The Reverend Charles Newman, former president of Archbishop Ryan High School in Philadelphia, was sentenced on Friday to three to six years in prison for stealing almost $1 million from the school, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.
As if that isn’t bad enough, prosecutors say that Newman gave about $54,000 to Arthur Baselice III, once a student at the school, as “hush money” so he would keep quiet about their sexual relationship. Authorities contend that the abuse began when Baselice III was 16-year-old junior at the school. He graduated in 1996. Ten years later, on November 30, 2006, Baselice III died of an overdose in a drug house.
During Newman’s sentencing, the young man’s mother, Elaine Baselice, addressed the court. “He plied my teenage son with alcohol and drugs so that Arthur could be more easily abused,” she said, according to the Philadelphia Daily News. “Newman had me believe my son was full of demons. Standing in the courtroom today, I am faced with the true demon!”
Newman was not charged with sexual abuse because the statute of limitations had expired. He was charged only for the theft. The priest spoke briefly during the hearing in disjointed remarks, but did not apologize to the Baselices or explain what happened to the money. The court didn’t buy whatever he said.
“Your explanations are sorely lacking ”¦ and that’s putting it mildly,” Judge Rose Marie DeFino-Nastasi said. “Your explanations are bizarre.”
Reading the coverage of this case, it seemed to me that the Reverend Charles Newman fit the profile of a sociopath.
More info:
Philadelphia Inquirer: Ex-principal gets 3-6 years for theft
Philadelphia Daily News: ”˜Detestable’ conduct nets priest 3-6 years
Child abuse in Ireland
The Newman case was bad, but not nearly as shocking as another story now in the news—the endemic rape and abuse of thousands of children in Ireland, from the 1930s to the 1990s, by Catholic priests and nuns.
On May 20, a 2,600-page report by Ireland’s Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse was released. It found that children in 250 church-run schools, orphanages and other institutions, supported by taxpayer funds, were routinely abused and molested. Catholic religious orders ran more than 50 workhouse-style reform schools. One of the orders, the Christian Brothers, which ran several boys’ institutions, harbored serial child molesters and sadists on its staff.
The report took nine years to complete. Thousands of still-traumatized men and women, now in their 50s to 80s, testified, some traveling back to Ireland from America or Australia.
“A climate of fear, created by pervasive, excessive and arbitrary punishment, permeated most of the institutions and all those run for boys,” the report stated. “Children lived with the daily terror of not knowing where the next beating was coming from.”
At the time, however, the religious orders were concerned only about preventing scandal, not the danger to the children. According to the Associated Press, “The management did not listen to or believe children when they complained of the activities of some of the men who had responsibility for their care,” the commission found. “At best, the abusers were moved, but nothing was done about the harm done to the child. At worst, the child was blamed and seen as corrupted by the sexual activity, and was punished severely.”
The report may not lead to prosecution of the perpetrators because in 2004, the Christian Brothers successfully sued to prevent them from being named. “Most leaders of religious orders have rejected the allegations as exaggerations and lies, and testified to the commission that any abuses were the responsibility of often long-dead individuals,” AP reported.
The Irish government has paid 12,000 abuse survivors an average of $90,000 each, a total of more than $1 billion, and another 2,000 claims are pending. But in 2001, Irish Catholic leaders cut a deal with the government that capped its contribution to the claims at $175 million—a fraction of the total cost.
More info:
The Independent, London: Thousands were raped in Irish reform schools
Boston.com: Catholic Church shamed by Irish abuse report
Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse: Executive summary
Betrayal by Spirit
In The Betrayal Bond, author Patrick J. Carnes, Ph.D., specifically discusses how abuse by clergy affects victims. “It is generally agreed that the impact on survivors of sexual abuse by spiritual leaders is greater than survivors of other forms of power abuse,” he writes. “Since part of coping with trauma is spiritual, sexual abuse by a spiritual leader further complicates the recovery process.”
Why is this so? Carnes writes:
Every journey or recovery depends on the survivor coming to a point where all that person has gone through means something.
Betrayal by the spirit means that the person who betrays the victim also plays a critical role in the resources the victim has for defining meaning. The victim’s spiritual path is blocked. The fundamental question all victims have to answer for themselves is, ”˜Why do bad things happen to good people?’ It is a far more troubling question when the cause of the problem is supposed to be the resource for the answer.
Close to home
For me, all of this scandal hits very close to home. My cousin was abused by a priest. His was one of the early cases—he got a settlement at least 15 years ago. I don’t know how much it was, and I don’t know exactly what happened. According to the terms of the settlement, he’s not allowed to talk about it.
But I do know this: My cousin’s life is a disaster. His marriage fell apart. He was never able to hold a steady job. He spent his settlement money buying drinks for friends in bars. He became addicted to heroin. He assaulted his elderly father. His brothers want nothing to do with him.
When my cousin and two other men first pursued their claims against the priest, his mother, my aunt, took the word of the church over the word of her son. She went to her grave believing that my cousin lied about the entire thing.
I wonder if my aunt could believe today’s news.
I am glad most posters have stated God, the Catholic Church and organized religion are not inherently evil. I am an orthodox Catholic and I am sick of the jokes about priests and insults. It’s a cheap and lousy to attack Christianity.
That said- I do believe the Devil ( yes, real capitol D- he exists) does target in particular the Catholic church. No doubt about it and to often church leadership are his footmen. He targets the Church , because the Catholic Church is the fullness of the faith.
I condemn and find these crimes the most repugnant. And I am the first to hold the church accountable- this makes me no friends. Both psychos I know are parishoners. They use the church to act out in.
I blog on evil and psychopathy-
http://holywatersalt.blogspot.com
Well, I believe in God and I have no problem with the Catholic church in general–actually rather like it the few times I have attended one. But I think there are bad people both in and out of religion. The only thing I would like to toss in the mix really about the Catholic church and child abuse, is that I think it is unnatural to expect a Priest or Nun to take a vow of celibacy and refrain from sexual activity. I think when a person has that set of “rules” to follow that prevents them from satisfying their natural impulse that is just ASKING for trouble.
With that said, it does not excuse preying on vulnerable children. BUT I can also see the dynamics of how it could happen because seems to me the Priest might see the child as vulnerable and least likely to “out him”, thus he may choose a child to express his sexual urges with, even if he is not “technically” a pedophile–meaning even if a child is not his sexual preference. A priest very well might prefer adults but if his sexual desires become overwhelming and a child is around, it may just be too tempting and that is the way it plays out. Well, what I mean is, even if a child would not be his FIRST choice, given a different set of circumstances, it could be the child is convenient, more likely to keep quiet, and thus the Priest is more likely to keep his JOB of priest.
Please understand I don’t condone it and I think it is WRONG and yes the adults are the adults who should be able to control their own behavior etc. But I am also saying I think the Catholic church has this rule in effect that really goes against nature and the sexual urges we all have and want to express. I think these cases of abuse of children in the church should be prosecuted to the fullest and the church sholuld stop covering it up. But I also think the church needs to allow Priests and Nuns to marry and ditch that vow of celibacy. If that one little rule was changed, I think there’d be a lot less horny Catholic Priest running around wearing robes who can’t get it on with adults without losing their job, so they stoop to abusing innocent children.
Ok, in scrolling back thru the comments, I see Blogger T said:
“it is not just the catholic church. It is ALL denominations. In fact it is a bigger problem in protestant churches …….”
Well, I guess that blows my theory of a buncha horny priests who had to take a vow of celibacy and should be allowed to marry theory right outta the water!!!
Jen-
I don’t think this is the place to debate celibacy. I find your remarks abusive, cruel and lacking in empathy to say the least.
I think there is great virtue in choosing a life of celibacy (and I certainly hope I’m right, seeing as I may be destined for it myself.) However, I think that most people underestimate the pull of the sex drive, and without proper understanding of how to transform/transmute this energy, it’s very dangerous to simply repress it and regard it as evil. I don’t think it’s a problem with Catholicism per se to require celibacy. I just think that people take the vow not totally understanding how and why. In Buddhist retreats, we had to take a vow of celibacy for up to 3 months even without talking or speaking to anyone. During that time, we got to observe all of our sexual/romantic attractions to the others around us that we could not act on. We just observed the energy and let it wash over us. For some (like me), we couldn’t wait to get out of the retreat so we could pursue our romantic attractions. However, a few I know of took it on as a challenge to see if they could feel the energies without acting on them. Those people are among some of the wisest and most peaceful people I know, and they don’t feel the need to act out inappropriately by molesting children.
Holysaltwater,
Given the topic of Catholicism and sexual abuse, it didn’t occur to me that mentioning celibacy would be considered to be out of line. I was trying to convey my opinion that the sex drive is a strong motivating force in alot of behavior, even bad behavior, and that I don’t think suppressing it is healthy–simply MY OPINION. But I was also hoping to get across the point that I don’t think lack of sex is an excuse for abusing children (and for the record I think most people who have no sexual outlets DO NOT abuse children). In rereading my earlier post I see that I did inject some of my off the wall humor in my comments that I suppose could be considered offensive–(humor that probably only I find funny, but oh well). But anyway, I didn’t deliberately intend the remarks to be offensive, but I can see where someone might take offense to them. But anyway, I have nothing else to say on the subject but sorry you took offense and find my remarks abusive, cruel, and lacking in empathy.
Jen,
I agree with you and I also disagree with you on this.
First, I thinkk that ANY CHILD ABUSER IS A PSYCHOPATH, period, and they choose children because they are SICKO PREDATORS.
Doesn’t matter if they are teachers, priests, baptist, catholic, or voo doo priests….they are SICKO PREDATORY PSYCHOPATHS. that is why they target children who are vulnerable.
As Donna has stated she believes that psychopaths are not straight or bi or gay, but ANY SEXUAL OUTLET is fine with them, though they have a prefered one, but any port in a storm.
My personal opinion is that crucifiction is too fast and painless for psychopathic kiddie diddlers—-
What does make me upset is that the Catholic church and some other churches have had “higher authorities” cover up KNOWN CRIMES BY THEIR PRIESTS/MINISTERS—-and in my book, any “higher authority” that covers up a crime of this sort should also be punished with the offender, with the same punishment. What lets it go on, in any place is when people COVER UP this kind of thing instead of EXPOSE IT!
OxDrover,
Well said…There is NO excuse for cover-up, and I believe that act in itself is just as wrong as the abusers behaviour- they are cohorts in crime. It sickens me to allow ANY SEXUAL DEVIANT to be allowed to go underground. The punishment should be the same for both.
Well if you covered up for a bank robber or a murderer you would be an “Accompliace AFTER THE FACT” and would also go to prison in many cases….so I think this should be the same treatment as covering up for the bank robber.
Unfortunately, people who have been abused by their fathers often state their mother either “didn’t believe” it or hushed it up, or even in some cases BLAMED THEM!
This whole manipulation and cover up makes me feel so desperate for humanity. And some how ordinary people ade and abet the most horrible crimes. Not to go into too much detail – I have experienced it in my up bringing, when questionable behaviour came to light with male members of my family, and I ‘called it’ I was turned on and shunned. I was even told that they ‘knew’ but that the person in question had ‘never actually hurt anyone’! (no! just co-erced, exploited young vulnerable females into sexual relationships!!) My relationship with the s/p has made me painfully aware of how easily humans are able to ‘block out’ behaviours that are clearly unacceptable. A human being’s capacity for Denial seems to be evil’s most powerful and dangerous tool.