Yesterday I happened to be watching CNN as the verdict in the Casey Anthony trial was announced. Like much of America, I was stunned that she was acquitted. From the reports I’ve seen about Anthony’s pathological lying and lack of concern about her missing daughter, I am confident that she exhibits sociopathic traits. A criminal profiler came out and said on national television that she is a psychopath. See:
Profiler says letters show Casey Anthony to be a psychopath
All of us at Lovefraud know what sociopaths/psychopaths are capable of. So I was more stunned by one of the so-called CNN pundits, Dr. Frank Farley, who came on the show later. He said that the prosecution’s theory of Casey Anthony’s motive for murder was ludicrous. No mother, he claimed, would kill her child simply so she could go out and party.
Farley actually posted his views in a blog piece on CNN, in an article called Infanticide in order to party: A nonsense motive. He wrote:
No credible motivational psychology that I know of would support that a single mother who seemed to love her child and who had lots of back-up parenting, in the grandparents and perhaps even from a brother, would go through the careful planning and complex, unpredictable, scary process of killing and disposing of her child in order to get a bit more free time.
This could not be true, unless she was seriously mentally ill, and no available evidence showed that. To go against that deep human instinct to take care of a child, and instead kill that child, demands a very significant reward in the opposite direction, and partying doesn’t rise to that level.
What sane human being could wake up in the morning and say, “Gee, I could have a fun time if I killed my daughter.” There was also no evidence that Caylee was a difficult child whose behavior could lead her mother into a homicidal rage. This whole scheme goes against our deepest instincts rooted in thousands of years of evolution.
Obviously, the guy knows nothing about sociopaths. These disordered individuals have no love motivation. They are capable of killing for the flimsiest of reasons. Take the case of Diane Downs, cited in Dr. Robert Hare’s book, Without Conscience. She shot her three children in 1983 so she could carry on an affair.
ABC News recently aired interviews with Diane Downs, along with a clinical diagnosis: psychopath. Watch the videos here:
1983 Video: Mom who shot kids speaks on ABCNews.go.com.
Professor Farley
Now here’s what is really scary: Frank Farley, Ph.D., is a psychologist and professor at Temple University, and former president of the American Psychological Association. He teaches educational psychology to graduate students. Here’s his biography:
Frank Farley, Ph.D., Temple University College of Education
Farley has come up with this goofy theory of “Type T Personalities.” The “T,” he says, stands for “thrill-seeking,” and certain people are driven to a life of constant stimulation and risk-taking. In fact, he recently wrote an op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times, claiming that this is why politicians cheat on their wives. I mentioned it in a recent blog post:
More on powerful men behaving badly
Actually, cheating politicians are probably displaying their sociopathic tendencies—grandiosity, overactive sex drive, recklessness, sense of entitlement. But Farley doesn’t get it. He also doesn’t get that it is quite possible for a woman to kill her child for barely any motivation.
And this is what he is teaching to his educational psychology students. No wonder so many people do not know that the sociopathic personality disorder exists.
Constantine,
my exSpath was obsessed with that show, Coast to Coast. He sat in his car and listened to it for hours until 3AM. All that alien crap and ufo’s just fascinated him. But what he was really into were the old recordings of Father Malachi Martin, the exorcist. I heard him talk about him and just ignored it, thinking it was just a kooky thing that intrigued him. Later, I re-read “People of the Lie” by Dr. Scott Peck and realized that Malachi Martin was a friend of Scott Peck and he really did do exorcisms. My spath was obsessed with this because he actually believes that he is possessed by the devil and that is the reason he does so much evil.
Sheesh! even in his fantasies, he won’t accept responsibility for his behavior. He has to blame the devil. what a dork! He isn’t possessed by the devil, he IS the devil.
I just saw an interview on the TV news with one of the ALTERNATE jurors and he said that the prosecution “didn’t prove HOW the baby died” (I mean what does it take to prove the baby was murdered?!!!!!! DUH?) and a bunch of other comments about as DUMB. I think TV has some how screwed up COMMON SENSE about a murder case. Do jurors think you have to prove with a VIDEO TAPE of someone killing someone else to have enough evidence to convict them? This aint’ CSI for goodness sakes< this is REAL LIFE.
What does a woman have to do in order to show someone she has a connection to the death of her baby while she parties hardy and gets a tat that says "beautiful life" when he baby is DEAD and she knows it?
There's supposed to be a special news thing on tonight at 10/9 central I'll probably watch it and SCREAM AT THE TV!!!!!! Good thing I live far enough away from other people that they won't arrest me for being crazy or drunk!
Sky,
Wow, that’s really interesting – Malachi Martin you say?! I don’t know what to make of him personally (he’s was a highly controversial figure during his life). I read his “Hostage to the Devil” when I was younger, and it is probably the best written account of exorcism. (Martin also had the “gift of the gab” to an unusual degree – something that makes me a bit suspicious!) In fairness, though, the book is spooky as hell – even if you don’t believe in such things!
Oh, and that reminds me. There’s another interview where Martin seems to suggest that Peck himself was “possessed” in later life. (He doesn’t mention Peck’s name, but it seems very clear to me that that’s the person to whom he is referring.) I’m a scientific rationalist myself, but as a mythical way of decribing the disorder, “possession” is probably as good a term as any!
I know I’ve mentioned your spaths’ preoccupation with demonic possession before. But I wonder why it was that he felt that way? (Besides the simple failure to accept responsibiltiy for his own actions!) Did he ever speak of it in any detail? I’d be interested in knowing any details that you feel like sharing….It’s an interesting twist on the pathology, at any rate.
Perhaps we should call Father Amorth (the chief exorcist in Rome) to take another look at Casey Anthony? She does have thoes empty black reptilian eyes!
Oxy:
What does it matter HOW the child died? The child is dead…murdered! It drives me crazy!!
I am going to watch that special tonight. Haha, I cracked up about you screaming at the TV!!! Not to make light of the situation, but I know what you mean! I am so angry about this.
Oxy:
I hope you know I wasn’t yelling at you.
Louise I know you weren’t yellling at me, sheet I am YELLING AT THE SYSTEM THAT LETS CASEY GO FREE!!!! Man, alive!!!! I can’t believe it, that juror sounded like a complete idiot!!!!!
And really, does it matter if she smothered to death on chloroform or if she smothered with the tape or if casey choked her first? HOW? It doesn’t matter!!!! The child was MURDERED!
Hell even in California they could convict Scott Peterson and there wasn’t any way to TELL HOW Laci died, her head was gone! So does that mean she wasn’t murdered? California’s courts are crazy but at least they are more sane than Florida’s.
I AM LIVID!
Constantine,
It seems to me that my spath believed in God, which is sort of unusual for a spath. Most are atheist afaik. They reject authority of any kind, so they reject the idea of God. But spath did believe in God, based on his letter to God that I found in the bible, which he wrote when he was very sick. So I guess it was his belief in the supernatural that made him believe in the devil as well. He didn’t talk about it to me though. The only reason I know is because of certain looks he gave me when I mentioned that when he snored, he sounded exactly like a demon in a possessed person (he really did). His face froze and it looked like his mask was slipping…He gave me a piercing look and I just looked away.
I feel like there was another time I mentioned possession and he gave me that same look, but I can’t remember what it was. I just know he was keenly aware of his desire to do evil, but didn’t know where it came from. I now believe it had to do with identifying with his father, who was also a spath. The way he talked of him, it was clear he was very attached to him.
As far as Casey Anthony, she looks like she has horns. Did anyone else notice that strange forhead?
Thanks Sky,
Very interesting….However, strange as it seems, I think that belief in God is, oddly enough, not at all incompatible with being a Psychopath. Obviously it doesn’t make sense to us, but somehow I think it’s quite often the case.
Ted Bundy also claimed to have the feeling of being “taken over” by an outside entity. Likewise “The Son of Sam” (whom Martin actually interviewed in prison), and many others. Obviously we have to take these statements with a very large grain of salt, since they are pathological liars. But I think some of them might actually perceive it that way. I’m not saying it corresponds to a reality, but the FEELING of being “taken over” might possibly be real. I don’t know…
Casey Anthony actually rather resembles my spath. And yes, I have noticed the horns thing! I would be as livid as Oxy, but I just have so little faith in human nature anymore, that I pretty much take these “outrages” as a matter of course.
Oxy:
Good, I’m glad you realize I wasn’t yelling at you. It just makes me so mad, too!! Man!!! What station is that special supposed to be on?
Good point about Scott Peterson!!! You are right…Laci didn’t even have a head and he was still convicted. Something is really fishy about this story I think. I just heard on the radio this evening that one of the jurors said that all the jurors were crying and sick to their stomaches when they decided on the verdict. They knew she was guilty, but because there wasn’t enough evidence, they knew they couldn’t find her guilty. Why not?? Are the jurors coached by someone??
Yep Constantine, I feel more sick than livid.
She seems to be a rather stupid spath, perhaps she’ll hang herself.