguan rum Flor de Cana is the best one I know. But try this once with tequila (if golden): a slice of orange and cinnamon. Pure ambrosia!
Dear Skylar,
Genes are not specific “for poverty” or “wealth”—and there ARE several “different types” of psychopaths, though there are some things in common, like the tendency for “risk taking” and “impulsiveness” and so on…but it isn’t just ONE GENE on any tendency and a TENDENCY is not a done deal…environment plays a big role in how they turn out, how they act. Whether they become president of the US or end up in prison like my P-son.
While what we define as a “psychopath” (officially: Anti-social personality disorder) has a pattern of behaviors, just like what we define as ” depression, Major” has a pattern to it, but not all people who are depressed act the same….some kill themselves, some just lie in bed and stare at the ceiling…but there are some things in common with both of those “depressed” people. And there may be (probably are) some environmental and genetic things involved with depression as well. Ditto Bi-polar and other emotional or mental illnesses.
We are all a mixture of genes and environments—and it is a VERY COMPLEX thing that is being studied, and as bright as you are dear Skylar…I don’t think that even even YOU AND I TOGETHER with our education + our observations are qualified to publish a book on it just yet that will be the definitive text for the next generation of medical practitioners in psychiatry. LOL 🙂
I think (for what it is worth) that the “rolling stone” (going from one thing to another) chaotic life style of many of the psychopaths I know tends to leave them broke and without much in the way of job training, jobs, or the stability it takes to accumulate things so they couch surf and con and try to take money and things from others but usually live in poverty. Another kind may be like John Edwards and get a college degree and marry and raise a family and cheat and lie and use and abuse, but yet, be “mainstream” as far as getting an education and a good job and accumulating “wealth.”
Why is one psychopath”successful” (in terms of job and money) or as Dr. Hare says “a snake in a suit” and the other one lives the life of a mooching bum or a criminal? I’m not sure WHY—it isn’t JUST IQ–as my P-son is in the 99th percentile of IQ (smart) yet he is about as DUMB as they come in making decisions, totally has no impulse control to stick around and finish high school much less college and jobs….HOOKED on adrenaline for sure and totally out of touch with what other people think of as “normal” behavior or thinking.
There are so many questions and so few definitive answers. Wish I could be around in 100 years and see what research has brought out about the way these people’s thinking and brains work. (((hugs))))
Constantine, I want to thank you for the vote of confidence.
“At any rate, my impression from talking to you is that you are made of much finer stuff than this Irish guy, let alone the other creeps you’ve mentioned!”
This is a very kind thing to say and it is such a good feeling to know that someone sees me and recognizes what I have been through on a not so easy journey.
Often, we have a harder time healing because no one says, I SEE YOU… I HEAR YOU…YOU ARE REAL..WHAT YOU ARE GOING THROUGH IS REAL… and most importantly to be there with us at the finish line when we finally make it across and we are still alive!!
That is what your post did for me today Constantine!
Blessings and I humbly thank you….