Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
Hope its not too late to wish all you Moms on LF happy Mothers Day!
Off To N.Zealand early Tuesday morning, and looking forward to being with Daves sisters,and their families, who are nice and NORMAL! {NON spath}.
Praise de Lawd!!
Love also to you Hens, you didnt get the Mom you wanted or needed, Onejoy and Sky,EB, and LL didnt get the parents they needed either.I got 2 spath kids.Sometimes life just SUCKS!!
But hey WE all love each OTHER, how good is that, guys?Lets celebrate THAT!!
Love,
Mama GemXX
Yes, Happy Mother’s Day!
After reading the positive reviews for “Cold Blooded Kindness, it got me to thinking how few genuinely good books there are on Sociopathy/Psychopathy. Stout, Hare, Donna’s book (the latter I haven’t read yet – but when time permits…), etc., are quite first rate and informative. However, my own opinion is that this site itself is BY FAR the best place to come for a truly integral understanding of this personality disorder (i.e., if human evil can be so classified). That, and the people here are significantly more insightful and agreeable than what one is likely to encounter in everyday life.
That being said, I would like to point out two things. First, if you haven’t already read it, Hervey Cleckley’s brilliant “The Mask of Sanity” can now be read in full online. (I’m not good at making links, but you can just google it hopefully.) Of all the books I’ve encountered dealing with psychopathy, I’d say that Cleckley’s work is unequivocally the best. (It’s also a riveting page-turner once the momentum gets going.) He writes a somewhat antiquated, though highly literate style, and his fine sense of language is second to none. But more to the point, he has a remarkable level of insight regarding these people that one is unlikely to find elsewhere. It’s a profound shame that this book is out of print!
Secondly, I notice that many people on this site have favorable views of M. Scott Peck’s “People of the Lie.” Well, I am likewise guilty of having a high opinion of this book. However, I read a shocking article that features an interview with Peck (google, “Gin Cigarettes, women, The Sunday Times.” Again, sorry about having no link!) which has radically changed my opinion of the man. Really, I can’t believe that he was such a scoundrel! Some of you might disagree with that sentiment, but read the article – it’s quite harrowing, I can assure you. He comes across as being very close to being a socio. himself; the best case scenario I’d say is maybe he’s somewhere on the borderline between sociopathy and “malignant narcissism.” (I find the distinction laughable myself, but that’s neither here nor there.)
At any rate, it almost feels like a betrayal to discover that someone like Peck is a thorough fake. Indeed, look at how he treated his poor wife! Absolutely contemptible. And what bestial arrogance! Nevertheless, rather than be disheartened, I would say to Peck fans that there is a profound lesson to be learned here: most significantly is the manner in which the bad guys can abuse and manipulate language in order to gain people’s trust. All his crap about God and spirituality might be true in the abstract, but coming out of his mouth it becomes bile and poison. So be on guard my friends! The bad guys aren’t just the drooling idiots with bad credit and felonious prison records. They are the suave and well-spoken Scott Pecks of the world, who gain the confidence of good people and then systematically dismatle and destroy them over a period of decades. A “prophet” indeed!
Good grief – we really can’t trust anyone, can we?!
Constantine
I really think you’re on to something. Here are the data points.deleted
Superkid, those are excellent insights about your ex spath. Your spath is just like mine, desiring to blend in, his facade was of a working class hero and he dressed in jeans and a t-shirt religiously. always wore a baseball cap. He was very self sufficient and was drawn to hoarders and survivalists.
I don’t agree with the negative assessment of Dr. Peck, though. He was controversial and he was called the anti-christ by some fundamentalists. There are spaths everywhere and they will slander anyone who threatens to expose them. Dr. Peck did that. He wasn’t a spath though because he never tried to hide what he did. Spaths hide their real selves. Sam V could be a sociopath, but in my eyes, he is too narcissistic to hide what he is. So he’s not a sociopath. The videos don’t seem that offensive to me but maybe that’s because I saw my spath go into rages that would make anyone shudder. And it was constant.
The article about Gin and cigs was extremely slanted, here’s a link to a more balanced article. which portrays him as a human with many faults.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200212/m-scott-peck-wrestling-god?page=3
Constantine,
Long time no speak! I have been reading here for a long time but have chosen to remain silent. Until now. Something you said got me off the fence!
“At any rate, it almost feels like a betrayal to discover that someone like Peck is a thorough fake. Indeed, look at how he treated his poor wife! Absolutely contemptible. And what bestial arrogance! Nevertheless, rather than be disheartened, I would say to Peck fans that there is a profound lesson to be learned here: most significantly is the manner in which the bad guys can abuse and manipulate language in order to gain people’s trust. All his crap about God and spirituality might be true in the abstract, but coming out of his mouth it becomes bile and poison. So be on guard my friends! The bad guys aren’t just the drooling idiots with bad credit and felonious prison records. They are the suave and well-spoken Scott Pecks of the world, who gain the confidence of good people and then systematically dismatle and destroy them over a period of decades. A “prophet” indeed!
Good grief ”“ we really can’t trust anyone, can we?!”
I can relate to this because I was involved with someone at one time who said this EXACT SAME THING to me over the decade that we have not been together (we have emailed over the years) even using the same phrases and words. What a coinkidink yah? :). The funny thing is I believe with all of my heart that he was projecting.
I was just telling Donna this week that I initially came to LoveFraud because of an involvement with a spath I had met last year but really it was meant for me to be here because of a psychologist from Ireland that I met online eleven years ago who I believe spathed me worse than my recent spath did! Irish guy was particularly insidious because he was so sweet, gentle, full of flowery language you know the type, moonbeams, soulmates, “i recognized you from another life” carp and the “cosmic” connection bit that Carnes describes in Betrayal Bond.
I am sure he is convinced that I am Lucy and he is Charlie Brown however as I said, I believe he is projecting.
James Taylor had a song “people will take your soul if you let them, but don’t you let them”. I believe he would say I was the baddie however after being on Lovefraud I have come to realize that he was the one who lovebombed me and started with the “you are my soulmate” very quickly and then discarded me after he precipitated a crisis.
Donna’s experience mirrors mine in that my encounter with Irish Guy led me to a spiritual awakening that is very, very profound and very real. I can relate to Liz in Eat, Pray, Love in her letting go of her man issues so she could find the Divine. Gawd it took me TEN YEARS (that I will never get back) but what a JOURNEY folks! It was the only time in my entire life that I wanted to die. I was so depressed..insidiously evil of him to do that to someone who loved him so.
After all these years I am finally free from his grasp (lies, all of it) and like the Jackson Browne song “Birds of St. Mark’s”, it came time for me to call back all the birds I sent over his castle wall and I DO NOT SEND ANY MORE.. YeeHaw!!! But I do send him light and love. I had to forgive for my own sanity…
Thanks for the Mother’s Day wishes Constantine!
Oxy/Joyce there are no words to describe how you help me in your MOST sage advise..more than you can ever know.. You, my friend are truly a MEDICINE WOMAN in all regards. Know that today and give yourself a huge hug for Mother’s Day.
Blessings,
AR
Ox,
I just read this article lol! Interesting perspective when the word altruism is combined with what is known as the pity play.
I never forgot about that in Martha Stout’s book. It is the NUMBER ONE thing to watch for in a psychopath, however, if altruism is in the mix, it would make the psychopath harder to recognize or uncover, particularly if their altruism is widely known by others and publicly “respected”.
To me it looks like the pity play on steroids 🙂
LL
P.S.
Oxy, my son just now (as I was writing to Constantine) gave me Viktor Frankl’s “Man’s Search For Meaning” as a Mother’s Day gift. I told him that is what I wanted. It was your mentioning of this book that made me want to read it. I see that Mr. Frankl dedicated this book to his mother!!
THANK YOU OX!!
I really don’t want to keep posting here, just reading. Everyone is so helpful but I felt awhile back that some were suspecting that I am a “Vankinite” or some other covert Trojan. Maybe my own paranoia from my PTSD but I felt shamed and don’t wish to post regularly. Just had to come out of my hiding place today!! I will keep reading tho because I find tremendous support in everyone’s posts.
First off, let me “attack” skylar’s post 🙂 Sky Sam Vankin IS A PSYCHHOPATH AND SCORES HIGH ON THE PCLR, the man is a monster…..just because they expose themselves doesn’t mean they are not one, they are not ALL sneaky and not all open. Your statement is waaaaay too broad.
Adams’ rib….if someone thought you were a troll, please forgive them, because some people come here soooooo very raw and see psychopaths behind every bush. Sometimes even posters that know us and know we aren’t trolls will strike out in their own pain (had that happen to me yesterday) but while it wasn’t what I wanted, of course, I do understand that this particular poster is in a great deal of pain. I am sorry if I caused her a “trigger” to make her pain worse, but it was unintentional and she I think knows me well enough that it will come round. IN the meantime, I will just back off interacting with her, but not caring about her.
So please, don’t let a misunderstanding come between you and this wonderful community here.
I had forgotten he dedicated it to his mother. That book was such a turning point in my healing and pain. I vote for Dr. Frankl for sainthood! He and Carrie ten Boom, a Dutch woman who wrote “the hiding place” about her time in the Nazi prison camps for hiding Jews in her home during the war. She went on to found camps for healing for these survivors of the concentration camps as the rest of her life’s work.
Those larger and many times more harsh terror camps in many ways are just like the “terror camps” of families and relationships, just larger in nature, but the damage that is done to the person “interred” in the “camp” is the same.
Hope you enjoy the book. Happy mother’s day (((hugs)))
Constatntine,
It is disppointing when someone who holds themselves up as a model of morality and “preaches” morals turns out to be themselves less than “holy.” The priest who molests kids, the deacon who steals from the church, the Nun who embezzles millions from the church coffers to gamble with…the preacher who beats his wife, or verbally abuses his family….we want to hold these people to a higher standard than the rest of humanity.
Of course they are “humans” like the rest of us, some good some not so good, but the fact is that they themselves fall short of the MESSAGE THEY PREACH doesn’t mean the message is necessarily bad.
I have read Peck’s people of the lie and there is some of it I do not agree with entirely, but in the main, I think there is helpful information there in dealing with the psychopaths and abusers of our lives.
The mask of sanity is also a good book and when you realize WHEN it was written, it is AMAZING really.
Superkid, thanks for reminding me where I heard about the Oakley books…I have CRS and couldn’t remember where I heard about them but I am SOOOOOO IMPRESSED BY THIS WOMAN’S WRITING—she gets it!
Interesting too about your X reading the 48 laws of Power, which I think is the “psychopath’s handbook” (see my book review of it) as well as the Art of War.
As Oakley says in “Evil Genes” the information about psychopathy is like widely scattered gems…we just have to search for them and put them together into a “picture” mosaic of what we are trying to learn.