By Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Most of you know I have spent a good portion of my life training animals of various kinds dogs for obedience and to work livestock, horses, donkeys and cattle (oxen).
When we train animals, we “condition” them to do X and they receive Y reward. Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, conditioned dogs to expect to be fed by ringing a bell every time they got fed. Eventually when a bell was rung, even though there was no food in sight, the animals expected to be fed, and their bodies reacted by making them “slobber” at the mouth, just as they would if food were present.
B.F. Skinner, and American psychologist, observed that animals who had intermittent rewards, rather than continual rewards, would continue a behavior longer than animals who got rewarded every time they did an act. For example, a rat that pushed a lever and got a grain of food every time, would quickly stop pushing it if the food didn’t com. But a rat that sometimes got a food pellet when he pushed the lever would continue to pound on the lever for a very long time, or even never stop pushing it, even though he did not get a food pellet.
In humans, this “intermittent” rewards works in a slot machine, or in gambling games, because every once in a while you get rewarded. Therefore, you keep hoping that next time will be THE TIME.
Psychopaths and intermittent rewards
You may ask what this training technique has to do with psychopaths. Well, just as Las Vegas was built on intermittent rewards for gamblers, relationships with psychopaths are built on the intermittent rewards they give us.
At the first part of the relationship, the psychopath “love bombs” us by giving us the good things we enjoy compliments, doing things for us, great sex. WOW! We think we have found nirvana. Just as a dog I am beginning to train gets a treat every time he “sits,” then only sometimes when he “sits,” the psychopath only gives us the “loving” some of the time. Also, just as I eventually no longer give the dog a food treat any time he “sits,” and the most he will get is a “good dog” verbal compliment, or a scolding if he doesn’t sit fast enough, the psychopath quits giving us treats and gives us “scoldings.”
We have been conditioned by the psychopath to be and do what they want, because we still desire that initial “love bombing,” and we dread the “scolding” they will give us if we don’t “jump” when they say “frog.” We keep on hoping against hope that we will be able to please them again. We do whatever we can to keep the scoldings to a minimum and get them to reward us with “love” again.
Running for bread
It doesn’t make any kind of difference if the animal we are training is a dog, a parrot, a donkey, an steer, a horse ”¦ the conditioning works the same. Intermittent rewards cause the desired behavior to continue. If we give continual rewards every time they perform the behavior, it wouldn’t take long for the behavior to be extinguished when we stopped rewarding it.
My mammoth jack donkeys, Fat Ass and Hairy Ass, haven’t had a piece of bread (their preferred treat) in a year or more. But any time I go to the hangar and open the freezer, they come running up to the fence on the never dying hope that I will get bread out of the freezer and give them a piece. They are totally “conditioned” to that treat, and they know that the opening and closing of the freezer is what always preceded them getting a slice of bread.
The psychopath we have had relationships with know what “rings our chimes,” what makes us happy and what makes us sad, or what makes us angry. It is like a panel of buttons on the front of our chest. They know just the exact words to say, or the thing to do, that will press our “buttons” and get the reaction they want from us.
No Contact is the answer
No Contact keeps those buttons covered. That is why it works.
Psychopaths know that in the past, if they pressed “button A,” you would do B. So they will keep on trying because IT ALWAYS WORKED IN THE PAST. They just know if they keep doing it, it will EVENTUALLY work again. So they will press it harder and faster and longer. Just like some old lady sitting at a slot machine, plugging in quarters, she just “knows” that the very next quarter will get her a reward. Just like my donkeys running up to the fence when I open the freezer, they still hope to get a slice of bread, a reward.
Expect when you go No Contact that the psychopath will up the ante and will work harder and longer to get a reaction. If it takes 30 times for them to eventually get a reaction, THEY LEARN THAT it takes 30 TIMES TO GET A REACTION. If next time it takes 40 times, they learn that they must work a bit harder to get a reaction, so they keep on and on and never stop.
So hang in there. Once you make up your mind to go NO CONTACT, then STAY no contact, because if you give them ANY reward of ANY kind, even a well deserved “cussing,” it is still a reward. It is ATTENTION, and even negative attention is attention. Not being noticed at all is the worst punishment they can have.
If you are required by law to have contact with them, like if you share children, do it only by e-mail, so that you have a record of it. Discuss ONLY the children. Do not respond to any nasty comments they make. Refuse to discuss the other person with your children, and Gray Rock them entirely. NO emotional responses at all. If possible, get someone else to pick up and drop off the kids, so you do not have to see him/her. Or do it in a public place, a police department parking lot if necessary.
We can stop them only by not responding. So when your ex is trying to push your buttons, just think about Joyce’s donkeys Fat Ass and Hairy Ass running up to the fence for a slice of bread. Visualize your psychopath with long ears, standing there trying to get a reaction from you, and then DON’T GIVE IT. Take control and refuse to allow the psychopath to make you respond to his/her button pushing!
God bless.
“As Mr Pistorius’ affadavit was read to the court by his lawyer, he began to sob audibly.
“Reeva and I were deeply in love and I could not have been happier. She felt the same,” his statement read.
The lawyer stopped as the judge held up his hand. Every set of eyes in the court turned to Mr Pistorius weeping uncontrollably. “My compassion as a human being does not allow me to just sit here,” the magistrate said.
As Mr Pistorius’ brother Carl tried to calm him, the magistrate told him he must try to compose himself.
“I know it’s difficult,” he said. “You can’t go back to the police station not understanding what has gone on here today,” he said. “Do you understand?”
“Yes your worship,” Mr Pistorius gulped.”
That’s from the UK paper the Telegraph. I wonder if it even crossed the magistrate’s mind that Pistorius could have been faking his distress. Or crying thinking of the prison term he’s facing. How did her skull fracture Oscar? How did blood end up on the bat? Where did you suppose Reeva had disappeared to when you were ‘awakened by the intruder in the bathroom’ ? And so on.
Tea Light-
It seems that the judge’s action helps to maintain the integrity of the prosecutor’s case. Later on, the Defense might claim that the Defendant didn’t understand the charges because of his mental state – because of the anguish and confusion, etc. that he claims he was experiencing.
Seems like there needs to be a separate thread for this case.
Bit off topic, but on the Pistorius thread:
a transcript of his address to the court is available here:
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Oscar-Pistorius-at-court-for-bail-hearing-20130219
Anyone fancy a game of “How many red flags can you spot?”
🙂
Tea Light, this is only a bail hearing, at this stage the state will be keeping their cards close to their chest, they will release just enough info to support their opposing his bail application. The real forensics will come out later in the trial. Hence the defence counsel’s request for further information – he is trying to extract details of the states case.
It’s a game and a farce. I went through the very same nonsense when I was still enabling my idiot ex after his arrest and during the seemingly endless bail hearings and postponements – before I realised what he was..
This trial will be interesting and seems (hopefully) to be highlighting the massive problem of women (and child) abuse in this country.
Just so sad that Reeva had to lose her life to bring it into the spotlight.
Just as a footnote, Reeva was reportedly a law graduate as well as a successful model and TV personality.
Fixer, you’re right, he is entitled to a fair trial. Heather, thanks for the link, red flags lol! It sounds like you have experience of the SA judicial system. Glad to learn you saw your ex for an abuser. Peace and love x
Tea Light
I don’t think Mr Pistorius is faking his distress at all. I truly do think he is reallllly upset at having to face the consequences of his abusive and murderous actions. Knowing his future? Yes, he is sincerely distressed. Just not for the right person.
Oh yes, more than I ever wanted or needed!
This was my ex’s case, if anyone is interested:
http://www.cxpress.co.za/showArticle.asp?aid=7241
And he was acquitted. We have something like a 4% conviction rate here. It really is a circus.
Katy I saw the interviews with Reeva’s uncle and brother which they gave after her memorial and they were extremely dignified and held their emotions in check almost throughout but her poor uncle did break down at one point. I know it’s not wise to rush to judgement before all the evidence is presented but Pistorius’ defense appears very weak. He went to the balcony in the pitch dark for a fan with Reeva asleep in bed next to him? Then heard noises in the bathroom and started shooting at the door, without turning on a light? Or calling out first to Reeva? We’ll see. Thoughts with her family.
I’ll read the article now Heather thank you for sharing it, the conviction rate in SA is as low as that? Due to corruption? Lack of police resources and numbers? Does that potentially not bode well for Reeva’s family do you think or will every step be taken to conduct a scrupulous trial because of the level of media scrutiny?
Tea light,
Yes, dockets go missing regularly, our police resources are overstretched beyond the limit and of course if you are of sufficient means to get yourself and expert team to pick holes in the evidence (ie: the glove that doesn’t fit) – you are likely to create enough reasonable doubt..
I’m also of the opinion that Pistorius story is utter BS (for want of a more polite description) but unfortunately I don’t hold high hopes that Reeva’s family will get the justice they deserve.
My ex was caught red handed sitting on top of almost 2 tons of Cocaine.. The defence team picked holes in the evidence and created enough reasonable doubt – the bag numbers for the evidence hadn’t been maintained, the cellular telephone records had discrepancies, the cops didn’t have a warrant when they searched the boat etc etc.
Especially if it’s ruled a schedule 6 offence (most serious) the state will have to prove beyond a shadow of a shadow of a doubt that he is guilty.. I do not have enough faith in them to believe they will manage this.