Yesterday I happened to be watching CNN as the verdict in the Casey Anthony trial was announced. Like much of America, I was stunned that she was acquitted. From the reports I’ve seen about Anthony’s pathological lying and lack of concern about her missing daughter, I am confident that she exhibits sociopathic traits. A criminal profiler came out and said on national television that she is a psychopath. See:
Profiler says letters show Casey Anthony to be a psychopath
All of us at Lovefraud know what sociopaths/psychopaths are capable of. So I was more stunned by one of the so-called CNN pundits, Dr. Frank Farley, who came on the show later. He said that the prosecution’s theory of Casey Anthony’s motive for murder was ludicrous. No mother, he claimed, would kill her child simply so she could go out and party.
Farley actually posted his views in a blog piece on CNN, in an article called Infanticide in order to party: A nonsense motive. He wrote:
No credible motivational psychology that I know of would support that a single mother who seemed to love her child and who had lots of back-up parenting, in the grandparents and perhaps even from a brother, would go through the careful planning and complex, unpredictable, scary process of killing and disposing of her child in order to get a bit more free time.
This could not be true, unless she was seriously mentally ill, and no available evidence showed that. To go against that deep human instinct to take care of a child, and instead kill that child, demands a very significant reward in the opposite direction, and partying doesn’t rise to that level.
What sane human being could wake up in the morning and say, “Gee, I could have a fun time if I killed my daughter.” There was also no evidence that Caylee was a difficult child whose behavior could lead her mother into a homicidal rage. This whole scheme goes against our deepest instincts rooted in thousands of years of evolution.
Obviously, the guy knows nothing about sociopaths. These disordered individuals have no love motivation. They are capable of killing for the flimsiest of reasons. Take the case of Diane Downs, cited in Dr. Robert Hare’s book, Without Conscience. She shot her three children in 1983 so she could carry on an affair.
ABC News recently aired interviews with Diane Downs, along with a clinical diagnosis: psychopath. Watch the videos here:
1983 Video: Mom who shot kids speaks on ABCNews.go.com.
Professor Farley
Now here’s what is really scary: Frank Farley, Ph.D., is a psychologist and professor at Temple University, and former president of the American Psychological Association. He teaches educational psychology to graduate students. Here’s his biography:
Frank Farley, Ph.D., Temple University College of Education
Farley has come up with this goofy theory of “Type T Personalities.” The “T,” he says, stands for “thrill-seeking,” and certain people are driven to a life of constant stimulation and risk-taking. In fact, he recently wrote an op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times, claiming that this is why politicians cheat on their wives. I mentioned it in a recent blog post:
More on powerful men behaving badly
Actually, cheating politicians are probably displaying their sociopathic tendencies—grandiosity, overactive sex drive, recklessness, sense of entitlement. But Farley doesn’t get it. He also doesn’t get that it is quite possible for a woman to kill her child for barely any motivation.
And this is what he is teaching to his educational psychology students. No wonder so many people do not know that the sociopathic personality disorder exists.
Wow, wonder if this guy ever heard of Susan Smith who drove her children into a lake so she could “party” with her new BF, or how about that woman just this year who smothered her two little kids and then pushed her car off a ramp into a creek supposedly because her own mother was nagging her to take care of the kids instead of party all the time?
I don’t care how many PhDs this man has he is an idiot! Sheesh. In his case it means PILED HIGHER AND DEEPER! Wonder how high he would score on a narcissistic check list! Also proves that lots of degrees and credentials don’t necessarily mean one has any common sense.
ps. the real answer is that the SAME person that is the “real killer” of the baby is also the “real killer” of Nichole Brown Simpson…I hope the cops start looking immediately as this person is now a SERIAL killer. Maybe they will let OJ out of prison to help Casey look for him. (tongue in cheek here guys, just to make sure you know!) Sheesh….
Eh, this whole Anthony thing-from family to jury-was/is about $$. Think about it. Even the jury is corrupt. One juror is already open for an interview but for money only and lots of it. The defense attorneys probably rubbed their demonic money grubbing paws the minute this young psychopath crossed their threshold. Get her acquitted, $$$$$$! Baby blood money for EVERYONE! Long, public trial of a beautiful murdered little girl and a young, attractive, lying, immoral mom. Oh yeah, public sympathy, attention and outrage over an acquittal. I smell greedy rats from start to finish.
I was OUTRAGED when I heard the jury’s verdict on Casey Anthony. What mother in their RIGHT mind doesn’t report their child missing for 31 days…then gets a tatoo “Beautiful Life” and hits the party circuit? Better yet…I wonder what the jury was thinking when they read Casey’s journal where she wrote she felt she had made the “right decision” during the time little Caylee was missing.
And if the jury found her guilty on LYING TO THE POLICE do they honestly believe anything she said about her father or brother would have been TRUE??? The woman hadn’t worked at Disney World in 2 Years!!! GIMME A BREAK!
What scares me most is the validation this VERDICT gives to other sociopaths ~ “You CAN commit MURDER and get away with it!”
DISGUSTING!!!!!!
I think Farley is a sociopath who wants to extend cover to all other sociopaths by teaching lies. I don’t believe he is clueless at all. As a psychologist, it’s simply not possible that he has never read about sociopaths. It’s not possible.
Dear Sky,
Sugar like all psychopaths who READ about psychopaths, they don’t think it APPLIES to them…..ROTFLMAO SNORT! THEY ARE SPECIAL!
sky: agree.
Hmmmmm – where is Candice Delong when you need her? I would love to hear Ms. D’s thoughts on this case – but if she’s been on the air, I must have missed it. Anyway, I guess this means that “Deadly Women” will at least have enough new material for another season!
I have noticed that a lot of the “real experts” tend to shy away from the media circuses associated with these type of cases. Hare, for example (to all appearances a man of great dignity) flat out refused to go on Larry King when OJ was driving down the road during the now infamous “White Blazer chase”. Funny how that works.
All the same, I think this would be a good time to get a Love Fraud person on the radio show Coast to Coast. Donna should call them – I bet she’d have a good chance of getting an interview. (Barbara Oakley was already a guest, and for those interested her full interview is on Youtube.) Some of the people on there are a bit nutty, but they also get quite respectable guests like Michio Kaku and Edgar Mitchell. (It’s also the most popular and listened to radio show in North America.) At any rate, the Casey Anthony trial would be a nice lead in to a general discussion of Psychopathy. So get on the phone, Donna, what are you waiting for?!
Whew, that woman from 1983 is a total nut job.
The defense reminded me of an episode on a tv show. It was either boston legal or the practice, in which the legal team developed a defense strategy of blaming someone else. This raised reasonable doubt because the other person COULD have done it. After acquital, the other person was arrested and the defense strategy turned around and blamed the first defendant. Because of double jeapardy, the first defendant was safe. I’m not remembering it exactly, but I think that’s where this defense team got this strategy. It worked on tv, so why not?