Psychopaths tend to be sexually promiscuous. They often have numerous short term romantic relationships and indiscriminant sexual encounters throughout their lives. Further, they commonly engage carelessly and recklessly, without regard for consequences. This, unfortunately, often leaves trails of children behind in their wakes.
Psychopaths do not make good parents. They may be able to create the children, but do not have the ability to effectively parent. Frequently, they fail to properly provide for these children in most ways, as they are unusually focused on themselves, their own wants and needs, and often driven to act in anger and revenge. This is true, independent of whether or not they are involved with the other parent. (Although, it is worth mentioning that it may not seem as such in cases where they are still “wearing their masks.”)
They view their children as possessions or objects. The children are not protected by the loving bonds of parenthood, because psychopaths are not capable of genuine, unconditional love. No healthy emotional bonds exist either. Parenthood takes on a whole new meaning when a psychopathic parent is involved and it is not positive. While relationships may occur, and in some cases, may even span the course of lifetimes, they are always dysfunctional and potentially dangerous. This harm can be perpetrated in many ways. Acknowledging this as fact is important. Yet, this truth is often misunderstood by many involved.
The children of psychopaths are often as confused as the rest of the population regarding the behaviors. Some definitely achieve an awareness of the emotional disconnects and rage, even at very young ages, and have great fear, depending on what they have endured. This group may not want to interact with the parent. Others understand less, especially ones who were abandoned early in life and are less familiar with the actual traits and behaviors of the psychopathic parent. All are at risk, however, even as adults.
Some children (adult or otherwise) may recognize that things are “off,” but don’t know what to do with the information, are unable to articulate it, or choose to minimize the strange behaviors. Others may seek further approval from the parent, yearning for love and attention. Young children, who do not have other, outside life experiences to compare, may find the behaviors disturbing, but “normal,” as the psychopathic parent may be all they know.
Regardless, there is a lot occurring that is incredibly dysfunctional when a psychopathic parent is involved. They may operate very differently with various family members, but all of their behaviors are jaded by their own interests and agendas, not those of the children.
Psychopathic parents commonly play favorites with their children. They position them, as they would anyone or anything else. Their motives may be somewhat complex or very basic, but the reasons are not related to the care and well being of their offspring – ever. Also, a child’s spot in this twisted hierarchy is not guaranteed, and may whimsically change, depending on how “satisfied” the psychopathic parent is with the child at any given moment. Security, which plays a critical role in healthy child development, is non-existent.
An example may look something like this, remembering that not all will look the same; a “golden child” or children, as well as a “target child” or children. Additionally, there may be others (who may be less useful to the psychopath) who tend to be more or less forgotten about. They may feel that there is little to gain from interactions with these children. In some cases, it is possible that the psychopaths recognize their similarly afflicted children, and distance themselves. Could this be a “protective” measure, in an attempt to perpetuate “their kind?” Could it be that they are less fun to manipulate and harm or irritate? There are many theories and various schools of thought on why this is, some of with which I agree, others which I do not. In this article, I will focus on first two categories.
What does all of this mean to the children? Regardless of position, the answer is usually distress and some type of harm; physical, emotional, psychological, or otherwise. None of these positions is desirable for any child of any age.
The target child or children
A child on the receiving end of a psychopathic parent’s wrath is in a precarious place. This child or group of children may be targeted for a multitude of reasons.
In many cases, the targeted children are psychologically quite normal and require discrediting by the psychopath. They may have the psychopath figured out. Or, they may be the children of the parent that the psychopath harbors the most hatred for or resentment toward. In some cases, these children bear the brunt of the psychopath’s anger and wild, abusive, neglectful, and manipulative behaviors.
Regardless of age, this group is lied to and about. The psychopathic parent also tends to blame them and/or their normal parent for almost everything that is wrong in the psychopathic parent’s life. This may cause guilt or anger in the target child, depending on the circumstances.
In essence, the psychopathic parent sees this group as a significant liability and/or objects of sadistic pleasure. These children are also the ones who tend to become the pawns in the psychopathic parent’s games of “payback” with the non-psychopathic parent. Although, a confusing, dangerous, and potentially frustrating place for a child to be, it’s relatively simple to understand, once alerted to the behaviors.
The golden child or children
The plight of the “golden child” is much more complex. It’s a larger scale manipulation because the psychopath must remain undercover. Naturally, the position of “golden child” has to do with the psychopath, not the child, and what they feel the child has to offer them. The golden child may fall anywhere in the birth and relationship order.
The psychopaths may recognize that they need to have at least one child on their side, as many others may be estranged. Even psychopaths come realize their mortality (sort of) and may desire some type of “insurance” that they will always have at least one relation at their beck and call, for either physical or financial support as they age. It is also possible that they need a “partner in crime,” or “cover” in order to appear normal. Perhaps they need a “buddy.” The reasons vary. One thing that does not change, however, is that their “caring” and positive affect is not genuine. Conversely, it is harmful.
“Golden children” are sometimes gullible in many respects, which may be what influenced the psychopaths’ selections in the first place. The children are not at fault for this. This group typically believes that the parent cares for them. They are easy targets, as they are often ones who did not grow up in frequent, direct contact with the psychopathic parent. Or, they did and are under their manipulative influences.
In cases where psychopaths are attempting to “mend” relationships, that they claim were estranged due to the actions of an outside force, they will only try this with children they know fail to understand the affliction. If the child’s personality is forgiving and he or she does not seek greater understanding, taking most behaviors at face value and accepting excuses, the child will fall, hook, line, and sinker.
Yet somewhere, the child probably has or had an idea of the parent’s true nature. They choose to overlook what they know. They want to believe that they are important to this parent, so they cast reality aside. Additionally, it is important to remember that psychopaths “lovebomb” their children too. This feels good and makes the child feel special, especially if they are held in comparison to the targets.
If the child hears and gets what he wants from the parent, the child will invest in the “relationship.” The child’s investment will be genuine, but the psychopath’s never will be. When the children are older and have fewer interactions with this parent, the psychopath’s work is considerably easier. Superficial relations are easier to maintain.
If other disordered individuals or enablers surround the psychopathic parent and fuel their assertions, the expectation should be that the manipulations will occur at a greater rate or to a pronounced degree. Sadly, the child or children may not understand, which will eventually lead to even greater disappointment and confusion.
Significant dissonance will occur when the words and the actions of the parent really don’t match. In time, the child will hopefully come to understand what he already knew. With no ability to maintain rewarding relationships, just simply knowing what to do, say, or offer the child materially, will not mask the emotional disconnection. Even when “emotions” are displayed, the normal child should eventually piece the problems together and acknowledge the reality.
At that point, he or she may ask the same questions and search for the same answers as every other person the psychopath has drawn close. It is , indeed, an unfortunate position to be in.
Which is worse?
Neither is good. However, although the target children may wish that things were completely different, at least members of this group know where they stand. They have the ability to rectify what is and move forward in a healthy fashion.
The golden children will have to live and learn, which will, inevitably, come to take its toll. They cannot fill the empty places, because they cannot define what the voids are or why they exist. The pedestal can be a very lonely place, when the motives for their placement are sinister. With the words that mean nothing, the lies and blame regarding the decent, and the feigned affect void of meaning, the golden children truly are left chasing ghosts.
Children of psychopathy have obstacles to overcome regardless of the scenario. Again, education and awareness at all levels – mental health, legal, and within the families themselves -will be what helps to decide the outcomes of those in this position.
Look for future information on children of psychopathy. Dr. Liane Leedom, M.D. and I have two research articles, currently in press, which will continue to shed light on this very important topic. We are both excited to begin sharing our findings shortly.
Sunflower, I had a wonderful step father, but I realize he also was an enabler…but he DID nurture me and give me things I got no where else.
I know that ONE person in a child’s life can make the difference in how that child turns out. I am glad that you had that in your great grandmother. I also had a grandfather that was nurturing as well. So I was fortunate to have two in my life.
Keep that love alive in your heart and mind even if the person is gone, remember the kind words that they spoke to you and the wisdom that they imparted.
Sunflower, sometimes, adult children need to “divorce” their DNA donors, for whatever reason. Many don’t do this because of Wills and financial issues, but most don’t realize that “blood relatives” is not a MANDATE to be a lifetime supply. “Blood relatives” refers to a biological connection, only.
I know of very strong and resolved people who were abused and devalued by their parents and “started over” only to have one (or, both) parent(s) contact them when their health begins to fail or they experience some dire trauma. They only reach out to their estranged offspring to invoke the “sense of obligation” that they expect their offspring to feel: TAKE CARE OF ME. Those strong and resolved people simply responded with, “I’m sorry, but I cannot help you,” and shut the door and never looked back.
Yes, this is a drastic and paiinful step for most people. The “supply offspring” were raised with very strong shame-cores and they worked their ways out of those false beliefs. They knew that allowing that toxicity back into their lives would result in further harm, and they weren’t willing to risk more damage over some “sense of duty.”
IMHO, severing ties with ALL toxic individuals is a personal imperative, whether they fit the profile of a socipath, or not. Toxic is toxic – no amount of good intentions is going to alter that dynamic.
So….having typed all of that, you’re much more valuable than the opinion of your egg-donor.
Brightest blessings
Sunflower,
Sounds like we have pretty similar history’s.
The first step is learning to say “NO”.
We are so eager to please, we work so hard to live up to unrealistic expectations and put all our energies into gaining acceptance. Saying “yes” continually to whatever outrageous tasks and requests are put to us is second nature.
Changing this is a good step in the right direction.
She was the only childhood I ever had and I’m so greatful I had her in my life.
There’s much needed and far too little information about how a child of a P develops.
Can a true P smell the difference on a bred supplier and just the casual victim? Just a thought…
There is a book called I think “the disease to please” or something along that line (CRS I cant remember stuff) LOL anyway, there are several good books on why we are “people pleasers” and I suggest you get some (more than one) and read them, You will see yourself in them and realize that there IS a void there for needing love and the psychopaths can sense that in us and they hone on in to it like a lion picks out the easier victim from a herd of 1,000 antelopes.
They “love bomb” us and we fall for it….I just fell for one a few weeks ago…just cost me some money and some tears, mostly mad at myself but the thing is that there ARE LESSONS there and we must LEARN THEM OR REPEAT THEM. That is our only choice. Learn or repeat.
Heather,
lol, of course I didn’t mean we are all freaks. The spaths don’t always succeed in turning their kids into spaths, but they do try.
I’ve met a couple of spathy guys who have no kids and are not married. But what they expressed to me is that they take GREAT interest in their nephews, the sons of their sisters (whom they hate, BTW). These guys are misogynists and they want to make sure that they spread that attitude around to other men. One of them even expressed to me, “guys should stick together” he was referring to sticking together against women.
But anyway, spaths want to slime everyone and turn us all into them. So it isn’t surprising that they would focus on the most vulnerable, the children.
Sunflower,
yes, they can tell the difference between someone who is emotionally reactive and someone who is “boring”. My spath expressed that my good sister was “boring” and that her son “has no ambition”, even though the young man got through a private university mostly on scholarships, landed a 50 grand a year job straight out of college, paid off the small loans in 1 year, bought his own condo the next year and spends all his time reading books that will better him. LOL!
What he meant is that my nephew has no “hooks”. He will often test for hooks by showing people his latest “invention” that will make millions! moron.
What a great article! Got me thinking…
Oxy&Skylar: read all your insightful input! I hope one person in a child’s life can make a difference, glad you had your step father. Sister in law is trying very hard to turn her kid to be like her. “They want to slime everyone.” My niece is a normal child, of course she is emotionally reactive. She will turn 7 the end of this month. Things are not getting any better for her.
SIL has invited her elderly family relative (74 year old male) to stay with them for a few days. This man has a shady past, my mom says he has abused young girls in the past in a different country, never got reported. My niece is currently being coached by her mom to be physically affectionate with this man. I am more inclined to believe he is a child predator, why else would SIL invite him, she is so excited and can’t wait for her daughter to spend time with him. In the meantime SIL is not very nice to her own parents (who love their grandchild, my niece), or her brothers! She isolates the kid from every family member, why should my niece be spending time with this man, why is that now important to SIL? My brother and mom are afraid to stop this guest from visiting, they are afraid to say anything to SIL, they don’t believe much harm will come out of it. My brother told me “he is too old to harm any child now… if those rumors were true in the first place.”
I am not sure, I do not want to falsely accuse anybody, but the way SIL seems overly eager does make me want to suspect that some evil intentions are in place. I have learned from this site spaths recognize their own kind and use each other to inflict harm. So I am worried for my niece’s safety, is there anything I can tell my niece? Is there a subtle way to give my niece a message, my SIL told my brother to keep this elderly guy’s past a secret… So I am not supposed to know about this.
I understand that spaths do not want to be questioned, confronted, lectured to, but I can only be quiet for so long. I have this urge to talk to her, tell her off. I have no support since my mom and brother are not willing to change anything, but still… Is being quiet to maintain my privileges to visit their home and maintain contact with my niece the right thing to do? Should I be more proactive and have a talk with SIL no matter what happens? It is really hard to stay quiet, especially when recently SIL beat up on her kid for scoring 60% on a test, and called her a retard. My mom witnessed this, went to her room and shut the door, told me she felt bad for the kid, but SIL cannot be talked to. “I am the mother, I can do anything I want to my daughter.” But in actuality my niece is very smart, she is now in second grade/third grade high ability class. Such distortion of reality and facts!
I DO NOT want to be like my mom or my brother, I am aware that I have no rights, there is no proof, I do not know how to stop SIL causing harm to her own daughter, I feel like I should be doing MORE!
I am looking for any input, pearls, suggestions… Anything to help me do what is right, and make a difference. Thanks everyone.
Codependency is not included in the DSM-IV nor any prior edition of the DSM, mainly because it’s not a mental illness.
CodependencyFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Development and scope of conceptHistorically, the concept of codependence “comes directly out of Alcoholics Anonymous, part of a dawning realization that the problem was not solely the addict, but also the family and friends who constitute a network for the alcoholic.”[3] It was subsequently broadened to cover the way “that the codependent person is fixated on another person for approval, sustenance, and so on.”[3] As such, the concept overlaps with, but developed in the main independently from, the older psychoanalytic concept of the ‘passive dependent personality’ … attaching himself to a stronger personality.”[4]
Some would retain the stricter, narrower dictionary definition of codependency, which requires one person to be physically or psychologically addicted, such as to heroin, and the second person to be psychologically dependent on that behavior.[5]
Not to disparage Al Anon, it saved my sanity and I am about to to back because now my child is an alcoholic.
caringaunt,
You have not only a responsibility but a duty to protect your niece. What is going on in this household is a serious danger to a child and if they cannot see it the situation should be reported to child protective services. I am really not a big fan of the quality of child protective services but you must do something. That is my opinion. Protect this unsuspectin child from a known preditor. Getting old does not stop their behavior. Best of luck to you and God bless you for caring enough to take action.