It’s amazing how people can have differing opinions of the same book. Last May, the Lovefraud Reader Ox Drover wrote a review of The Gaslight Effect, by Dr. Robin Stern. I am always on the lookout for books that will help readers understand, and recover from, a traumatic entanglement with a sociopath. Because Oxy was so complimentary about The Gaslight Effect, I was anxious to read it, and possibly recommend it to others.
Well, I read the book, but I’m not sure I can recommend it.
Oxy did point out that Dr. Stern never mentions the word, “sociopath,” referring to the perpetrator as the “gaslighter,” and the victim as the “gaslightee.” Although Oxy was willing to look past this omission, I’m not.
First of all, let’s define “gaslighting.” According to Wikipedia:
Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse in which false information is presented to the victim with the intent of making them doubt their own memory and perception. It may simply be the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred, or it could be the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim.
Gaslighting is nasty behavior. The problem I have with this book is that Dr. Stern never, ever mentions, not once, that a person who is gaslighting someone else may be malicious, controlling, and intent on destroying the soul of the victim. She does not mention that the gaslighter may be mentally and emotionally abusing someone else, simply for his or her amusement. She does not say that the gaslighter may be evil.
Here’s how Dr. Stern defines the gaslighting relationship:
The Gaslight Effect results from a relationship between two people: a gaslighter, who needs to be right in order to preserve his own sense of self and his sense of having power in the world; and a gaslightee, who allows the gaslighter to define her sense of reality because she idealizes him and seeks his approval.
This definition makes it seem like the two parties—gaslighter and gaslightee—are equally responsible for the dynamics. I don’t think that’s true. Then, a few pages later, Dr. Stern writes:
Of course, neither of you may be aware of what’s really happening. The gaslighter may genuinely believe every word he tells you or sincerely feel that he’s only saving you from yourself. Remember: He’s being driven by his own needs. Your gaslighter might seem like a strong, powerful man, or he may appear to be an insecure, tantrum-throwing little boy; either way, he feels weak and powerless. To feel powerful and safe, he has to prove that he is right, and he has to get you to agree with him.
Excuse me while I barf. Sociopaths who engage in gaslighting do not feel weak and powerless. They are motivated by dominance and feel totally entitled to do what they want and take what they want, even if it is someone else’s sanity.
Three types of gaslighters
Next, Dr. Stern describes three types of gaslighters—the Glamour Gaslighter, the Good-Guy Gaslighter, and the Intimidator. She spends the most time describing the Glamour Gaslighter:
He lets you know you’re the most wonderful woman in the world, the only one who’s ever understood him, the fairy-tale princess who has magically transformed his life. He’ll transform your life, too, he implies or even promises, he’ll shower you with affection, take you to wonderful places, sweep you off your feet with gifts or intimate confessions or sexual attention of a kind you’ve never known before.
This is a perfect description of a sociopath in full seduction mode. But Dr. Stern doesn’t seem to get it. Instead, she explains that this man is in love with the idea of a relationship. He likes to be a leading man, and is looking for a leading lady to fill her part.
Dr. Stern describes the Good-Guy Gaslighter as someone who needs to appear reasonable and good, but is deeply committed to getting his own way. She spends the least amount of time describing the Intimidator, perhaps because the problems are so obvious—put-downs, yelling, bullying, guilt trips and other types of punishment. In order for a relationship with an Intimidator to be more satisfying, she says, the Intimidator will need to alter his way of relating. Yeah, right.
Stress response
Much of this book describes sample cases of gaslightees trying to understand and cope with gaslighters. I’m sure this helps people realize and identify what is going on in these relationships.
The book, however, falls down when Dr. Stern explains why this behavior happens. She writes, “Gaslighting is a response to stress; people become either gaslighters or gaslightees when they feel threatened.”
Sociopaths don’t engage in gaslighting because they’re stressed. They engage in it because it’s who they are and what they do. And victims don’t become gaslightees because of stress. They are trapped because of a psychopathic bond created by the predator.
Then, Dr. Stern asks the reader to be honest:
Think about the ways in which you aren’t being your best self. Do you set off your gaslighter by being overly critical or demanding? Do you belittle your gaslighter or play on his vulnerabilities? Do you say or do things that you know will make him crazy?
Gee, the people I hear from are walking on eggshells trying not to set the guy off. Until, of course, it gets so bad that they have not choice but to explode.
What’s your view?
In the last chapter, Dr. Stern offers three courses of action for people in these situations: Changing the gaslighting relationship from within, limiting a gaslighting relationship, or leaving the relationship. Yes, these are the three choices, and the book offers suggestions on how to decide what to do.
When considering whether to stay in the relationship and change it from within, Dr. Stern reminds the reader to be compassionate, both for herself and the gaslighter. She writes:
You don’t have to put up with unlimited bad treatment, but if your gaslighter persists in gaslighting you, you can remind yourself that he is also suffering, perhaps even more than you are. After all, he almost certainly grew up in a home where he was gaslighted by someone and couldn’t make it stop—so now he doesn’t understand why you have the power to say no.
Is this true? I am asking an honest question of Lovefraud readers here, and I would appreciate your feedback. Have any of you ever been subjected to gaslighting by someone who was basically a good person with problems? Can any of you attribute gaslighting behavior to the perpetrator’s stress or internal pain? Or, do you feel that gaslighting behavior is due to sociopathic traits?
Afraid to recommend
Overall, I have mixed feelings about this book, The Gaslight Effect. The author does a good job of explaining what the behavior looks like, and the questions victims should ask themselves to determine what is really going on. She offers strategies for coping with the behavior, including leaving the relationship.
But Dr. Stern seems to come from that school of therapy that believes both parties contribute equally to relationship problems. Throughout the entire book, I kept waiting for the author to warn the reader that some gaslighters have dangerous, pathological personality disorders, and they should run, not walk, for the nearest exit. The warning never came.
Therefore, I’m afraid to recommend the book, because it may encourage people to stay and try to work things out with an abuser. And the longer people stay in a gaslighting relationship, the more power they lose, and the harder it is to finally leave.
When I read the Gaslight book, what stood out was this was another book where the author understood the concept but didn’t truly understand the perpetrator (too much sympathy for the perpetrator???).
The best book I have (other than Donna’s) where the author “got it” is Marie-France Hirigoyen, “Stalking the Soul”.
The other good book is by Lundy Bancroft, “Why Does he DO That?” (but it doesn’t go far enough). The books by M.A. Sandra L. Brown have a grain of explanation which is enough for newly discarded victims but has far far to go for the reality needed for victims to recover, similar to “The Gaslight Effect” which is missing the real substance of these perpertrators.
Dancing….
“too much empathy” IS a problem. TOO much of anything is a problem.
Women who are compassionate, but WISE, EDUCATED to not trust unconditionally…and STRONG and CONFIDENT….are less likely to attract a con man….
I don’t “blame” myself…but I do take responsibility for everything I do in my life. Had I been smarter…I would have listened to my “hunches” (instincts) and I would have checked up on these guys who I thought were lying to me….
I actually did years ago…when I was only 30. I didn’t trust the guy I was engaged to. I was SMART enough to check up on him..where he was….etc. I caught him redhanded…on several things and RAN!!!
Somehow, as I got older…and I had my children…I lost some confidence in myself….and “ignored” my hunches and allowwed him to continue to lie…and manipulate me. It was after 5 yrs of being alone without a man. I was “desparate and vulnerable”.
So I was NOT “healthy” emotionally, in my opinion.
Thats why I closed my eyes to the truth …he was conning me.
tobehappy while I do agree that Psychopaths WILL take advantage of people who have MORE vulnerabilities, I just mean to say their pool of prey isn’t exclusive to people who have grown up in abusive homes or come from a place of abuse. Let’s face it, Psychopaths take advantage of the HEALTHY inclination in people to love unconditionally and be in a relationship. Some people are hard nosed by nature, as we’re all different, and possibly could be less vulnerable to a Psychopaths lovebombing but no one is immune if they aren’t aware of Psychopathy. Your example was anecdotal but there are likely dozens upon dozens of women who are like her, yet have been conned.
There really is no “formula” IMHO. Psychopaths get a thrill out of being able to render a once healthy, strong, confident, independent woman to a cowering, emotional ball on the floor. They love a “challenge”. This is based on research of many accounts, see Women Who Love Psychopaths by Sandra Brown MA.
There was no “defect” in me that made me vulnerable to a Psychopath- i’ve been involved with TWO ( one male, one female )… they just knew what to MIRROR to hook me.
WRONG PLACE, WRONG TIME. That’s all there is to it. The traits of victims of sociopaths runs all over the map, from all different backgrounds… the one thing that unites all is HIGH EMPATHY.
http://www.lovefraud.com/blog/2010/12/06/blame-the-victim-fallacies/
There are a lot of interesting comments in that post ( the article written by Donna is also important to read ) *A lot* of the members who posted described themselves as healthy, confident women PRIOR to the sociopath. STRONG even. It is dangerous to think one is immune just because one “walks differently” and thus projects an image of competence. Thats akin to chickens bending their head differently expecting that if they do then it’ll rain.
From the LF link i posted, I quote :
“Consider the research by Dr. Liane Leedom on women who were targeted by psychopaths. She found that they have three traits in common:
* Extraverts. The women are outgoing, competitive, strong-willed and liked excitement. Sometimes they are free-spirited.
* Cooperative. They are high in empathy, tolerance and compassion. They value getting along with others, and are willing to compromise their own interests for the larger picture.
* Invested in relationships. They like being around people. They are sentimental and focus on special moments.
“
I agree with the “high empathy”…but I still feel that there is a ‘weakness’…(whether its lack of confidence, fear of being alone…not educated enough about “people”….or inexperience with relationships…..) or something in our “subconscious” that tells us we aren’t good enough…….for those who have been abused by a monster.
Look at Sandra Bullock. She missed all of the “red flags” but got involved with him anyway!!! Lack of education. His past was a good indication of who he really IS. Need I say more.
I just refuse to call myself a ‘victim’…even if I was conned and lied to. I was too weak to get involved with any man at the time…too trusting….too little confidence in myself ….and in “deniel” because I just wanted someone to love me so badly….(desparate)
I just believe in taking responsibility for our own actions.
Sure, if I’m walking home alone at night…and get attacked…it isn’t MY fault that there are monsters out there. But, had I been educated, and smarter…I wouldn’t be walking at night alone!!!
dancing: Yes, and these are positive traits.
TB, tobe and dancingnancies, Happy new year!
tobehappy the thing is that psychopaths target victims from all walks of life and all experiences.
Donna Andersen herself says in the article :
” *
Dr. Leedom’s research relates to women. But I’ve heard from many Lovefraud readers, both men and women, who were successful, take-charge individuals—until they met the psychopath.
Personally, I don’t think anyone who watched me walk down the street would tag me as timid or vulnerable. I’m an athlete, and my stride is confident. But I was victimized by a psychopath, who took $227,000 from me, and cheated on me incessantly. And the guy started setting his hooks via e-mail, before he ever saw me walk.
Maybe projecting dominance would work to avoid muggers. But it’s not going to stop victimization by a card-carrying psychopath intent on finding a resourceful new supply. ”
Considering there are many stories on Lovefraud where these women were at the prime of their lives, strong, energetic, confident- i think it’s impossible to ignore this fact.
You yourself may FEEL that he took advantage of the vulnerabilities in your life at the time- he may as very well HAVE! But not in all cases, with ALL people. That’s my point.
The “weakness” is IMHO being unaware that there exist out there people who completely LACK empathy. The weakness is not knowing Psychopaths exist.
I don’t mean to be so relentless in this assertion but I think it’s a huge misconception that I would like to bring awareness to whenever I can
Happy new year one step! 😀 Make it a great one…
It’s good to be educated, no doubt. But, we didn’t have this info available before. That’s why LF and books exist now.
We got conned in the beginning, when they were very different acting people.