In a local tragedy a week ago, a woman, Tracy Coleman, her brother and her 13-year-old son were shot to death by the woman’s boyfriend, Sharif Whitlock. The murders took place 45 minutes after the woman had filed a domestic violence complaint against her boyfriend. The perpetrator fled the scene and later hanged himself.
The case was the lead incident in a story published yesterday by my local newspaper, the Press of Atlantic City. It was entitled, Hamilton Twp. shooting deaths show familiar domestic violence outcome. The well-done story focused on the larger issue of domestic violence. In Atlantic County, New Jersey over the last two years, 13 people have been killed in domestic violence situations, including three perpetrators. A total of 21 children lost a parent.
Reading about Coleman and Whitlock, I could see all the typical signs of a sociopathic perpetrator and a well-meaning victim. The couple had broken up, but Whitlock constantly called Coleman, accusing and threatening her. For her part, Coleman felt she couldn’t abandon someone who had so many problems.
And then came the statement with caught my attention: Whitlock used technology to try to control his girlfriend.
The article quoted Yasmine Lopez, Coleman’s friend and instructor in the dental hygienist class she was taking:
Lopez said in the days before the shooting, Whitlock constantly called and texted his girlfriend so much so that the cell phone in her pocket never stopped vibrating. During one of those calls on June 2, Lopez said she overheard Whitlock on the phone, making threats and telling Coleman, “Don’t you understand? I want to kill myself.”
The article then quoted from the police report:
When Coleman spoke to a police officer June 6, she said Whitlock had broken her cell phone. The complaint says Whitlock later bought a new phone, had the number changed to Coleman’s number giving him access to her friends and family and “called subjects on (her) contact list and harassed them.”
This harassment via technology now has a name: Digital abuse.
Control in the technology age
Cell phones, e-mail, Facebook and Twitter—digital technology provides abusers with another avenue for asserting control over their victims and monitoring what they are doing.
The Press reporters interviewed Susan Risdon, spokesperson for the National Domestic Violence Hotline. She said that digital abuse often runs in tandem with verbal abuse and physical violence.
“We see a lot of instances where someone will send their partner 50 to 80 text messages a day, and if they can’t get a hold of them, they’ll text their best friend, saying, ”˜Are you with her?’” Risdon said.
“Domestic violence involves control, trying to isolate someone from their friends and loved ones, and keeping them to yourself. Digital abuse is a way to extend that isolation.”
Abuse among youth
The victim in this case, Tracy Coleman, was 44 years old. But digital abuse is even more common among those who live and breathe everything digital—teenagers and young adults. A study by the Associated Press and MTV, which was released late last year, found that 50 percent of 14- to 24-year-olds have experienced some form of digital abuse.
Here’s how the study defined digital abuse:
- writing something online that wasn’t true
- sharing information that a person didn’t want shared
- writing something mean
- spreading false rumors
- threatening physical harm
- impersonation
- spying
- posting embarrassing photos or video
- being pressured to send naked photos
- being teased
- encouraging people to hurt themselves.
Last year MTV launched a campaign called aimed at stopping the spread of abuse in the form of sexting, cyberbullying and digital dating abuse. The goal is to “empower America’s youth to identify, respond to and stop the spread of various forms of digital harassment.”
The campaign is called A Thin Line, reflecting the thin line between what’s public and what should be private. The website explains several kinds of abuse: sexting, constant messaging, spying, digital disrespect and cruelty. It also offers suggestions for young people to take control of their digital domains. One of the key recommendations: If they see or experience abuse, report it.
I hope young people get the message. Maybe if they learn that digital bullying, harassment and threats are not okay, they’ll get the message that the same behaviors in real life are also not to be tolerated.
This is the kind of article (and I see many of them on the news and in the papers) that makes me so sad….essentially, this is STALKING. My son and I had a discussion the other day about the DEFINITION of “stalking.”
When I sort of “have” to give an explination on why I am so “paranoid” (gun toting) I casually mention that in the past I had a STALKER who is now out on parole and I don’t want to be caught “with my pants down around my knees and no way to protect myself.” MY IDEA is that by saying I had a STALKER people will underestand that this is a SERIOUS threat from some one “out to get me”—my son disagrees about what “most people” would think. He thinks that most people would think a “stalker” was just a obnoxious pain in the butt but nothing to really be afraid of.
I would like your opinions on this. I KNOW, IN MY MIND AT LEAST that a stalker is DANGEROUS many times, if NOT MOST of the time, but whaqt you guys think “most people” believe when you say “stalker”? Maybe I better come up with a better or different word to convey that this is SERIOUS but jyet I don’t want to give a lot of DETAILS. What’ya tink?
Oxy – I think maybe the word stalker is banded about with the youth of today(whippersnapper’s;) in such a way that it looses it’s real meaning.
For instance – if one friend is looking at anothers FB profile more than once or twice…”Hahahaha! *so and so* is stalking me”… and they may simply be bored and absentmindedly flicking on an off things… this is called ‘stalking.’ that’s what I’ve seen/heard anyway. they are taking something and subverting it …. yoot culture. I wonder what word they use for ACTUAL stalking!(ask your son – I want to know!)x
probably: ‘Naaaah man! I mean PROPPA stalking!;)
I am sounding old, but I hear kids taking serious issues and banding them about as ‘fun’ a lot. A lot more than we did as kids…
An adult taking pictures at a child’s party – ” man he’s a Paedo” without being interested in what the word Paedophile MEANS. Oh – I dunno. just my thoughts on your question…
My daughter’s father’s wife began texting him continually from the moment they got together whenever they were apart… he has had a nightmare since… the relationship just gets more and more oppressive and abusive…he says: ‘she’s just insecure’. technology helps abusers reach a wider audience and track their victim without leaving the house, sociopaths construct elaborate attacks and lovefrauds, aswell as being a useful re-source. What to do?
Well, you agree with my son D. That leaves me at an impasse because I want SOME WORD that conveys SERIOUS problems with someone “following” me for evil purposes, but yet don’t want to go into any nitty-gritty details.
Any ideas GANG!? Come on you guys are smart, you can come up with something. I am ALL out of ideas on this one!
Dear Oxy – I dont PERSONALLY agree with your son. I just see that with younger people that seems to be the trend.
I dont think the words need to be changed (STALKER.PSYCHOPATH.PAEDOPHILE) but peoples understanding of what that REALLY means does.x
Yea, I think that is the problem is that the younger generations use these words as “slang” and like in my generation if you called someone a b1atch you would get slapped in the mouth, now they call each other “hos” and “b1atches” and so on or “perves” but the words are not SERIOUSLY used.
Got any ideas on what word I could substitute?
Predator.
Thanks Blue, but not sure the red necks around here would know what a HUMAN PREDATOR is, I’m thinking about NUT CASE or NUT JOB, or CRAZY guy, or maybe just a “mentally ill” guy is obscessed with me. Not QUITE the whole truth, but close enough I guess for not having to go into a lot of detail that I don’t want to.l Any more ideas? I don’t have to make up my mind today. Thank goodness!