Yesterday I happened to be watching CNN as the verdict in the Casey Anthony trial was announced. Like much of America, I was stunned that she was acquitted. From the reports I’ve seen about Anthony’s pathological lying and lack of concern about her missing daughter, I am confident that she exhibits sociopathic traits. A criminal profiler came out and said on national television that she is a psychopath. See:
Profiler says letters show Casey Anthony to be a psychopath
All of us at Lovefraud know what sociopaths/psychopaths are capable of. So I was more stunned by one of the so-called CNN pundits, Dr. Frank Farley, who came on the show later. He said that the prosecution’s theory of Casey Anthony’s motive for murder was ludicrous. No mother, he claimed, would kill her child simply so she could go out and party.
Farley actually posted his views in a blog piece on CNN, in an article called Infanticide in order to party: A nonsense motive. He wrote:
No credible motivational psychology that I know of would support that a single mother who seemed to love her child and who had lots of back-up parenting, in the grandparents and perhaps even from a brother, would go through the careful planning and complex, unpredictable, scary process of killing and disposing of her child in order to get a bit more free time.
This could not be true, unless she was seriously mentally ill, and no available evidence showed that. To go against that deep human instinct to take care of a child, and instead kill that child, demands a very significant reward in the opposite direction, and partying doesn’t rise to that level.
What sane human being could wake up in the morning and say, “Gee, I could have a fun time if I killed my daughter.” There was also no evidence that Caylee was a difficult child whose behavior could lead her mother into a homicidal rage. This whole scheme goes against our deepest instincts rooted in thousands of years of evolution.
Obviously, the guy knows nothing about sociopaths. These disordered individuals have no love motivation. They are capable of killing for the flimsiest of reasons. Take the case of Diane Downs, cited in Dr. Robert Hare’s book, Without Conscience. She shot her three children in 1983 so she could carry on an affair.
ABC News recently aired interviews with Diane Downs, along with a clinical diagnosis: psychopath. Watch the videos here:
1983 Video: Mom who shot kids speaks on ABCNews.go.com.
Professor Farley
Now here’s what is really scary: Frank Farley, Ph.D., is a psychologist and professor at Temple University, and former president of the American Psychological Association. He teaches educational psychology to graduate students. Here’s his biography:
Frank Farley, Ph.D., Temple University College of Education
Farley has come up with this goofy theory of “Type T Personalities.” The “T,” he says, stands for “thrill-seeking,” and certain people are driven to a life of constant stimulation and risk-taking. In fact, he recently wrote an op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times, claiming that this is why politicians cheat on their wives. I mentioned it in a recent blog post:
More on powerful men behaving badly
Actually, cheating politicians are probably displaying their sociopathic tendencies—grandiosity, overactive sex drive, recklessness, sense of entitlement. But Farley doesn’t get it. He also doesn’t get that it is quite possible for a woman to kill her child for barely any motivation.
And this is what he is teaching to his educational psychology students. No wonder so many people do not know that the sociopathic personality disorder exists.
kim:
What blows me away is the mere fact that she was so DUMB and still got away with it! Normally, dumb criminals get locked up fast. Not her. But it’s most likely because of what you said in your last paragraph…normal people just can’t imagine that kind of evil so they project.
Don’t worry…she WILL do something else and the next time won’t be so lucky.
I agree. She’ll poison a husband, or something.
KIMMMMMMMIIIIIEEEEEE!!!! YOU’RE BACK!!!!! How are you darling???? MISSSSED YOU!!! Tell us all about what is going on!
This Frank Farley IDIOT (in my opinion) proves that ANYONE can get a PhD and he is worse than clueless. Makes me grind my teeth every time this article comes up! LO(L
Hi, Ox. Well, I think Farley’s PhD is more of an educational degree than a psych degree. Educational Psych is the study of the psychology of learning…not of abnormal personality, so how would he know? I think he ought to ask himself what Anthony learned from her experience. How to be a dumb shit and still out fox the average joe. Picture a self-satisfied smirk on Anthony’s face, here!!!
Another thing about this: Farley assumes that the soul motive is the desire to party…that’s simplistic, I think. I beleive it is far more complex than that!!! I think there was an element of jealousy involved, as well as revenge against her mother, a desire to be independant and out from under her mothers thumb. A desire to be in relationship and play house, maybe even the belief that by offing Caylee, she could mend the fissure in her relationship with her mother and they would come together in their search, and then later, in their grief.
I just read a fascinating book called, “Poisoned Blood” about Marie Hilley…are you familiar with her? In the epilouge the author describes the reaction of all the people affected by her, and it’s so right on the mark!!! It’s the stuff we deal with here, on a daily basis.
Kim, I read the Wiki biography of this woman and yea, she sure sounds like a psychopath for sure….If I ever knew anything about her I had forgotten it.
I agree with you that there were OTHER motives in Casey getting rid of the baby, and that the dynamics of the grandmother-daughter-granddaughter were a triangle of jealousy with Casey’s mother trying to “take over” the baby which Casey both “owned/hated” and definitely hated her mother. I think the whole family dynamics is BADLY off kilter.
She had the audacity to assume a new identity (understandable because she was running from the law), then kill it off, and reappear as the new identities twin sister!!! She then took up where she had left off with her fake assumed dead twins husband. WTF? Why? Just for the sake of duping delight?
Most people who knew her just couldn’t believe that such a cultured and nice lady could possibly have done such evil things!!!
Her daughter and son and duped second husband stood by her through it all and were presant at her funeral. Talk about trauma bonding!!!!
Kim/Oxy
I agree that there was greater motivation when Casey killed Kaylee. (which I think was actually an accident but Casey didn’t care if she died either.)
Kim, you are so right about the dynamic b/t Casey and her mom. I call the war with Kaylee an example of “dog in the manger” syndrome. Casey didn’t want Kaylee, but she didn’t want her mother to have her either. So she took her when she went partying, gave her Xanax so she’d sleep, and myabe even taped her up so if she woke up early she couldn’t scream cry or move. I believe the Xanax knocked her out and the tape smothered her. I also believe mom pressured Casey to take care of/spend more time with Kaylee as a manipulation, she knew Casey didn’t want her and she wanted Casey to feel flustrated by how Kaylee stiffled her desired life and give her up to mama. All happened b/c Casey didn’t want her mom to have Kaylee. B/c I think if Casey said, I don’t want my daughter, mom would have taken custody.
I think dog in the manger syndrome explains a lot of spaths staying with spouses they don’t want, b/c they see it as a loss if the spouse goes elsewhere. And loss is NEVER tolerated by an spath.
Well, Kim, yea, I think you are right “duping delight” LOL While I can NOW see how deluded the son, daughter and 2nd husband were/are in that situation, I would at some point been standing beside the grave of my P son weeping uncontrollably as well…but fortunately, I am past that, my grieving has been done for the adult son I NEVER HAD, and the little boy son I loved is so long gone, and I grieved for him long ago….that if I were notified today the convict was dead I could only feel relief that he is no longer a threat to me.
Even my relationship with son C, or really, my LACK of a relationship with him, I’m working through the grief over that, and glad to be in as limited as I can be in contact and still both of us work toward keeping his “X-brother” in prison. Just because we have a common enemy doesn’t mean we are friends. I can trust him to help me with keeping his X brother in prison because he is terrified of his brother (with good reason), but as for having a relationship with him, can’t trust him and without trust don’t want a relationship with him.
.