Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Cold-Blooded Kindness: Neuroquirks of a Codependent Killer, or Just Give Me a Shot at Loving You, Dear, and Other Reflections on Helping That Hurts is the tongue-in-cheek title of this book by Barbara Oakley, with a foreword by David Sloan Wilson. It belies the serious research and investigation done by this remarkable, highly educated and acclaimed woman.
Oakley is associate professor of engineering at Oakland University in Michigan, and her work focuses mainly on the complex relationship between neurocircuitry and social behavior. The list of her varied experiences reads like fiction ”¦ she worked for several years as a Russian language translator on Soviet fishing trawlers in the Bearing Sea during the height of the Cold War. She met her husband while working as a radio operator at the South Pole station in Antarctica. She went from private to Regular Army captain in the U.S. military, and is also a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering.
In Cold-Blooded Kindness, along with a project called Pathological Altruism (forthcoming book by the same name this year), Oakley was investigating if altruism could be taken to the extreme and become pathological and harmful.
Some “researchers” have, for what they thought was the “greater good,” slanted their research to show what they believed was an altruistic motive. For example, many people have heard about the “battered woman syndrome,” and how it is now incorporated into laws in many states as a mitigating factor in cases where women wound or kill the men who have battered (or supposedly battered) them. What isn’t known, though, is that the “research” into this “syndrome” was badly flawed. The researcher was a woman who was so intent on doing the “greater good” of protecting abused women, that her altruism caused her to slant her studies, and anyone who pointed out that her research was suspect, was in fact, “blaming the victim,” and therefore, evil.
Oakley points out that she started to seek out a person who appeared to be altruistic to the point that it became harmful, but her own research led her to see the situation differently than she had planned.
She started investigating a Utah woman and artist named Carole Alden, who had “been abused” and had killed that abusive husband, Marty Sessions. But the book really isn’t so much about Alden murdering Sessions, for which she ended up in prison, but about how Carole Alden, though presenting herself as the ultimate altruist (rescuing animals and people), was instead, the ultimate abuser.
The examination of the human brain, and the social interactions of children, and the development of empathy and altruism in children, are explored. Both the social and the genetic aspects of these are gone into in depth.
Oakley explores “co-dependency” and “enabling” behaviors and calls for more actual research into these areas, especially concerning possible sex hormone links and to genetics. She also points out while little, if any, real research has been done on “battered women syndrome,” and it is not accepted in the DSM-IV, it is accepted in many state statutes.
Oakley never comes out and actually says Carole Alden is a psychopath (though the word is used and described in the book itself), but Oakley’s book describes Carole Alden’s behavior relative to the Psychopathic Check List-Revised. It shows that while Carole presented herself to others as a victim of circumstances, and as altruistic to the nth degree, she was, in fact, a controlling, manipulative, using, abusing, pathological liar, who took in dozens, if not hundreds, of stray animals. She cared for them poorly in most cases, but better than she cared for her own children.
It is also possible that Carole is a serial killer, as there are two other deaths of men she was involved with that were “suspicious” in their very nature.
When Oakley was corresponding with Carole Alden, she was convinced by the letters that Carole Alden was the personality she was seeking for her thesis of “altruism gone too far,” and that Carole was indeed the victim of this. Upon meeting Carole though, in prison, Oakley began to see the real situation. When she investigated the family, the crime, the real history of Carole Alden, not just the self-serving tales of how everyone abused her, Oakley began to see the malignancy. Carole changed her story, came to believe her own lies, and slanted all aspects of “truth,” even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Not only is this a history of one pathological woman who murdered one man and possibly more, and who abused and neglected her children, it is about the personality disordered in general who present themselves as victims, when in fact, they are at best—co-victims/co-abusers with their partners.
Oakley is not “blaming” legitimate victim, but seeking to find the common thread in some partners (women and men) who participate to one degree or another with the abuse they endure. She is seeking a way to educate and warn these people so that the abuse can be prevented.
While Carole Alden took in a series of ex-convict men, who were addicts, to “cure” and “fix” them, which appeared to be altruistic in nature, in fact, it was anything but altruistic. It supplied Carole with her “professional victim” and “professional altruistic” persona that she was seeking to establish. What caused this in Carole, when her parents and other siblings were apparently normal and highly functioning members of society?
I tend to underline and highlight important passages in my books as I read, and I finally gave up trying with this book, as the first 100 pages are almost all day-glow yellow.
This is a highly readable book, and I am anxiously awaiting the arrival of one of Oakley’s previous books. I will also be one of the first in line to buy her upcoming one Pathological Altruism. I highly recommend that anyone who is seriously trying to figure out how we (former victims) are alike, and how the fake altruism of some psychopaths works, read this book.
Cold-Blooded Kindness on Amazon.com
Adams,
Truly this is very painful for me. I’ve been NC a long time now.
I wrote him an email when he was subtly trying to push my buttons a couple of months ago. DO NOT EVER CONTACT ME AGAIN OVERT OR COVERT.
I told him that would be my “last” reaction. I meant it.
LL
Superkid,
I understand how you feel. But it won’t last. My ex spath went back to his ex wife. They’re divorced now.
LL
Ox, that passage struck me too! I had the same thoughts about comparing what the C camp survivors went through and my little ol broken heart. It helped me see the pain for what it is regardless of the experience (tho I do not discount those horrifying C camp experiences) in the end the spath pain=trauma.
LL did he just copy and paste? These guys do WHATEVER it takes without any thought just to get the end result: SUPPLY.
Superkid, I feel for you I know that pain very well. My recent spath got me back for another go at a “relationship” and the whole time he was with the woman who is now his current supply-until she finds out he’s the Devil incarnate.
I IMMEDIATELY dumped him when I saw them out together and he tried to get me back. I hear she broke off with him temporarily too. While he was chasing me, she was chasing him and she knows what he is! She knows but does not care.
I am sending you lots of Light and Love. The pain is so intense I know!! It’s TRAUMATIC. Love yourself, be kind to yourself Kid. Take it slow, day by day, build something good within yourself. Focus on YOU because you ARE LOVABLE to a normal partner to a real person who is not disordered. Blessings, my dear!!
Adams
LOL!! “did he copy and paste” LOL!
He doesn’t NEED my supply, he already HAS supply!
He ain’t gettin it from me.
SK, hang in there. A month isn’t very long. Trust me, things will get better, even though it’s slow going. AND very painful. You’ll get through this. I’m so sorry you’re hurting today.
LL
LL
Thank you for your support.
You know, I’m feeling all this pain of him being gone, this huge hole in my heart, and he’s back with his ex. I keep thinking, to make this pain go away I want him back to to fill this gaping hole in my heart. But the reality is, I have all this pain because he was using me. 🙁
Superkid
Dear Superkid,
Losing something (even something that wasn’t real on their part, but we thought it was real) is a LOSS, and loss=grief, which is the process of processing that loss, realizing it is gone, and coming to grips with that loss, moving on to accepting it is gone, but life is still valuable.
Doesn’t matter if the loss is a death or a loss of a job, or a financial loss, or whatever is IMPORTANT TO YOU, it is a LOSS, and loss causes PAIN and grief.
It takes TIME to process that pain and grief, and there are stages of that processing. They do not go 1,2,3, 4, 5 and done, they go 1, 4, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 3, 2, etc etc like a roller coaster.
Some of the stages are denial, bargaining, sadness, anger, and eventually acceptance of the loss and coming to peace with it. The bigger the loss the bigger the pain. You may flip and flop and ride the “roller coaster” of the grief for a while…and BETRAYAL by someone we loved seems to be one of the WORST kinds of losses and the hardest to process.
Our fantasy of what this “relation-shit” was all about is also a big loss. Our love was real, theirs wasn’t. That hurts, devalues us. When they dangle the hook back at us, baited and try to get control back over us, it is soooooo tempting…but we KNOW there is a hook in that bait, we know there is nothing but more pain from associating with them, and so NO CONTACT gives us time to process the fact that the LOSS IS THERE and there is nada we can do about it to change it.
Death of a person we love is difficult but in many ways it is easier than betrayal. At least the person we love is gone and there is no way to even fantasize bringing them back.
Realizing that the relation-shit is GONE or in truth never really was there in a mutual way, only in a one-sided way hits I think at our core self esteem. BUT we can learn to validate ourselves, and validate our own worth. Learn to set boundaries and defend them…..from even those closest to us, our families that we want to be the kind of families we love. ONLY people who value us have the right to be in our lives, only people who treat us well should be in our lives. That may mean that “friends” blood relatives and “lovers” are pushed to the side, but once you process that grief, validate your own worth, life will be a whole lot better. Peaceful, calm, drama free and just “life” but without the abuse, emotional or physical, that had become so painful.
We learn to trust ourselves, and then we can learn to let others EARN our trust by treating us well. We learn to set boundaries about how we allow others to treat us. Life gets pretty pleaceful then. But it takes time, work, and effort…but you can do it. You are stronger than you know. Just keep putting one foot in front of the other. (((hugs))) and my prayers for your peace.
Superkid,
i’ve lost a back tooth. A huge one and i’m carnivorous. Now i’ll need an implant but it’s a false thing and like natural things, nothing.
This is a lost and i’m grieving it very much.
However, to lose a psychopath is to get rid of a big pain in the ass. In the following months you’ll realize you lost nothing valuable.
Eva, Oxy
Tears.
And Thanks.
Superkid
SK,
I so understand how you’re feeling 🙁
But it does get better. Ya know, even though ex spath sent that stupid mother’s day e card, five months ago, I would have jumped at it, shoot one month OUT I might have jumped at it…
But then I would be right back where I was before. And it would be WORSE each time because when we go back, we’ve dropped another boundary, and disrespected ourselves, further allowing more abuse.
This is what’s happening with his wife too, be rest assured of that. She doesn’t have anything that you didn’t have from him COMPLETE AND TOTAL MISERY.
It IS a loss. IT DOES HURT. But after a short time here, you’ll begin to realize that even though you have pangs of what the fantasy was and THINK about going back. when the opportunity presents itself, you won’t if you believe in yourself enough and resist the games. It’s hard though.
I mean, I’ve realized that I’m still addicted to him and the cycles, but thank God not enough that I want to repeat it!
LL
Darwinsmom,
I find your posts compelling and insightful.
This last one particularly.
You say he would ask a question but appear to be distracted when you answered and then show later that he heard every word you said.
At first I thought it showed the ability to multi-task. And it does, but it also shows a deceitful childish trick, someone who never grew up.
I know an N-man who is very, very intelligent and he told me that his teachers would call on him when he was day dreaming in class with the hopes of catching him off guard, but that he would always know the answer. School bored him because he was so smart. I remember being the same way as a kid. Bored in class, I wanted to read my book, not do math, but I knew that the teacher would call on me if she saw me zoning out. So I would “pretend” to be zoning out, she would call on me and I would answer the question, quickly. After that she left me alone. This is a child’s trick that lots of smart little kids do. It’s so childish that we soon outgrow it and never think that way again. It’s a trick that someone who is helpless and under the thumb of an oppressor, might use because he has no other coping skills. Adults don’t need to do that.
I’m sure that your exspath was very intelligent, but that doesn’t stop them from needing to create a facade and paint a picture and plant a seed. This is called “frame-control” by con artists. They present themselves a certain way, so that in the future, you will make assumptions about them that are favorable to them.
Nolarntobecop has a neighbor who told her that she was not someone to be messed with. And she demonstrated her vindictiveness toward a third party so that tobecop would see it. They all do stuff like that. My spath would regale me with stories about his prowess in the courtroom, from the very beginning of our relationshit.
As smart as they are, they feel the need to show themselves to be even smarter, so they create scenarios where they seem to learn things magically. My spath mostly taught himself how to fly a helicopter. But what he didn’t let anyone know was how many lessons he took on the unpowered gyrocopter which was being towed behind a plane. It seems unbelievable that anyone would need to spend so much time and energy creating scenarios to make themselves look good, but since they have no emotion and no existance beyond what they can make others believe, this is very important to them.
They are smart and they can learn quickly, but they can never take it very far, so they need to create a super persona in order to pre-empt any further questioning. Just like I did when I was 10 years old. This could be just another way that they became a victim of their own success. They avert the challenge of growth and learning, through deceit and then they stay childish their entire lives. sad.