Back in May and June, the media blitz for The Psychopath Test, by Jon Ronson, was in full swing. I finally got around to reading the book.
Ronson is a British journalist who apparently specializes in writing about nut cases. He wrote The Men Who Stare at Goats, which was made into a movie starring George Clooney and Jeff Bridges. He has a BBC radio show that, according to the New York Times book review, is considered comedy. But he’s famous, and people like him. I guess I wish that he’d used his clout and notoriety to do some good with this book.
Its full title is The Psychopath Test—A journey through the madness industry. The title is accurate. The book is essentially a history of how the disorder was identified and how the study and treatment of psychopathy evolved, with the stories of a few psychopaths included, most of them killers.
Ronson makes the most important point of the book almost in passing. He describes several meeting with Bob Hare, the respected psychopathy researcher who created “the psychopath test” that gives the book its title (the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, or PCL-R). Ronson includes a scene in which he is in the U.K., driving Hare to the airport.
Hare says that he wishes he hadn’t spent all his time studying psychopaths in prison—he should have also studied them at the stock exchanges. (I’ve heard Hare make similar statements.) Ronson writes:
“But surely stock-market psychopaths can’t be as bad as serial-killer psychopaths,” I said.
“Serial killers ruin families.” Bob shrugged. “Corporate and political and religious psychopaths ruin economies. They ruin societies.”
This—Bob was saying—was the straightforward solution to the greatest mystery of all: Why is the world so unfair? Why all that savage economic injustice, those brutal wars, the everyday corporate cruelty? The answer: psychopaths ”¦ We aren’t all good people just trying to do good. Some of us are psychopaths. And psychopaths are to blame for this brutal, misshapen society. They’re the jagged rocks thrown into the still pond.
I thoroughly believe that psychopaths are responsible for most of the human-caused pain in society. Ronson actually came out and said it. But unfortunately, he didn’t continue to make the case. After the statement on page 112 of the book, he never returned to the thought.
One other part of the book was enlightening. Ronson spends a few pages discussing the evolution of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), now in its fourth edition, with the fifth edition underway. On page 239, he explains why the mental health field has not agreed on what to call this disorder—psychopathy, sociopathy, antisocial personality disorder, whatever. He writes what he learned from Robert Spitzer, a psychiatrist who became editor of the third edition of the DSM:
I’d always wondered why there had been no mention of psychopaths in the DSM. It turned out, Spitzer told me, that there had indeed been a backstage schism—between Bob Hare and a sociologist named Lee Robins. She believed clinicians couldn’t reliably measure personality traits like empathy. She proposed dropping them from the DSM checklist and going only for overt symptoms. Bob vehemently disagreed, but the DSM committee sided with Lee Robins, and Psychopathy was abandoned for Antisocial Personality Disorder.
So there it is—the beginning of the dispute about naming the disorder and how to diagnose it, which has only kept the general public confused.
You might be entertained by this book—Ronson’s writing style is engaging, and the historical background is interesting. But if you’ve had a close encounter with your very own psychopath, you aren’t going to learn anything to help in your recovery.
ogd it. again with the NPD w/spath tendencies. never do what they say. always drama and hissy fit. sooo predictable.
Rock this town, let’s rock this town tonight. Rock rock rock til the broad day light. Yes, i’m gonna rock rock, rock it all night long…. (jiggling my wobbly bits) whew. (end with bump and grind… and rock is what what… I… do. ROCK! T.Q. T.Q very much….
While agreeing Ronson’s book missed an opportunity to go more in-depth about Hare’s insights regarding ‘paths in our society and the inevitable ‘trail of tears’ left behind, Ronson’s less clinical definition of the PCL-R traits were very helpful for me. Having struggled with trying to identify my ex’s conduct as it relates to the Checklist, Ronson’s lay explanations for items such as “Irresponsible” helped me grasp Hare’s intent and confirmed my suspicions my ex is a psychopath. I’m very careful not to label… I am not a professional in the field of mental health.
It’s a shame no one interviewed Hare for the fabulous 2010 documentary, “Inside Job.” His analysis of the key players in our financial meltdown would have been a wonderful edition to the movie. Irresponsible, charming and superficial, lies with ease, no compassion or empathy, sense of entitlement, etc. Having had to deal with my ex for more than three years in numerous and frivolous court battles, it is my unprofessional opinion many attorney’s and judges, (AKA attorneys) have some degree of this personality disorder. Circus’ comment many ‘paths enjoy philosophy, and thus, logic is right on.
Few professionals are better trained at using logic than lawyers. Hell with the facts—it’s how you fashion your argument which wins or loses a case in our court system — or in Congress (more attorneys). Using logic, along with a tad bit of corruption, unethical conduct and outright lies — yet another trait 😉 — is seemingly the only way to ‘win’ in this world. Sad state of affairs.
Occupy the whole damn country! Time to stop the insanity.
Peace and Justice, Jenni
Unfuck the world~!
The more I learn about P/N/S/A the more I am coming to the conclusion that this personality (disorder) is a SURVIVAL STRATEGY.
As an example . . there are sharks and dolphins. Sharks eat people,
the dolphins don’t. We can’t say that the sharks have a disorder. Through years of evolution, this is how they evolved.
I believe some humans evolved by being honest, loving, caring, and others evolved by cheating, lying, and having no compassion. This is what worked for them.
So if you’re an honest, loving, and compassionate person, the only power you have against the “sharks”, is to “run like hell and don’t look back”.
“Sharks” can’t/won’t change, and WE can’t/won’t change.
It is a part of our DNA created & refined through generations of surviving “a la Darwin”.
And further . . (I hate to say it) . . . IMHO P/N/S/A it is NOT a disorder . . . any more than killer sharks, pit bulls, or tarantulas have a disorder.
Thank you, Sarah! How insightful. I don’t agree with you entirely, but I like that you’re not calling them evil, vile monsters and suggesting we kill and torment them. I do think psychopathy and ASPD especially are disorders. Low-anxious psychopathy might be a step in evolution, considering a lot of successful psychopaths end up in board rooms. But, in the end, it is detrimental to society as a whole. So, regardless of whether or not it’s a step in evolution or a disorder, we should at least try to change their behaviour. Yeah, they can’t grow a conscience or develop empathy. They weren’t born that way. But there’s no reason they can’t abide by our rules and still seek jobs that fit their personality. And there’s no reason they can’t seek out “partners” who are only interested in sex like they are. Hare had a similar idea for treatment for psychopaths, as did Doren. If only more people knew about these treatments, it would spare the rest of us a lot of pain, instead of writing them off as monsters and saying they can’t be helped and that we should just kill them all. That’s never going to happen… Because it isn’t moral. Sad that I would have to remind people that killing someone isn’t moral…
I do think antisocials and high-anxious psychopaths are disordered, because they don’t usually like who they are and they experience a lot of suffering themselves. And those conditions seem to be learned (nurture, not nature), rather than a genetic trait.
I agree with ya Sarah, that is why we call them predator’s….survival of the fittest, eat or be eaten, they will rule the world someday…..
The meek shall inherit the earth? BS….
I dont want to be anything like them, but I carry a big ass stick and look out for myself more so than I used to.
Hens;
At least we can take humor in watching a whole camp of sociopaths implode over the “question” of Mormonism!
Hens:
Me, too!!! I don’t mess with people’s BS anymore.
Sarah,
you are right that psychopathy is a survival strategy – for a child or other powerless people. Emotional manipulations are what children do as infants to get taken care of: charm, pity and rage.
The spath is simply an emotionally arrested human being, someone who did NOT evolve.
Human beings are different than most animals because we are extremely adaptable. We don’t just evolve as a species, we evolve as individuals as we progress toward adulthood. The spath is someone who stops evolving in the emotional centers of the brain. They cannot adapt themselves to society so they desperately try to manipulate others to adapt to them. That is what worked for them as infants and that is the strategy that they will continue to use. Your analogy of them as sharks is also correct, in that the shark is a species that has not evolved in hundreds of thousands of years. It’s still the same as it was and it’s still a vicious predator.
Hi Circus,
Scientific research is leaning towards P/S/N/A as well as other personality characteristics (i.e., shyness & agressiveness etc) being INHERITED.
That is also my personal experience. i.e., That these personality characteristics are inherited . . Just as physical characteristics such as colored blindness, height, eye color, and baldness.
PS. My psychopathic son is a clone of his father & his father’s mother…
however, I brought him up (almost exclusively). He didn’t learn compassion, love, kindness from me & my parents. He is genetically aggressive, a bully, a liar, mean spirited and very exploitative in the same way as his genetic father (with whom he had minimal contact). The similarities are BEYOND freaky.
Tiny Monarch butterflies, fly 3,000 miles to a location, where it had NEVER BEEN OR SEEN. Everybody agrees that, “that is genetic”! It wasn’t taught, told, or given directions. It is the genius, magic, and awesomeness of nature (i.e. genetics).