By Joyce Alexander, RNP (retired)
Most of you know I have spent a good portion of my life training animals of various kinds dogs for obedience and to work livestock, horses, donkeys and cattle (oxen).
When we train animals, we “condition” them to do X and they receive Y reward. Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, conditioned dogs to expect to be fed by ringing a bell every time they got fed. Eventually when a bell was rung, even though there was no food in sight, the animals expected to be fed, and their bodies reacted by making them “slobber” at the mouth, just as they would if food were present.
B.F. Skinner, and American psychologist, observed that animals who had intermittent rewards, rather than continual rewards, would continue a behavior longer than animals who got rewarded every time they did an act. For example, a rat that pushed a lever and got a grain of food every time, would quickly stop pushing it if the food didn’t com. But a rat that sometimes got a food pellet when he pushed the lever would continue to pound on the lever for a very long time, or even never stop pushing it, even though he did not get a food pellet.
In humans, this “intermittent” rewards works in a slot machine, or in gambling games, because every once in a while you get rewarded. Therefore, you keep hoping that next time will be THE TIME.
Psychopaths and intermittent rewards
You may ask what this training technique has to do with psychopaths. Well, just as Las Vegas was built on intermittent rewards for gamblers, relationships with psychopaths are built on the intermittent rewards they give us.
At the first part of the relationship, the psychopath “love bombs” us by giving us the good things we enjoy compliments, doing things for us, great sex. WOW! We think we have found nirvana. Just as a dog I am beginning to train gets a treat every time he “sits,” then only sometimes when he “sits,” the psychopath only gives us the “loving” some of the time. Also, just as I eventually no longer give the dog a food treat any time he “sits,” and the most he will get is a “good dog” verbal compliment, or a scolding if he doesn’t sit fast enough, the psychopath quits giving us treats and gives us “scoldings.”
We have been conditioned by the psychopath to be and do what they want, because we still desire that initial “love bombing,” and we dread the “scolding” they will give us if we don’t “jump” when they say “frog.” We keep on hoping against hope that we will be able to please them again. We do whatever we can to keep the scoldings to a minimum and get them to reward us with “love” again.
Running for bread
It doesn’t make any kind of difference if the animal we are training is a dog, a parrot, a donkey, an steer, a horse ”¦ the conditioning works the same. Intermittent rewards cause the desired behavior to continue. If we give continual rewards every time they perform the behavior, it wouldn’t take long for the behavior to be extinguished when we stopped rewarding it.
My mammoth jack donkeys, Fat Ass and Hairy Ass, haven’t had a piece of bread (their preferred treat) in a year or more. But any time I go to the hangar and open the freezer, they come running up to the fence on the never dying hope that I will get bread out of the freezer and give them a piece. They are totally “conditioned” to that treat, and they know that the opening and closing of the freezer is what always preceded them getting a slice of bread.
The psychopath we have had relationships with know what “rings our chimes,” what makes us happy and what makes us sad, or what makes us angry. It is like a panel of buttons on the front of our chest. They know just the exact words to say, or the thing to do, that will press our “buttons” and get the reaction they want from us.
No Contact is the answer
No Contact keeps those buttons covered. That is why it works.
Psychopaths know that in the past, if they pressed “button A,” you would do B. So they will keep on trying because IT ALWAYS WORKED IN THE PAST. They just know if they keep doing it, it will EVENTUALLY work again. So they will press it harder and faster and longer. Just like some old lady sitting at a slot machine, plugging in quarters, she just “knows” that the very next quarter will get her a reward. Just like my donkeys running up to the fence when I open the freezer, they still hope to get a slice of bread, a reward.
Expect when you go No Contact that the psychopath will up the ante and will work harder and longer to get a reaction. If it takes 30 times for them to eventually get a reaction, THEY LEARN THAT it takes 30 TIMES TO GET A REACTION. If next time it takes 40 times, they learn that they must work a bit harder to get a reaction, so they keep on and on and never stop.
So hang in there. Once you make up your mind to go NO CONTACT, then STAY no contact, because if you give them ANY reward of ANY kind, even a well deserved “cussing,” it is still a reward. It is ATTENTION, and even negative attention is attention. Not being noticed at all is the worst punishment they can have.
If you are required by law to have contact with them, like if you share children, do it only by e-mail, so that you have a record of it. Discuss ONLY the children. Do not respond to any nasty comments they make. Refuse to discuss the other person with your children, and Gray Rock them entirely. NO emotional responses at all. If possible, get someone else to pick up and drop off the kids, so you do not have to see him/her. Or do it in a public place, a police department parking lot if necessary.
We can stop them only by not responding. So when your ex is trying to push your buttons, just think about Joyce’s donkeys Fat Ass and Hairy Ass running up to the fence for a slice of bread. Visualize your psychopath with long ears, standing there trying to get a reaction from you, and then DON’T GIVE IT. Take control and refuse to allow the psychopath to make you respond to his/her button pushing!
God bless.
Heather, just read the article on your ex’s trial blimey o’reilly..very glad he is ‘ex’ Heather and forever may he remain so. Very interesting to read your take on the case from a South African perspective and hope to read more posts from you when the trial starts. Stay safe there x
HeatherCT, thank you for giving us a SA perspective on this. I love your country but am appalled at what it has become in terms of crime etc.
Yea, I heard that this is going to be the SA equivalent of OJ’s trial.
Hey Ox..
Yeah, unfortunately due the levels of crime his story is “plausible” which is all it needs to be unless they come up with serious conflicting forensic evidence…
BTW thanks for the above article, loved it. Fat and Hairy Ass’s are magnetted to my fridge door as a reminder! Serves a double purpose “fat ass” reminds me not to “fridge pick” lol
When I was reading about Pistorius’ arraignment hearing,and going out on the balcony without his blades for a fan,then returning and thinking he heard an intruder in the bathroom(no bars on window,construction co. having left ladders up)I thought such confusion MIGHT be possible since he was known to be paranoid……BUT
THEN….I read the toilet was separate,with it’s own door.It was a TINY space,NO WHERE TO GO.The door was locked.Why would a burgular lock the door?He said when he thought there was an intruder,he put his blades on and grabbed his gun.Why didn’t he check on Reeva and tell her he thought there was an intruder in the house so that she could seek safety?!!!It was as if Reeva was an afterthought.A man “deeply in love” with a woman does not treat her as an ‘afterthought’-especially in times of danger!
You’ll be surprised and appalled Blossom, there are many instances here of fathers shooting sons/family members as they believed they were intruders.
Past 1 small news article we rarely hear about them as joe public murders are so common here they’re not really newsworthy. This has only hit the headlines because of who they both were.
It is not unusual to “shoot first, ask questions later” here.
Not that I think that is is any way justifiable,
HeatherCT,
No,it’s still not justifiable.Even the PA said that at the very least,by firing into that door 3 times,his intentions were to KILL the intruder….it’s still MURDER.
You’re correct Blossom, as for it to have been self defence there would have to have been a clear an imminent danger.
(which clearly there wasnt from behind a locked loo door)..
It will be interesting to watch this unfold. I hope justice prevails. I’m just not convinced that it will.
Blossom I was suprised to read the toilet was seperate to the bathroom too. Why did he feel secure enough to enter the bathroom without shooting through the bathroom door? Why did he feel threatened enough once in the bathroom to start firing into the toilet door? And if he justified his weapons on grounds of death threats and intruder risk why in God’s name did he leave the bathroom window open the balcony door open and ladders left in the grounds? Did he stage these elements beforehand? So he could claim a self-defense motive for killing Reeva?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/28/politics/violence-against-women/index.html
VAWA passed in the senate!!! A victory for us.
Hey Sky,
You beat me to it, I was just going to post it.
YEA – it’s a start !!!!
Now, it’s onto Children’s Rights !!!!