Reviewed by Joyce Alexander, RNP (Retired)
I bought The Psychopath Test—A Journey Through the Madness Industry, by John Ronson, based mainly on the title. Jon Ronson is a journalist and author of two previous books that were widely accepted. A movie was made about one of them, The Men Who Stare at Goats, starring George Clooney. The first couple of chapters of this book weren’t all that interesting to me, but before long I was hooked into the story he was writing.
Mr. Ronson looks at the “madness industry” from an outsider’s point of view. He actually took training from Dr. Robert “Bob” Hare in how to use the Psychopathic Check List-Revised to spot a psychopath. Ronson went a few steps further, though, in his learning about commercial psychiatry, and the industry that has grown up around the DSM II-V, defining what is and what is not “madness.”
Dr. Robert Hare, as we know, was the developer of the PCL-R, which is similar to the “cook book” diagnostic manual for psychiatry (DSM), with check lists of symptoms for definite diagnostic criteria to define and “diagnose” what is normal behavior and what is not. There were some interesting discussions documented between Ronson and Dr. Hare about the validity of the PCL-R and where the “cut off score” should be.
Ronson gave the history of the development of the DSM, which has expanded with numerous added “disorders” and “mental illnesses” with each new edition and revision, to where it is now nearly a thousand pages. Though it is intended for mental health professionals, the DSM IV sold many, many more copies, mostly to laypeople, than there are mental health professionals in the world.
Ronson set out to interview and evaluate several people who were “notorious” criminals or well known high-flying and important business leaders and politicians in several countries to see how they fared when compared to the PCL-R. He also was able to visit the inside of the “hospitals” in the UK where diagnosed psychopathic criminals are held, literally “forever,” while they are being “treated” for their psychopathy after their criminal sentences are served out.
Ronson’s faith in the diagnostic ability of the mental health professionals was not strengthened when he studied the famous experiment by Dr. David Rosenhan and several others in the 1970s, who went to several mental hospitals and reported to the physicians there that they “heard voices” in their heads. This was the only abnormal symptom (or lie) that they presented to the professionals. They were admitted to the hospitals, where they never again acted “crazy” or lied to the staff. They behaved entirely normally. It was almost two months before they could “get out” by admitting that they were crazy and needed help. “There was only one way out. They had to agree with the psychiatrists that they were insane and then pretend to get better.”
Rosenhan’s experiment, once published, caused pandemonium in the mental health profession. One hospital challenged him to send in more fakes. Rosehan agreed. The hospital claimed it found 41 fakes the first month. The down side of their sleuthing, though, was that Rosenhan hadn’t sent any fakes to their hospital.
While no branch of medicine is totally objective, (they don’t call it the “practice” of medicine for nothing!) by its very nature, psychiatry is somewhat more subjective (in the eye of the beholder) than physical medicine. Ronson’s book does make the point, though, that putting labels on every behavior imaginable isn’t the answer to improving the practice, and neither is a pill for every disorder.
Psychiatry and pharmacology have both made vast improvements in the lives of many people who are truly mentally ill, but with poor diagnosis and poor medication, some great horrors have also been accomplished as well. Not every bad behavior means a person is psychopathic and not every bouncy kid is ADHD or bi-polar at age three. Ronson does make the point that mental health is a located on a continuum. No one is 100% mentally “healthy,” any more than no one is 100% physically “healthy.”
On the whole, I enjoyed the book, and he makes some great cases and writes in an interesting manner. The only criticism for his writing are the first couple of chapters “The Missing Part of the Puzzle Revealed—”and I’m not quite sure why they were included in this otherwise very interesting book. Maybe somehow I missed his sense of humor, but the rest of the book made up for the start I didn’t get.
I would recommend this book to anyone wanting to learn about abnormal versus normal psychology, and a bit about the “industry” that has grown up around “madness.”
The Psychopath Test on Amazon.com.
BBE:
Interesting about the family resemblance. I know what you mean. I think we all tend to think about how a partner will fit in with our families should we get serious about them. I have always gotten along with the families of those I have been involved with. I have been divorced almost 20 years and I still keep in touch with my former mother in law. She still loves me. I think the X spath also could see me in his family. He told me he could see himself with me and to me that meant he could also see introducing me to his family. He did tell me that his mom has never liked his wife…they have never gotten along. And he told me that my personality is the total opposite of his wife’s personality. So anyway, I understand what you are saying.
Louise;
There are a lot of issues on my mother’s side of the family: alcohol and drug abuse, sexual abuse to name a few. Actually, my brother and I, both adopted, are quite tame by our cousin’s standards and my mother is not co-dependent like her younger sister or overbearing like her older one. My uncle on her side was an alcoholic and has passed…
Thus, you can see why I might be attracted to somebody with family issues and I would probably be intimidated by somebody coming from a full functional family…
BBE:
Wow, I can TOTALLY relate! I would also feel inadequate around someone who I thought had a perfect family. I haven’t found anyone yet though who has a perfect family or even a functional one…haha! Seems as if we are all very flawed.
Louise;
Or we just stay away from those who are not!
BBE:
Yeah, good point!!
Even the one externally functional x-bf, meaning the career guy, was a sex addict fond of rest rooms and the internet. He is now merely a workaholic. Classic too, three hours total commute each day plus 10 hour days…
BBE:
Yep, I have found that “addicts” of any kind will just replace one addiction with another. So if he was a sex addict, now he replaced it with work. I have seen it a lot. It looks like my X spath has many addictions…alcohol, sex and work. Geez.
Well, I know the x-spath is still addicted to porn as last week in a moment of weakness I saw he had logged into xtube and another porn site that I think is his profile.
At least I am at the gym.
BBE:
Hmmmm, well yeah, I’d rather be addicted to exercise than porn! 🙂
I’ve always been a rescuer, but I don’t feel so much that way now. Having been raised in a home with a VERY narcissistic, demanding, mentally/physically abusive brother [he was two decades older than me], I felt very much like the underdog. My father was a pharmacist who held many other business interests, so he was gone most of the time. My brother took on his role and lorded over me with tyranny. So for me, rescuing animals and burying the dead ones in my little animal cemetery gave me comfort in knowing SOMEBODY cared for these little critters. I felt like one of them. I think for me, that’s what drew me to the P’s I married. They both had very abusive fathers [and they did, I’ve witnessed it firsthand] and passive mothers, like I had. We were kindred spirits. We bonded. But…..I had sympathy, empathy and they had the P genes that made them bitter, angry and vengeful. We went two separate ways. I’ve heard it said, hard times either make you right or wrong, kind or hard. Time has marched on for me and I’ve come to understand that if a person is hard, no matter what their past; they are reacting with anger, bitterness and resentment. I no longer waste my time trying to turn that person into a kind individual. I have found a pretty solid medium on which to base my feelings/time/effort. Experience has done this for me. So, in many ways, I have come to understand and appreciate what I have learned from adversity. I appreciate my life. I believe that people who have it too easy in life grow dissatisfied, bored and ungrateful. I would not be surprised to know that is many times what lies at the root of drug/alcohol addiction, suicide etc. Rather than all being too unbearable, it’s too easy.
Oxy; I just ordered this book, thanks!