Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
eb, I used to have a list of “this week’s project” for things that I would focus on specifically that particular week…like learning to set boundaries one week, learning to be grateful the next week, and counting my blessings the next week,,,and so on. I never ran out of projects to work on….but bit by bit, bit by bit, things started to feel better in my life and I started to grown, find peace, and just in general heal.
I still stumble across a “this week’s project” and concentrate on one aspect of healing myself, improving myself, etc. making myself stronger…and I work on that for a while by especially concentrating on it. There is never going to be a time when I say to myself “I’m perfect” LOL ROTFLAMO hee hee so there will always be things I can do to make my life better.
Ox Drover:
Good for you! Sounds like you really had a plan and it worked for you.
Healing is like any other plan, you have to have a “map” of where you want to go, and you just follow that map…if you don’t know where you want to go, you have no idea how to get there.
Ox Drover:
So true. This is helping me so much…thank you.
Hi Oxy/Joyce,
Saw the following news article (horribly tragic) about a boy who died in a hoarding situation in Chicago and whose family tried to cover it up, and thought of your book review. I bought “Cold Blooded Kindness” ages ago based on your review, and it’s really opened my eyes. I see its implications everywhere I turn these days. Haven’t been around lately (life can surely get in the way sometimes!), but was amiss in not thanking you before now.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2036174/Matthew-Degner-14-dead-bungalow-housing-200-diseased-animals.html
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-09-13/news/ct-met-berwyn-hoarding-charges-0913-2-20110913_1_animal-hoarding-animal-hoarding-exotic-animals
As I said, since I read your review I see references everywhere, so thanks for the heads up. Also to Donna’s post about ‘Sir Patrick’. Thought you, and perhaps Donna and the LF authors, might find the following links of interest:
Thread on A&E: “Let’s be honest – are hoarders just sociopaths?” http://community.aetv.com/service/displayDiscussionThreads.kickAction?as=119137&w=265899&d=455293&ac=new
Tufts University: Typologies of Hoarders:
http://www.tufts.edu/vet/hoarding/picts/typology.jpg
http://vet.tufts.edu/hoarding/pubs/AngellReport.pdf
For those who don’t like to click links, HARC (Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium) lists 5 categories of animal hoarders. The worst category is the “Exploiter Hoarder”. Attributes of this category of hoarder are:
– Most difficult or problematic type to deal with
– Acquires animals purely to serve own needs
– Tends to have sociopathic characteristics and/or personality disorder
– Lacks empathy for people or animals; indifferent to
the harm caused to animals or people
– Tends toward extreme denial of the situation
– Rejects authority or any outsider’s legitimate concern
over animal care
– Believes his/her knowledge is superior to all others’;
adopts the role of expert with extreme need to control
– Has superficial charm and charisma ”“ very articulate,
skilled in crafting excuses and explanations, and capable
of presenting an appearance that conveys believability
and competence to officials, the public, and the media
– Is manipulative and cunning
– Is self-concerned and narcissistic
– Lacks guilt, remorse or social conscience
– Acquires animals actively rather than passively
– Demonstrates predatory behavior ”“ will lie, cheat,
steal without remorse and potentially has a plan to
use these tools to achieve own ends
– Plans to evade the law and beat the system, such as
dispersing animals to other animal hoarders or friends
Sadly, when it comes to hoarding, it seems to be much easier for the authorities to attribute animal cruelty from hoarding to sociopathy/psychopathy. But when it comes to children or dependent family members, they’re still coming from the ‘it’s OCD – you need to be sympathetic to the hoarder and don’t push them at all’ mindset.
Hope you’re well, and you survived the hurricane/tornado/heatwave season intact.
Hmm, sorry for the bolding problem above. Browser problems seem to be preventing me from editing it.
Hmm, posted a comment directed to Oxy, with links to articles linking animal hoarding and sociopathy. Seems I’ve missed some board change where comments with embedded links are moderated?
Anyway, I posted a comment earlier (waiting moderation) which contains some links to research from HARC (Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium) which related to this book, that I thought Oxy would be interested in. For some reason I couldn’t edit it, which is why there is a lonely (and seemingly nonsensical) comment above apologizing for my previous comment.
Ah, the joys of technology!
Hi Annie – ’tis always been so – links will often not make it through. and seeming nonsensical is a prerequisite to posting on lf. 🙂
one/joy
I am sorry about what happened with your moldy roommate. I hope you can think of some way to tell the story in a funny way so you can laugh at it.
I do identify with your needs. I need human, friendly, physical contact to get over this empty pain caused by my spath.
I just started volunteering to assist the elderly in my community. There is no cost to me. I show up, chat,listen, encourage them to take a walk, find a way to connect, and it is so wonderful. Under the guise of GIVING I’m RECEIVING a whole lot. I love it.
I had to do something to get my spath out of my head.
I feel so bad. I keep thinking, will he change? Will he reach out to me and tell me he loves me? I know the answer is no. Every time i come back to this site you and the others here help me get my head on straight. I forget what “SPATHY” is unless I’m here. I start to attribute normal human traits to my SPATH. That’s a mistake. When i start feeling so sad and hurt, all i want to do is sleep.
My heart goes out to you. If you were in my city, I’d come over and take you out to coffee.
Aw SK, thank you so much.
you know that idea that he might …still…just…
that’s the FOG (fear obligation guilt) still speaking through you.
it’s not something i talk about much, but i had a moment between flushing out the fake dead ‘boy’ and the spath calling me (resurrection night i call it) that i thought, ‘i love this person so much as long as they are honest with me, i could stay connected….’ it didn’t last long SK, because i know better – not about spaths at that time, but about lying dishonest people – they lie to everyone. it doesn’t change from person to person.
not sure (because my memory isn’t good..yet) if you know that my spath pretended to be 6 people online and there were about 20 in total in her con…it took quite a while to get the boy i loved and the bitch spath to ‘be’ one person in my mind. it’s the same for others who have seen ‘two faces’ of their spaths (who are decidedly ONE person) – THE BAD FACE IS THE TRUE FACE! THE BAD FACE IS THE DEFAULT SETTING THAT THEY WILL RETURN TO TIME AND AGAIN.
don’t care if your spath was ever good or had potential SK – keep reminding yourself of the bad that has been shown to you. these people WILL NOT change. i thought about the nastiest thing the spath did to me, the hardest thing – and i kept that in my minds eyes every time i couldn’t get the fake people and the one real person to stick together. over time it worked. i know now that ‘he’ never existed. only the spath playing her games conning and hurting, manipulating people and slandering them.